Search (44 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Sack, H.; Waitelonis, J.: Zeitbezogene kollaborative Annotation zur Verbesserung der inhaltsbasierten Videosuche (2008) 0.03 
    0.03488829 = product of:
  0.08722072 = sum of:
    0.03162189 = weight(_text_:j in 2890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03162189 = score(doc=2890,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2890, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2890)
    0.055598833 = weight(_text_:b in 2890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055598833 = score(doc=2890,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.3875115 = fieldWeight in 2890, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2890)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Social-Tagging-Systeme ermöglichen die Annotation beliebiger Ressourcen mit nutzerbasierten Metadaten. Ressourcen wurden in diesem Zusammenhang stets als Ganzes betrachtet, ohne dass eine differenzierte Annotation einzelner Ressourcen-Fragmente möglich war. Dies fällt insbesondere bei zeitabhängigen Multimediadaten, wie z. B. Videodaten ins Gewicht, da der Nutzer oft nur an einzelnen Szenen einer umfangreichen Videodatei interessiert ist. Dieser Beitrag stellt eine einfache Möglichkeit der zeitbezogenen, kollaborativen Annotation von Multimediadaten vor und veranschaulicht deren Umsetzung am Beispiel der Videosuchmaschine yovisto.
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  2. Hotho, A.; Jäschke, R.; Benz, D.; Grahl, M.; Krause, B.; Schmitz, C.; Stumme, G.: Social Bookmarking am Beispiel BibSonomy (2009) 0.03 
    0.033323545 = product of:
  0.08330886 = sum of:
    0.03837822 = weight(_text_:u in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03837822 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
    0.044930637 = weight(_text_:b in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044930637 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
  3. Held, C.; Cress, U.: Social Tagging aus kognitionspsychologischer Sicht (2008) 0.03 
    0.029158099 = product of:
  0.072895244 = sum of:
    0.03358094 = weight(_text_:u in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03358094 = score(doc=2885,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
    0.039314307 = weight(_text_:b in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039314307 = score(doc=2885,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  4. Voß, J.: Vom Social Tagging zum Semantic Tagging (2008) 0.03 
    0.028374478 = product of:
  0.070936196 = sum of:
    0.03162189 = weight(_text_:j in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03162189 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
    0.039314307 = weight(_text_:b in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039314307 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  5. Blank, M.; Bopp, T.; Hampel, T.; Schulte, J.: Social Tagging = Soziale Suche? (2008) 0.03 
    0.028374478 = product of:
  0.070936196 = sum of:
    0.03162189 = weight(_text_:j in 2888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03162189 = score(doc=2888,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2888, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2888)
    0.039314307 = weight(_text_:b in 2888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039314307 = score(doc=2888,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 2888, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2888)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  6. Tschetschonig, K.; Ladengruber, R.; Hampel, T.; Schulte, J.: Kollaborative Tagging-Systeme im Electronic Commerce (2008) 0.03 
    0.028374478 = product of:
  0.070936196 = sum of:
    0.03162189 = weight(_text_:j in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03162189 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
    0.039314307 = weight(_text_:b in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039314307 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  7. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.03 
    0.026750943 = product of:
  0.06687736 = sum of:
    0.044930637 = weight(_text_:b in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044930637 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
    0.02194672 = product of:
      0.04389344 = sum of:
        0.04389344 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04389344 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Pages
    S.15-22
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  8. Web-2.0-Dienste als Ergänzung zu algorithmischen Suchmaschinen (2008) 0.02 
    0.024992658 = product of:
  0.06248164 = sum of:
    0.028783662 = weight(_text_:u in 4323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028783662 = score(doc=4323,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 4323, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4323)
    0.033697978 = weight(_text_:b in 4323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033697978 = score(doc=4323,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 4323, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4323)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Mit sozialen Suchdiensten - wie z. B. Yahoo Clever, Lycos iQ oder Mister Wong - ist eine Ergänzung und teilweise sogar eine Konkurrenz zu den bisherigen Ansätzen in der Web-Suche entstanden. Während Google und Co. automatisch generierte Trefferlisten bieten, binden soziale Suchdienste die Anwender zu Generierung der Suchergebnisse in den Suchprozess ein. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird in diesem Buch der Frage nachgegangen, inwieweit soziale Suchdienste mit traditionellen Suchmaschinen konkurrieren oder diese qualitativ ergänzen können. Der vorliegende Band beleuchtet die hier aufgeworfene Fragestellung aus verschiedenen Perspektiven, um auf die Bedeutung von sozialen Suchdiensten zu schließen.
    Editor
    Lewandowski, D. u. C. Maaß
  9. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.02 
    0.023407076 = product of:
  0.058517687 = sum of:
    0.039314307 = weight(_text_:b in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039314307 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
    0.01920338 = product of:
      0.03840676 = sum of:
        0.03840676 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03840676 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  10. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.02 
    0.020063207 = product of:
  0.050158016 = sum of:
    0.033697978 = weight(_text_:b in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033697978 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
    0.016460039 = product of:
      0.032920077 = sum of:
        0.032920077 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032920077 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
    Source
    Semantic digital libraries. Eds.: S.R. Kruk, B. McDaniel
  11. Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009) 0.02 
    0.020063207 = product of:
  0.050158016 = sum of:
    0.033697978 = weight(_text_:b in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033697978 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
    0.016460039 = product of:
      0.032920077 = sum of:
        0.032920077 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032920077 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    b
  12. Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009) 0.02 
    0.020063207 = product of:
  0.050158016 = sum of:
    0.033697978 = weight(_text_:b in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033697978 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
    0.016460039 = product of:
      0.032920077 = sum of:
        0.032920077 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032920077 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    b
  13. Simon, J.: Interdisciplinary knowledge creation : using wikis in science (2006) 0.02 
    0.018629381 = product of:
  0.046573453 = sum of:
    0.022587063 = weight(_text_:j in 2516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022587063 = score(doc=2516,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2516, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2516)
    0.023986388 = weight(_text_:u in 2516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023986388 = score(doc=2516,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2516, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2516)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  14. Lüth, J.: Inhaltserschließung von Internetquellen durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer : Ergebnisse eines Tests mit Internetquellen der Virtuellen Fachbibliothek EconBiz (2009) 0.02 
    0.018629381 = product of:
  0.046573453 = sum of:
    0.022587063 = weight(_text_:j in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022587063 = score(doc=2784,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
    0.023986388 = weight(_text_:u in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023986388 = score(doc=2784,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    EconBiz, die Virtuelle Fachbibliothek Wirtschaftswissenschaften, wird gemeinsam von der Deutschen Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften (ZBW) und der Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln angeboten. Ein zentraler Bestandteil von EconBiz ist der Fachinformationsführer für Internetquellen, der derzeit über 16.000 Datensätze umfasst. Der Fachinformationsführer dient der Recherche nach Internetquellen und frei verfügbaren Volltexten. Die Erschließung dieser Quellen erfolgt arbeitsteilig durch bibliothekarisches und wissenschaftliches Personal im LinkShare System, einem System für die kooperative Erschließung und Verwaltung digitaler Netzobjekte. Nutzerinnen und Nutzer von EconBiz haben die Möglichkeit, Quellen für die Aufnahme in den Fachinformationsführer vorzuschlagen. Eine Beteiligung an der inhaltlichen Erschließung der Quellen erfolgt nicht. In Social-Bookmarking-Portalen wie "deLicio.us", "Furl" oder "Mister Wong" haben Nutzerinnen und Nutzer die Möglichkeit, eigene Listen mit Lesezeichen, englisch "Bookmarks", zu verwalten. Dazu bieten die verschiedenen Anbieter dieser Dienste allerhand nützliche Funktionen, u. a. mit folgenden Merkmalen: - Vergabe von Kategorien oder Schlagworten, so genannten "Tags", - Anlegen privater oder öffentlicher Bookmarks, - Abspeichern einer Version der Quelle. Derzeit üben diese Dienste eine sehr hohe Anziehungskraft auf Nutzerinnen und Nutzer aus, zum einen für die Verwaltung der eigenen Lesezeichen, zum anderen als Instrument für die Recherche nach relevanten Quellen. Mehr über das Potential und die Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Social-Bookmarking-Diensten möchte die ZBW im Rahmen eines Projekts "Inhaltserschließung durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer" erfahren. Dafür wurde über einen begrenzten Zeitraum eine Teilmenge der im EconBiz-Fachinformationsführer enthaltenen Internetquellen in Social-Bookmarking-Webseiten angeboten. Ziel ist es, Erkenntnisse darüber zu gewinnen, in welchem Umfang diese von den Nutzerinnen und Nutzern der Socaial-Bookmarking-Dienste nachgenutzt und um eigene Schlagworte ergänzt werden.
  15. Peters, I.: Folksonomies : indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0 (2009) 0.02 
    0.016661773 = product of:
  0.04165443 = sum of:
    0.01918911 = weight(_text_:u in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01918911 = score(doc=4203,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
    0.022465318 = weight(_text_:b in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022465318 = score(doc=4203,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Zugl.: Düsseldorf, Univ., Diss., 2009 u.d.T.: Peters, Isabella: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval Rez. in: IWP - Information Wissenschaft & Praxis, 61(2010) Heft 8, S.469-470 (U. Spree): "... Nachdem sich die Rezensentin durch 418 Seiten Text hindurch gelesen hat, bleibt sie unentschieden, wie der auffällige Einsatz langer Zitate (im Durchschnitt drei Zitate, die länger als vier kleingedruckte Zeilen sind, pro Seite) zu bewerten ist, zumal die Zitate nicht selten rein illustrativen Charakter haben bzw. Isabella Peters noch einmal zitiert, was sie bereits in eigenen Worten ausgedrückt hat. Redundanz und Verlängerung der Lesezeit halten sich hier die Waage mit der Möglichkeit, dass sich die Leserin einen unmittelbaren Eindruck von Sprache und Duktus der zitierten Literatur verschaffen kann. Eindeutig unschön ist das Beenden eines Gedankens oder einer Argumentation durch ein Zitat (z. B. S. 170). Im deutschen Original entstehen auf diese Weise die für deutsche wissenschaftliche Qualifikationsarbeiten typischen denglischen Texte. Für alle, die sich für Wissensrepräsentation, Information Retrieval und kollaborative Informationsdienste interessieren, ist "Folksonomies : Indexing and Retrieval in Web 2.0" trotz der angeführten kleinen Mängel zur Lektüre und Anschaffung - wegen seines beinahe enzyklopädischen Charakters auch als Nachschlage- oder Referenzwerk geeignet - unbedingt zu empfehlen. Abschließend möchte ich mich in einem Punkt der Produktinfo von de Gruyter uneingeschränkt anschließen: ein "Grundlagenwerk für Folksonomies".
  16. Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008) 0.01 
    0.014521505 = product of:
  0.036303762 = sum of:
    0.022587063 = weight(_text_:j in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022587063 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
    0.0137167005 = product of:
      0.027433401 = sum of:
        0.027433401 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027433401 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  17. Hunter, J.: Collaborative semantic tagging and annotation systems (2009) 0.01 
    0.014455721 = product of:
  0.072278604 = sum of:
    0.072278604 = weight(_text_:j in 7382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.072278604 = score(doc=7382,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 7382, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7382)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  18. Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Scott, J.: Social bookmarking tools (I) : a general review (2005) 0.01 
    0.014187239 = product of:
  0.035468098 = sum of:
    0.015810944 = weight(_text_:j in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015810944 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.12287348 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
    0.019657154 = weight(_text_:b in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019657154 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.13700598 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
  19. Vander Wal, T.: Welcome to the Matrix! (2008) 0.01 
    0.013375471 = product of:
  0.03343868 = sum of:
    0.022465318 = weight(_text_:b in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022465318 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
    0.01097336 = product of:
      0.02194672 = sum of:
        0.02194672 = weight(_text_:22 in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02194672 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2009 9:15:45
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  20. Panke, S.; Gaiser, B.: "With my head up in the clouds" : Social Tagging aus Nutzersicht (2008) 0.01 
    0.009531229 = product of:
  0.04765614 = sum of:
    0.04765614 = weight(_text_:b in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04765614 = score(doc=2883,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049623 = queryNorm
        0.3321527 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a

Authors

Languages

  • d 22
  • e 22

Types

  • a 38
  • el 6
  • m 3
  • b 2
  • s 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications