Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"r"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Wätjen, H.-J.; Diekmann, B.; Möller, G.; Carstensen, K.-U.: Bericht zum DFG-Projekt: GERHARD : German Harvest Automated Retrieval and Directory (1998) 0.05
    0.046906788 = product of:
      0.11726697 = sum of:
        0.050639506 = weight(_text_:u in 3065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050639506 = score(doc=3065,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13997382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 3065, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3065)
        0.06662746 = weight(_text_:g in 3065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06662746 = score(doc=3065,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1605568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 3065, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3065)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  2. Landry, P.; Zumer, M.; Clavel-Merrin, G.: Report on cross-language subject access options (2006) 0.02
    0.023009712 = product of:
      0.05752428 = sum of:
        0.017547807 = weight(_text_:m in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017547807 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.106374584 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
        0.03997647 = weight(_text_:g in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03997647 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1605568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  3. Euzenat, J.; Bach, T.Le; Barrasa, J.; Bouquet, P.; Bo, J.De; Dieng, R.; Ehrig, M.; Hauswirth, M.; Jarrar, M.; Lara, R.; Maynard, D.; Napoli, A.; Stamou, G.; Stuckenschmidt, H.; Shvaiko, P.; Tessaris, S.; Acker, S. Van; Zaihrayeu, I.: State of the art on ontology alignment (2004) 0.02
    0.018765379 = product of:
      0.046913445 = sum of:
        0.020262461 = weight(_text_:m in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020262461 = score(doc=172,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.106374584 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.19048217 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
        0.026650982 = weight(_text_:g in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026650982 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1605568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.165991 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  4. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.02
    0.016417375 = product of:
      0.041043438 = sum of:
        0.017723827 = weight(_text_:u in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017723827 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13997382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.12662244 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
        0.02331961 = weight(_text_:g in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02331961 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1605568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.14524212 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  5. Michel, D.: Taxonomy of Subject Relationships (1997) 0.01
    0.010127901 = product of:
      0.050639506 = sum of:
        0.050639506 = weight(_text_:u in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050639506 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13997382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  6. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.01
    0.005791676 = product of:
      0.02895838 = sum of:
        0.02895838 = product of:
          0.05791676 = sum of:
            0.05791676 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05791676 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969394 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04274735 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  7. Reiner, U.: VZG-Projekt Colibri : Bewertung von automatisch DDC-klassifizierten Titeldatensätzen der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (DNB) (2009) 0.01
    0.0050639505 = product of:
      0.025319753 = sum of:
        0.025319753 = weight(_text_:u in 2675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025319753 = score(doc=2675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13997382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2675)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  8. Riva, P.; Boeuf, P. le; Zumer, M.: IFLA Library Reference Model : a conceptual model for bibliographic information (2017) 0.00
    0.0040944885 = product of:
      0.02047244 = sum of:
        0.02047244 = weight(_text_:m in 5179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02047244 = score(doc=5179,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.106374584 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 5179, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5179)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  9. Borghoff, U.M.; Rödig, P.; Schmalhofer, F.: DFG-Projekt Datenbankgestützte Langzeitarchivierung digitaler Objekte : Schlussbericht Juli 2005 - Geschäftszeichen 554 922(1) UV BW Mänchen (2005) 0.00
    0.0040511605 = product of:
      0.020255802 = sum of:
        0.020255802 = weight(_text_:u in 4250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020255802 = score(doc=4250,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13997382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 4250, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4250)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Über die letzten Jahrzehnte ist die Menge digitaler Publikationen exponentiell angestiegen. Doch die digitalen Bestände sind durch die schleichende Obsoletheit von Datenformaten, Software und Hardware bedroht. Aber auch die zunehmende Komplexität neuerer Dokumente und zugehöriger Abspielumgebungen stellt ein Problem dar. Das Thema der Langzeitarchivierung wurde lange vernachlässigt, rückt aber zunehmend ins Bewusstsein der Verantwortlichen und der Öffentlichkeit, nicht zuletzt wegen spektakulärer Datenverluste. Ziel dieser Studie ist es, Grundlagen und Bausteine für eine technische Lösung zu entwickeln und deren Einbettung in die Aufgabenbereiche einer Archivierungsorganisation aufzuzeigen. Es fehlt eine systematische Herangehensweise zum Aufbau technischen Wissens, die der Heterogenität und Komplexität sowie der bereits vorhandenen Obsoletheit in der Welt des digitalen Publizierens gerecht wird. In einem ersten Schritt entwickeln wir deshalb ein Modell, das sich spezifisch den technischen Aspekten digitaler Objekte widmet. Dieses Modell erlaubt es, digitale Objekte bezüglich der Archivierungsaspekte zu charakterisieren und zu klassifizieren sowie technische Grundlagen präzise zuzuordnen. Auf dieser Basis können u. a. systematisch modulare Metadatenschemata gewonnen werden, die den Langzeiterhalt gezielt unterstützen. Das Modell liefert außerdem einen Beitrag zur Formulierung von zugehörigen Ontologien. Des Weiteren fördern die Modularität der Metadatenschemata und die einheitliche Begrifflichkeit einer Ontologie die Föderation und Kooperation von Archivierungsorganisationen und -systemen. Die Abstützung auf das entwickelte Modell systematisiert in einem weiteren Schritt die Herleitung von technisch orientierten Prozessen zur Erfüllung von Archivierungsaufgaben. Der Entwicklung eines eigenen Modells liegt die Einschätzung zu Grunde, dass Referenzmodelle, wie OAIS (Open Archival Information System), zwar eine geeignete Ausgangsbasis auf konzeptioneller Ebene bieten, aber sie sind zu generell und beschreiben vor- oder nachgelagerte Prozesse nur als Schnittstelle. Die aus dem Modell hergeleiteten Lösungsansätze sind zunächst unabhängig von einer konkreten Realisierung. Als Beitrag zur Umsetzung wird in einem eigenen Abschnitt der Einsatz von Datenbankmanagementsystemen (DBMS) als Implementierungsbasis ausführlich diskutiert.
  10. Garrel, J. von; Mayer, J.; Mühlfeld, M.: Künstliche Intelligenz im Studium : eine quantitative Befragung von Studierenden zur Nutzung von ChatGPT & Co. (2023) 0.00
    0.0029246346 = product of:
      0.014623173 = sum of:
        0.014623173 = weight(_text_:m in 1006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014623173 = score(doc=1006,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.106374584 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 1006, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1006)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  11. Förderung von Informationsinfrastrukturen für die Wissenschaft : Ein Positionspapier der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (2018) 0.00
    0.002895838 = product of:
      0.01447919 = sum of:
        0.01447919 = product of:
          0.02895838 = sum of:
            0.02895838 = weight(_text_:22 in 4178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02895838 = score(doc=4178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969394 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04274735 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4178)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2018 17:30:43