Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  • × theme_ss:"Indexierungsstudien"
  1. Kautto, V.: Classing and indexing : a comparative time study (1992) 0.01 
    0.013719295 = product of:
  0.068596475 = sum of:
    0.068596475 = weight(_text_:o in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068596475 = score(doc=2670,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20624171 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.33260235 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    A total of 16 classifiers made a subject analysis of a set of books such that some of the books were first classified by the UDC anf then indexed with terms from the General Finnish Subject Headings while another set were processed in the opposite order. Finally books on the same subject were either classifies or indexed. The total number of books processed was 581. A comparison was made of the time required for processing in different situations and of the number of classes or subject headings used. The time figures were compared with corresponding data from the British Library (1972) and the Library of Congress (1990 and 1991). The author finds that the contents analysis requires one third, classification one third and indexing obe third of the time, if the document is both classified and indexed. There was a plausible correlation (o.51) between the length of experience in classification and the decrease in the time required for classing. The average number of UDC numbers was 4,3 and the average number of terms from the list of subject headings was 4,0
  2. Krovetz, R.; Croft, W.B.: Lexical ambiguity and information retrieval (1992) 0.01 
    0.0069672973 = product of:
  0.034836486 = sum of:
    0.034836486 = weight(_text_:r in 4028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034836486 = score(doc=4028,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 4028, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4028)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  3. Harter, S.P.; Cheng, Y.-R.: Colinked descriptors : improving vocabulary selection for end-user searching (1996) 0.01 
    0.005971969 = product of:
  0.029859845 = sum of:
    0.029859845 = weight(_text_:r in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029859845 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  4. Burgin, R.: ¬The effect of indexing exhaustivity on retrieval performance (1991) 0.01 
    0.005971969 = product of:
  0.029859845 = sum of:
    0.029859845 = weight(_text_:r in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029859845 = score(doc=5262,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  5. Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996) 0.00 
    0.00445546 = product of:
  0.0222773 = sum of:
    0.0222773 = product of:
      0.0445546 = sum of:
        0.0445546 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0445546 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
  6. Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990) 0.00 
    0.0038985272 = product of:
  0.019492636 = sum of:
    0.019492636 = product of:
      0.03898527 = sum of:
        0.03898527 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03898527 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26

Authors

Themes