Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.019692358 = product of:
  0.049230892 = sum of:
    0.024347689 = weight(_text_:u in 3405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024347689 = score(doc=3405,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 3405, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3405)
    0.024883203 = weight(_text_:r in 3405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024883203 = score(doc=3405,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3405, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3405)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Source

Philosophy, computing and information science. Eds.: R. Hagengruber u. U.V. Riss

0.013719295 = product of:
  0.068596475 = sum of:
    0.068596475 = weight(_text_:o in 277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068596475 = score(doc=277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20624171 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.33260235 = fieldWeight in 277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=277)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

In philosophy, Ontology is the basic description of things in the world. In information science, an ontology refers to an engineering artifact, constituted by a specific vocabulary used to describe a certain reality. Ontologies have been proposed for validating both conceptual models and conceptual schemas; however, these roles are quite dissimilar. In this article, we show that ontologies can be better understood if we classify the different uses of the term as it appears in the literature. First, we explain Ontology (upper case O) as used in Philosophy. Then, we propose a differentiation between ontologies of information systems and ontologies for information systems. All three concepts have an important role in information science. We clarify the different meanings and uses of Ontology and ontologies through a comparison of research by Wand and Weber and by Guarino in ontology-driven information systems. The contributions of this article are twofold: (a) It provides a better understanding of what ontologies are, and (b) it explains the double role of ontologies in information science research.