Search (145 results, page 2 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Assem, M. van; Menken, M.R.; Schreiber, G.; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.: ¬A method for converting thesauri to RDF/OWL (2004) 0.03 
    0.028374478 = product of:
  0.070936196 = sum of:
    0.03162189 = weight(_text_:j in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03162189 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
    0.039314307 = weight(_text_:b in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039314307 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
  2. Fenske, M.: Modell eines automatisierbaren syntaktischen Metathesaurus und seine Eignung für parlamentarische Thesauri im Internet (2006) 0.02 
    0.024992658 = product of:
  0.06248164 = sum of:
    0.028783662 = weight(_text_:u in 32) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028783662 = score(doc=32,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 32, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=32)
    0.033697978 = weight(_text_:b in 32) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033697978 = score(doc=32,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 32, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=32)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Es werden Konzepte eines syntaktischen Metathesaurus, der identische Benennungen und deren Relationen aufeinander abbildet, vorgestellt und von semantischen Metathesauri abgegrenzt. Dieses aus mehreren Konzepten bestehende Modell bietet sich für die automatische Zusammenführung weit gehend übereinstimmender Thesauri zu einem virtuellen Metathesaurus an, den man in Internetportale und Suchmaschinen integrieren kann. Besondere Vorteile sind hierbei das günstige Kosten-Nutzen- Verhältnis und die geringen technischen Anforderungen eines syntaktischen Metathesaurus. Es werden die Inkonsistenzen bei der Zusammenführung inhomogener Thesauri ausführlich beschrieben und Möglichkeiten zur Konsistenzverbesserung angeboten. Ein syntaktisches Thesauruskonzept eignet sich für den Einsatz bei der Websuche in Parlamentsinformationssystemen, wie z. B. dem Parlamentsspiegel, einer Datenbank zum Nachweis der deutschen Parlamentsmaterialien.
    Source
    Vom Wandel der Wissensorganisation im Informationszeitalter: Festschrift für Walther Umstätter zum 65. Geburtstag, hrsg. von P. Hauke u. K. Umlauf
  3. Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997) 0.02 
    0.02323441 = product of:
  0.058086023 = sum of:
    0.036139302 = weight(_text_:j in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036139302 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
    0.02194672 = product of:
      0.04389344 = sum of:
        0.04389344 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04389344 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
  4. Chen, H.; Martinez, J.; Kirchhoff, A.; Ng, T.D.; Schatz, B.R.: Alleviating search uncertainty through concept associations : automatic indexing, co-occurence analysis, and parallel computing (1998) 0.02 
    0.022355257 = product of:
  0.05588814 = sum of:
    0.027104476 = weight(_text_:j in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027104476 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
    0.028783662 = weight(_text_:u in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028783662 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  5. Greenberg, J.: User comprehension and application of information retrieval thesauri (2004) 0.02 
    0.022355257 = product of:
  0.05588814 = sum of:
    0.027104476 = weight(_text_:j in 5008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027104476 = score(doc=5008,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5008, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5008)
    0.028783662 = weight(_text_:u in 5008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028783662 = score(doc=5008,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 5008, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5008)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Auch in: The thesaurus: review, renaissance and revision. Ed. by S.K. Roe u. A.R. Thomas. Binghamton: Haworth 2004.
  6. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.02 
    0.02111373 = product of:
  0.05278432 = sum of:
    0.03358094 = weight(_text_:u in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03358094 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
    0.01920338 = product of:
      0.03840676 = sum of:
        0.03840676 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03840676 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
    Source
    Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
  7. Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction : key issues and selected readings (2004) 0.02 
    0.02111373 = product of:
  0.05278432 = sum of:
    0.03358094 = weight(_text_:u in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03358094 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
    0.01920338 = product of:
      0.03840676 = sum of:
        0.03840676 = weight(_text_:22 in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03840676 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    18. 5.2006 20:06:22
    Footnote
    Auch in: The thesaurus: review, renaissance and revision. Ed. by S.K. Roe u. A.R. Thomas. Binghamton: Haworth 2004.
  8. Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: ¬A bibliometric-based semiautomatic approach to identification of candidate thesaurus terms : parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts (2005) 0.02 
    0.02111373 = product of:
  0.05278432 = sum of:
    0.03358094 = weight(_text_:u in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03358094 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
    0.01920338 = product of:
      0.03840676 = sum of:
        0.03840676 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03840676 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    8. 3.2007 19:55:22
    Source
    Context: nature, impact and role. 5th International Conference an Conceptions of Library and Information Sciences, CoLIS 2005 Glasgow, UK, June 2005. Ed. by F. Crestani u. I. Ruthven
  9. Wang, J.: Automatic thesaurus development : term extraction from title metadata (2006) 0.02 
    0.020267485 = product of:
  0.050668713 = sum of:
    0.022587063 = weight(_text_:j in 5063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022587063 = score(doc=5063,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5063, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5063)
    0.02808165 = weight(_text_:b in 5063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02808165 = score(doc=5063,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 5063, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5063)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The application of thesauri in networked environments is seriously hampered by the challenges of introducing new concepts and terminology into the formal controlled vocabulary, which is critical for enhancing its retrieval capability. The author describes an automated process of adding new terms to thesauri as entry vocabulary by analyzing the association between words/phrases extracted from bibliographic titles and subject descriptors in the metadata record (subject descriptors are terms assigned from controlled vocabularies of thesauri to describe the subjects of the objects [e.g., books, articles] represented by the metadata records). The investigated approach uses a corpus of metadata for scientific and technical (S&T) publications in which the titles contain substantive words for key topics. The three steps of the method are (a) extracting words and phrases from the title field of the metadata; (b) applying a method to identify and select the specific and meaningful keywords based on the associated controlled vocabulary terms from the thesaurus used to catalog the objects; and (c) inserting selected keywords into the thesaurus as new terms (most of them are in hierarchical relationships with the existing concepts), thereby updating the thesaurus with new terminology that is being used in the literature. The effectiveness of the method was demonstrated by an experiment with the Chinese Classification Thesaurus (CCT) and bibliographic data in China Machine-Readable Cataloging Record (MARC) format (CNMARC) provided by Peking University Library. This approach is equally effective in large-scale collections and in other languages.
  10. Kless, D.; Milton, S.; Kazmierczak, E.; Lindenthal, J.: Thesaurus and ontology structure : formal and pragmatic differences and similarities (2015) 0.02 
    0.020267485 = product of:
  0.050668713 = sum of:
    0.022587063 = weight(_text_:j in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022587063 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
    0.02808165 = weight(_text_:b in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02808165 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Thesauri and other types of controlled vocabularies are increasingly re-engineered into ontologies described using the Web Ontology Language (OWL), particularly in the life sciences. This has led to the perception by some that thesauri are ontologies once they are described by using the syntax of OWL while others have emphasized the need to re-engineer a vocabulary to use it as ontology. This confusion is rooted in different perceptions of what ontologies are and how they differ from other types of vocabularies. In this article, we rigorously examine the structural differences and similarities between thesauri and meaning-defining ontologies described in OWL. Specifically, we conduct (a) a conceptual comparison of thesauri and ontologies, and (b) a comparison of a specific thesaurus and a specific ontology in the same subject field. Our results show that thesauri and ontologies need to be treated as 2 orthogonal kinds of models with superficially similar structures. An ontology is not a good thesaurus, nor is a thesaurus a good ontology. A thesaurus requires significant structural and other content changes to become an ontology, and vice versa.
  11. ¬The thesaurus: review, renaissance and revision (2004) 0.02 
    0.01898304 = product of:
  0.0474576 = sum of:
    0.027104476 = weight(_text_:j in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027104476 = score(doc=3243,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
    0.020353124 = weight(_text_:u in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020353124 = score(doc=3243,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.15348957 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Enthält u.a. folgende Aussage von J. Aitchison u. S. Dextre Clarke: "We face a paradox. Ostensibly, the need and the opportunity to apply thesauri to information retrieval are greater than ever before. On the other hand, users resist most efforts to persuade them to apply one. The drive for interoperability of systems means we must design our vocabularies for easy integration into downstream applications such as content management systems, indexing/metatagging interfaces, search engines, and portals. Summarizing the search for vocabularies that work more intuitively, we see that there are trends working in opposite directions. In the hugely popular taxonomies an the one hand, relationships between terms are more loosely defined than in thesauri. In the ontologies that will support computer-to-computer communications in AI applications such as the Semantic Web, we see the need for much more precisely defined term relationships."
    Enthält die Beiträge: Spiteri, L.F.: Word association testing and thesaurus construction: a pilot study. Aitchison, J., S.G. Dextre-Clarke: The Thesaurus: a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future. Thomas, A.R.: Teach yourself thesaurus: exercises, reading, resources. Shearer, J.R.: A practical exercise in building a thesaurus. Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction: key issues and selected readings. Riesland, M.A.: Tools of the trade: vocabulary management software. Will, L.: Thesaurus consultancy. Owens, L.A., P.A. Cochrane: Thesaurus evaluation. Greenberg, J.: User comprehension and application of information retrieval thesauri. Johnson, E.H.: Distributed thesaurus Web services. Thomas, A.R., S.K. Roe: An interview with Dr. Amy J. Warner. Landry, P.: Multilingual subject access: the linking approach of MACS.
    Editor
    Roe, S.K. u. A.R. Thomas
  12. Maille, B.: ¬Les relations sémantiques des thésaurus (1991) 0.02 
    0.017972255 = product of:
  0.089861274 = sum of:
    0.089861274 = weight(_text_:b in 5525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.089861274 = score(doc=5525,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 5525, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5525)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  13. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.02 
    0.017835954 = product of:
  0.044589885 = sum of:
    0.01679047 = weight(_text_:u in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01679047 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.12662244 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
    0.027799416 = weight(_text_:b in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027799416 = score(doc=1800,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.19375575 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  14. Müller, T.: Wissensrepräsentation mit semantischen Netzen im Bereich Luftfahrt (2006) 0.02 
    0.01671934 = product of:
  0.04179835 = sum of:
    0.02808165 = weight(_text_:b in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02808165 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
    0.0137167005 = product of:
      0.027433401 = sum of:
        0.027433401 = weight(_text_:22 in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027433401 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Es ist ein semantisches Netz für den Gegenstandsbereich Luftfahrt modelliert worden, welches Unternehmensinformationen, Organisationen, Fluglinien, Flughäfen, etc. enthält, Diese sind 10 Hauptkategorien zugeordnet worden, die untergliedert nach Facetten sind. Die Begriffe des Gegenstandsbereiches sind mit 23 unterschiedlichen Relationen verknüpft worden (Z. B.: 'hat Standort in', bietet an, 'ist Homebase von', etc). Der Schwerpunkt der Betrachtung liegt auf dem Unterschied zwischen den drei klassischen Standardrelationen und den zusätzlich eingerichteten Relationen, bezüglich ihrem Nutzen für ein effizientes Retrieval. Die angelegten Kategorien und Relationen sind sowohl für eine kognitive als auch für eine maschinelle Verarbeitung geeignet.
    Date
    26. 9.2006 21:00:22
  15. Köper, B.: Vergleich von ausgewählten Thesaurus-Begriffsfeldern hinsichtlich ihrer linguistischen Relation (1990) 0.02 
    0.015725723 = product of:
  0.078628615 = sum of:
    0.078628615 = weight(_text_:b in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.078628615 = score(doc=39,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  16. Will, L.D.: Publications on thesaurus construction and use : including some references to facet analysis, taxonomies, ontologies, topic maps and related issues (2005) 0.02 
    0.015725723 = product of:
  0.078628615 = sum of:
    0.078628615 = weight(_text_:b in 3192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.078628615 = score(doc=3192,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 3192, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3192)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    b
  17. Keitz, W. von: Wissensrepräsentation: Thesaurus : Skript zur Vorlesung (1989) 0.02 
    0.015351288 = product of:
  0.07675644 = sum of:
    0.07675644 = weight(_text_:u in 2231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07675644 = score(doc=2231,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.57884544 = fieldWeight in 2231, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2231)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    u
  18. Hedden, H.: ¬The accidental taxonomist (2012) 0.01 
    0.0149035035 = product of:
  0.03725876 = sum of:
    0.018069651 = weight(_text_:j in 2915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018069651 = score(doc=2915,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 2915, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2915)
    0.01918911 = weight(_text_:u in 2915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01918911 = score(doc=2915,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 2915, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2915)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: IWP 64(2013) H.6, S.373-374 (J. Fassbender)
    Theme
    Grundlagen u. Einführungen: Allgemeine Literatur
  19. Panyr, J.: Thesaurus und wissensbasierte Systeme - Thesauri und Wissensbasen (1988) 0.01 
    0.014455721 = product of:
  0.072278604 = sum of:
    0.072278604 = weight(_text_:j in 22) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.072278604 = score(doc=22,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 22, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=22)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  20. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Nax, K.; Storp, M.: Ideenskizze eines dynamisch konfigurierbaren elektronischen Thesaurus am Beispiel der Sozialwissenschaften (1994) 0.01 
    0.013479191 = product of:
  0.067395955 = sum of:
    0.067395955 = weight(_text_:b in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067395955 = score(doc=112,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 96
  • d 37
  • f 8
  • es 2
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 118
  • m 12
  • el 10
  • s 4
  • n 3
  • b 2
  • r 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • u 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications