Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Soergel, D."
  1. Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018) 0.08
    0.07520599 = product of:
      0.11280898 = sum of:
        0.016439613 = product of:
          0.049318835 = sum of:
            0.049318835 = weight(_text_:f in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049318835 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009566996 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
        0.015249942 = weight(_text_:und in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015249942 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
        0.015476737 = weight(_text_:for in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015476737 = score(doc=4721,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
        0.010929092 = weight(_text_:the in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010929092 = score(doc=4721,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.19722053 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
        0.015182858 = weight(_text_:of in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015182858 = score(doc=4721,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
        0.010929092 = weight(_text_:the in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010929092 = score(doc=4721,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.19722053 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
        0.019034648 = product of:
          0.038069297 = sum of:
            0.038069297 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038069297 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(8/12)
    
    Date
    17. 1.2019 19:04:22
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Soergel, D.: Unleashing the power of data through organization : structure and connections for meaning, learning and discovery (2015) 0.07
    0.073624656 = product of:
      0.14724931 = sum of:
        0.008456109 = weight(_text_:information in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008456109 = score(doc=2376,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
        0.021629399 = weight(_text_:for in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021629399 = score(doc=2376,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.32799318 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
        0.01527387 = weight(_text_:the in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01527387 = score(doc=2376,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27562407 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
        0.008217963 = weight(_text_:of in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008217963 = score(doc=2376,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1496253 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
        0.01527387 = weight(_text_:the in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01527387 = score(doc=2376,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27562407 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
        0.0783981 = sum of:
          0.05460479 = weight(_text_:communities in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05460479 = score(doc=2376,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.29306096 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
          0.023793312 = weight(_text_:22 in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023793312 = score(doc=2376,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge organization is needed everywhere. Its importance is marked by its pervasiveness. This paper will show many areas, tasks, and functions where proper use of knowledge organization, construed as broadly as the term implies, provides support for learning and understanding, for sense making and meaning making, for inference, and for discovery by people and computer programs and thereby will make the world a better place. The paper focuses not on metadata but rather on structuring and representing the actual data or knowledge itself and argues for more communication between the largely separated KO, ontology, data modeling, and semantic web communities to address the many problems that need better solutions. In particular, the paper discusses the application of knowledge organization in knowledge bases for question answering and cognitive systems, knowledge bases for information extraction from text or multimedia, linked data, big data and data analytics, electronic health records as one example, influence diagrams (causal maps), dynamic system models, process diagrams, concept maps, and other node-link diagrams, information systems in organizations, knowledge organization for understanding and learning, and knowledge transfer between domains. The paper argues for moving beyond triples to a more powerful representation using entities and multi-way relationships but not attributes.
    Date
    27.11.2015 20:52:22
  3. Komlodi, A.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Search histories for user support in user interfaces (2006) 0.05
    0.048754722 = product of:
      0.097509444 = sum of:
        0.020294663 = weight(_text_:information in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020294663 = score(doc=5298,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
        0.014216291 = weight(_text_:for in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014216291 = score(doc=5298,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.21557912 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
        0.01738808 = weight(_text_:the in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01738808 = score(doc=5298,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31377596 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
        0.013946345 = weight(_text_:of in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013946345 = score(doc=5298,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
        0.01738808 = weight(_text_:the in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01738808 = score(doc=5298,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31377596 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
        0.014275986 = product of:
          0.028551972 = sum of:
            0.028551972 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028551972 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    The authors describe user interface tools based on search histories to support legal information seekers. The design of the tools was informed by the results of a user study (Komlodi, 2002a) that examined the use of human memory, external memory aids, and search histories in legal information seeking and derived interface design recommendations for information storage and retrieval systems. The data collected were analyzed to identify potential task areas where search histories can support information seeking and use. The results show that many information-seeking tasks can take advantage of automatically and manually recorded history information. These findings encouraged the design of user interface tools building on search history information: direct search history displays, history-enabled scratchpad facilities, and organized results collection tools.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:04:19
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.803-897
  4. Soergel, D.: Conceptual foundations for semantic mapping and semantic search (2011) 0.05
    0.047603056 = product of:
      0.08160524 = sum of:
        0.012329709 = product of:
          0.036989126 = sum of:
            0.036989126 = weight(_text_:f in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036989126 = score(doc=3939,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.007175247 = weight(_text_:information in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007175247 = score(doc=3939,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
        0.011437457 = weight(_text_:und in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011437457 = score(doc=3939,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
        0.014216291 = weight(_text_:for in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014216291 = score(doc=3939,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.21557912 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
        0.014197307 = weight(_text_:the in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014197307 = score(doc=3939,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25619698 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
        0.008051926 = weight(_text_:of in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008051926 = score(doc=3939,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.14660224 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
        0.014197307 = weight(_text_:the in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014197307 = score(doc=3939,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25619698 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
      0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
    
    Abstract
    This article proposes an approach to mapping between Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS), including ontologies, classifications, taxonomies, and thesauri and even natural languages, that is based on deep semantics. In this approach, concepts in each KOS are expressed through canonical expressions, such as description logic formulas, that combine atomic (or elemental) concepts drawn from a core classification. Relationships between concepts within or across KOS can then be derived by reasoning over the canonical expressions. The canonical expressions can also be used to provide a facet-based query formulation front-end for free-text search. The article illustrates this approach through many examples. It presents methods for the efficient construction of canonical expressions (linguistic analysis, exploiting information in the KOS and their hierarchies, and crowdsourcing) that make this approach feasible.
    Series
    Bibliotheca Academica - Reihe Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften; Bd. 1
    Source
    Concepts in context: Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010. Eds.: F. Boteram, W. Gödert u. J. Hubrich
  5. Zhang, P.; Soergel, D.: Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking (2014) 0.05
    0.046793636 = product of:
      0.09358727 = sum of:
        0.013370283 = weight(_text_:information in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013370283 = score(doc=1344,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
        0.015294294 = weight(_text_:for in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015294294 = score(doc=1344,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2319262 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
        0.016731687 = weight(_text_:the in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016731687 = score(doc=1344,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.30193105 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
        0.019562665 = weight(_text_:of in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019562665 = score(doc=1344,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.35617945 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
        0.016731687 = weight(_text_:the in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016731687 = score(doc=1344,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.30193105 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
        0.011896656 = product of:
          0.023793312 = sum of:
            0.023793312 = weight(_text_:22 in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023793312 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    This review introduces a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking to provide a theoretical basis for: - empirical studies that improve our understanding of the cognitive process and mechanisms of sensemaking and integration of results of such studies; - education in critical thinking and sensemaking skills; - the design of sensemaking assistant tools that support and guide users. The paper reviews and extends existing sensemaking models with ideas from learning and cognition. It reviews literature on sensemaking models in human-computer interaction (HCI), cognitive system engineering, organizational communication, and library and information sciences (LIS), learning theories, cognitive psychology, and task-based information seeking. The model resulting from this synthesis moves to a stronger basis for explaining sensemaking behaviors and conceptual changes. The model illustrates the iterative processes of sensemaking, extends existing models that focus on activities by integrating cognitive mechanisms and the creation of instantiated structure elements of knowledge, and different types of conceptual change to show a complete picture of the cognitive processes of sensemaking. The processes and cognitive mechanisms identified provide better foundations for knowledge creation, organization, and sharing practices and a stronger basis for design of sensemaking assistant systems and tools.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:55:39
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1733-1756
    Theme
    Information
  6. Soergel, D.: ¬The rise of ontologies or the reinvention of classification (1999) 0.05
    0.046094727 = product of:
      0.110627346 = sum of:
        0.020713156 = weight(_text_:information in 4335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020713156 = score(doc=4335,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 4335, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4335)
        0.01934592 = weight(_text_:for in 4335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01934592 = score(doc=4335,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.29336601 = fieldWeight in 4335, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4335)
        0.023662178 = weight(_text_:the in 4335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023662178 = score(doc=4335,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.42699498 = fieldWeight in 4335, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4335)
        0.023243912 = weight(_text_:of in 4335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023243912 = score(doc=4335,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.42320424 = fieldWeight in 4335, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4335)
        0.023662178 = weight(_text_:the in 4335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023662178 = score(doc=4335,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.42699498 = fieldWeight in 4335, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4335)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: The 50th Anniversary of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Pt.2: Paradigms, models, and models of information science
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.12, S.1119-1120
  7. Soergel, D.: Digital libraries and knowledge organization (2009) 0.05
    0.045283817 = product of:
      0.09056763 = sum of:
        0.013370283 = weight(_text_:information in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013370283 = score(doc=672,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
        0.013679632 = weight(_text_:for in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013679632 = score(doc=672,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20744109 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
        0.011831089 = weight(_text_:the in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011831089 = score(doc=672,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.21349749 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
        0.012553146 = weight(_text_:of in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012553146 = score(doc=672,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.22855641 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
        0.011831089 = weight(_text_:the in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011831089 = score(doc=672,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.21349749 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
        0.027302396 = product of:
          0.05460479 = sum of:
            0.05460479 = weight(_text_:communities in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05460479 = score(doc=672,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.29306096 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter describes not so much what digital libraries are but what digital libraries with semantic support could and should be. It discusses the nature of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) and how KOS can support digital library users. It projects a vision for designers to make and for users to demand better digital libraries. What is a digital library? The term \Digital Library" (DL) is used to refer to a range of systems, from digital object and metadata repositories, reference-linking systems, archives, and content management systems to complex systems that integrate advanced digital library services and support for research and practice communities. A DL may offer many technology-enabled functions and services that support users, both as information producers and as information users. Many of these functions appear in information systems that would not normally be considered digital libraries, making boundaries even more blurry. Instead of pursuing the hopeless quest of coming up with the definition of digital library, we present a framework that allows a clear and somewhat standardized description of any information system so that users can select the system(s) that best meet their requirements. Section 2 gives a broad outline for more detail see the DELOS DL Reference Model.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  8. Soergel, D.; Lauser, B.; Liang, A.; Fisseha, F.; Keizer, J.; Katz, S.: Reengineering thesauri for new applications : the AGROVOC example (2004) 0.04
    0.044998363 = product of:
      0.089996725 = sum of:
        0.024659418 = product of:
          0.07397825 = sum of:
            0.07397825 = weight(_text_:f in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07397825 = score(doc=2347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.014350494 = weight(_text_:information in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014350494 = score(doc=2347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
        0.016415559 = weight(_text_:for in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016415559 = score(doc=2347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.24892932 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
        0.011592053 = weight(_text_:the in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011592053 = score(doc=2347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20918396 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
        0.011387144 = weight(_text_:of in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011387144 = score(doc=2347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
        0.011592053 = weight(_text_:the in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011592053 = score(doc=2347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20918396 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Source
    Journal of digital information. 4(2004) no.4, art.#257
  9. Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014) 0.04
    0.042513385 = product of:
      0.08502677 = sum of:
        0.008371122 = weight(_text_:information in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008371122 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
        0.009575742 = weight(_text_:for in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009575742 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.14520876 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
        0.01512036 = weight(_text_:the in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01512036 = score(doc=1400,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2728539 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
        0.013285002 = weight(_text_:of in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013285002 = score(doc=1400,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
        0.01512036 = weight(_text_:the in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01512036 = score(doc=1400,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2728539 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
        0.023554176 = product of:
          0.047108352 = sum of:
            0.047108352 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047108352 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses and illustrates through examples how meaningful or deep learning can be supported through well-structured presentation of material, through giving learners schemas they can use to organize knowledge in their minds, and through helping learners to understand knowledge organization principles they can use to construct their own schemas. It is a call to all authors, educators and information designers to pay attention to meaningful presentation that expresses the internal structure of the domain and facilitates the learner's assimilation of concepts and their relationships.
    Pages
    S.22-32
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  10. Soergel, D.: ¬The Broad System of Ordering : a critique (1979) 0.04
    0.041941073 = product of:
      0.10065858 = sum of:
        0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 1864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009566996 = score(doc=1864,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1864, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1864)
        0.018955056 = weight(_text_:for in 1864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018955056 = score(doc=1864,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 1864, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1864)
        0.0267707 = weight(_text_:the in 1864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0267707 = score(doc=1864,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.4830897 = fieldWeight in 1864, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1864)
        0.018595127 = weight(_text_:of in 1864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018595127 = score(doc=1864,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 1864, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1864)
        0.0267707 = weight(_text_:the in 1864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0267707 = score(doc=1864,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.4830897 = fieldWeight in 1864, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1864)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    Critical comments on the BSO concern basic principles used in system construction, the quality of which, from the standpoint of the author, does not meet the requirements set out for the BSO. First of all, it would be necessary to revise and clearly formulate the purpose of the system, to make and consistently implement a basic decision on its structural characteristics, to provide for high-quality conceptual analysis and subject expertise which directly influence the content of the tables, and to clearly display supplemetary materials for the tables
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 4(1979) no.3, S.21-24
  11. Soergel, D.: Indexing and retrieval performance : the logical evidence (1994) 0.04
    0.040667456 = product of:
      0.0976019 = sum of:
        0.008371122 = weight(_text_:information in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008371122 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
        0.013542145 = weight(_text_:for in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013542145 = score(doc=579,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
        0.027880566 = weight(_text_:the in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027880566 = score(doc=579,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.50311774 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
        0.0199275 = weight(_text_:of in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0199275 = score(doc=579,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
        0.027880566 = weight(_text_:the in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027880566 = score(doc=579,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.50311774 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a logical analysis of the characteristics of indexing and their effects on retrieval performance.It establishes the ability to ask the questions one needs to ask as the foundation of performance evaluation, and recall and discrimination as the basic quantitative performance measures for binary noninteractive retrieval systems. It then defines the characteristics of indexing that affect retrieval - namely, indexing devices, viewpoint-based and importance-based indexing exhaustivity, indexing specifity, indexing correctness, and indexing consistency - and examines in detail their effects on retrieval. It concludes that retrieval performance depends chiefly on the match between indexing and the requirements of the individual query and on the adaption of the query formulation to the characteristics of the retrieval system, and that the ensuing complexity must be considered in the design and testing of retrieval systems
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.8, S.589-599
  12. Fidel, R.; Soergel, D.: Factors affecting online bibliographic retrieval : a conceptual framework for research (1983) 0.04
    0.04007603 = product of:
      0.09618247 = sum of:
        0.019133992 = weight(_text_:information in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019133992 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
        0.030953474 = weight(_text_:for in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030953474 = score(doc=2588,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.46938562 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
        0.01545607 = weight(_text_:the in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01545607 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27891195 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
        0.015182858 = weight(_text_:of in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015182858 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
        0.01545607 = weight(_text_:the in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01545607 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27891195 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 34(1983), S.163-180
  13. Balakrishnan, U.; Voß, J.; Soergel, D.: Towards integrated systems for KOS management, mapping, and access : Coli-conc and its collaborative computer-assisted KOS mapping tool Cocoda (2018) 0.04
    0.039984297 = product of:
      0.079968594 = sum of:
        0.016439613 = product of:
          0.049318835 = sum of:
            0.049318835 = weight(_text_:f in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049318835 = score(doc=4825,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009566996 = score(doc=4825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
        0.018955056 = weight(_text_:for in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018955056 = score(doc=4825,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
        0.010929092 = weight(_text_:the in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010929092 = score(doc=4825,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.19722053 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
        0.013148742 = weight(_text_:of in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013148742 = score(doc=4825,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
        0.010929092 = weight(_text_:the in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010929092 = score(doc=4825,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.19722053 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  14. Komlodi, A.; Marchionini, G.; Soergel, D.: Search history support for finding and using information : user interface design recommendations from a user study (2007) 0.04
    0.037008833 = product of:
      0.0888212 = sum of:
        0.027789611 = weight(_text_:information in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027789611 = score(doc=892,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.4507101 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
        0.016415559 = weight(_text_:for in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016415559 = score(doc=892,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.24892932 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
        0.015334844 = weight(_text_:the in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015334844 = score(doc=892,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27672437 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
        0.013946345 = weight(_text_:of in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013946345 = score(doc=892,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
        0.015334844 = weight(_text_:the in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015334844 = score(doc=892,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27672437 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    Recording search histories, presenting them to the searcher, and building additional interface tools on them offer many opportunities for supporting user tasks in information seeking and use. This study investigated the use of search history information in legal information seeking. Qualitative methods were used to explore how attorneys and law librarians used their memory and external memory aids while searching for information and in transferring to information use. Based on the findings, interface design recommendations were made for information systems. Results of the study from the legal user group presented evidence of the usefulness of search histories and history-based interface tools. Both user manifestations and researcher observations revealed that searchers need historical information in information seeking. Search histories were found to be useful in many user tasks: memory support, search system use, information seeking, information use, task management, task integration, and collaboration. Integrating information across various user tasks and collaborating with others are extensions of traditional information-seeking and use models. These findings encouraged the design of user interface tools and guidelines building on search history information.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.1, S.10-29
  15. Ding, W.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Performance of visual, verbal, and combined video surrogates (1999) 0.04
    0.03583564 = product of:
      0.08600553 = sum of:
        0.018718397 = weight(_text_:information in 6679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018718397 = score(doc=6679,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 6679, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6679)
        0.016585674 = weight(_text_:for in 6679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016585674 = score(doc=6679,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25150898 = fieldWeight in 6679, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6679)
        0.016563525 = weight(_text_:the in 6679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016563525 = score(doc=6679,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2988965 = fieldWeight in 6679, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6679)
        0.017574405 = weight(_text_:of in 6679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017574405 = score(doc=6679,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 6679, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6679)
        0.016563525 = weight(_text_:the in 6679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016563525 = score(doc=6679,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2988965 = fieldWeight in 6679, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6679)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigates the information representation power of different modalities in the video data in order to collect empirical evidence for video surrogate creation and thus better support effective video browsing and information retrieval. Three types of video surrogates - keyframe, keyword/phrase, and combination of the two were created and compared under two user tasks-verbal comprehension and visual gisting in user performance and preference. Results and discussions follow
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today
    Series
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  16. Soergel, D.: Data structure and software support for for integrated thesauri (1996) 0.04
    0.03557416 = product of:
      0.085377984 = sum of:
        0.022874914 = weight(_text_:und in 6052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022874914 = score(doc=6052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 6052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6052)
        0.023215106 = weight(_text_:for in 6052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023215106 = score(doc=6052,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.35203922 = fieldWeight in 6052, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6052)
        0.011592053 = weight(_text_:the in 6052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011592053 = score(doc=6052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20918396 = fieldWeight in 6052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6052)
        0.016103853 = weight(_text_:of in 6052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016103853 = score(doc=6052,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 6052, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6052)
        0.011592053 = weight(_text_:the in 6052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011592053 = score(doc=6052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20918396 = fieldWeight in 6052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6052)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Source
    Compatibility and integration of order systems: Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  17. Wang, P.; Soergel, D.: ¬A cognitive model of document use during a research project : Study I: Document selection (1998) 0.03
    0.033167414 = product of:
      0.079601794 = sum of:
        0.010356578 = weight(_text_:information in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010356578 = score(doc=443,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
        0.013679632 = weight(_text_:for in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013679632 = score(doc=443,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20744109 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
        0.01991469 = weight(_text_:the in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01991469 = score(doc=443,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3593698 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
        0.015736202 = weight(_text_:of in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015736202 = score(doc=443,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
        0.01991469 = weight(_text_:the in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01991469 = score(doc=443,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3593698 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    This article proposes a model of document selection by real users of a bibliographic retrieval system. It reports on Part 1 of a longitudinal study of decision making on document use by academics during a actual research project. (Part 2 followed up the same users on how the selected documents were actually used in subsequent stages). The participants are 25 self-selected faculty and graduate students in Agricultural Economics. After a reference interview, the researcher conducted a search of DIALOG databases and prepared a printout. The users selected documents from this printout, They were asked to read and think aloud while selecting documents. There verbal reports were recorded and analyzed from a utiliy-theoretic perspective. The following model of the decision-making in the selection process emerged: document information lemenets (DIEs) in document records provide the information for judging the documents on 11 criteria (including topicality, orientation, quality, novelty, and authority); the criteria judgments are comninded in an assessment of document value along 5 dimensions (Epistemic, functional, conditional, social, and emotional values), leading to the use decision. This model accounts for the use of personal knowledge and decision strategies applied in the selection process. The model has implications for the design of an intelligent document selection assistant
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.2, S.115-133
  18. Wang, P.; Soergel, D.: Beyond topical relevance : document selection behaviour of real users of IR systems (1993) 0.03
    0.033017997 = product of:
      0.0792432 = sum of:
        0.019133992 = weight(_text_:information in 7960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019133992 = score(doc=7960,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 7960, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7960)
        0.015476737 = weight(_text_:for in 7960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015476737 = score(doc=7960,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 7960, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7960)
        0.010929092 = weight(_text_:the in 7960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010929092 = score(doc=7960,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.19722053 = fieldWeight in 7960, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7960)
        0.022774287 = weight(_text_:of in 7960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022774287 = score(doc=7960,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.41465375 = fieldWeight in 7960, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7960)
        0.010929092 = weight(_text_:the in 7960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010929092 = score(doc=7960,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.19722053 = fieldWeight in 7960, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7960)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on part of a study of real users' behaviour in selecting documents from a list of citations resulting from a search of an information retrieval system. Document selection involves value judgements and decision making. Understanding how users evaluate documents and make decisions provides a basis for designing intelligent information retrieval system that can do a better job of predicting usefulness
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Learned Information
    Source
    Integrating technologies - converging professions: proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Columbus, OH, 24-28 October 1993. Ed.: S. Bonzi
  19. Huang, X.; Soergel, D.; Klavans, J.L.: Modeling and analyzing the topicality of art images (2015) 0.03
    0.031987514 = product of:
      0.07677004 = sum of:
        0.005979372 = weight(_text_:information in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005979372 = score(doc=2127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
        0.013679632 = weight(_text_:for in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013679632 = score(doc=2127,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20744109 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
        0.021053577 = weight(_text_:the in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021053577 = score(doc=2127,freq=38.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.37992156 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
              6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                38.0 = termFreq=38.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
        0.015003879 = weight(_text_:of in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015003879 = score(doc=2127,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
        0.021053577 = weight(_text_:the in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021053577 = score(doc=2127,freq=38.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.37992156 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
              6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                38.0 = termFreq=38.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    This study demonstrates an improved conceptual foundation to support well-structured analysis of image topicality. First we present a conceptual framework for analyzing image topicality, explicating the layers, the perspectives, and the topical relevance relationships involved in modeling the topicality of art images. We adapt a generic relevance typology to image analysis by extending it with definitions and relationships specific to the visual art domain and integrating it with schemes of image-text relationships that are important for image subject indexing. We then apply the adapted typology to analyze the topical relevance relationships between 11 art images and 768 image tags assigned by art historians and librarians. The original contribution of our work is the topical structure analysis of image tags that allows the viewer to more easily grasp the content, context, and meaning of an image and quickly tune into aspects of interest; it could also guide both the indexer and the searcher to specify image tags/descriptors in a more systematic and precise manner and thus improve the match between the two parties. An additional contribution is systematically examining and integrating the variety of image-text relationships from a relevance perspective. The paper concludes with implications for relational indexing and social tagging.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.8, S.1616-1644
  20. Soergel, D.: Mathematical analysis of documentation systems : an attempt to a theory of classification and search request formulation (1967) 0.03
    0.031957805 = product of:
      0.076698735 = sum of:
        0.008456109 = weight(_text_:information in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008456109 = score(doc=5449,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
        0.00967296 = weight(_text_:for in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00967296 = score(doc=5449,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.14668301 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
        0.016731687 = weight(_text_:the in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016731687 = score(doc=5449,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.30193105 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
        0.025106292 = weight(_text_:of in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025106292 = score(doc=5449,freq=56.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.45711282 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
              7.483315 = tf(freq=56.0), with freq of:
                56.0 = termFreq=56.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
        0.016731687 = weight(_text_:the in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016731687 = score(doc=5449,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.30193105 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    As an attempt to make a general structural theory of information retrieval, a documentation system (DS) is defined as a formal system consisting of (a) a set o of objects (documents); (b) a set A++ of elementary attributes (key-words), from which further attributes may be constructed: A++ generates A; (c) a set of axioms of the form X++(x)=m (m¯M, M a set of constant connecting attributes with objects: from the axioms further theorems (=true statements) may be constructed. By use of the theorems, different mappings O -> P(o) (P(o) set of all subsets of o) (search question -> set of documents retrieved) are defined. The type of a DS depends on two basic decisions: (1) choice of the rules for the construction of attributes and theorems, e.g., logical product in coordinate indexing; links. (2) choice of M; M may consist of the two constants 'applicable' and 'not applicable', or some positive integers, ...; Further practical decisions: A++ hierarchical or not; kind of mapping; introduction of roles (=further attributes). The most simple case - ordinary two-valued Coordinate Indexing - is discusssed in detail; o is a free distributive (but not Boolean) lattice, the homographic image a ring of subsets of o; instead of negation which is not useful, a useful retrieval operation 'praeternagation' is introduced. Furthermore these are discussed: a generalized definition of superimposed coding, some functions for the distance of objects or attributes; optimization and automatic derivation of classifications. The model takes into account term-term relations and document-document relations. It may serve as a structural framework in terms of which the functional problems of retrieval theory may be expressed more clearly
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 3(1967), S.129-173