Search (34 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Godby, C.J.; Smith, D.; Childress, E.: Encoding application profiles in a computational model of the crosswalk (2008) 0.07
    0.066640064 = product of:
      0.13328013 = sum of:
        0.053077027 = weight(_text_:et in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053077027 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
        0.08020309 = sum of:
          0.050637968 = weight(_text_:al in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050637968 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043643 = queryNorm
              0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
          0.029565124 = weight(_text_:22 in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029565124 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043643 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    OCLC's Crosswalk Web Service (Godby, Smith and Childress, 2008) formalizes the notion of crosswalk, as defined in Gill,et al. (n.d.), by hiding technical details and permitting the semantic equivalences to emerge as the centerpiece. One outcome is that metadata experts, who are typically not programmers, can enter the translation logic into a spreadsheet that can be automatically converted into executable code. In this paper, we describe the implementation of the Dublin Core Terms application profile in the management of crosswalks involving MARC. A crosswalk that encodes an application profile extends the typical format with two columns: one that annotates the namespace to which an element belongs, and one that annotates a 'broader-narrower' relation between a pair of elements, such as Dublin Core coverage and Dublin Core Terms spatial. This information is sufficient to produce scripts written in OCLC's Semantic Equivalence Expression Language (or Seel), which are called from the Crosswalk Web Service to generate production-grade translations. With its focus on elements that can be mixed, matched, added, and redefined, the application profile (Heery and Patel, 2000) is a natural fit with the translation model of the Crosswalk Web Service, which attempts to achieve interoperability by mapping one pair of elements at a time.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  2. Heckner, M.; Mühlbacher, S.; Wolff, C.: Tagging tagging : a classification model for user keywords in scientific bibliography management systems (2007) 0.06
    0.06424952 = product of:
      0.08566603 = sum of:
        0.022949224 = weight(_text_:c in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022949224 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
        0.042461623 = weight(_text_:et in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042461623 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
        0.020255188 = product of:
          0.040510375 = sum of:
            0.040510375 = weight(_text_:al in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040510375 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043643 = queryNorm
                0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Therefore our main research questions are as follows: - Is it possible to discover regular patterns in tag usage and to establish a stable category model? - Does a specific tagging language comparable to internet slang or chatspeak evolve? - How do social tags differ from traditional (author / expert) keywords? - To what degree are social tags taken from or findable in the full text of the tagged resource? - Do tags in a research literature context go beyond simple content description (e.g. tags indicating time or task-related information, cf. Kipp et al. 2006)?
  3. Widhalm, R.; Mueck, T.A.: Merging topics in well-formed XML topic maps (2003) 0.05
    0.047037605 = product of:
      0.09407521 = sum of:
        0.06369243 = weight(_text_:et in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06369243 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
        0.03038278 = product of:
          0.06076556 = sum of:
            0.06076556 = weight(_text_:al in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06076556 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043643 = queryNorm
                0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    The Semantic Web - ISWC 2003. Eds. D. Fensel et al
  4. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.04
    0.041242164 = product of:
      0.08248433 = sum of:
        0.067701764 = product of:
          0.27080706 = sum of:
            0.27080706 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27080706 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.46254054 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043643 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.014782562 = product of:
          0.029565124 = sum of:
            0.029565124 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029565124 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043643 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
  5. Garcia Marco, F.J.: Compatibility & heterogeneity in knowledge organization : some reflections around a case study in the field of consumer information (2008) 0.02
    0.021734547 = product of:
      0.043469094 = sum of:
        0.02868653 = weight(_text_:c in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02868653 = score(doc=1678,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
        0.014782562 = product of:
          0.029565124 = sum of:
            0.029565124 = weight(_text_:22 in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029565124 = score(doc=1678,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043643 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A case study in compatibility and heterogeneity of knowledge organization (KO) systems and processes is presented. It is based in the experience of the author in the field of information for consumer protection, a good example of the emerging transdisciplinary applied social sciences. The activities and knowledge organization problems and solutions of the Aragonian Consumers' Information and Documentation Centre are described and analyzed. Six assertions can be concluded: a) heterogeneity and compatibility are certainly an inherent problem in knowledge organization and also in practical domains; b) knowledge organization is also a social task, not only a lögical one; c) knowledge organization is affected by economical and efficiency considerations; d) knowledge organization is at the heart of Knowledge Management; e) identifying and maintaining the focus in interdisciplinary fields is a must; f the different knowledge organization tools of a institution must be considered as an integrated system, pursuing a unifying model.
    Date
    16. 3.2008 18:22:50
  6. Lauser, B.; Johannsen, G.; Caracciolo, C.; Hage, W.R. van; Keizer, J.; Mayr, P.: Comparing human and automatic thesaurus mapping approaches in the agricultural domain (2008) 0.02
    0.021734547 = product of:
      0.043469094 = sum of:
        0.02868653 = weight(_text_:c in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02868653 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
        0.014782562 = product of:
          0.029565124 = sum of:
            0.029565124 = weight(_text_:22 in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029565124 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043643 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  7. Schubert, C.; Kinkeldey, C.; Reich, H.: Handbuch Datenbankanwendung zur Wissensrepräsentation im Verbundprojekt DeCOVER (2006) 0.02
    0.016227553 = product of:
      0.06491021 = sum of:
        0.06491021 = weight(_text_:c in 4256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06491021 = score(doc=4256,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.43117565 = fieldWeight in 4256, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4256)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  8. Gödert, W.: Multilingualität und Lokalisierung zur Wissenserkundung : oder vom Nutzen semantischer Netze für das Information Retrieval (2007) 0.02
    0.015923107 = product of:
      0.06369243 = sum of:
        0.06369243 = weight(_text_:et in 557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06369243 = score(doc=557,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 557, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=557)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Das CrissCross-Projekt verfolgt die Zielsetzung, ein erweitertes multilinguales und thesaurusbasiertes Registervokabular zur Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC Deutsch) zu erstellen, das als Recherchevokabulars zu heterogen erschlossenen Dokumenten verwendet werden kann und soll damit die Ausgangsbedingungen für die Gestaltung von OPAC-Retrievalumgebungen verbessern helfen. Im einzelnen soll jedes Sachschlagwort der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) eine DDC-Notation erhalten und es sollen die im Projekt MACS begonnen Arbeiten fortgesetzt werden, Links zwischen den Schlagwörtern der SWD, den Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) und dem Répertoire d'autorité-matière encyclopédique et alphabétique unifé (Rameau) herzustellen. In diesem Beitrag wird der Vorschlag gemacht, die Zielsetzung des Projektes darin zu sehen, eine Kern-Ontologie mit universalen Relationen als Klassifikation zu benutzen und die beteiligten Normdateien als zugeordnete semantische Netze zu entwickeln, indem nicht-generische Relationen die Aufgabe der durch die Lokalisierung gestellten Anforderungen übernehmen. Generische Relationen im bekannten Thesaurussinn sind für derartige semantische Netze nicht mehr erforderlich, da sie sich aus den generischen Beziehungen der Kern-Ontologie vererben.
  9. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.02
    0.015163018 = product of:
      0.060652073 = sum of:
        0.060652073 = product of:
          0.2426083 = sum of:
            0.2426083 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2426083 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37000585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043643 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  10. Isaac, A.; Wang, S.; Zinn, C.; Matthezing, H.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Evaluating thesaurus alignments for semantic interoperability in the library domain (2009) 0.01
    0.011474612 = product of:
      0.04589845 = sum of:
        0.04589845 = weight(_text_:c in 1650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04589845 = score(doc=1650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1650)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  11. Bean, C.A.: Hierarchical relationships used in mapping between knowledge structures (2006) 0.01
    0.010040285 = product of:
      0.04016114 = sum of:
        0.04016114 = weight(_text_:c in 5866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04016114 = score(doc=5866,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 5866, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5866)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  12. Dini, L.: CACAO : multilingual access to bibliographic records (2007) 0.01
    0.008869536 = product of:
      0.035478145 = sum of:
        0.035478145 = product of:
          0.07095629 = sum of:
            0.07095629 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07095629 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043643 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  13. Boteram, F.; Hubrich, J.: Towards a comprehensive international Knowledge Organization System (2008) 0.01
    0.008869536 = product of:
      0.035478145 = sum of:
        0.035478145 = product of:
          0.07095629 = sum of:
            0.07095629 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07095629 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043643 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2008 19:30:41
  14. Vizine-Goetz, D.; Hickey, C.; Houghton, A.; Thompson, R.: Vocabulary mapping for terminology services (2004) 0.01
    0.00860596 = product of:
      0.03442384 = sum of:
        0.03442384 = weight(_text_:c in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03442384 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  15. Galinski, C.: Wozu Normen? : Wozu semantische Interoperabilität? (2006) 0.01
    0.00860596 = product of:
      0.03442384 = sum of:
        0.03442384 = weight(_text_:c in 5811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03442384 = score(doc=5811,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 5811, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5811)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  16. Landry, P.: MACS: multilingual access to subject and link management : Extending the Multilingual Capacity of TEL in the EDL Project (2007) 0.01
    0.007391281 = product of:
      0.029565124 = sum of:
        0.029565124 = product of:
          0.059130248 = sum of:
            0.059130248 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059130248 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043643 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  17. Sigel, A.: Wissensorganisation, Topic Maps und Ontology Engineering : Die Verbindung bewährter Begriffsstrukturen mit aktueller XML Technologie (2004) 0.01
    0.0071716327 = product of:
      0.02868653 = sum of:
        0.02868653 = weight(_text_:c in 3236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02868653 = score(doc=3236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 3236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3236)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Wissensorganisation und Edutainment: Wissen im Spannungsfeld von Gesellschaft, Gestaltung und Industrie. Proceedings der 7. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Berlin, 21.-23.3.2001. Hrsg.: C. Lehner, H.P. Ohly u. G. Rahmstorf
  18. Isaac, A.: Aligning thesauri for an integrated access to Cultural Heritage Resources (2007) 0.01
    0.0070995544 = product of:
      0.028398218 = sum of:
        0.028398218 = weight(_text_:c in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028398218 = score(doc=553,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.18863934 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Currently, a number of efforts are being carried out to integrate collections from different institutions and containing heterogeneous material. Examples of such projects are The European Library [1] and the Memory of the Netherlands [2]. A crucial point for the success of these is the availability to provide a unified access on top of the different collections, e.g. using one single vocabulary for querying or browsing the objects they contain. This is made difficult by the fact that the objects from different collections are often described using different vocabularies - thesauri, classification schemes - and are therefore not interoperable at the semantic level. To solve this problem, one can turn to semantic links - mappings - between the elements of the different vocabularies. If one knows that a concept C from a vocabulary V is semantically equivalent to a concept to a concept D from vocabulary W, then an appropriate search engine can return all the objects that were indexed against D for a query for objects described using C. We thus have an access to other collections, using a single one vocabulary. This is however an ideal situation, and hard alignment work is required to reach it. Several projects in the past have tried to implement such a solution, like MACS [3] and Renardus [4]. They have demonstrated very interesting results, but also highlighted the difficulty of aligning manually all the different vocabularies involved in practical cases, which sometimes contain hundreds of thousands of concepts. To alleviate this problem, a number of tools have been proposed in order to provide with candidate mappings between two input vocabularies, making alignment a (semi-) automatic task. Recently, the Semantic Web community has produced a lot of these alignment tools'. Several techniques are found, depending on the material they exploit: labels of concepts, structure of vocabularies, collection objects and external knowledge sources. Throughout our presentation, we will present a concrete heterogeneity case where alignment techniques have been applied to build a (pilot) browser, developed in the context of the STITCH project [5]. This browser enables a unified access to two collections of illuminated manuscripts, using the description vocabulary used in the first collection, Mandragore [6], or the one used by the second, Iconclass [7]. In our talk, we will also make the point for using unified representations the vocabulary semantic and lexical information. Additionally to ease the use of the alignment tools that have these vocabularies as input, turning to a standard representation format helps designing applications that are more generic, like the browser we demonstrate. We give pointers to SKOS [8], an open and web-enabled format currently developed by the Semantic Web community.
  19. Altenhöner, R; Hengel, C.; Jahns, Y.; Junger, U.; Mahnke, C.; Oehlschläger, S.; Werner, C.: Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 74. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in Quebec, Kanada : Aus den Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control, der Core Activities ICADS und UNIMARC sowie der Information Technology Section (2008) 0.01
    0.0062108166 = product of:
      0.024843266 = sum of:
        0.024843266 = weight(_text_:c in 2317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024843266 = score(doc=2317,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.16502506 = fieldWeight in 2317, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2317)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  20. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Marinai, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Report on execution and results of the interoperability tests (2008) 0.01
    0.0059130243 = product of:
      0.023652097 = sum of:
        0.023652097 = product of:
          0.047304194 = sum of:
            0.047304194 = weight(_text_:22 in 7411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047304194 = score(doc=7411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22