Search (3186 results, page 1 of 160)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Geiß, D.: Aus der Praxis der Patentinformation : Die Entwicklung der elektronischen Medien und Dienstleistungen bei den Patentbehörden und Internetprovidern 2011 (2011) 0.23 
    0.22667953 = product of:
  0.3777992 = sum of:
    0.10629173 = weight(_text_:patent in 4712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10629173 = score(doc=4712,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24282473 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.43773025 = fieldWeight in 4712, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4712)
    0.039717197 = weight(_text_:und in 4712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039717197 = score(doc=4712,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.08150501 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.48729765 = fieldWeight in 4712, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4712)
    0.23179029 = weight(_text_:markenamt in 4712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23179029 = score(doc=4712,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3585839 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.6464046 = fieldWeight in 4712, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4712)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Die 39. Arbeitssitzung der AGM (Arbeitsgruppe Elektronische Medien in der Patentinformation) am 10. November 2011 beim Technischen Informationszentrum des Deutschen Patent- und Markenamt in Berlin behandelte traditionsgemäß "Fortschritte in der Patentinformation". Die AG hat rd. 76 Mitglieder aus Wirtschaft und Behörden. In diesem Jahr haben sich 28 Patentfachleute in Berlin mit Neuerungen und der zukünftigen Entwicklung der Patentinformation vertraut gemacht. Wer hätte es für möglich gehalten, dass innerhalb von nur etwa zwei Jahren fast alle ostasiatischen Patentdokumente und Gebrauchsmuster, seien sie aus China, aus Japan, aus Korea oder aus Taiwan in lateinischen Buchstaben über brauchbare Maschinenübersetzungen und nicht nur über Google recherchierbar sind und dies nicht nur in den bibliographischen Daten und Abstracts sondern in Volltexten. Insbesondere dem Europäischen Patentamt, der WIPO mit Patentscope und verschiedenen bedeutenden Provider haben wir dieses Fortschritt zu verdanken.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.8, S.385-392
  2. Liu, D.-R.; Shih, M.-J.: Hybrid-patent classification based on patent-network analysis (2011) 0.15 
    0.14922068 = product of:
  0.37305167 = sum of:
    0.35430577 = weight(_text_:patent in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.35430577 = score(doc=4189,freq=32.0), product of:
        0.24282473 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        1.4591008 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
          5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
            32.0 = termFreq=32.0
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
    0.018745892 = product of:
      0.037491783 = sum of:
        0.012579837 = weight(_text_:m in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012579837 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09151058 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036774147 = queryNorm
            0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
        0.024911948 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024911948 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1287768 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036774147 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Effective patent management is essential for organizations to maintain their competitive advantage. The classification of patents is a critical part of patent management and industrial analysis. This study proposes a hybrid-patent-classification approach that combines a novel patent-network-based classification method with three conventional classification methods to analyze query patents and predict their classes. The novel patent network contains various types of nodes that represent different features extracted from patent documents. The nodes are connected based on the relationship metrics derived from the patent metadata. The proposed classification method predicts a query patent's class by analyzing all reachable nodes in the patent network and calculating their relevance to the query patent. It then classifies the query patent with a modified k-nearest neighbor classifier. To further improve the approach, we combine it with content-based, citation-based, and metadata-based classification methods to develop a hybrid-classification approach. We evaluate the performance of the hybrid approach on a test dataset of patent documents obtained from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and compare its performance with that of the three conventional methods. The results demonstrate that the proposed patent-network-based approach yields more accurate class predictions than the patent network-based approach.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:04:21
  3. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Patent citation analysis with Google (2017) 0.12 
    0.11876793 = product of:
  0.29691982 = sum of:
    0.29377487 = weight(_text_:patent in 3317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29377487 = score(doc=3317,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.24282473 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        1.2098227 = fieldWeight in 3317, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3317)
    0.0031449592 = product of:
      0.012579837 = sum of:
        0.012579837 = weight(_text_:m in 3317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012579837 = score(doc=3317,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09151058 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036774147 = queryNorm
            0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 3317, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3317)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Citations from patents to scientific publications provide useful evidence about the commercial impact of academic research, but automatically searchable databases are needed to exploit this connection for large-scale patent citation evaluations. Google covers multiple different international patent office databases but does not index patent citations or allow automatic searches. In response, this article introduces a semiautomatic indirect method via Bing to extract and filter patent citations from Google to academic papers with an overall precision of 98%. The method was evaluated with 322,192 science and engineering Scopus articles from every second year for the period 1996-2012. Although manual Google Patent searches give more results, especially for articles with many patent citations, the difference is not large enough to be a major problem. Within Biomedical Engineering, Biotechnology, and Pharmacology & Pharmaceutics, 7% to 10% of Scopus articles had at least one patent citation but other fields had far fewer, so patent citation analysis is only relevant for a minority of publications. Low but positive correlations between Google Patent citations and Scopus citations across all fields suggest that traditional citation counts cannot substitute for patent citations when evaluating research.
  4. Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014) 0.10 
    0.10406826 = product of:
  0.26017064 = sum of:
    0.23767556 = weight(_text_:patent in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23767556 = score(doc=1352,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.24282473 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.9787947 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
    0.02249507 = product of:
      0.04499014 = sum of:
        0.015095805 = weight(_text_:m in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015095805 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09151058 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036774147 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
        0.029894335 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029894335 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1287768 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036774147 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Patent analysis has become important for management as it offers timely and valuable information to evaluate R&D performance and identify the prospects of patents. This study explores the scattering patterns of patent impact based on citations in 3 distinct technological areas, the liquid crystal, semiconductor, and drug technological areas, to identify the core patents in each area. The research follows the approach from Bradford's law, which equally divides total citations into 3 zones. While the result suggests that the scattering of patent citations corresponded with features of Bradford's law, the proportion of patents in the 3 zones did not match the proportion as proposed by the law. As a result, the study shows that the distributions of citations in all 3 areas were more concentrated than what Bradford's law proposed. The Groos (1967) droop was also presented by the scattering of patent citations, and the growth rate of cumulative citation decreased in the third zone.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:11:29
  5. Geiß, D.: Patentinformation - ein Werkzeug für die Wirtschaft : PATLIB 2010 in Dresden (2010) 0.10 
    0.1001689 = product of:
  0.16694815 = sum of:
    0.12400703 = weight(_text_:patent in 3994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12400703 = score(doc=3994,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24282473 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.5106853 = fieldWeight in 3994, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3994)
    0.034221943 = weight(_text_:und in 3994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034221943 = score(doc=3994,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.08150501 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 3994, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3994)
    0.008719182 = product of:
      0.034876727 = sum of:
        0.034876727 = weight(_text_:22 in 3994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034876727 = score(doc=3994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1287768 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036774147 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3994)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Die diesjährige Arbeitstagung der Europäischen Patentbibliotheken fand vom 31. Mai bis zum 3. Juni 2010 in Dresden statt und stand unter dem Motto: PATLIB 2010 - Patent Information - a Business tool. Veranstalter waren das Europäische Patentamt in enger Zusammenarbeit mit dem Deutschen Patentamt und der Technischen Universität Dresden. Rund 250 Teilnehmer von 180 Patentbibliotheken aus 28 Ländern waren nach Dresden gekommen, um die Kooperation mit dem Amt und den Partnern weiter zu festigen, die zukünftige Entwicklung im Zeichen der Erweiterung ihrer Dienstleistungen und deren Qualitätsstandards zu diskutieren und aus Beispielen zu lernen, wie in Zukunft die Dienstleistungen noch effizienter gestaltet werden können.
    Date
    26. 8.2010 13:22:18
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.5, S.303-308
  6. Geiß, D.: Neue Wege der Patent- und Markeninformation (2013) 0.10 
    0.09858176 = product of:
  0.2464544 = sum of:
    0.21258347 = weight(_text_:patent in 1020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21258347 = score(doc=1020,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24282473 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.8754605 = fieldWeight in 1020, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1020)
    0.03387094 = weight(_text_:und in 1020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03387094 = score(doc=1020,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08150501 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1020, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1020)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.4, S.216-2273
  7. Geis, D.: Aus der Praxis der Patentinformation : die Entwicklung der elektronischen Medien und Dienstleistungen bei den Patentbehörden und Internetprovidern (2014) 0.09 
    0.086828075 = product of:
  0.21707018 = sum of:
    0.17715289 = weight(_text_:patent in 1268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17715289 = score(doc=1268,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24282473 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.7295504 = fieldWeight in 1268, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1268)
    0.039917286 = weight(_text_:und in 1268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039917286 = score(doc=1268,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08150501 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 1268, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1268)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Bericht über die 41. Arbeitssitzung der AGM beim Technischen Informationszentrum des Deutschen Patent- und Markenamts am 7.11.2013.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 65(2014) H.2, S.127-136
  8. Neunzert, H.: Mathematische Modellierung : ein "curriculum vitae" (2012) 0.08 
    0.079108566 = product of:
  0.19777142 = sum of:
    0.03387094 = weight(_text_:und in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03387094 = score(doc=2255,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08150501 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
    0.16390048 = product of:
      0.6556019 = sum of:
        0.6556019 = weight(_text_:c3 in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6556019 = score(doc=2255,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3585839 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036774147 = queryNorm
            1.8283083 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vortrag auf der Tagung "Geschichte und Modellierung", Jena, 3. Februar 2012. Vgl. unter: http://www.fmi.uni-jena.de/Fakult%C3%A4t/Institute+und+Abteilungen/Abteilung+f%C3%BCr+Didaktik/Kolloquien.html?highlight=neunzert.
  9. Becks, D.; Mandl, T.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Spezielle Anforderungen bei der Evaluierung von Patent-Retrieval-Systemen (2010) 0.08 
    0.078052185 = product of:
  0.19513047 = sum of:
    0.17537242 = weight(_text_:patent in 4667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17537242 = score(doc=4667,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24282473 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.7222181 = fieldWeight in 4667, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4667)
    0.019758048 = weight(_text_:und in 4667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019758048 = score(doc=4667,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08150501 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 4667, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4667)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Innerhalb der informationswissenschaftlich geprägten Fachinformation nimmt die Patentdomäne eine gewisse Sonderstellung ein, da sie über eine Reihe von Besonderheiten verfügt, die es notwendig machen, die klassischen Methoden der Bewertung zu überarbeiten bzw. zu adaptieren. Dies belegen unter anderem die Ergebnisse des Intellectual Property Track, der seit 2009 im Rahmen der Evaluierungskampagne CLEF stattfindet. Der vorliegende Artikel beschreibt die innerhalb des zuvor genannten Track erzielten Ergebnisse. Darüber hinaus werden die Konsequenzen für die Evaluierung von Patent-Retrieval-Systemen herausgearbeitet.
    Source
    Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
  10. Orduna-Malea, E.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Web citations in patents : evidence of technological impact? (2017) 0.08 
    0.07515066 = product of:
  0.18787664 = sum of:
    0.18410268 = weight(_text_:patent in 3764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18410268 = score(doc=3764,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.24282473 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.7581711 = fieldWeight in 3764, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3764)
    0.0037739512 = product of:
      0.015095805 = sum of:
        0.015095805 = weight(_text_:m in 3764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015095805 = score(doc=3764,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09151058 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036774147 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 3764, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3764)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Patents sometimes cite webpages either as general background to the problem being addressed or to identify prior publications that limit the scope of the patent granted. Counts of the number of patents citing an organization's website may therefore provide an indicator of its technological capacity or relevance. This article introduces methods to extract URL citations from patents and evaluates the usefulness of counts of patent web citations as a technology indicator. An analysis of patents citing 200 US universities or 177 UK universities found computer science and engineering departments to be frequently cited, as well as research-related webpages, such as Wikipedia, YouTube, or the Internet Archive. Overall, however, patent URL citations seem to be frequent enough to be useful for ranking major US and the top few UK universities if popular hosted subdomains are filtered out, but the hit count estimates on the first search engine results page should not be relied upon for accuracy.
  11. Geiß, D.: Aus der Praxis der Patentinformation : die Entwicklung der elektronischen Medien und Dienstleistungen bei den Patentbehörden und Internetprovidern (2010) 0.07 
    0.07358672 = product of:
  0.18396679 = sum of:
    0.1417223 = weight(_text_:patent in 3642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1417223 = score(doc=3642,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24282473 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.58364034 = fieldWeight in 3642, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3642)
    0.042244483 = weight(_text_:und in 3642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042244483 = score(doc=3642,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.08150501 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.51830536 = fieldWeight in 3642, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3642)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Die 37. Arbeitssitzung der AGM (Arbeitsgruppe Elektronische Medien in der Patentinformation) beim Technischen Informationszentrum des Deutschen Patent- und Markenamtes in Berlin am 12. November 2009 stand wie in jedem Jahr unter dem Motto "Fortschritte in der Patentinformation". Die Arbeitsgruppe besteht seit 37 Jahren und hat inzwischen rd. 80 Mitglieder aus Wirtschaft und Behörden, die bei Bedarf regelmäßig informiert werden. In diesem Jahr haben wieder 38 Fachleute den Weg nach Berlin gefunden, um sich mit Fragen und Problemen der Patentinformation auseinanderzusetzen.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.4, S.259-266
  12. Sieglerschmidt, J.: Wissensordnungen im analogen und im digitalen Zeitalter (2017) 0.07 
    0.070842996 = product of:
  0.17710748 = sum of:
    0.022580625 = weight(_text_:und in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022580625 = score(doc=4026,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08150501 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
    0.15452686 = product of:
      0.61810744 = sum of:
        0.61810744 = weight(_text_:c3 in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.61810744 = score(doc=4026,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.3585839 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036774147 = queryNorm
            1.7237456 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=0rtGDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA35&dq=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung+OR+sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&ots=5u0TwCbFqE&sig=GGw3Coc21CINkone-6Lx8LaSAjY#v=onepage&q=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung%20OR%20sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&f=false.
    Footnote
    Wierabdruck aus: Handbuch Kulturportale: Online-Angebote aus Kultur und Wissenschaft. Hrsg.: Ellen Euler u.a. Berlin 2015.
  13. Chang, K.-C.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, S.; Yuan, C,-C.: Threshold effects of the patent H-index in the relationship between patent citations and market value (2015) 0.07 
    0.06722479 = product of:
  0.33612397 = sum of:
    0.33612397 = weight(_text_:patent in 2344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.33612397 = score(doc=2344,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.24282473 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        1.3842247 = fieldWeight in 2344, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2344)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This study employs a panel threshold regression model to test whether the patent h-index has a threshold effect on the relationship between patent citations and market value in the pharmaceutical industry. It aims to bridge the gap in extant research on this topic. This study demonstrates that the patent h-index has a triple threshold effect on the relationship between patent citations and market value. When the patent h-index is less than or equal to the lowest threshold, 4, there is a positive relationship between patent citations and market value. This study indicates that the first regime (where the patent h-index is less than or equal to 4) is optimal, because this is where the extent of the positive relationship between patent citations and market value is the greatest.
  14. Kay, L.; Newman, N.; Youtie, J.; Porter, A.L.; Rafols, I.: Patent overlay mapping : visualizing technological distance (2014) 0.06 
    0.06387339 = product of:
  0.31936693 = sum of:
    0.31936693 = weight(_text_:patent in 1543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31936693 = score(doc=1543,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.24282473 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        1.3152158 = fieldWeight in 1543, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1543)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper presents a new global patent map that represents all technological categories and a method to locate patent data of individual organizations and technological fields on the global map. This overlay map technique may support competitive intelligence and policy decision making. The global patent map is based on similarities in citing-to-cited relationships between categories of the International Patent Classification (IPC) of European Patent Office (EPO) patents from 2000 to 2006. This patent data set, extracted from the PATSTAT database, includes 760,000 patent records in 466 IPC-based categories. We compare the global patent maps derived from this categorization to related efforts of other global patent maps. The paper overlays the nanotechnology-related patenting activities of two companies and two different nanotechnology subfields on the global patent map. The exercise shows the potential of patent overlay maps to visualize technological areas and potentially support decision making. Furthermore, this study shows that IPC categories that are similar to one another based on citing-to-cited patterns (and thus close in the global patent map) are not necessarily in the same hierarchical IPC branch, thereby revealing new relationships between technologies that are classified as pertaining to different (and sometimes distant) subject areas in the IPC scheme.
  15. Cetintas, S.; Si, L.: Effective query generation and postprocessing strategies for prior art patent search (2012) 0.06 
    0.061367568 = product of:
  0.30683783 = sum of:
    0.30683783 = weight(_text_:patent in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30683783 = score(doc=71,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.24282473 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        1.2636185 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Rapid increase in global competition demands increased protection of intellectual property rights and underlines the importance of patents as major intellectual property documents. Prior art patent search is the task of identifying related patents for a given patent file, and is an essential step in judging the validity of a patent application. This article proposes an automated query generation and postprocessing method for prior art patent search. The proposed approach first constructs structured queries by combining terms extracted from different fields of a query patent and then reranks the retrieved patents by utilizing the International Patent Classification (IPC) code similarities between the query patent and the retrieved patents along with the retrieval score. An extensive set of empirical results carried out on a large-scale, real-world dataset shows that utilizing 20 or 30 query terms extracted from all fields of an original query patent according to their log(tf)idf values helps form a representative search query out of the query patent and is found to be more effective than is using any number of query terms from any single field. It is shown that combining terms extracted from different fields of the query patent by giving higher importance to terms extracted from the abstract, claims, and description fields than to terms extracted from the title field is more effective than treating all extracted terms equally while forming the search query. Finally, utilizing the similarities between the IPC codes of the query patent and retrieved patents is shown to be beneficial to improve the effectiveness of the prior art search.
  16. Münch, V.: Auf STN kann man jetzt auch mit physikalischen Größen in Patent-Volltexten suchen (2011) 0.06 
    0.060779657 = product of:
  0.15194914 = sum of:
    0.12400703 = weight(_text_:patent in 4779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12400703 = score(doc=4779,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24282473 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.5106853 = fieldWeight in 4779, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4779)
    0.0279421 = weight(_text_:und in 4779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0279421 = score(doc=4779,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08150501 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 4779, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4779)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    FIZ Karlsruhe hat für STN International eine weltweit einzigartige numerische Suchfunktion für Volltextdatenbanken entwickelt. Mit dieser Funktion können physikalische Eigenschaften anhand von Messwerten und Messbereichen in Zahlen sowie Maßeinheiten ganz gezielt aus Patentschriften und anderen Volltextdokumenten abgefragt werden. Die Antworten sind mit der Fundstelle im Text verknüpft. Die numerische Suchfunktion arbeitet auch in Verbindung mit den Nachbarschaftsoperatoren des STNRetrievalsystems, beispielsweise, um gesuchte Messgrößen mit Schlagworten zu verbinden. Die neue Funktion wird zunächst für die Volltext-Patentdatenbank PCTFULL angeboten. Jeremias Gromotka, FIZ Karlsruhe, und Elke Thomä, PATON, Ilmenau, stellten diese Neuentwicklung auf der PATINFO 2011 vor.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.5, S.241-242
  17. Yan, B.; Luo, J.: Measuring technological distance for patent mapping (2017) 0.06 
    0.058754977 = product of:
  0.29377487 = sum of:
    0.29377487 = weight(_text_:patent in 3351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29377487 = score(doc=3351,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.24282473 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        1.2098227 = fieldWeight in 3351, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3351)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Recent works in the information science literature have presented cases of using patent databases and patent classification information to construct network maps of technology fields, which aim to aid in competitive intelligence analysis and innovation decision making. Constructing such a patent network requires a proper measure of the distance between different classes of patents in the patent classification systems. Despite the existence of various distance measures in the literature, it is unclear how to consistently assess and compare them, and which ones to select for constructing patent technology network maps. This ambiguity has limited the development and applications of such technology maps. Herein, we propose to compare alternative distance measures and identify the superior ones by analyzing the differences and similarities in the structural properties of resulting patent network maps. Using United States patent data from 1976 to 2006 and the International Patent Classification (IPC) system, we compare 12 representative distance measures, which quantify interfield knowledge base proximity, field-crossing diversification likelihood or frequency of innovation agents, and co-occurrences of patent classes in the same patents. Our comparative analyses suggest the patent technology network maps based on normalized coreference and inventor diversification likelihood measures are the best representatives.
  18. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.06 
    0.056305826 = product of:
  0.14076456 = sum of:
    0.11681419 = product of:
      0.35044256 = sum of:
        0.35044256 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35044256 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31177163 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036774147 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.02395037 = weight(_text_:und in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02395037 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08150501 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  19. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.06 
    0.055381566 = product of:
  0.092302606 = sum of:
    0.06814162 = product of:
      0.20442484 = sum of:
        0.20442484 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20442484 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31177163 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036774147 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.019758048 = weight(_text_:und in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019758048 = score(doc=5955,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08150501 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.004402943 = product of:
      0.017611772 = sum of:
        0.017611772 = weight(_text_:m in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017611772 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09151058 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036774147 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Diskussionen um Datennetze und Informationstechnik drehen sich häufig um kompetentes Handeln. In der Publikation werden Voraussetzungen eines autonomen informationellen Handelns gezeigt: Abstrahieren, Analogien bilden, Plausibilitäten beachten, Schlussfolgern und kreativ sein. Informationelle Kompetenz ist gelebte Informationelle Autonomie. Es lassen sich Konsequenzen für ein zukünftiges Menschenbild in informationstechnischen Umgebungen ziehen.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
    Type
    m
  20. Li, R.; Chambers, T.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Meng, L.: Patent citation analysis : calculating science linkage based on citing motivation (2014) 0.05 
    0.053145867 = product of:
  0.26572934 = sum of:
    0.26572934 = weight(_text_:patent in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26572934 = score(doc=1257,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.24282473 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036774147 = queryNorm
        1.0943257 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Science linkage is a widely used patent bibliometric indicator to measure patent linkage to scientific research based on the frequency of citations to scientific papers within the patent. Science linkage is also regarded as noisy because the subject of patent citation behavior varies from inventors/applicants to examiners. In order to identify and ultimately reduce this noise, we analyzed the different citing motivations of examiners and inventors/applicants. We built 4 hypotheses based upon our study of patent law, the unique economic nature of a patent, and a patent citation's market effect. To test our hypotheses, we conducted an expert survey based on our science linkage calculation in the domain of catalyst from U.S. patent data (2006-2009) over 3 types of citations: self-citation by inventor/applicant, non-self-citation by inventor/applicant, and citation by examiner. According to our results, evaluated by domain experts, we conclude that the non-self-citation by inventor/applicant is quite noisy and cannot indicate science linkage and that self-citation by inventor/applicant, although limited, is more appropriate for understanding science linkage.

Authors

Languages

  • d 1661
  • e 1478
  • a 2
  • hu 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 2462
  • el 472
  • m 469
  • s 113
  • x 80
  • r 31
  • n 10
  • b 6
  • i 4
  • p 3
  • v 2
  • l 1
  • ms 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications