Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

0.039290782 = product of:
  0.09822695 = sum of:
    0.07038033 = weight(_text_:r in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07038033 = score(doc=4992,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.5172279 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
    0.027846623 = product of:
      0.055693246 = sum of:
        0.055693246 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055693246 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Date

14. 2.2012 12:53:22

0.008445639 = product of:
  0.042228196 = sum of:
    0.042228196 = weight(_text_:r in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042228196 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.007038033 = product of:
  0.035190165 = sum of:
    0.035190165 = weight(_text_:r in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035190165 = score(doc=5226,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.25861394 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.0069672973 = product of:
  0.034836486 = sum of:
    0.034836486 = weight(_text_:r in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034836486 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.0069672973 = product of:
  0.034836486 = sum of:
    0.034836486 = weight(_text_:r in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034836486 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The author presents a different view on properties of impact measures than given in the paper of De Visscher (2011). He argues that a good impact measure works better when citations are concentrated rather than spread out over articles. The author also presents theoretical evidence that the g-index and the R-index can be close to the square root of the total number of citations, whereas this is not the case for the A-index. Here the author confirms an assertion of De Visscher.

0.005971969 = product of:
  0.029859845 = sum of:
    0.029859845 = weight(_text_:r in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029859845 = score(doc=3336,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Adding or deleting items such as self-citations has an influence on the h-index of an author. This influence will be proved mathematically in this article. We hereby prove the experimental finding in E. Gianoli and M.A. Molina-Montenegro ([2009]) that the influence of adding or deleting self-citations on the h-index is greater for low values of the h-index. Why this is logical also is shown by a simple theoretical example. Adding or deleting sources such as adding or deleting minor contributions of an author also has an influence on the h-index of this author; this influence is modeled in this article. This model explains some practical examples found in X. Hu, R. Rousseau, and J. Chen (in press).

0.005971969 = product of:
  0.029859845 = sum of:
    0.029859845 = weight(_text_:r in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029859845 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)