-
Cronin, B.: Bibliometrics and beyond : some thoughts on web-based citation analysis (2001)
0.00
0.0036767495 = product of:
0.007353499 = sum of:
0.007353499 = product of:
0.014706998 = sum of:
0.014706998 = weight(_text_:e in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014706998 = score(doc=3890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Rosenberg, V.: ¬An assessment of ISI's new Web of Science : ISI's services brings citiation indexing to new and advanced researchers (1998)
0.00
0.0026262498 = product of:
0.0052524996 = sum of:
0.0052524996 = product of:
0.010504999 = sum of:
0.010504999 = weight(_text_:e in 1885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010504999 = score(doc=1885,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 1885, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1885)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Garfield, E.: Agony and ecstasy of the Internet : experiences of an information scientist qua publisher (1996)
0.00
0.0025998545 = product of:
0.005199709 = sum of:
0.005199709 = product of:
0.010399418 = sum of:
0.010399418 = weight(_text_:e in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010399418 = score(doc=3044,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.15721233 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Brody, T.; Harnad, S.; Carr, L.: Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact (2006)
0.00
0.0025998545 = product of:
0.005199709 = sum of:
0.005199709 = product of:
0.010399418 = sum of:
0.010399418 = weight(_text_:e in 165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010399418 = score(doc=165,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.15721233 = fieldWeight in 165, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=165)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The use of citation counts to assess the impact of research articles is well established. However, the citation impact of an article can only be measured several years after it has been published. As research articles are increasingly accessed through the Web, the number of times an article is downloaded can be instantly recorded and counted. One would expect the number of times an article is read to be related both to the number of times it is cited and to how old the article is. The authors analyze how short-term Web usage impact predicts medium-term citation impact. The physics e-print archive-arXiv.org-is used to test this.
- Language
- e
-
Davis, P.M.; Cohen, S.A.: ¬The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999 (2001)
0.00
0.0015757497 = product of:
0.0031514994 = sum of:
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006302999 = score(doc=5768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Prime-Claverie, C.; Beigbeder, M.; Lafouge, T.: Transposition of the cocitation method with a view to classifying Web pages (2004)
0.00
0.0015757497 = product of:
0.0031514994 = sum of:
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 3095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006302999 = score(doc=3095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 3095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Barnett, G.A.; Fink, E.L.: Impact of the internet and scholar age distribution on academic citation age (2008)
0.00
0.0015757497 = product of:
0.0031514994 = sum of:
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 1376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006302999 = score(doc=1376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Wouters, P.; Vries, R. de: Formally citing the Web (2004)
0.00
0.0014856312 = product of:
0.0029712624 = sum of:
0.0029712624 = product of:
0.005942525 = sum of:
0.005942525 = weight(_text_:e in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005942525 = score(doc=3093,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.08983562 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- How do authors refer to Web-based information sources in their formal scientific publications? It is not yet weIl known how scientists and scholars actually include new types of information sources, available through the new media, in their published work. This article reports an a comparative study of the lists of references in 38 scientific journals in five different scientific and social scientific fields. The fields are sociology, library and information science, biochemistry and biotechnology, neuroscience, and the mathematics of computing. As is weIl known, references, citations, and hyperlinks play different roles in academic publishing and communication. Our study focuses an hyperlinks as attributes of references in formal scholarly publications. The study developed and applied a method to analyze the differential roles of publishing media in the analysis of scientific and scholarly literature references. The present secondary databases that include reference and citation data (the Web of Science) cannot be used for this type of research. By the automated processing and analysis of the full text of scientific and scholarly articles, we were able to extract the references and hyperlinks contained in these references in relation to other features of the scientific and scholarly literature. Our findings show that hyperlinking references are indeed, as expected, abundantly present in the formal literature. They also tend to cite more recent literature than the average reference. The large majority of the references are to Web instances of traditional scientific journals. Other types of Web-based information sources are less weIl represented in the lists of references, except in the case of pure e-journals. We conclude that this can be explained by taking the role of the publisher into account. Indeed, it seems that the shift from print-based to electronic publishing has created new roles for the publisher. By shaping the way scientific references are hyperlinking to other information sources, the publisher may have a large impact an the availability of scientific and scholarly information.
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.: Extracting macroscopic information from Web links (2001)
0.00
0.0013131249 = product of:
0.0026262498 = sum of:
0.0026262498 = product of:
0.0052524996 = sum of:
0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 6851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052524996 = score(doc=6851,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 6851, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6851)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Vaughan, L.; Shaw, D.: Web citation data for impact assessment : a comparison of four science disciplines (2005)
0.00
0.0013131249 = product of:
0.0026262498 = sum of:
0.0026262498 = product of:
0.0052524996 = sum of:
0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052524996 = score(doc=3880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.; Björneborn, L.: Webometrics (2004)
0.00
0.0013131249 = product of:
0.0026262498 = sum of:
0.0026262498 = product of:
0.0052524996 = sum of:
0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052524996 = score(doc=4279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Vaughan, L.; Shaw , D.: Bibliographic and Web citations : what Is the difference? (2003)
0.00
0.0013131249 = product of:
0.0026262498 = sum of:
0.0026262498 = product of:
0.0052524996 = sum of:
0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052524996 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
