Search (301 results, page 1 of 16)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. Euzenat, J.; Shvaiko, P.: Ontology matching (2010) 0.17
    0.16857706 = product of:
      0.21072133 = sum of:
        0.0019505285 = product of:
          0.017554756 = sum of:
            0.017554756 = weight(_text_:p in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017554756 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
          0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
        0.0051063686 = weight(_text_:a in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0051063686 = score(doc=168,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
        0.013710184 = weight(_text_:j in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013710184 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
        0.18995425 = sum of:
          0.17330238 = weight(_text_:euzenat in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17330238 = score(doc=168,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.29188806 = queryWeight, product of:
                9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03072615 = queryNorm
              0.5937289 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
          0.016651876 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.016651876 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03072615 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
      0.8 = coord(4/5)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologies are viewed as the silver bullet for many applications, but in open or evolving systems, different parties can adopt different ontologies. This increases heterogeneity problems rather than reducing heterogeneity. This book proposes ontology matching as a solution to the problem of semantic heterogeneity, offering researchers and practitioners a uniform framework of reference to currently available work. The techniques presented apply to database schema matching, catalog integration, XML schema matching and more. Ontologies tend to be found everywhere. They are viewed as the silver bullet for many applications, such as database integration, peer-to-peer systems, e-commerce, semantic web services, or social networks. However, in open or evolving systems, such as the semantic web, different parties would, in general, adopt different ontologies. Thus, merely using ontologies, like using XML, does not reduce heterogeneity: it just raises heterogeneity problems to a higher level. Euzenat and Shvaiko's book is devoted to ontology matching as a solution to the semantic heterogeneity problem faced by computer systems. Ontology matching aims at finding correspondences between semantically related entities of different ontologies. These correspondences may stand for equivalence as well as other relations, such as consequence, subsumption, or disjointness, between ontology entities. Many different matching solutions have been proposed so far from various viewpoints, e.g., databases, information systems, artificial intelligence. With Ontology Matching, researchers and practitioners will find a reference book which presents currently available work in a uniform framework. In particular, the work and the techniques presented in this book can equally be applied to database schema matching, catalog integration, XML schema matching and other related problems. The objectives of the book include presenting (i) the state of the art and (ii) the latest research results in ontology matching by providing a detailed account of matching techniques and matching systems in a systematic way from theoretical, practical and application perspectives.
    Date
    20. 6.2012 19:08:22
  2. Euzenat, J.; Meilicke, C.; Stuckenschmidt, H.; Shvaiko, P.; Trojahn, C.: Ontology alignment evaluation initiative : six years of experience (2011) 0.08
    0.08170893 = product of:
      0.10213616 = sum of:
        0.0024381608 = product of:
          0.021943446 = sum of:
            0.021943446 = weight(_text_:p in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021943446 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
          0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
        0.005970713 = weight(_text_:a in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005970713 = score(doc=161,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
        0.01713773 = weight(_text_:j in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01713773 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
        0.076589555 = product of:
          0.15317911 = sum of:
            0.15317911 = weight(_text_:euzenat in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15317911 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29188806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.5247872 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8 = coord(4/5)
    
    Abstract
    In the area of semantic technologies, benchmarking and systematic evaluation is not yet as established as in other areas of computer science, e.g., information retrieval. In spite of successful attempts, more effort and experience are required in order to achieve such a level of maturity. In this paper, we report results and lessons learned from the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI), a benchmarking initiative for ontology matching. The goal of this work is twofold: on the one hand, we document the state of the art in evaluating ontology matching methods and provide potential participants of the initiative with a better understanding of the design and the underlying principles of the OAEI campaigns. On the other hand, we report experiences gained in this particular area of semantic technologies to potential developers of benchmarking for other kinds of systems. For this purpose, we describe the evaluation design used in the OAEI campaigns in terms of datasets, evaluation criteria and workflows, provide a global view on the results of the campaigns carried out from 2005 to 2010 and discuss upcoming trends, both specific to ontology matching and generally relevant for the evaluation of semantic technologies. Finally, we argue that there is a need for a further automation of benchmarking to shorten the feedback cycle for tool developers.
    Type
    a
  3. Euzenat, J.; Bach, T.Le; Barrasa, J.; Bouquet, P.; Bo, J.De; Dieng, R.; Ehrig, M.; Hauswirth, M.; Jarrar, M.; Lara, R.; Maynard, D.; Napoli, A.; Stamou, G.; Stuckenschmidt, H.; Shvaiko, P.; Tessaris, S.; Acker, S. Van; Zaihrayeu, I.: State of the art on ontology alignment (2004) 0.07
    0.07106829 = product of:
      0.08883536 = sum of:
        0.0027584638 = product of:
          0.024826175 = sum of:
            0.024826175 = weight(_text_:p in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024826175 = score(doc=172,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.22471954 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
          0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
        0.005416122 = weight(_text_:a in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005416122 = score(doc=172,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
        0.019389128 = weight(_text_:j in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019389128 = score(doc=172,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.19859353 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
        0.06127164 = product of:
          0.12254328 = sum of:
            0.12254328 = weight(_text_:euzenat in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12254328 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29188806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.41982973 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8 = coord(4/5)
    
    Abstract
    In this document we provide an overall view of the state of the art in ontology alignment. It is organised as a description of the need for ontology alignment, a presentation of the techniques currently in use for ontology alignment and a presentation of existing systems. The state of the art is not restricted to any discipline and consider as some form of ontology alignment the work made on schema matching within the database area for instance. Heterogeneity problems on the semantic web can be solved, for some of them, by aligning heterogeneous ontologies. This is illustrated through a number of use cases of ontology alignment. Aligning ontologies consists of providing the corresponding entities in these ontologies. This process is precisely defined in deliverable D2.2.1. The current deliverable presents the many techniques currently used for implementing this process. These techniques are classified along the many features that can be found in ontologies (labels, structures, instances, semantics). They resort to many different disciplines such as statistics, machine learning or data analysis. The alignment itself is obtained by combining these techniques towards a particular goal (obtaining an alignment with particular features, optimising some criterion). Several combination techniques are also presented. Finally, these techniques have been experimented in various systems for ontology alignment or schema matching. Several such systems are presented briefly in the last section and characterized by the above techniques they rely on. The conclusion is that many techniques are available for achieving ontology alignment and many systems have been developed based on these techniques. However, few comparisons and few integration is actually provided by these implementations. This deliverable serves as a basis for considering further action along these two lines. It provide a first inventory of what should be evaluated and suggests what evaluation criterion can be used.
    Content
    This document is part of a research project funded by the IST Programme of the Commission of the European Communities as project number IST-2004-507482.
  4. Petras, V.: Heterogenitätsbehandlung und Terminology Mapping durch Crosskonkordanzen : eine Fallstudie (2010) 0.05
    0.05376149 = product of:
      0.06720186 = sum of:
        0.0031594043 = weight(_text_:a in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031594043 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
        0.025479238 = weight(_text_:u in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025479238 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
        0.023992823 = weight(_text_:j in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023992823 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
        0.014570392 = product of:
          0.029140783 = sum of:
            0.029140783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029140783 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8 = coord(4/5)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Type
    a
  5. Mayr, P.; Schaer, P.; Mutschke, P.: ¬A science model driven retrieval prototype (2011) 0.05
    0.04954762 = product of:
      0.061934523 = sum of:
        0.0050676223 = product of:
          0.0456086 = sum of:
            0.0456086 = weight(_text_:p in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0456086 = score(doc=649,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.4128362 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
          0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
        0.005416122 = weight(_text_:a in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005416122 = score(doc=649,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
        0.0308855 = weight(_text_:u in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0308855 = score(doc=649,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.30697915 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
        0.020565277 = weight(_text_:j in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020565277 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
      0.8 = coord(4/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper is about a better understanding of the structure and dynamics of science and the usage of these insights for compensating the typical problems that arises in metadata-driven Digital Libraries. Three science model driven retrieval services are presented: co-word analysis based query expansion, re-ranking via Bradfordizing and author centrality. The services are evaluated with relevance assessments from which two important implications emerge: (1) precision values of the retrieval services are the same or better than the tf-idf retrieval baseline and (2) each service retrieved a disjoint set of documents. The different services each favor quite other - but still relevant - documents than pure term-frequency based rankings. The proposed models and derived retrieval services therefore open up new viewpoints on the scientific knowledge space and provide an alternative framework to structure scholarly information systems.
    Source
    Concepts in context: Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010. Eds.: F. Boteram, W. Gödert u. J. Hubrich
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  6. Boteram, F.; Hubrich, J.: Towards a comprehensive international Knowledge Organization System (2008) 0.04
    0.04426075 = product of:
      0.073767915 = sum of:
        0.0076595526 = weight(_text_:a in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076595526 = score(doc=4786,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
        0.041130554 = weight(_text_:j in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041130554 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
        0.024977813 = product of:
          0.049955625 = sum of:
            0.049955625 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049955625 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2008 19:30:41
    Type
    a
  7. Hubrich, J.: Multilinguale Wissensorganisation im Zeitalter der Globalisierung : das Projekt CrissCross (2010) 0.04
    0.044080004 = product of:
      0.055100005 = sum of:
        0.0022567173 = weight(_text_:a in 4793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0022567173 = score(doc=4793,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 4793, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4793)
        0.018199457 = weight(_text_:u in 4793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018199457 = score(doc=4793,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4793, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4793)
        0.02423641 = weight(_text_:j in 4793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02423641 = score(doc=4793,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 4793, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4793)
        0.010407423 = product of:
          0.020814845 = sum of:
            0.020814845 = weight(_text_:22 in 4793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020814845 = score(doc=4793,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4793, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4793)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8 = coord(4/5)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Type
    a
  8. Hubrich, J.: Intersystem relations : Characteristics and functionalities (2011) 0.04
    0.043802254 = product of:
      0.073003754 = sum of:
        0.0051063686 = weight(_text_:a in 4780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0051063686 = score(doc=4780,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4780, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4780)
        0.029119128 = weight(_text_:u in 4780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029119128 = score(doc=4780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4780)
        0.038778257 = weight(_text_:j in 4780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038778257 = score(doc=4780,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.39718705 = fieldWeight in 4780, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4780)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Within the frame of the methodological support of the CrissCross project and the research conducted in the Reseda project, a tiered model of semantic interoperability was developed. This correlates methods of establishing semantic interoperability and types of intersystem relations to search functionalities in retrieval scenarios. In this article the model is outlined and exemplified with reference to respective selective alignment projects.
    Source
    Concepts in context: Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010. Eds.: F. Boteram, W. Gödert u. J. Hubrich
    Type
    a
  9. Hubrich, J.: Semantische Interoperabilität zwischen Klassifikationen und anderen Wissenssystemen (2018) 0.04
    0.043327074 = product of:
      0.07221179 = sum of:
        0.0036107479 = weight(_text_:a in 4272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0036107479 = score(doc=4272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4272)
        0.041180667 = weight(_text_:u in 4272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041180667 = score(doc=4272,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.40930554 = fieldWeight in 4272, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4272)
        0.027420368 = weight(_text_:j in 4272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027420368 = score(doc=4272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 4272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4272)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Source
    Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken: Theorie - Anwendung - Nutzen. Hrsg. H. Alex, G. Bee u. U. Junger
    Type
    a
  10. Balakrishnan, U.; Voß, J.; Soergel, D.: Towards integrated systems for KOS management, mapping, and access : Coli-conc and its collaborative computer-assisted KOS mapping tool Cocoda (2018) 0.04
    0.043327074 = product of:
      0.07221179 = sum of:
        0.0036107479 = weight(_text_:a in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0036107479 = score(doc=4825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
        0.041180667 = weight(_text_:u in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041180667 = score(doc=4825,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.40930554 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
        0.027420368 = weight(_text_:j in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027420368 = score(doc=4825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
    Type
    a
  11. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.04
    0.040788814 = product of:
      0.050986018 = sum of:
        0.021184148 = product of:
          0.19065733 = sum of:
            0.19065733 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19065733 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3256442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
        0.0022567173 = weight(_text_:a in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0022567173 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.01713773 = weight(_text_:j in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01713773 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.010407423 = product of:
          0.020814845 = sum of:
            0.020814845 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020814845 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8 = coord(4/5)
    
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
    Type
    a
  12. Jacobs, J.-H.; Mengel, T.; Müller, K.: Insights and Outlooks : a retrospective view on the CrissCross project (2011) 0.04
    0.03832697 = product of:
      0.06387828 = sum of:
        0.0044680727 = weight(_text_:a in 4785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044680727 = score(doc=4785,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 4785, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4785)
        0.025479238 = weight(_text_:u in 4785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025479238 = score(doc=4785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 4785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4785)
        0.033930976 = weight(_text_:j in 4785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033930976 = score(doc=4785,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 4785, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4785)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Source
    Concepts in context: Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010. Eds.: F. Boteram, W. Gödert u. J. Hubrich
    Type
    a
  13. Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000) 0.03
    0.032892108 = product of:
      0.054820176 = sum of:
        0.0063188085 = weight(_text_:a in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063188085 = score(doc=759,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
        0.033930976 = weight(_text_:j in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033930976 = score(doc=759,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
        0.014570392 = product of:
          0.029140783 = sum of:
            0.029140783 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029140783 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    XML will have a profound impact on the way data is exchanged on the Internet. An important feature of this language is the separation of content from presentation, which makes it easier to select and/or reformat the data. However, due to the likelihood of numerous industry and domain specific DTDs, those who wish to integrate information will still be faced with the problem of semantic interoperability. In this paper we discuss why this problem is not solved by XML, and then discuss why the Resource Description Framework is only a partial solution. We then present the SHOE language, which we feel has many of the features necessary to enable a semantic web, and describe an existing set of tools that make it easy to use the language.
    Date
    11. 5.2013 19:22:18
    Type
    a
  14. Balakrishnan, U.; Peters, S.; Voß, J.: Coli-conc : eine Infrastruktur zur Nutzung und Erstellung von Konkordanzen (2021) 0.03
    0.031578884 = product of:
      0.052631468 = sum of:
        0.0031594043 = weight(_text_:a in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031594043 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
        0.025479238 = weight(_text_:u in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025479238 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
        0.023992823 = weight(_text_:j in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023992823 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Type
    a
  15. Boteram, F.: Integrating semantic interoperability into FRSAD (2011) 0.03
    0.029076021 = product of:
      0.048460033 = sum of:
        0.0060554086 = weight(_text_:a in 4791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0060554086 = score(doc=4791,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 4791, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4791)
        0.021839347 = weight(_text_:u in 4791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021839347 = score(doc=4791,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 4791, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4791)
        0.020565277 = weight(_text_:j in 4791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020565277 = score(doc=4791,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4791, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4791)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Since its launch in 1998, the initiative introducing the Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Records (FRBR) has provided and established a new standar for the representation of bibliographic data. Following the success of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, a number of related modules have been developed, complementing the initial standard. One of the most recent and promising efforts in this field is the initiative surrounding the development and approval of the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD). FRSAD is a specification of the requirements for modelling subject authority data, based on a conceptual model, which combines various theoretical aspects and technical modelling strategies. This article analyses the model's adaptability and appropriateness in an environment of heterogeneous and distributed systems and makes some suggestions for further improvements.
    Source
    Concepts in context: Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010. Eds.: F. Boteram, W. Gödert u. J. Hubrich
    Type
    a
  16. Dobrev, P.; Kalaydjiev, O.; Angelova, G.: From conceptual structures to semantic interoperability of content (2007) 0.03
    0.02887297 = product of:
      0.036091212 = sum of:
        0.0024381608 = product of:
          0.021943446 = sum of:
            0.021943446 = weight(_text_:p in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021943446 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
          0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
        0.005046174 = weight(_text_:a in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005046174 = score(doc=4607,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
        0.018199457 = weight(_text_:u in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018199457 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
        0.010407423 = product of:
          0.020814845 = sum of:
            0.020814845 = weight(_text_:22 in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020814845 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8 = coord(4/5)
    
    Abstract
    Smart applications behave intelligently because they understand at least partially the context where they operate. To do this, they need not only a formal domain model but also formal descriptions of the data they process and their own operational behaviour. Interoperability of smart applications is based on formalised definitions of all their data and processes. This paper studies the semantic interoperability of data in the case of eLearning and describes an experiment and its assessment. New content is imported into a knowledge-based learning environment without real updates of the original domain model, which is encoded as a knowledge base of conceptual graphs. A component called mediator enables the import by assigning dummy metadata annotations for the imported items. However, some functionality of the original system is lost, when processing the imported content, due to the lack of proper metadata annotation which cannot be associated fully automatically. So the paper presents an interoperability scenario when appropriate content items are viewed from the perspective of the original world and can be (partially) reused there.
    Source
    Conceptual structures: knowledge architectures for smart applications: 15th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2007, Sheffield, UK, July 22 - 27, 2007 ; proceedings. Eds.: U. Priss u.a
    Type
    a
  17. Panzer, M.: Two tales of a concept : aligning FRSAD with SKOS (2011) 0.03
    0.028692449 = product of:
      0.047820747 = sum of:
        0.005416122 = weight(_text_:a in 4789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005416122 = score(doc=4789,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4789, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4789)
        0.021839347 = weight(_text_:u in 4789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021839347 = score(doc=4789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 4789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4789)
        0.020565277 = weight(_text_:j in 4789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020565277 = score(doc=4789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4789)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The FRSAD model provides an abstract analysis of subject authority data. The article tries to assess the compatibility of this conceptual framework with formalisms and practices that have emerged from the Semantic Web community. Through applying SKOS, it becomes apparent that some interpretive decisions necessary to accommodate the rigor of formal knowledge representation languages are not supported by FRSAD itself. Difficulties in clearly aligning the thema entity with either a SKOS or OWL counterpart reveal ambiguities in the FRSAD model regarding the ontological status of thema, which seems to reflect a general uncertainty regarding the aboutness of subject authority data in the library domain.
    Source
    Concepts in context: Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010. Eds.: F. Boteram, W. Gödert u. J. Hubrich
    Type
    a
  18. Hubrich, J.: CrissCross: SWD-DDC-Mapping (2008) 0.03
    0.028609797 = product of:
      0.047682993 = sum of:
        0.0036107479 = weight(_text_:a in 2175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0036107479 = score(doc=2175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2175)
        0.027420368 = weight(_text_:j in 2175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027420368 = score(doc=2175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 2175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2175)
        0.016651876 = product of:
          0.033303753 = sum of:
            0.033303753 = weight(_text_:22 in 2175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033303753 = score(doc=2175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03072615 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 10:35:21
    Type
    a
  19. Sieglerschmidt, J.: Convergence of internet services in the cultural heritage sector : the long way to common vocabularies, metadata formats, ontologies (2008) 0.03
    0.028257074 = product of:
      0.04709512 = sum of:
        0.004690499 = weight(_text_:a in 1686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004690499 = score(doc=1686,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1686, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1686)
        0.021839347 = weight(_text_:u in 1686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021839347 = score(doc=1686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1686)
        0.020565277 = weight(_text_:j in 1686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020565277 = score(doc=1686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 1686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1686)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Since several years it has been observed that information offered by different knowledge producing institutions on the internet is more and more interlinked. This tendency will increase, because the fragmented information offers on the internet make the retrieval of information difficult as even impossible. At the same time the quantity of information offered on the internet grows exponentially in Europe - and elsewhere - due to many digitization projects. Insofar as funding institutions base the acceptance of projects on the observation of certain documentation standards the knowledge created will be retrievable and will remain so for a longer time. Otherwise the retrieval of information will become a matter of chance due to the limits of fragmented, knowledge producing social groups.
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  20. Soergel, D.: Conceptual foundations for semantic mapping and semantic search (2011) 0.03
    0.028257074 = product of:
      0.04709512 = sum of:
        0.004690499 = weight(_text_:a in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004690499 = score(doc=3939,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
        0.021839347 = weight(_text_:u in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021839347 = score(doc=3939,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
        0.020565277 = weight(_text_:j in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020565277 = score(doc=3939,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03072615 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article proposes an approach to mapping between Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS), including ontologies, classifications, taxonomies, and thesauri and even natural languages, that is based on deep semantics. In this approach, concepts in each KOS are expressed through canonical expressions, such as description logic formulas, that combine atomic (or elemental) concepts drawn from a core classification. Relationships between concepts within or across KOS can then be derived by reasoning over the canonical expressions. The canonical expressions can also be used to provide a facet-based query formulation front-end for free-text search. The article illustrates this approach through many examples. It presents methods for the efficient construction of canonical expressions (linguistic analysis, exploiting information in the KOS and their hierarchies, and crowdsourcing) that make this approach feasible.
    Source
    Concepts in context: Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010. Eds.: F. Boteram, W. Gödert u. J. Hubrich
    Type
    a

Years

Languages

  • e 225
  • d 71
  • no 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 219
  • el 89
  • m 14
  • x 8
  • r 5
  • s 5
  • p 2
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects