Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Folksonomies"
  1. Spiteri, L.: ¬The structure and form of folksonomy tags : the road to the public library catalogue (2007) 0.03 
    0.033323545 = product of:
  0.08330886 = sum of:
    0.03837822 = weight(_text_:u in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03837822 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
    0.044930637 = weight(_text_:b in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044930637 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
  2. Peters, I.: Folksonomies : indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0 (2009) 0.02 
    0.016661773 = product of:
  0.04165443 = sum of:
    0.01918911 = weight(_text_:u in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01918911 = score(doc=4203,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
    0.022465318 = weight(_text_:b in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022465318 = score(doc=4203,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Zugl.: Düsseldorf, Univ., Diss., 2009 u.d.T.: Peters, Isabella: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval Rez. in: IWP - Information Wissenschaft & Praxis, 61(2010) Heft 8, S.469-470 (U. Spree): "... Nachdem sich die Rezensentin durch 418 Seiten Text hindurch gelesen hat, bleibt sie unentschieden, wie der auffällige Einsatz langer Zitate (im Durchschnitt drei Zitate, die länger als vier kleingedruckte Zeilen sind, pro Seite) zu bewerten ist, zumal die Zitate nicht selten rein illustrativen Charakter haben bzw. Isabella Peters noch einmal zitiert, was sie bereits in eigenen Worten ausgedrückt hat. Redundanz und Verlängerung der Lesezeit halten sich hier die Waage mit der Möglichkeit, dass sich die Leserin einen unmittelbaren Eindruck von Sprache und Duktus der zitierten Literatur verschaffen kann. Eindeutig unschön ist das Beenden eines Gedankens oder einer Argumentation durch ein Zitat (z. B. S. 170). Im deutschen Original entstehen auf diese Weise die für deutsche wissenschaftliche Qualifikationsarbeiten typischen denglischen Texte. Für alle, die sich für Wissensrepräsentation, Information Retrieval und kollaborative Informationsdienste interessieren, ist "Folksonomies : Indexing and Retrieval in Web 2.0" trotz der angeführten kleinen Mängel zur Lektüre und Anschaffung - wegen seines beinahe enzyklopädischen Charakters auch als Nachschlage- oder Referenzwerk geeignet - unbedingt zu empfehlen. Abschließend möchte ich mich in einem Punkt der Produktinfo von de Gruyter uneingeschränkt anschließen: ein "Grundlagenwerk für Folksonomies".
  3. Peters, I.: Benutzerzentrierte Erschließungsverfahren (2013) 0.01 
    0.009594555 = product of:
  0.047972776 = sum of:
    0.047972776 = weight(_text_:u in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047972776 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
  4. Peters, I.; Schumann, L.; Terliesner, J.: Folksonomy-basiertes Information Retrieval unter der Lupe (2012) 0.01 
    0.008944021 = product of:
  0.044720102 = sum of:
    0.044720102 = weight(_text_:j in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044720102 = score(doc=406,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2012.63.issue-4/iwp-2012-0047/iwp-2012-0047.xml?format=INT.
  5. Voss, J.: Collaborative thesaurus tagging the Wikipedia way (2006) 0.01 
    0.0072278604 = product of:
  0.036139302 = sum of:
    0.036139302 = weight(_text_:j in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036139302 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  6. Furner, J.: Folksonomies (2009) 0.01 
    0.0072278604 = product of:
  0.036139302 = sum of:
    0.036139302 = weight(_text_:j in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036139302 = score(doc=3857,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  7. Güntner, G.; Sint, R.; Westenthaler, R.: ¬Ein Ansatz zur Unterstützung traditioneller Klassifikation durch Social Tagging (2008) 0.01 
    0.0067395954 = product of:
  0.033697978 = sum of:
    0.033697978 = weight(_text_:b in 2897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033697978 = score(doc=2897,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 2897, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2897)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  8. Watters, C.; Nizam, N.: Knowledge organization on the Web : the emergent role of social classification (2012) 0.01 
    0.006716188 = product of:
  0.03358094 = sum of:
    0.03358094 = weight(_text_:u in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03358094 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
  9. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.01 
    0.0065840157 = product of:
  0.032920077 = sum of:
    0.032920077 = product of:
      0.065840155 = sum of:
        0.065840155 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065840155 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  10. Lüth, J.: Inhaltserschließung durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer : Ergebnisse eines Tests mit Internetquellen der virtuellen Fachbibliothek EconBiz (2007) 0.01 
    0.006324378 = product of:
  0.03162189 = sum of:
    0.03162189 = weight(_text_:j in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03162189 = score(doc=411,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  11. Spiteri, L.F.: Incorporating facets into social tagging applications : an analysis of current trends (2010) 0.01 
    0.006324378 = product of:
  0.03162189 = sum of:
    0.03162189 = weight(_text_:j in 3561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03162189 = score(doc=3561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 3561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3561)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem special issue: Is there a catalog in your future? Celebrating Nancy J. Williamson: Scholar, educator, colleague, mentor
  12. Mai, J.-E.: Folksonomies and the new order : authority in the digital disorder (2011) 0.01 
    0.006324378 = product of:
  0.03162189 = sum of:
    0.03162189 = weight(_text_:j in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03162189 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  13. Bullard, J.: Curated Folksonomies : three implementations of structure through human judgment (2018) 0.01 
    0.006324378 = product of:
  0.03162189 = sum of:
    0.03162189 = weight(_text_:j in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03162189 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  14. Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval (2008) 0.01 
    0.0057567325 = product of:
  0.028783662 = sum of:
    0.028783662 = weight(_text_:u in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028783662 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Die populären Web 2.0-Dienste werden von Prosumern - Produzenten und gleichsam Konsumenten - nicht nur dazu genutzt, Inhalte zu produzieren, sondern auch, um sie inhaltlich zu erschließen. Folksonomies erlauben es dem Nutzer, Dokumente mit eigenen Schlagworten, sog. Tags, zu beschreiben, ohne dabei auf gewisse Regeln oder Vorgaben achten zu müssen. Neben einigen Vorteilen zeigen Folksonomies aber auch zahlreiche Schwächen (u. a. einen Mangel an Präzision). Um diesen Nachteilen größtenteils entgegenzuwirken, schlagen wir eine Interpretation der Tags als natürlichsprachige Wörter vor. Dadurch ist es uns möglich, Methoden des Natural Language Processing (NLP) auf die Tags anzuwenden und so linguistische Probleme der Tags zu beseitigen. Darüber hinaus diskutieren wir Ansätze und weitere Vorschläge (Tagverteilungen, Kollaboration und akteurspezifische Aspekte) hinsichtlich eines Relevance Rankings von getaggten Dokumenten. Neben Vorschlägen auf ähnliche Dokumente ("more like this!") erlauben Folksonomies auch Hinweise auf verwandte Nutzer und damit auf Communities ("more like me!").
  15. Peters, I.: Folksonomies, social tagging and information retrieval (2011) 0.01 
    0.0057567325 = product of:
  0.028783662 = sum of:
    0.028783662 = weight(_text_:u in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028783662 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Innovations in information retrieval: perspectives for theory and practice. Eds.: A. Foster, u. P. Rafferty
  16. Pera, M.S.; Lund, W.; Ng, Y.-K.: ¬A sophisticated library search strategy using folksonomies and similarity matching (2009) 0.01 
    0.00561633 = product of:
  0.02808165 = sum of:
    0.02808165 = weight(_text_:b in 2939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02808165 = score(doc=2939,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 2939, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2939)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Libraries, private and public, offer valuable resources to library patrons. As of today, the only way to locate information archived exclusively in libraries is through their catalogs. Library patrons, however, often find it difficult to formulate a proper query, which requires using specific keywords assigned to different fields of desired library catalog records, to obtain relevant results. These improperly formulated queries often yield irrelevant results or no results at all. This negative experience in dealing with existing library systems turns library patrons away from directly querying library catalogs; instead, they rely on Web search engines to perform their searches first, and upon obtaining the initial information (e.g., titles, subject headings, or authors) on the desired library materials, they query library catalogs. This searching strategy is an evidence of failure of today's library systems. In solving this problem, we propose an enhanced library system, which allows partial, similarity matching of (a) tags defined by ordinary users at a folksonomy site that describe the content of books and (b) unrestricted keywords specified by an ordinary library patron in a query to search for relevant library catalog records. The proposed library system allows patrons posting a query Q using commonly used words and ranks the retrieved results according to their degrees of resemblance with Q while maintaining the query processing time comparable with that achieved by current library search engines.
  17. Park, H.: ¬A conceptual framework to study folksonomic interaction (2011) 0.01 
    0.00561633 = product of:
  0.02808165 = sum of:
    0.02808165 = weight(_text_:b in 4852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02808165 = score(doc=4852,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 4852, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4852)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper proposes a conceptual framework to recast a folksonomy as a Web classification and to use this to explore the ways in which people work with it in assessing, sharing, and navigating Web resources. The author uses information scent and foraging theory as a context to discuss how folksonomy is constructed through interactions among users, a folksonomic system, and a given domain that consists of a group of users who share the same interest or goals. The discussion centers on two dimensions of folksonomies: (1) folksonomy as a Web classification which puts like information together in a Web context; and (2) folksonomy as information scent which helps users to find related resources and users, and obtain desired information. This paper aims to integrate these two dimensions with a conceptual framework that addresses the structure of a folksonomy shaped by users' interactions. A proposed framework consists of three components of users' interactions with a folksonomy: (a) tagging - cognitive categorization of Web accessible resources by an individual user; (b) navigation - exploration and discovery of Web accessible resources in the folksonomic system; and (c) knowledge sharing - representation and communication of knowledge within a domain. This understanding will help us motivate possible future directions of research in folksonomy. This initial framework will frame a number of research questions and help lay the groundwork for future empirical research which focuses on qualitative analysis of a folksonomy and users' tagging behaviors.
  18. Kim, H.H.: Toward video semantic search based on a structured folksonomy (2011) 0.00 
    0.0047972775 = product of:
  0.023986388 = sum of:
    0.023986388 = weight(_text_:u in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023986388 = score(doc=4350,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  19. Bar-Ilan, J.; Belous, Y.: Children as architects of Web directories : an exploratory study (2007) 0.00 
    0.0045174127 = product of:
  0.022587063 = sum of:
    0.022587063 = weight(_text_:j in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022587063 = score(doc=289,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  20. Cope, J.: Librarianship as intellectual craft : the ethics of classification in the realms of leisure and waged labor (2012) 0.00 
    0.0045174127 = product of:
  0.022587063 = sum of:
    0.022587063 = weight(_text_:j in 421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022587063 = score(doc=421,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 421, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=421)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 22
  • el 4
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications