Search (112 results, page 2 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Aagaard, H.: Social indexing at the Stockholm Public Library (2011) 0.00
    0.0026262498 = product of:
      0.0052524996 = sum of:
        0.0052524996 = product of:
          0.010504999 = sum of:
            0.010504999 = weight(_text_:e in 1807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010504999 = score(doc=1807,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 1807, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1807)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  2. Xu, C.; Zhang, Q.: ¬The dominant factor of social tags for users' decision behavior on e-commerce websites : color or text (2019) 0.00
    0.0026262498 = product of:
      0.0052524996 = sum of:
        0.0052524996 = product of:
          0.010504999 = sum of:
            0.010504999 = weight(_text_:e in 5359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010504999 = score(doc=5359,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 5359, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5359)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Colored Tags (abbr.Tag) as a unique type of social tags is used on e-commerce websites (e.g., Taobao) to summarize the high-frequency keywords extracted from users' online reviews about products they bought before. Tag is represented inked red or green according to users' personal experiences and judgments about purchased items: red for positive comments, green for negative ones. The valence of users' emotion induced by red or green is controversial. This study firstly discovers that colored tags inked in red incite users' positive emotion (evaluations) and colored tags inked in green incite negative emotion (evaluations) using an ERP experiment, which is manifested in ERP components (e.g., N170, N2c, and LPC). There are two main features of Tag: the text of Tag (abbr. Text) and the color of Tag (abbr.Color). Our study then proves that Color (red or green) is the dominant factor in users' decision behavior compared with Text under the high cognitive load condition, while users' decision behavior is influenced by Text (positive tags or negative tags) predominately rather than by Color under the low cognitive load condition with the help of Eye tracking instrument. Those findings can help to design colored tags for recommendation systems on e-commerce websites and other online platforms.
    Language
    e
  3. Stuart, E.: Flickr: organizing and tagging images online (2019) 0.00
    0.0025998545 = product of:
      0.005199709 = sum of:
        0.005199709 = product of:
          0.010399418 = sum of:
            0.010399418 = weight(_text_:e in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010399418 = score(doc=5233,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.15721233 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  4. Corrado, E.; Moulaison, H.L.: Social tagging and communities of practice : two case studies (2008) 0.00
    0.0022284468 = product of:
      0.0044568935 = sum of:
        0.0044568935 = product of:
          0.008913787 = sum of:
            0.008913787 = weight(_text_:e in 2271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008913787 = score(doc=2271,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 2271, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2271)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  5. Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Zhang, Z.; Foo, S.; Yan, E.; George, N.L.; Guo, L.: Perspectives on social tagging (2009) 0.00
    0.0022284468 = product of:
      0.0044568935 = sum of:
        0.0044568935 = product of:
          0.008913787 = sum of:
            0.008913787 = weight(_text_:e in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008913787 = score(doc=3290,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  6. Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Fried, M.; Toma, I.; Yan, E.; Foo, S.; Milojevicacute, S.: Upper tag ontology for integrating social tagging data (2010) 0.00
    0.0022284468 = product of:
      0.0044568935 = sum of:
        0.0044568935 = product of:
          0.008913787 = sum of:
            0.008913787 = weight(_text_:e in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008913787 = score(doc=3421,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  7. Estellés Arolas, E.; González Ladrón-de-Guevar, F.: Uses of explicit and implicit tags in social bookmarking (2012) 0.00
    0.0022284468 = product of:
      0.0044568935 = sum of:
        0.0044568935 = product of:
          0.008913787 = sum of:
            0.008913787 = weight(_text_:e in 4984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008913787 = score(doc=4984,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 4984, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4984)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  8. Konkova, E.; Göker, A.; Butterworth, R.; MacFarlane, A.: Social tagging: exploring the image, the tags, and the game (2014) 0.00
    0.0022284468 = product of:
      0.0044568935 = sum of:
        0.0044568935 = product of:
          0.008913787 = sum of:
            0.008913787 = weight(_text_:e in 1370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008913787 = score(doc=1370,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 1370, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1370)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  9. Shiri, A.: Trend analysis in social tagging : an LIS perspective (2007) 0.00
    0.0021009997 = product of:
      0.0042019994 = sum of:
        0.0042019994 = product of:
          0.008403999 = sum of:
            0.008403999 = weight(_text_:e in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008403999 = score(doc=529,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  10. Spiteri, L.F.: Extending the scope of library discovery systems via hashtags (2018) 0.00
    0.0021009997 = product of:
      0.0042019994 = sum of:
        0.0042019994 = product of:
          0.008403999 = sum of:
            0.008403999 = weight(_text_:e in 4798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008403999 = score(doc=4798,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 4798, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4798)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  11. Evedove Tartarotti, R. Dal'; Lopes Fujita, M.: ¬The perspective of social indexing in online bibliographic catalogs : between the individual and the collaborative (2016) 0.00
    0.0021009997 = product of:
      0.0042019994 = sum of:
        0.0042019994 = product of:
          0.008403999 = sum of:
            0.008403999 = weight(_text_:e in 4917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008403999 = score(doc=4917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 4917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  12. Hänger, C.: Knowledge management in the digital age : the possibilities of user generated content (2009) 0.00
    0.0018570389 = product of:
      0.0037140779 = sum of:
        0.0037140779 = product of:
          0.0074281557 = sum of:
            0.0074281557 = weight(_text_:e in 2813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0074281557 = score(doc=2813,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 2813, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2813)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Today, in times of Web 2.0., graduates and undergraduates interact in virtual communities like studiVZ (Studentenverzeichnis) and generate content by reviewing or tagging documents. This phenomenon offers good prospects for academic libraries. They can use the customers' tags for indexing the growing amount of electronic resources and thereby optimize the search for these documents. Important examples are the journals, databases and e-books included in the "Nationallizenzen" financed by the German Research Foundation (DFG). The documents in this collection are not manually indexed by librarians and have no annotation according to the German standard classification systems. Connecting search systems by means of Web-2.0.-services is an important task for libraries. For this purpose users are encouraged to tag printed and electronic resources in search systems like the libraries' online catalogs and to establish connections between entries in other systems, e.g. Bibsonomy, and the items found in the online catalog. As a consequence annotations chosen by both, users and librarians, will coexist: The items in the tagging systems and the online catalog are linked, library users may find other publications of interest, and contacts between library users with similar scientific interests may be established. Librarians have to face the fact that user generated tags do not necessarily have the same quality as their own annotations and will therefore have to seek for instruments for comparing user generated tags with library generated keywords.
    Language
    e
  13. Tsui, E.; Wang, W.M.; Cheung, C.F.; Lau, A.S.M.: ¬A concept-relationship acquisition and inference approach for hierarchical taxonomy construction from tags (2010) 0.00
    0.0018570389 = product of:
      0.0037140779 = sum of:
        0.0037140779 = product of:
          0.0074281557 = sum of:
            0.0074281557 = weight(_text_:e in 4220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0074281557 = score(doc=4220,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 4220, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4220)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  14. Li, D.; Ding, Y.; Sugimoto, C.; He, B.; Tang, J.; Yan, E.; Lin, N.; Qin, Z.; Dong, T.: Modeling topic and community structure in social tagging : the TTR-LDA-Community model (2011) 0.00
    0.0018570389 = product of:
      0.0037140779 = sum of:
        0.0037140779 = product of:
          0.0074281557 = sum of:
            0.0074281557 = weight(_text_:e in 4759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0074281557 = score(doc=4759,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 4759, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  15. Lin, N.; Li, D.; Ding, Y.; He, B.; Qin, Z.; Tang, J.; Li, J.; Dong, T.: ¬The dynamic features of Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube (2012) 0.00
    0.0018570389 = product of:
      0.0037140779 = sum of:
        0.0037140779 = product of:
          0.0074281557 = sum of:
            0.0074281557 = weight(_text_:e in 4970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0074281557 = score(doc=4970,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 4970, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4970)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article investigates the dynamic features of social tagging vocabularies in Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube from 2003 to 2008. Three algorithms are designed to study the macro- and micro-tag growth as well as the dynamics of taggers' activities, respectively. Moreover, we propose a Tagger Tag Resource Latent Dirichlet Allocation (TTR-LDA) model to explore the evolution of topics emerging from those social vocabularies. Our results show that (a) at the macro level, tag growth in all the three tagging systems obeys power law distribution with exponents lower than 1; at the micro level, the tag growth of popular resources in all three tagging systems follows a similar power law distribution; (b) the exponents of tag growth vary in different evolving stages of resources; (c) the growth of number of taggers associated with different popular resources presents a feature of convergence over time; (d) the active level of taggers has a positive correlation with the macro-tag growth of different tagging systems; and (e) some topics evolve into several subtopics over time while others experience relatively stable stages in which their contents do not change much, and certain groups of taggers continue their interests in them.
    Language
    e
  16. Marchitelli, A.; Piazzini, T.: OPAC, SOPAC e social networking : cataloghi di biblioteca 2.0? (2008) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Hidderley, R.; Rafferty, P.: Flickr and democratic indexing : disciplining desire lines (2006) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  18. Abbas, J.: In the margins : reflections on scribbles (2007) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  19. Abreu, A.: "Every bit informs another" : framework analysis for descriptive practice and linked information (2008) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  20. Tennis, J.T.; Jacob, E.K.: Toward a theory of structure in information organization frameworks (2008) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 2251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=2251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 2251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e

Languages

  • e 105
  • d 6
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 97
  • el 13
  • m 6
  • b 2
  • s 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…