-
Voß, J.: Classification of knowledge organization systems with Wikidata (2016)
0.13
0.12561692 = product of:
0.16748923 = sum of:
0.0060341097 = weight(_text_:e in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060341097 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
0.06429735 = weight(_text_:et in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06429735 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
0.09715778 = sum of:
0.061342683 = weight(_text_:al in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061342683 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
0.035815097 = weight(_text_:22 in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035815097 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15428185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Language
- e
- Pages
- S.15-22
- Source
- Proceedings of the 15th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems Workshop (NKOS 2016) co-located with the 20th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries 2016 (TPDL 2016), Hannover, Germany, September 9, 2016. Edi. by Philipp Mayr et al. [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1676/=urn:nbn:de:0074-1676-5]
-
Leskinen, P.; Hyvönen, E.: Extracting genealogical networks of linked data from biographical texts (2019)
0.09
0.09056443 = product of:
0.12075257 = sum of:
0.009955773 = weight(_text_:e in 5798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009955773 = score(doc=5798,freq=4.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.15721233 = fieldWeight in 5798, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5798)
0.07501357 = weight(_text_:et in 5798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07501357 = score(doc=5798,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 5798, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5798)
0.03578323 = product of:
0.07156646 = sum of:
0.07156646 = weight(_text_:al in 5798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07156646 = score(doc=5798,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 5798, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5798)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Language
- e
- Source
- ¬The Semantic Web: ESWC 2019 Satellite Events. ESWC 2019. Ed.: P. Hitzler et al
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬The nature of browsing (2019)
0.09
0.088377446 = product of:
0.117836595 = sum of:
0.0070397947 = weight(_text_:e in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070397947 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
0.07501357 = weight(_text_:et in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07501357 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
0.03578323 = product of:
0.07156646 = sum of:
0.07156646 = weight(_text_:al in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07156646 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- The recent article by McKay et al. on browsing (2019) provides a valuable addition to the empirical literature of information science on this topic, and I read the descriptions of the various browsing cases with interest. However, the authors refer to my article on browsing (Bates, 2007) in ways that do not make sense to me and which do not at all conform to what I actually said.
- Language
- e
-
Hirsch, C.C.: InterBRAIN : topographical atlas of the anatomy of the human CNS (1998)
0.09
0.088377446 = product of:
0.117836595 = sum of:
0.0070397947 = weight(_text_:e in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070397947 = score(doc=822,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
0.07501357 = weight(_text_:et in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07501357 = score(doc=822,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
0.03578323 = product of:
0.07156646 = sum of:
0.07156646 = weight(_text_:al in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07156646 = score(doc=822,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- The intricate 3D structure of the CNS lends itself to multimedia presentation, and is depicted here by way of dynamic 3D models that can be freely rotated, and in over 200 illustrations taken from the successful book "The Human Central Nervous System" by R. Nieuwenhuys et al, allowing the user to explore all aspects of this complex and fascinating subject. All this fully hyperlinked with over 2000 specialist terms. Optimal exam revision is guaranteed with the self-study option. For further information please contact: http://www.brainmedia.de/html/frames/pr/pr<BL>5/pr<BL>5<BL>02.html
- Language
- e
-
Tunkelang, D.: Dynamic category sets : an approach for faceted search (2006)
0.09
0.088377446 = product of:
0.117836595 = sum of:
0.0070397947 = weight(_text_:e in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070397947 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
0.07501357 = weight(_text_:et in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07501357 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
0.03578323 = product of:
0.07156646 = sum of:
0.07156646 = weight(_text_:al in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07156646 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- In this paper, we present Dynamic Category Sets, a novel approach that addresses the vocabulary problem for faceted data. In their paper on the vocabulary problem, Furnas et al. note that "the keywords that are assigned by indexers are often at odds with those tried by searchers." Faceted search systems exhibit an interesting aspect of this problem: users do not necessarily understand an information space in terms of the same facets as the indexers who designed it. Our approach addresses this problem by employing a data-driven approach to discover sets of values across multiple facets that best match the query. When there are multiple candidates, we offer a clarification dialog that allows the user to disambiguate them.
- Language
- e
-
Wordhoard (o.J.)
0.09
0.088377446 = product of:
0.117836595 = sum of:
0.0070397947 = weight(_text_:e in 3922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070397947 = score(doc=3922,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 3922, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3922)
0.07501357 = weight(_text_:et in 3922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07501357 = score(doc=3922,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 3922, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3922)
0.03578323 = product of:
0.07156646 = sum of:
0.07156646 = weight(_text_:al in 3922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07156646 = score(doc=3922,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 3922, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3922)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- WordHoard defines a multiword unit as a special type of collocate in which the component words comprise a meaningful phrase. For example, "Knight of the Round Table" is a meaningful multiword unit or phrase. WordHoard uses the notion of a pseudo-bigram to generalize the computation of bigram (two word) statistical measures to phrases (n-grams) longer than two words, and to allow comparisons of these measures for phrases with different word counts. WordHoard applies the localmaxs algorithm of Silva et al. to the pseudo-bigrams to identify potential compositional phrases that "stand out" in a text. WordHoard can also filter two and three word phrases using the word class filters suggested by Justeson and Katz.
- Language
- e
-
WordHoard: finding multiword units (20??)
0.09
0.088377446 = product of:
0.117836595 = sum of:
0.0070397947 = weight(_text_:e in 1123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070397947 = score(doc=1123,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 1123, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1123)
0.07501357 = weight(_text_:et in 1123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07501357 = score(doc=1123,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 1123, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1123)
0.03578323 = product of:
0.07156646 = sum of:
0.07156646 = weight(_text_:al in 1123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07156646 = score(doc=1123,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 1123, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1123)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- WordHoard defines a multiword unit as a special type of collocate in which the component words comprise a meaningful phrase. For example, "Knight of the Round Table" is a meaningful multiword unit or phrase. WordHoard uses the notion of a pseudo-bigram to generalize the computation of bigram (two word) statistical measures to phrases (n-grams) longer than two words, and to allow comparisons of these measures for phrases with different word counts. WordHoard applies the localmaxs algorithm of Silva et al. to the pseudo-bigrams to identify potential compositional phrases that "stand out" in a text. WordHoard can also filter two and three word phrases using the word class filters suggested by Justeson and Katz.
- Language
- e
-
Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2017)
0.09
0.08771258 = product of:
0.1169501 = sum of:
0.0050284253 = weight(_text_:e in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050284253 = score(doc=3868,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
0.075775154 = weight(_text_:et in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075775154 = score(doc=3868,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.3665629 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
0.03614652 = product of:
0.07229304 = sum of:
0.07229304 = weight(_text_:al in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07229304 = score(doc=3868,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.3580415 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This paper reports on an analysis of the loss levels that would result if a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI), were missing the subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by its professional indexers, employing the methodology developed by Gross and Taylor (2005), and later by Gross et al. (2015). The results indicate that AEI users would lose a similar proportion of hits per query to that experienced by library catalog users: on average, 27% of the resources found by a sample of keyword queries on the AEI database would not have been found without the subject indexing, based on the Australian Thesaurus of Education Descriptors (ATED). The paper also discusses the methodological limitations of these studies, pointing out that real-life users might still find some of the resources missed by a particular query through follow-up searches, while additional resources might also be found through iterative searching on the subject vocabulary. The paper goes on to describe a new research design, based on a before - and - after experiment, which addresses some of these limitations. It is argued that this alternative design will provide a more realistic picture of the value that professionally assigned subject indexing and controlled subject vocabularies can add to literature searching of a more scholarly and thorough kind.
- Language
- e
-
Patton, M.; Reynolds, D.; Choudhury, G.S.; DiLauro, T.: Toward a metadata generation framework : a case study at Johns Hopkins University (2004)
0.09
0.08526236 = product of:
0.11368314 = sum of:
0.00402274 = weight(_text_:e in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00402274 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.07424419 = weight(_text_:et in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07424419 = score(doc=1192,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.35915685 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.035416216 = product of:
0.07083243 = sum of:
0.07083243 = weight(_text_:al in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07083243 = score(doc=1192,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.3508076 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- In the June 2003 issue of D-Lib Magazine, Kenney et al. (2003) discuss a comparative study between Cornell's email reference staff and Google's Answers service. This interesting study provided insights on the potential impact of "computing and simple algorithms combined with human intelligence" for library reference services. As mentioned in the Kenney et al. article, Bill Arms (2000) had discussed the possibilities of automated digital libraries in an even earlier D-Lib article. Arms discusses not only automating reference services, but also another library function that seems to inspire lively debates about automation-metadata creation. While intended to illuminate, these debates sometimes generate more heat than light. In an effort to explore the potential for automating metadata generation, the Digital Knowledge Center (DKC) of the Sheridan Libraries at The Johns Hopkins University developed and tested an automated name authority control (ANAC) tool. ANAC represents a component of a digital workflow management system developed in connection with the digital Lester S. Levy Collection of Sheet Music. The evaluation of ANAC followed the spirit of the Kenney et al. study that was, as they stated, "more exploratory than scientific." These ANAC evaluation results are shared with the hope of fostering constructive dialogue and discussions about the potential for semi-automated techniques or frameworks for library functions and services such as metadata creation. The DKC's research agenda emphasizes the development of tools that combine automated processes and human intervention, with the overall goal of involving humans at higher levels of analysis and decision-making. Others have looked at issues regarding the automated generation of metadata. A session at the 2003 Joint Conference on Digital Libraries was devoted to automatic metadata creation, and a session at the 2004 conference addressed automated name disambiguation. Commercial vendors such as OCLC, Marcive, and LTI have long used automated techniques for matching names to Library of Congress authority records. We began developing ANAC as a component of a larger suite of open source tools to support workflow management for digital projects. This article describes the goals for the ANAC tool, provides an overview of the metadata records used for testing, describes the architecture for ANAC, and concludes with discussions of the methodology and evaluation of the experiment comparing human cataloging and ANAC-generated results.
- Language
- e
-
Rauber, A.: Digital preservation in data-driven science : on the importance of process capture, preservation and validation (2012)
0.08
0.07762666 = product of:
0.103502214 = sum of:
0.008533521 = weight(_text_:e in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008533521 = score(doc=469,freq=4.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
0.06429735 = weight(_text_:et in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06429735 = score(doc=469,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
0.030671341 = product of:
0.061342683 = sum of:
0.061342683 = weight(_text_:al in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061342683 = score(doc=469,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Current digital preservation is strongly biased towards data objects: digital files of document-style objects, or encapsulated and largely self-contained objects. To provide authenticity and provenance information, comprehensive metadata models are deployed to document information on an object's context. Yet, we claim that simply documenting an objects context may not be sufficient to ensure proper provenance and to fulfill the stated preservation goals. Specifically in e-Science and business settings, capturing, documenting and preserving entire processes may be necessary to meet the preservation goals. We thus present an approach for capturing, documenting and preserving processes, and means to assess their authenticity upon re-execution. We will discuss options as well as limitations and open challenges to achieve sound preservation, speci?cally within scientific processes.
- Language
- e
- Source
- Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Digital Archives held in conjunction with the 16th Int. Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL) on September 27, 2012 in Paphos, Cyprus [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-912/proceedings.pdf]. Eds.: A. Mitschik et al
-
Auer, S.; Bizer, C.; Kobilarov, G.; Lehmann, J.; Cyganiak, R.; Ives, Z.: DBpedia: a nucleus for a Web of open data (2007)
0.08
0.075752094 = product of:
0.1010028 = sum of:
0.0060341097 = weight(_text_:e in 4260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060341097 = score(doc=4260,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4260, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4260)
0.06429735 = weight(_text_:et in 4260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06429735 = score(doc=4260,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 4260, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4260)
0.030671341 = product of:
0.061342683 = sum of:
0.061342683 = weight(_text_:al in 4260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061342683 = score(doc=4260,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 4260, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4260)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Language
- e
- Source
- ¬The Semantic Web : 6th International Semantic Web Conference, 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2007 + ASWC 2007, Busan, Korea, November 11-15, 2007 : proceedings. Ed.: Karl Aberer et al
-
Halpin, H.; Hayes, P.J.; McCusker, J.P.; McGuinness, D.L.; Thompson, H.S.: When owl:sameAs isn't the same : an analysis of identity in linked data (2010)
0.08
0.075752094 = product of:
0.1010028 = sum of:
0.0060341097 = weight(_text_:e in 4703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060341097 = score(doc=4703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4703)
0.06429735 = weight(_text_:et in 4703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06429735 = score(doc=4703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 4703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4703)
0.030671341 = product of:
0.061342683 = sum of:
0.061342683 = weight(_text_:al in 4703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061342683 = score(doc=4703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 4703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Language
- e
- Source
- The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010. 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. Eds.: Peter F. Patel-Schneider et al
-
Halpin, H.; Hayes, P.J.: When owl:sameAs isn't the same : an analysis of identity links on the Semantic Web (2010)
0.08
0.075752094 = product of:
0.1010028 = sum of:
0.0060341097 = weight(_text_:e in 4834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060341097 = score(doc=4834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4834)
0.06429735 = weight(_text_:et in 4834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06429735 = score(doc=4834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 4834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4834)
0.030671341 = product of:
0.061342683 = sum of:
0.061342683 = weight(_text_:al in 4834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061342683 = score(doc=4834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 4834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Linked Data on the Web (LDOW2010). Proceedings of the WWW2010 Workshop on Linked Data on the Web. Raleigh, USA, April 27, 2010. Edited by Christian Bizer et al
-
Ruhl, M.: Do we need metadata? : an on-line survey in German archives (2012)
0.08
0.075752094 = product of:
0.1010028 = sum of:
0.0060341097 = weight(_text_:e in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060341097 = score(doc=471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
0.06429735 = weight(_text_:et in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06429735 = score(doc=471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
0.030671341 = product of:
0.061342683 = sum of:
0.061342683 = weight(_text_:al in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061342683 = score(doc=471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Digital Archives held in conjunction with the 16th Int. Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL) on September 27, 2012 in Paphos, Cyprus [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-912/proceedings.pdf]. Eds.: A. Mitschik et al
-
Voigt, M.; Mitschick, A.; Schulz, J.: Yet another triple store benchmark? : practical experiences with real-world data (2012)
0.08
0.075752094 = product of:
0.1010028 = sum of:
0.0060341097 = weight(_text_:e in 476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060341097 = score(doc=476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=476)
0.06429735 = weight(_text_:et in 476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06429735 = score(doc=476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=476)
0.030671341 = product of:
0.061342683 = sum of:
0.061342683 = weight(_text_:al in 476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061342683 = score(doc=476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=476)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Digital Archives held in conjunction with the 16th Int. Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL) on September 27, 2012 in Paphos, Cyprus [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-912/proceedings.pdf]. Eds.: A. Mitschik et al
-
Zadeh, B.Q.; Handschuh, S.: ¬The ACL RD-TEC : a dataset for benchmarking terminology extraction and classification in computational linguistics (2014)
0.08
0.075752094 = product of:
0.1010028 = sum of:
0.0060341097 = weight(_text_:e in 2803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060341097 = score(doc=2803,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2803, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2803)
0.06429735 = weight(_text_:et in 2803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06429735 = score(doc=2803,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 2803, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2803)
0.030671341 = product of:
0.061342683 = sum of:
0.061342683 = weight(_text_:al in 2803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061342683 = score(doc=2803,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 2803, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2803)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Computational Terminology, Dublin, Ireland, August 23 2014. COLING 2014. Eds.: Patrick Drouin et al., Dublin, Ireland, 2014-08-23 [https://www.deri.ie/sites/default/files/publications/the-acl-rd-tec.pdf]
-
Gnoli, C.; Pusterla, L.; Bendiscioli, A.; Recinella, C.: Classification for collections mapping and query expansion (2016)
0.08
0.075752094 = product of:
0.1010028 = sum of:
0.0060341097 = weight(_text_:e in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060341097 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
0.06429735 = weight(_text_:et in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06429735 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
0.030671341 = product of:
0.061342683 = sum of:
0.061342683 = weight(_text_:al in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061342683 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Proceedings of the 15th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems Workshop (NKOS 2016) co-located with the 20th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries 2016 (TPDL 2016), Hannover, Germany, September 9, 2016. Edi. by Philipp Mayr et al. [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1676/=urn:nbn:de:0074-1676-5]
-
Manguinhas, H.; Charles, V.; Isaac, A.; Miles, T.; Lima, A.; Neroulidis, A.; Ginouves, V.; Atsidis, D.; Hildebrand, M.; Brinkerink, M.; Gordea, S.: Linking subject labels in cultural heritage metadata to MIMO vocabulary using CultuurLink (2016)
0.08
0.075752094 = product of:
0.1010028 = sum of:
0.0060341097 = weight(_text_:e in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060341097 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
0.06429735 = weight(_text_:et in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06429735 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
0.030671341 = product of:
0.061342683 = sum of:
0.061342683 = weight(_text_:al in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061342683 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Proceedings of the 15th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems Workshop (NKOS 2016) co-located with the 20th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries 2016 (TPDL 2016), Hannover, Germany, September 9, 2016. Edi. by Philipp Mayr et al. [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1676/=urn:nbn:de:0074-1676-5]
-
Wu, Y.; Bai, R.: ¬An event relationship model for knowledge organization and visualization (2017)
0.08
0.075752094 = product of:
0.1010028 = sum of:
0.0060341097 = weight(_text_:e in 3867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060341097 = score(doc=3867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 3867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3867)
0.06429735 = weight(_text_:et in 3867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06429735 = score(doc=3867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 3867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3867)
0.030671341 = product of:
0.061342683 = sum of:
0.061342683 = weight(_text_:al in 3867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061342683 = score(doc=3867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 3867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3867)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- An event is a specific occurrence involving participants, which is a typed, n-ary association of entities or other events, each identified as a participant in a specific semantic role in the event (Pyysalo et al. 2012; Linguistic Data Consortium 2005). Event types may vary across domains. Representing relationships between events can facilitate the understanding of knowledge in complex systems (such as economic systems, human body, social systems). In the simplest form, an event can be represented as Entity A <Relation> Entity B. This paper evaluates several knowledge organization and visualization models and tools, such as concept maps (Cmap), topic maps (Ontopia), network analysis models (Gephi), and ontology (Protégé), then proposes an event relationship model that aims to integrate the strengths of these models, and can represent complex knowledge expressed in events and their relationships.
- Language
- e
-
Hyvönen, E.; Leskinen, P.; Tamper, M.; Keravuori, K.; Rantala, H.; Ikkala, E.; Tuominen, J.: BiographySampo - publishing and enriching biographies on the Semantic Web for digital humanities research (2019)
0.07
0.06588755 = product of:
0.087850064 = sum of:
0.0087094875 = weight(_text_:e in 5799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0087094875 = score(doc=5799,freq=6.0), product of:
0.063326925 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.13753214 = fieldWeight in 5799, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5799)
0.053581126 = weight(_text_:et in 5799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053581126 = score(doc=5799,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20671801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 5799, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5799)
0.02555945 = product of:
0.0511189 = sum of:
0.0511189 = weight(_text_:al in 5799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0511189 = score(doc=5799,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20191248 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0440575 = queryNorm
0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 5799, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5799)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Footnote
- Volltext unter: hyvonen-et-al-eswc-2019.pdf.
- Language
- e
