Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.04
    0.040344566 = product of:
      0.100861415 = sum of:
        0.029246345 = weight(_text_:m in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029246345 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.106374584 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
        0.07161507 = weight(_text_:u in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07161507 = score(doc=461,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13997382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.5116319 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Editor
    Cronin, B. u. H.B. Atkins
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.1, S.45-46 (M.J. López Huertas u. E. Jiménez-Contreras); Password 2002, H.3, S.14-19 (W.G. Stock)
    Type
    m
  2. Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005) 0.03
    0.030679617 = product of:
      0.07669904 = sum of:
        0.023397075 = weight(_text_:m in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023397075 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.106374584 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
        0.053301964 = weight(_text_:g in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053301964 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1605568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.331982 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  3. Thelwall, M.; Harries, G.: ¬The connection between the research of a university and counts of links to its Web pages : an investigation based upon a classification of the relationships of pages to the research of the host university (2003) 0.03
    0.026844664 = product of:
      0.067111656 = sum of:
        0.02047244 = weight(_text_:m in 1676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02047244 = score(doc=1676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.106374584 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 1676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1676)
        0.04663922 = weight(_text_:g in 1676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04663922 = score(doc=1676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1605568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 1676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1676)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  4. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.03
    0.026764035 = product of:
      0.06691009 = sum of:
        0.04663922 = weight(_text_:g in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04663922 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1605568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
        0.020270865 = product of:
          0.04054173 = sum of:
            0.04054173 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04054173 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969394 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04274735 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  5. Gabel, J.: Improving information retrieval of subjects through citation-analysis : a study (2006) 0.02
    0.023453394 = product of:
      0.058633484 = sum of:
        0.025319753 = weight(_text_:u in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025319753 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13997382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
        0.03331373 = weight(_text_:g in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03331373 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1605568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  6. De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008) 0.01
    0.014720014 = product of:
      0.036800034 = sum of:
        0.01654423 = weight(_text_:m in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01654423 = score(doc=3585,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.106374584 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.15552804 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
        0.020255802 = weight(_text_:u in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020255802 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13997382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
    Type
    m
  7. Morris, S.A.; Yen, G.; Wu, Z.; Asnake, B.: Time line visualization of research fronts (2003) 0.01
    0.009327844 = product of:
      0.04663922 = sum of:
        0.04663922 = weight(_text_:g in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04663922 = score(doc=1452,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1605568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  8. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.009266681 = product of:
      0.046333406 = sum of:
        0.046333406 = product of:
          0.09266681 = sum of:
            0.09266681 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09266681 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969394 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04274735 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  9. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01
    0.008190666 = product of:
      0.04095333 = sum of:
        0.04095333 = product of:
          0.08190666 = sum of:
            0.08190666 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08190666 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14969394 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04274735 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  10. Feitelson, D.G.; Yovel, U.: Predictive ranking of computer scientists using CiteSeer data (2004) 0.01
    0.0070895306 = product of:
      0.035447653 = sum of:
        0.035447653 = weight(_text_:u in 1259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035447653 = score(doc=1259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13997382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1259)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  11. Knothe, G.: Comparative citation analysis of duplicate or highly related publications (2006) 0.01
    0.006662746 = product of:
      0.03331373 = sum of:
        0.03331373 = weight(_text_:g in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03331373 = score(doc=213,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1605568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  12. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.01
    0.005791676 = product of:
      0.02895838 = sum of:
        0.02895838 = product of:
          0.05791676 = sum of:
            0.05791676 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05791676 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969394 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04274735 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  13. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00
    0.0049144 = product of:
      0.024572 = sum of:
        0.024572 = product of:
          0.049144 = sum of:
            0.049144 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049144 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14969394 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04274735 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  14. Leydesdorff, L.: Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures (2002) 0.00
    0.0040944885 = product of:
      0.02047244 = sum of:
        0.02047244 = weight(_text_:m in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02047244 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.106374584 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Can the inclusion of new journals in the Science Citation Index be used for the indication of structural change in the database, and how can this change be compared with reorganizations of reiations among previously included journals? Change in the number of journals (n) is distinguished from change in the number of journal categories (m). Although the number of journals can be considered as a given at each moment in time, the number of journal categories is based an a reconstruction that is time-stamped ex post. The reflexive reconstruction is in need of an update when new information becomes available in a next year. Implications of this shift towards an evolutionary perspective are specified.
  15. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.00
    0.0040541734 = product of:
      0.020270865 = sum of:
        0.020270865 = product of:
          0.04054173 = sum of:
            0.04054173 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04054173 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969394 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04274735 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  16. Umstätter, W.: Szientometrische Verfahren (2004) 0.00
    0.0040511605 = product of:
      0.020255802 = sum of:
        0.020255802 = weight(_text_:u in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020255802 = score(doc=2920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13997382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
  17. Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000) 0.00
    0.0035095613 = product of:
      0.017547807 = sum of:
        0.017547807 = weight(_text_:m in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017547807 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.106374584 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
  18. Prime-Claverie, C.; Beigbeder, M.; Lafouge, T.: Transposition of the cocitation method with a view to classifying Web pages (2004) 0.00
    0.0035095613 = product of:
      0.017547807 = sum of:
        0.017547807 = weight(_text_:m in 3095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017547807 = score(doc=3095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.106374584 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274735 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 3095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3095)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  19. wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003) 0.00
    0.0034750053 = product of:
      0.017375026 = sum of:
        0.017375026 = product of:
          0.03475005 = sum of:
            0.03475005 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03475005 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969394 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04274735 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
  20. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.00
    0.0034750053 = product of:
      0.017375026 = sum of:
        0.017375026 = product of:
          0.03475005 = sum of:
            0.03475005 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03475005 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969394 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04274735 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03