Search (341 results, page 1 of 18)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Eisenhardt, O.; Ohly, P.: Quantitative Analyse und Suchstrategien (1981) 0.08
    0.07825097 = product of:
      0.1956274 = sum of:
        0.13719295 = weight(_text_:o in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13719295 = score(doc=36,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20624171 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.6652047 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
        0.058434453 = weight(_text_:u in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058434453 = score(doc=36,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1980, Berlin, 29.9.-3.10.1980: IuD und Normung - Neue Kommunikationstechnologie - Berufspolitik - Datenbanken - Betriebsstatistik - Informetrie - Parlamentsdokumentation - Arbeitskreis Senioren - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  2. Nacke, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne (1980) 0.08
    0.07825097 = product of:
      0.1956274 = sum of:
        0.13719295 = weight(_text_:o in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13719295 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20624171 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.6652047 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
        0.058434453 = weight(_text_:u in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058434453 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  3. Nacke, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse (1980) 0.08
    0.07825097 = product of:
      0.1956274 = sum of:
        0.13719295 = weight(_text_:o in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13719295 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20624171 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.6652047 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.058434453 = weight(_text_:u in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058434453 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  4. Fairthorne, R.A.: Bradford's law and perspective (1980) 0.08
    0.07825097 = product of:
      0.1956274 = sum of:
        0.13719295 = weight(_text_:o in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13719295 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20624171 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.6652047 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
        0.058434453 = weight(_text_:u in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058434453 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
  5. Persson, O.; Melin, G.: Equalization, growth and integration of science (1996) 0.07
    0.073883116 = product of:
      0.18470779 = sum of:
        0.11432747 = weight(_text_:o in 6698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11432747 = score(doc=6698,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20624171 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.55433726 = fieldWeight in 6698, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6698)
        0.07038033 = weight(_text_:r in 6698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07038033 = score(doc=6698,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.5172279 = fieldWeight in 6698, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6698)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a study of the production of scientific papers, coauthorships and R&D expenditures in the OECD countries. Discusses the distribution of papers in the journal 'Science' by OECD country in comparison with 'Science Citation Index' papers as a whole and compares these to the distribution of R&D investments
  6. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.07
    0.07042237 = product of:
      0.11737062 = sum of:
        0.058434453 = weight(_text_:u in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058434453 = score(doc=402,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
        0.042228196 = weight(_text_:r in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042228196 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
        0.016707974 = product of:
          0.033415947 = sum of:
            0.033415947 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033415947 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041106213 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
  7. Henzler, R.: Bibliometrische Methoden der Termanalyse (1980) 0.05
    0.047261655 = product of:
      0.11815414 = sum of:
        0.058434453 = weight(_text_:u in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058434453 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
        0.05971969 = weight(_text_:r in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05971969 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  8. Zitatenanalyse und verwandte Verfahren : Vorträge einer öffentlichen Sitzung während der 32. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation, Oktober 1979 (1980) 0.05
    0.04573099 = product of:
      0.22865494 = sum of:
        0.22865494 = weight(_text_:o in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22865494 = score(doc=417,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.20624171 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            1.1086745 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: NACKE, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne; GERDEL, W.: Datentechnische Methoden in der Referenzanalyse; EISENHARDT, O.-H.: Ergebnisse der Referenzanalyse; KRUG, G.: List-Analyse; LANGE, H.: Requestanalyse; HENZLER, R.G.: Bibliometrische Methoden der Termanalyse; NACKE, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse
    Editor
    Nacke, O.
  9. Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008) 0.05
    0.045471027 = product of:
      0.07578504 = sum of:
        0.029217226 = weight(_text_:u in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029217226 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
        0.029859845 = weight(_text_:r in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029859845 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
        0.016707974 = product of:
          0.033415947 = sum of:
            0.033415947 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033415947 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041106213 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:03:12
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Costas, R., M. Bordons u. T.N. van Leeuwen u.a.: Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.740-753.
  10. Haustein, S.; Tunger, D.: Sziento- und bibliometrische Verfahren (2013) 0.04
    0.039384715 = product of:
      0.098461784 = sum of:
        0.048695378 = weight(_text_:u in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048695378 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
        0.049766406 = weight(_text_:r in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049766406 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
  11. Nacke, O.: Informetrie : ein neuer Name für eine neue Disziplin (1979) 0.04
    0.03658479 = product of:
      0.18292394 = sum of:
        0.18292394 = weight(_text_:o in 5241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18292394 = score(doc=5241,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20624171 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.8869396 = fieldWeight in 5241, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5241)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  12. Falkingham, L.T.; Reeves, R.: Context analysis : a technique for analysing research in a field, applied to literature on the management of R&D at the section level (1998) 0.04
    0.035666242 = product of:
      0.089165606 = sum of:
        0.06967297 = weight(_text_:r in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06967297 = score(doc=3689,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
        0.019492636 = product of:
          0.03898527 = sum of:
            0.03898527 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03898527 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041106213 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Context analysis is a new method for appraising a body of publications. the process consists of creating a database of attributes assigned to each paper by the reviewer and then looking for interesting relationships in the data. Assigning the attributes requires an understanding of the subject matter of the papers. Presents findings about one particular research field, Management of R&D at the Section Level. The findings support the view that this body of academic publications does not meet the needs of practitioner R&D managers. Discusses practical aspects of how to apply the method in other fields
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:18:46
  13. McKeown, K.; Daume III, H.; Chaturvedi, S.; Paparrizos, J.; Thadani, K.; Barrio, P.; Biran, O.; Bothe, S.; Collins, M.; Fleischmann, K.R.; Gravano, L.; Jha, R.; King, B.; McInerney, K.; Moon, T.; Neelakantan, A.; O'Seaghdha, D.; Radev, D.; Templeton, C.; Teufel, S.: Predicting the impact of scientific concepts using full-text features (2016) 0.03
    0.032818776 = product of:
      0.08204694 = sum of:
        0.057163734 = weight(_text_:o in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057163734 = score(doc=3153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20624171 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.27716863 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
        0.024883203 = weight(_text_:r in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024883203 = score(doc=3153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  14. Schlögl, C.: Informationskompetenz am Beispiel einer szientometrischen Untersuchung zum Informationsmanagement (2000) 0.03
    0.0275693 = product of:
      0.06892325 = sum of:
        0.034086764 = weight(_text_:u in 5485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034086764 = score(doc=5485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 5485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5485)
        0.034836486 = weight(_text_:r in 5485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034836486 = score(doc=5485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 5485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5485)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Informationskompetenz - Basiskompetenz in der Informationsgesellschaft: Proceedings des 7. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2000), Hrsg.: G. Knorz u. R. Kuhlen
  15. Nacke, O.: Lexikometrie, ein Verfahren zur Profilanalyse multidimensionaler Probleme (1996) 0.03
    0.02743859 = product of:
      0.13719295 = sum of:
        0.13719295 = weight(_text_:o in 5240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13719295 = score(doc=5240,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20624171 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.6652047 = fieldWeight in 5240, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5240)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  16. Järvelin, K.; Persson, O.: ¬The DCI-index : discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation (2008) 0.03
    0.025869353 = product of:
      0.12934676 = sum of:
        0.12934676 = weight(_text_:o in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12934676 = score(doc=2332,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20624171 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.627161 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The article by K. Järvelin & O. Persson published in JASIST 59(9), The DCI-Index: Discounted Cumulated Impact-Based Research Evaluation, (pp. 1433-1440) contains an unfortunate error in one of its formulas, Equation 3. The present paper gives the correction and an example of impact analysis based on the corrected formula.
  17. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.02
    0.02483617 = product of:
      0.062090423 = sum of:
        0.039813124 = weight(_text_:r in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039813124 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
        0.0222773 = product of:
          0.0445546 = sum of:
            0.0445546 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0445546 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041106213 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  18. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.02
    0.024493441 = product of:
      0.061233602 = sum of:
        0.038956303 = weight(_text_:u in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038956303 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
        0.0222773 = product of:
          0.0445546 = sum of:
            0.0445546 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0445546 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041106213 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
  19. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.02
    0.024493441 = product of:
      0.061233602 = sum of:
        0.038956303 = weight(_text_:u in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038956303 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
        0.0222773 = product of:
          0.0445546 = sum of:
            0.0445546 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0445546 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041106213 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
    Editor
    Cronin, B. u. C.R. Sugimoto
  20. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.02
    0.023959829 = product of:
      0.05989957 = sum of:
        0.04876092 = weight(_text_:r in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04876092 = score(doc=5171,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.358346 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
        0.01113865 = product of:
          0.0222773 = sum of:
            0.0222773 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0222773 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041106213 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Ahlgren, Jarneving, and. Rousseau review accepted procedures for author co-citation analysis first pointing out that since in the raw data matrix the row and column values are identical i,e, the co-citation count of two authors, there is no clear choice for diagonal values. They suggest the number of times an author has been co-cited with himself excluding self citation rather than the common treatment as zeros or as missing values. When the matrix is converted to a similarity matrix the normal procedure is to create a matrix of Pearson's r coefficients between data vectors. Ranking by r and by co-citation frequency and by intuition can easily yield three different orders. It would seem necessary that the adding of zeros to the matrix will not affect the value or the relative order of similarity measures but it is shown that this is not the case with Pearson's r. Using 913 bibliographic descriptions form the Web of Science of articles form JASIS and Scientometrics, authors names were extracted, edited and 12 information retrieval authors and 12 bibliometric authors each from the top 100 most cited were selected. Co-citation and r value (diagonal elements treated as missing) matrices were constructed, and then reconstructed in expanded form. Adding zeros can both change the r value and the ordering of the authors based upon that value. A chi-squared distance measure would not violate these requirements, nor would the cosine coefficient. It is also argued that co-citation data is ordinal data since there is no assurance of an absolute zero number of co-citations, and thus Pearson is not appropriate. The number of ties in co-citation data make the use of the Spearman rank order coefficient problematic.
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35

Years

Languages

  • e 287
  • d 51
  • m 1
  • ro 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 324
  • el 7
  • m 7
  • s 7
  • r 4
  • More… Less…