-
Soos, C.; Leazer, H.H.: Presentations of authorship in knowledge organization (2020)
0.08
0.08031191 = product of:
0.107082546 = sum of:
0.02868653 = weight(_text_:c in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02868653 = score(doc=21,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
0.053077027 = weight(_text_:et in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053077027 = score(doc=21,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
0.025318984 = product of:
0.050637968 = sum of:
0.050637968 = weight(_text_:al in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050637968 = score(doc=21,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- The "author" is a concept central to many publication and documentation practices, often carrying legal, professional, social, and personal importance. Typically viewed as the solitary owner of their creations, a person is held responsible for their work and positioned to receive the praise and criticism that may emerge in its wake. Although the role of the individual within creative production is undeniable, literary (Foucault 1977; Bloom 1997) and knowledge organization (Moulaison et. al. 2014) theorists have challenged the view that the work of one person can-or should-be fully detached from their professional and personal networks. As these relationships often provide important context and reveal the role of community in the creation of new things, their absence from catalog records presents a falsely simplified view of the creative process. Here, we address the consequences of what we call the "author-asowner" concept and suggest that an "author-as-node" approach, which situates an author within their networks of influence, may allow for more relational representation within knowledge organization systems, a framing that emphasizes rather than erases the messy complexities that affect the production of new objects and ideas.
-
Holden, C.: ¬The bibliographic work : history, theory, and practice (2021)
0.01
0.010040285 = product of:
0.04016114 = sum of:
0.04016114 = weight(_text_:c in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04016114 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Sfakakis, M.; Zapounidou, S.; Papatheodorou, C.: Mapping derivative relationships from BIBFRAME 2.0 to RDA (2020)
0.01
0.010040285 = product of:
0.04016114 = sum of:
0.04016114 = weight(_text_:c in 294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04016114 = score(doc=294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=294)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Menzel, S.; Schnaitter, H.; Zinck, J.; Petras, V.; Neudecker, C.; Labusch, K.; Leitner, E.; Rehm, G.: Named Entity Linking mit Wikidata und GND : das Potenzial handkuratierter und strukturierter Datenquellen für die semantische Anreicherung von Volltexten (2021)
0.01
0.0071716327 = product of:
0.02868653 = sum of:
0.02868653 = weight(_text_:c in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02868653 = score(doc=373,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Oliver, C: Introducing RDA : a guide to the basics after 3R (2021)
0.01
0.0071716327 = product of:
0.02868653 = sum of:
0.02868653 = weight(_text_:c in 716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02868653 = score(doc=716,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 716, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=716)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Zakaria, M.S.: Measuring typographical errors in online catalogs of academic libraries using Ballard's list : a case study from Egypt (2023)
0.01
0.0071716327 = product of:
0.02868653 = sum of:
0.02868653 = weight(_text_:c in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02868653 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Typographical errors in bibliographic records of online library catalogs are a common troublesome phenomenon, spread all over the world. They can affect the retrieval and identification of items in information retrieval systems and thus prevent users from finding the documents they need. The present study was conducted to measure typographical errors in the online catalog of the Egyptian Universities Libraries Consortium (EULC). The investigation depended on Terry Ballard's typographical error terms list. The EULC catalog was searched to identify matched erroneous records. The study found that the total number of erroneous records reached 1686, whereas the mean error rate for each record is 11.24, which is very high. About 396 erroneous records (23.49%) have been retrieved from Section C of Ballard's list (Moderate Probability). The typographical errors found within the abstracts of the study's sample records represented 35.82%. Omissions were the first common type of errors with 54.51%, followed by transpositions at 17.08%. Regarding the analysis of parts of speech, the study found that 63.46% of errors occur in noun terms. The results of the study indicated that typographical errors still pose a serious challenge for information retrieval systems, especially for library systems in the Arab environment. The study proposes some solutions for Egyptian university libraries in order to avoid typographic mistakes in the future.
-
Morris, V.: Automated language identification of bibliographic resources (2020)
0.01
0.0059130243 = product of:
0.023652097 = sum of:
0.023652097 = product of:
0.047304194 = sum of:
0.047304194 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047304194 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 2. 3.2020 19:04:22
-
Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023)
0.00
0.004434768 = product of:
0.017739072 = sum of:
0.017739072 = product of:
0.035478145 = sum of:
0.035478145 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035478145 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2023 12:00:14
-
Kim, J.(im); Kim, J.(enna): Effect of forename string on author name disambiguation (2020)
0.00
0.0036956405 = product of:
0.014782562 = sum of:
0.014782562 = product of:
0.029565124 = sum of:
0.029565124 = weight(_text_:22 in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029565124 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 11. 7.2020 13:22:58
-
Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023)
0.00
0.0036956405 = product of:
0.014782562 = sum of:
0.014782562 = product of:
0.029565124 = sum of:
0.029565124 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029565124 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:40:36
