-
Bean, C.: ¬The semantics of hierarchy : explicit parent-child relationships in MeSH tree structures (1998)
0.11
0.11243666 = product of:
0.14991555 = sum of:
0.04016114 = weight(_text_:c in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04016114 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.07430784 = weight(_text_:et in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07430784 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.035446577 = product of:
0.07089315 = sum of:
0.07089315 = weight(_text_:al in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07089315 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.09
0.085032485 = product of:
0.11337665 = sum of:
0.02008057 = weight(_text_:c in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02008057 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.03715392 = weight(_text_:et in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03715392 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.18143937 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.056142163 = sum of:
0.035446577 = weight(_text_:al in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035446577 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.17722149 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.020695586 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020695586 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
- Footnote
- Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and controlled languages in indexing (1995)
0.08
0.07839601 = product of:
0.15679201 = sum of:
0.106154054 = weight(_text_:et in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106154054 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.5183982 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
0.050637968 = product of:
0.101275936 = sum of:
0.101275936 = weight(_text_:al in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101275936 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.5063471 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
-
Hudon, M.: ¬A preliminary investigation of the usefulness of semantic relations and of standardized definitions for the purpose of specifying meaning in a thesaurus (1998)
0.05
0.047037605 = product of:
0.09407521 = sum of:
0.06369243 = weight(_text_:et in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06369243 = score(doc=55,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
0.03038278 = product of:
0.06076556 = sum of:
0.06076556 = weight(_text_:al in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06076556 = score(doc=55,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
-
Maniez, J.: Actualité des langages documentaires : fondements théoriques de la recherche d'information (2002)
0.03
0.031846214 = product of:
0.12738486 = sum of:
0.12738486 = weight(_text_:et in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12738486 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.6220778 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- Collections Sciences de l'Information, série Etudes et techniques
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Gilchrist, A.; Will, L.: Revision and extension of thesaurus standards (2004)
0.03
0.031358406 = product of:
0.06271681 = sum of:
0.042461623 = weight(_text_:et in 2615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042461623 = score(doc=2615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 2615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2615)
0.020255188 = product of:
0.040510375 = sum of:
0.040510375 = weight(_text_:al in 2615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040510375 = score(doc=2615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 2615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2615)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The current standards for monolingual and multilingual thesauri are long overdue for an update. This applies to the international standards ISO 2788 and ISO 5964, as well as the corresponding national standards in several countries and the American standard ANSI/NISO Z39.19. Work is now under way in the UK and in the USA to revise and extend the standards, with particular emphasis on interoperability needs in our world of vast electronic networks. Work in the UK is starting with the British Standards, in the hope of leading on to one international standard to serve all. Some of the issues still under discussion include the treatment of facet analysis, coverage of additional types of controlled vocabulary such as classification schemes, taxonomies and ontologies, and mapping from one vocabulary to another. 1. Are thesaurus standards still needed? Since the 1960s, even before the renowned Cranfield experiments (Cleverdon et al., 1966; Cleverdon, 1967) arguments have raged over the usefulness or otherwise of controlled vocabularies. The case has never been proved definitively one way or the other. At the same time, a recognition has become widespread that no one search method can answer all retrieval requirements. In today's environment of very large networks of resources, the skilled information professional uses a range of techniques. Among these, controlled vocabularies are valued alongside others. The first international standard for monolingual thesauri was issued in 1974. In those days, the main application was for postcoordinate indexing and retrieval from document collections or bibliographic databases. For many information professionals the only practicable alternative to a thesaurus was a classification scheme. And so the thesaurus developed a strong following. After computer systems with full text search capability became widely available, however, the arguments against controlled vocabularies gained more followers. The cost of building and maintaining a thesaurus or a classification scheme was a strong disincentive. Today's databases are typically immense compared with those three decades ago. Full text searching is taken for granted, not just in discrete databases but across all the resources in an intranet or even the Internet. But intranets have brought particular frustration as users discover that despite all the computer power, they cannot find items which they know to be present an the network. So the trend against controlled vocabularies is now being reversed, as many information professionals are turning to them for help. Standards to guide them are still in demand.
-
Coates, E.J.: Significance and term relationship in compound headings (1985)
0.03
0.031358406 = product of:
0.06271681 = sum of:
0.042461623 = weight(_text_:et in 3634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042461623 = score(doc=3634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3634)
0.020255188 = product of:
0.040510375 = sum of:
0.040510375 = weight(_text_:al in 3634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040510375 = score(doc=3634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3634)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and indexing languages (1985)
0.03
0.031358406 = product of:
0.06271681 = sum of:
0.042461623 = weight(_text_:et in 3641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042461623 = score(doc=3641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3641)
0.020255188 = product of:
0.040510375 = sum of:
0.040510375 = weight(_text_:al in 3641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040510375 = score(doc=3641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3641)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Rolling, L.: ¬The role of graphic display of concept relationships in indexing and retrieval vocabularies (1985)
0.03
0.031358406 = product of:
0.06271681 = sum of:
0.042461623 = weight(_text_:et in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042461623 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
0.020255188 = product of:
0.040510375 = sum of:
0.040510375 = weight(_text_:al in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040510375 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Mazzocchi, F.: Relations in KOS : is it possible to couple a common nature with different roles? (2017)
0.03
0.031358406 = product of:
0.06271681 = sum of:
0.042461623 = weight(_text_:et in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042461623 = score(doc=78,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
0.020255188 = product of:
0.040510375 = sum of:
0.040510375 = weight(_text_:al in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040510375 = score(doc=78,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this paper, which increases and deepens what was expressed in a previous work (Mazzocchi et al., 2007), is to scrutinize the underlying assumptions of the types of relations included in thesauri, particularly the genus-species relation. Logicist approaches to information organization, which are still dominant, will be compared with hermeneutically oriented approaches. In the light of these approaches, the nature and features of the relations, and what the notion of a priori could possibly mean with regard to them, are examined, together with the implications for designing and implementing knowledge organizations systems (KOS). Design/methodology/approach The inquiry is based on how the relations are described in literature, engaging in particular a discussion with Hjørland (2015) and Svenonius (2004). The philosophical roots of today's leading views are briefly illustrated, in order to put them under perspective and deconstruct the uncritical reception of their authority. To corroborate the discussion a semantic analysis of specific terms and relations is provided too. Findings All relations should be seen as "perspectival" (not as a priori). On the other hand, different types of relations, depending on the conceptual features of the terms involved, can hold a different degree of "stability." On this basis, they could be used to address different information concerns (e.g. interoperability vs expressiveness). Research limitations/implications Some arguments that the paper puts forth at the conceptual level need to be tested in application contexts. Originality/value This paper considers that the standpoint of logic and of hermeneutic (usually seen as conflicting) are both significant for information organization, and could be pragmatically integrated. In accordance with this view, an extension of thesaurus relations' set is advised, meaning that perspective hierarchical relations (i.e. relations that are not logically based but function contingently) should be also included in such a set.
-
Foskett, D.J.: Classification and integrative levels (1985)
0.03
0.027438603 = product of:
0.054877207 = sum of:
0.03715392 = weight(_text_:et in 3639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03715392 = score(doc=3639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.18143937 = fieldWeight in 3639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3639)
0.017723288 = product of:
0.035446577 = sum of:
0.035446577 = weight(_text_:al in 3639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035446577 = score(doc=3639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.17722149 = fieldWeight in 3639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3639)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Farradane, J.E.L.: Fundamental fallacies and new needs in classification (1985)
0.02
0.023518803 = product of:
0.047037605 = sum of:
0.031846214 = weight(_text_:et in 3642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031846214 = score(doc=3642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.15551946 = fieldWeight in 3642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3642)
0.01519139 = product of:
0.03038278 = sum of:
0.03038278 = weight(_text_:al in 3642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03038278 = score(doc=3642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.15190414 = fieldWeight in 3642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3642)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
¬The semantics of relationships : an interdisciplinary perspective (2002)
0.02
0.016036259 = product of:
0.064145036 = sum of:
0.064145036 = weight(_text_:c in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064145036 = score(doc=1430,freq=10.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.42609286 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: Types of relationships: CRUDE, D.A.: Hyponymy and its varieties; FELLBAUM, C.: On the semantics of troponymy; PRIBBENOW, S.: Meronymic relationships: from classical mereology to complex part-whole relations; KHOO, C. u.a.: The many facets of cause-effect relation - Pt.2: Relationships in knowledge representation and reasoning: GREEN, R.: Internally-structured conceptual models in cognitive semantics; HOVY, E.: Comparing sets of semantic relations in ontologies; GUARINO, N., C. WELTY: Identity and subsumption; JOUIS; C.: Logic of relationships - Pt.3: Applications of relationships: EVENS, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval; KHOO, C., S.H. MYAENG: Identifying semantic relations in text for information retrieval and information extraction; McCRAY, A.T., O. BODENREICHER: A conceptual framework for the biiomedical domain; HETZLER, B.: Visual analysis and exploration of relationships
-
Francu, V.: ¬A linguistic approach to information languages (2003)
0.01
0.014343265 = product of:
0.05737306 = sum of:
0.05737306 = weight(_text_:c in 3538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05737306 = score(doc=3538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.381109 = fieldWeight in 3538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3538)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimient: IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación , VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research. Eds.: J.A. Frias u. C. Travieso
-
Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.: Faceted thesauri (2008)
0.01
0.011474612 = product of:
0.04589845 = sum of:
0.04589845 = weight(_text_:c in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04589845 = score(doc=1855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991)
0.01
0.010347793 = product of:
0.04139117 = sum of:
0.04139117 = product of:
0.08278234 = sum of:
0.08278234 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08278234 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 11:52:22
-
Beghtol, C.: Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning (2001)
0.01
0.00860596 = product of:
0.03442384 = sum of:
0.03442384 = weight(_text_:c in 1138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03442384 = score(doc=1138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1138)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Khoo, C.; Chan, S.; Niu, Y.: ¬The many facets of the cause-effect relation (2002)
0.01
0.00860596 = product of:
0.03442384 = sum of:
0.03442384 = weight(_text_:c in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03442384 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996)
0.01
0.008362279 = product of:
0.033449117 = sum of:
0.033449117 = product of:
0.066898234 = sum of:
0.066898234 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066898234 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 31. 7.2006 14:22:21
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996)
0.01
0.007391281 = product of:
0.029565124 = sum of:
0.029565124 = product of:
0.059130248 = sum of:
0.059130248 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059130248 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Pages
- S.11-22
