-
Rayward, W.B.: ¬The origins of information science and the International Institute of Bibliography / International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID) (1997)
0.06
0.05583125 = product of:
0.1116625 = sum of:
0.016742244 = weight(_text_:information in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016742244 = score(doc=75,freq=8.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
0.009575742 = weight(_text_:for in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009575742 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.14520876 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
0.024380848 = weight(_text_:the in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024380848 = score(doc=75,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.4399637 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
0.0199275 = weight(_text_:of in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0199275 = score(doc=75,freq=18.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
0.024380848 = weight(_text_:the in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024380848 = score(doc=75,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.4399637 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
0.016655317 = product of:
0.033310633 = sum of:
0.033310633 = weight(_text_:22 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033310633 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- Describes the history and origins of the International Institute of Bibliography, founded in 1895 and which later became the FID. Outlines the work of Paul Otlet and his colleagues in developing the idea of universal bibliographic control through the Répertoire Bibliographique Universel and the emergence of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) as the means of its classifies arrangement. Stresses the key role played by this work in developing the main concepts of information science and documentation
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.2, S.3-15
-
Bhattacharyya, G.; Ranganathan, S.R.: From knowledge classification to library classification (1978)
0.05
0.05484867 = product of:
0.16454601 = sum of:
0.10161568 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 1229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10161568 = score(doc=1229,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16407113 = queryWeight, product of:
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.6193392 = fieldWeight in 1229, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1229)
0.020078024 = weight(_text_:the in 1229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020078024 = score(doc=1229,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36231726 = fieldWeight in 1229, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1229)
0.022774288 = weight(_text_:of in 1229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022774288 = score(doc=1229,freq=8.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.41465378 = fieldWeight in 1229, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1229)
0.020078024 = weight(_text_:the in 1229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020078024 = score(doc=1229,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36231726 = fieldWeight in 1229, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1229)
0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
- Imprint
- München : Verl. Dokumentation
- Source
- Conceptual basis of the classification of knowledge. Proc. of the Ottawa Conf. on the conceptual basis of knowledge, 1.-5.10.1971. Ed.: J.A. Wojciechowski
-
Mölgaard-Hansen, R.: From knowledge classification to library classification (1978)
0.05
0.05484867 = product of:
0.16454601 = sum of:
0.10161568 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10161568 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16407113 = queryWeight, product of:
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.6193392 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
0.020078024 = weight(_text_:the in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020078024 = score(doc=1808,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36231726 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
0.022774288 = weight(_text_:of in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022774288 = score(doc=1808,freq=8.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.41465378 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
0.020078024 = weight(_text_:the in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020078024 = score(doc=1808,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36231726 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
- Imprint
- München : Verl. Dokumentation
- Source
- Conceptual basis of the classification of knowledge. Proc. of the Ottawa Conf. on the conceptual basis of knowledge, 1.-5.10.1971. Ed.: J.A. Wojciechowski
-
Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008)
0.05
0.04864826 = product of:
0.09729652 = sum of:
0.008371122 = weight(_text_:information in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008371122 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
0.009575742 = weight(_text_:for in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009575742 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.14520876 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
0.02138342 = weight(_text_:the in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02138342 = score(doc=2550,freq=20.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3858737 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
0.0199275 = weight(_text_:of in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0199275 = score(doc=2550,freq=18.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
0.02138342 = weight(_text_:the in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02138342 = score(doc=2550,freq=20.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3858737 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
0.016655317 = product of:
0.033310633 = sum of:
0.033310633 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033310633 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- The paper takes a retrospective look at the work of Henry Evelyn Bliss, classificationist theorist and author of the Bibliographic Classification. Major features of his writings and philosophy are examined and evaluated for the originality of their contribution to the corpus of knowledge in the discipline. Reactions to Bliss's work are analysed, as is his influence on classification theory of the 20th century. Contemporary work on knowledge organization is seen to continue a number of strands from Bliss's original writings. His standing as a classificationist is compared with that of Ranganathan, with the conclusion that he is not given the credit he deserves.
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
- Source
- Journal of librarianship and information science. 40(2008) no.1, S.45-58
-
Rayward, W.B.: ¬The origins of information science and the International Institute of Bibliography / International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID) (1997)
0.04
0.04495126 = product of:
0.10788303 = sum of:
0.020504976 = weight(_text_:information in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020504976 = score(doc=76,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.016585674 = weight(_text_:for in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016585674 = score(doc=76,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.25150898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.024380848 = weight(_text_:the in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024380848 = score(doc=76,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.4399637 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.022030683 = weight(_text_:of in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022030683 = score(doc=76,freq=22.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.024380848 = weight(_text_:the in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024380848 = score(doc=76,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.4399637 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- The ideas and practices embraced by the term documentation introduced by Paul Otlet and his colleagues to describe the work of the International Institute of Bibliography (later FID) that they set up in Brussels in 1895, constituted a new discursive formation. The key concepts for information science were implicit in and operationalized by what was created within the International Institute of Bibliography in 1895 and the decades that followed. Important aspects of the origins of information science were contained within or became an extension of the discursive format labelled documentation
- Footnote
- Contribution to part 1 of a 2 part series on the history of documentation and information science
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.4, S.289-300
-
Barat, A.H.: Hungarians in the history of the UDC (2014)
0.04
0.04434925 = product of:
0.0886985 = sum of:
0.007175247 = weight(_text_:information in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007175247 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.008207779 = weight(_text_:for in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008207779 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.12446466 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.020078024 = weight(_text_:the in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020078024 = score(doc=1429,freq=24.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36231726 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.018883443 = weight(_text_:of in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018883443 = score(doc=1429,freq=22.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.020078024 = weight(_text_:the in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020078024 = score(doc=1429,freq=24.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36231726 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.014275986 = product of:
0.028551972 = sum of:
0.028551972 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028551972 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- I outline a major segment of the history of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in Hungary and all related important events and activities. Significant and committed specialists who played prominent role on a national and international level are also mentioned. It's not an overstatement, that the usage and publications of the UDC in Hungary are significant milestones in the international history of UDC. The usage of UDC has been very widespread and it is found in different types of libraries. People who were responsible for the developing of information retrieval systems and quality of these methods were very engaged and participated in international activities. There were several huge libraries such as special, academic, municipal and national library where UDC has been employed since quite early on and the leaders of these pioneer libraries travelled widely and were active in international researches and practices.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012)
0.04
0.04055682 = product of:
0.08111364 = sum of:
0.008371122 = weight(_text_:information in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008371122 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.009575742 = weight(_text_:for in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009575742 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.14520876 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.01512036 = weight(_text_:the in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01512036 = score(doc=632,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2728539 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.016270736 = weight(_text_:of in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016270736 = score(doc=632,freq=12.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.01512036 = weight(_text_:the in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01512036 = score(doc=632,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2728539 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.016655317 = product of:
0.033310633 = sum of:
0.033310633 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033310633 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- This paper maps the concepts "space" and "dimensionality" in classifications, in particular in visualizations hereof, from a historical perspective. After a historical excursion in the domain of classification theory of what in mathematics is known as dimensionality reduction in representations of a single universe of knowledge, its potentiality will be explored for information retrieval and navigation in the multiverse of the World Wide Web.
- Content
- This paper is an adaptation and augmented version of a paper presented at the NASKO 2011 conference: Charles van den Heuvel. 2011. Multidimensional classifications: Past and future conceptualizations and visualizations. In Smiraglia, Richard P., ed. Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, Vol. 3. Toronto, Canada, pp. 105-21. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_6_e.pdf.
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:31:25
-
Wiegand, W.A.: ¬The "¬Amherst method" : the origins of the Dewey Decimal Classification Scheme (1998)
0.04
0.03827405 = product of:
0.091857724 = sum of:
0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009566996 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
0.010943705 = weight(_text_:for in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010943705 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
0.025630994 = weight(_text_:the in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025630994 = score(doc=331,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.46252316 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
0.020085035 = weight(_text_:of in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020085035 = score(doc=331,freq=14.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
0.025630994 = weight(_text_:the in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025630994 = score(doc=331,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.46252316 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- Although a debate about the origins of the DDC has been going on for generations, historical consensus remains elusive. Contributes new information to the historiography on the origins of the Scheme, by (1) grounding an account of Melvil Dewey's thinking as he was crafting the Decimal Classification on an analysis of a larger body of sources than previous classification historians have consulted; and (2) by expanding and deepening historical understanding of the contextual forces influencing his decisions on the classification structure
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The relationship between classification research and information retrieval research : 1952 to 1970 (2017)
0.04
0.037877552 = product of:
0.09090613 = sum of:
0.013370283 = weight(_text_:information in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013370283 = score(doc=3945,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
0.00967296 = weight(_text_:for in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00967296 = score(doc=3945,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.14668301 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
0.024150109 = weight(_text_:the in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024150109 = score(doc=3945,freq=50.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.43579993 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
7.071068 = tf(freq=50.0), with freq of:
50.0 = termFreq=50.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
0.019562665 = weight(_text_:of in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019562665 = score(doc=3945,freq=34.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.35617945 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
34.0 = termFreq=34.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
0.024150109 = weight(_text_:the in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024150109 = score(doc=3945,freq=50.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.43579993 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
7.071068 = tf(freq=50.0), with freq of:
50.0 = termFreq=50.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present the initial relationship between the Classification Research Group (CRG) and the Center for Documentation and Communication Research (CDCR) and how this relationship changed between 1952 and 1970. The theory of normative behavior and its concepts of worldviews, social norms, social types, and information behavior are used to characterize the relationship between the small worlds of the two groups with the intent of understanding the gap between early classification research and information retrieval (IR) research. Design/methodology/approach This is a mixed method analysis of two groups as evidenced in published artifacts by and about their work. A thorough review of historical literature about the groups as well as their own published works was employed and an author co-citation analysis was used to characterize the conceptual similarities and differences of the two groups of researchers. Findings The CRG focused on fundamental principles to aid classification and retrieval of information. The CDCR were more inclined to develop practical methods of retrieval without benefit of good theoretical foundations. The CRG began it work under the contention that the general classification schemes at the time were inadequate for the developing IR mechanisms. The CDCR rejected the classification schemes of the times and focused on developing punch card mechanisms and processes that were generously funded by both government and corporate funding. Originality/value This paper provides a unique historical analysis of two groups of influential researchers in the field of library and information science.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 73(2017) no.6, S.1343-1379
-
Tsioli, M.; Corsini, S.: Indexation livres anciens Brunet-Parguez (1994)
0.04
0.03744203 = product of:
0.08986087 = sum of:
0.016439613 = product of:
0.049318835 = sum of:
0.049318835 = weight(_text_:f in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049318835 = score(doc=899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.015476737 = weight(_text_:for in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015476737 = score(doc=899,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
0.018929742 = weight(_text_:the in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018929742 = score(doc=899,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.34159598 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
0.020085035 = weight(_text_:of in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020085035 = score(doc=899,freq=14.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
0.018929742 = weight(_text_:the in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018929742 = score(doc=899,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.34159598 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- Report of 2 study days held in Toulouse in Feb 94 by LIBER to discuss applications to date of the SIBIL version of the Brunet-Parguez classification scheme for computerized indexing of books published before 1800, first introduced in 1987. The scheme is an adaptation by Guy Parguez of the 19th century Brunet system. Paricipants were overall satisfied with the basic structure, and agreed plans for further developments, including a new edition of the table, expansion of coverage, and translation
- Language
- f
-
Dewey, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index : introduction (1985)
0.04
0.036213215 = product of:
0.08691172 = sum of:
0.004783498 = weight(_text_:information in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004783498 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
0.014477162 = weight(_text_:for in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014477162 = score(doc=3628,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.21953502 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
0.025338057 = weight(_text_:the in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025338057 = score(doc=3628,freq=86.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.457237 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
9.273619 = tf(freq=86.0), with freq of:
86.0 = termFreq=86.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
0.016974952 = weight(_text_:of in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016974952 = score(doc=3628,freq=40.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
40.0 = termFreq=40.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
0.025338057 = weight(_text_:the in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025338057 = score(doc=3628,freq=86.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.457237 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
9.273619 = tf(freq=86.0), with freq of:
86.0 = termFreq=86.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- To those outside the field of library science, the name Melvil Dewey (1851-1931) is virtually synonymous with library classification. To those in the field, Dewey has been recognized as the premier classification maker. His enormously successful system (i.e., successful in terms of the wide adoption of the system around the world for over one hundred years) has now undergone nineteen editions. The Dewey Decimal Classification has been translated into more than twenty languages and is the most widely adopted classification scheme in the world. Even in its earliest manifestations, the Dewey Decimal Classification contained features that anticipated modern classification theory. Among these are the use of mnemonics and the commonly applied standard subdivisions, later called "common isolates" by S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.), which are the mainstays of facet analysis and synthesis. The device of standard subdivisions is an indication of the recognition of common aspects that pervade all subjects. The use of mnemonics, whereby recurring concepts in the scheme are represented by the same notation, for example, geographic concepts and language concepts, eased the transition of the Dewey Decimal Classification from a largely enumerative system to an increasingly faceted one. Another significant feature of the Dewey Decimal Classification is the use of the hierarchical notation based an the arabic numeral system. To a large extent, this feature accounts for the wide use and success of the system in the world across language barriers. With the prospect of increasing online information retrieval, the hierarchical notation will have a significant impact an the effectiveness of the Dewey Decimal Classification as an online retrieval tool. Because the notation is hierarchical, for example, with increasing digits in a number representing narrower subjects and decreasing digits indicating broader subjects, the Dewey Decimal Classification is particularly useful in generic searches for broadening or narrowing search results. In the preface to the second edition of his Decimal Classification Dewey explained the features of his "new" system. The excerpt below presents his ideas and theory concerning the rational basis of his classification, the standard subdivisions, the hierarchical notation based an decimal numbers, the use of mnemonics, the relative index, and relative location. It also reflects Dewey's lifelong interest in simplified spelling.
- Footnote
- Original in: Decimal Classification and Relativ Index for Arranging, Cataloging, and Indexing Public and Private Libraries and for Pamflets, Clippings, Notes, Scrap Books, Index rerums, etc. 2nd, rev. and greatly enlarged ed. Boston: Library Bureau 1885
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Foskett, D.J.: ¬'A rustic in the library' : The first Dr. Pafford Memorial Lecture (1997)
0.04
0.03514655 = product of:
0.08435172 = sum of:
0.007175247 = weight(_text_:information in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007175247 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
0.022447916 = weight(_text_:the in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022447916 = score(doc=538,freq=30.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.40508303 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
0.018004656 = weight(_text_:of in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018004656 = score(doc=538,freq=20.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
0.022447916 = weight(_text_:the in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022447916 = score(doc=538,freq=30.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.40508303 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
0.014275986 = product of:
0.028551972 = sum of:
0.028551972 = weight(_text_:22 in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028551972 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- The elements that comprise 'style' in creative writing are directly applicable to librarians, in the choice of books and periodicals, and in the process of cataloguing and classification to make them accessible to users. By the selection and arrangement of their stock librarians reveal professional accounts of the culture they have inherited and are endeavouring to pass on to future generations. Illustrates the discussion with particular reference to the life and career of Dr. John Henry Pyle Pafford, Librarian at London University, and in particular to his views on the development of general classification schemes, such as the DDC and BC, and the work of the CRG. Concludes by noting his work in the fields of education, national and international library cooperation, and as Library-Keeper of the University
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
- Source
- Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.4, S.211-216
-
Krishnamurthy, M.; Satija, M.P.; Martínez-Ávila, D.: Classification of classifications : species of library classifications (2024)
0.03
0.034251917 = product of:
0.0822046 = sum of:
0.007175247 = weight(_text_:information in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007175247 = score(doc=1158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
0.014216291 = weight(_text_:for in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014216291 = score(doc=1158,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.21557912 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
0.018328644 = weight(_text_:the in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018328644 = score(doc=1158,freq=20.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3307489 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
0.024155779 = weight(_text_:of in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024155779 = score(doc=1158,freq=36.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.43980673 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
0.018328644 = weight(_text_:the in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018328644 = score(doc=1158,freq=20.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3307489 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- Acknowledging the importance of classification not only for library and information science but also for the study and mapping of the world phenomena, in this paper we revisit and systematize the main types of classifications and focus on the species of classification mainly drawing on the work of S. R. Ranganathan. We trace the evolution of library classification systems by their structures and modes of design of various shades of classification systems and make a comparative study of enumerative and faceted species of library classifications. The value of this paper is to have a picture of the whole spectrum of existing classifications, which may serve for the study of future developments and constructions of new systems. This paper updates previous works by Comaromi and Ranganathan and is also theoretically inspired by them.
-
Classification research for knowledge representation and organization : Proc. of the 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991 (1992)
0.03
0.03376597 = product of:
0.08103833 = sum of:
0.010147331 = weight(_text_:information in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010147331 = score(doc=2072,freq=16.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.014216291 = weight(_text_:for in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014216291 = score(doc=2072,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.21557912 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.019003544 = weight(_text_:the in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019003544 = score(doc=2072,freq=86.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.34292775 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
9.273619 = tf(freq=86.0), with freq of:
86.0 = termFreq=86.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.018667623 = weight(_text_:of in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018667623 = score(doc=2072,freq=86.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.33988333 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
9.273619 = tf(freq=86.0), with freq of:
86.0 = termFreq=86.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.019003544 = weight(_text_:the in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019003544 = score(doc=2072,freq=86.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.34292775 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
9.273619 = tf(freq=86.0), with freq of:
86.0 = termFreq=86.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- This volume deals with both theoretical and empirical research in classification and encompasses universal classification systems, special classification systems, thesauri and the place of classification in a broad spectrum of document and information systems. Papers fall into one or three major areas as follows: 1) general principles and policies 2) structure and logic in classification; and empirical investigation; classification in the design of various types of document/information systems. The papers originate from the ISCCR '91 conference and have been selected according to the following criteria: relevance to the conference theme; importance of the topic in the representation and organization of knowledge; quality; and originality in terms of potential contribution to research and new knowledge.
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: SVENONIUS, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities; BEALL, J.: Editing the Dewey Decimal Classification online: the evolution of the DDC database; BEGHTOL, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: Concept relation structures and their graphic display; FUGMANN, R.: Illusory goals in information science research; GILCHRIST, A.: UDC: the 1990's and beyond; GREEN, R.: The expression of syntagmatic relationships in indexing: are frame-based index languages the answer?; HUMPHREY, S.M.: Use and management of classification systems for knowledge-based indexing; MIKSA, F.L.: The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification; SCOTT, M. u. A.F. FONSECA: Methodology for functional appraisal of records and creation of a functional thesaurus; ALBRECHTSEN, H.: PRESS: a thesaurus-based information system for software reuse; AMAESHI, B.: A preliminary AAT compatible African art thesaurus; CHATTERJEE, A.: Structures of Indian classification systems of the pre-Ranganathan era and their impact on the Colon Classification; COCHRANE, P.A.: Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: A general versus a special algorithm in the graphic display of thesauri; DAHLBERG, I.: The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view: DRABENSTOTT, K.M., RIESTER, L.C. u. B.A.DEDE: Shelflisting using expert systems; FIDEL, R.: Thesaurus requirements for an intermediary expert system; GREEN, R.: Insights into classification from the cognitive sciences: ramifications for index languages; GROLIER, E. de: Towards a syndetic information retrieval system; GUENTHER, R.: The USMARC format for classification data: development and implementation; HOWARTH, L.C.: Factors influencing policies for the adoption and integration of revisions to classification schedules; HUDON, M.: Term definitions in subject thesauri: the Canadian literacy thesaurus experience; HUSAIN, S.: Notational techniques for the accomodation of subjects in Colon Classification 7th edition: theoretical possibility vis-à-vis practical need; KWASNIK, B.H. u. C. JORGERSEN: The exploration by means of repertory grids of semantic differences among names of official documents; MICCO, M.: Suggestions for automating the Library of Congress Classification schedules; PERREAULT, J.M.: An essay on the prehistory of general categories (II): G.W. Leibniz, Conrad Gesner; REES-POTTER, L.K.: How well do thesauri serve the social sciences?; REVIE, C.W. u. G. SMART: The construction and the use of faceted classification schema in technical domains; ROCKMORE, M.: Structuring a flexible faceted thsaurus record for corporate information retrieval; ROULIN, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus; SMITH, L.C.: UNISIST revisited: compatibility in the context of collaboratories; STILES, W.G.: Notes concerning the use chain indexing as a possible means of simulating the inductive leap within artificial intelligence; SVENONIUS, E., LIU, S. u. B. SUBRAHMANYAM: Automation in chain indexing; TURNER, J.: Structure in data in the Stockshot database at the National Film Board of Canada; VIZINE-GOETZ, D.: The Dewey Decimal Classification as an online classification tool; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Restructuring UDC: problems and possibilies; WILSON, A.: The hierarchy of belief: ideological tendentiousness in universal classification; WILSON, B.F.: An evaluation of the systematic botany schedule of the Universal Decimal Classification (English full edition, 1979); ZENG, L.: Research and development of classification and thesauri in China; CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
- Footnote
- Rez. in: International classification 19(1992) no.4, S.228-229 (B.C. Vickery); Journal of classification 11(1994) no.2, S.255-256 (W. Gödert)
- LCSH
- Knowledge, Theory of / Congresses
- Subject
- Knowledge, Theory of / Congresses
-
Béthery, A.: Liberté bien ordonnée : les classifications encyclopédiques revues et corrigées (1988)
0.03
0.033419 = product of:
0.080205604 = sum of:
0.012329709 = product of:
0.036989126 = sum of:
0.036989126 = weight(_text_:f in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036989126 = score(doc=2532,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.014216291 = weight(_text_:for in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014216291 = score(doc=2532,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.21557912 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
0.01738808 = weight(_text_:the in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01738808 = score(doc=2532,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.31377596 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
0.018883443 = weight(_text_:of in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018883443 = score(doc=2532,freq=22.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
0.01738808 = weight(_text_:the in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01738808 = score(doc=2532,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.31377596 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- The current trend of simplifying user access to documents in public libraries in France has led to strong criticism of the traditional use of decimal classification, and growing popularity for classifying by centres of interest. The notion of locating documents 'where the reader expects to find them' does not bear reasoned analysis: this approach depends on the subjective attitudes of the reader, whose preconceptions are unknown. Public libraries serve readers of all types, and therefore the classification used must be based on general objective criteria. Argues for the retension of traditional encyclopedic classifications (UDC or Dewey), which despite their drawbacks, are based on subject structures known to everyone, and allow for updating to accommodate new concepts. Classification can operate with visual labelling systems, to simplify access: this approach provides ready identification of centres of interest without discarding the real advantages of universality.
- Language
- f
-
Beghtol, C.: Exploring new approaches to the organization of knowledge : the subject classification of James Duff Brown (2004)
0.03
0.03235802 = product of:
0.07765925 = sum of:
0.007175247 = weight(_text_:information in 869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007175247 = score(doc=869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=869)
0.011607553 = weight(_text_:for in 869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011607553 = score(doc=869,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.17601961 = fieldWeight in 869, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=869)
0.020897869 = weight(_text_:the in 869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020897869 = score(doc=869,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.37711173 = fieldWeight in 869, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=869)
0.017080715 = weight(_text_:of in 869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017080715 = score(doc=869,freq=18.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 869, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=869)
0.020897869 = weight(_text_:the in 869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020897869 = score(doc=869,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.37711173 = fieldWeight in 869, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=869)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- James Duff Brown was an influential and energetic librarian in Great Britain in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. His Subject Classification has characteristics that were unusual and idiosyncratic during his own time, but his work deserves recognition as one of the precursors of modern bibliographic classification systems. This article discusses a number of theories and classification practices that Brown developed. In particular, it investigates his views on the order of main classes, on the phenomenon of "concrete" subjects, and on the need for synthesized notations. It traces these ideas briefly into the future through the work of S. R. Ranganathan, the Classification Research Group, and the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification system. It concludes that Brown's work warrants further study for the light it may shed on current classification theory and practice.
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft: Pioneers in library and information science
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Library classification through a century (1965)
0.03
0.032316193 = product of:
0.09694857 = sum of:
0.02010487 = weight(_text_:for in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02010487 = score(doc=1835,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3048749 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
0.02898013 = weight(_text_:the in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02898013 = score(doc=1835,freq=50.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.5229599 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
7.071068 = tf(freq=50.0), with freq of:
50.0 = termFreq=50.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
0.018883443 = weight(_text_:of in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018883443 = score(doc=1835,freq=22.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
0.02898013 = weight(_text_:the in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02898013 = score(doc=1835,freq=50.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.5229599 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
7.071068 = tf(freq=50.0), with freq of:
50.0 = termFreq=50.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
- Abstract
- The progress in the first century of the classification era is traced in the three majot perios: pre-facet, transition-to-facet, and facet period. The facet-period is divided into the restricted facet formula, generilised facet formula periods and the two relativity periods - viz. Dorking and Elsinore periods. For each of the six resulting periods, the chief achievements in library classification and the social factors leading to them are mentioned. The achievements of the Dorking period just ending are described in greater detail. The follows the programme of research work for the Elsinore period of 1965 to 1975. A programme for fundamental research in the idea, verbal, and notational planes is chalked out. Then follows the programme for routine research in the building of schedules of common isolates, whcih is a back log from the Dorking period, and in the new area of the design and building of schedules for the depth classification of diverse subjects, needed for documentation work and service. Lastly, the organization suitable to carry out the programme is outlined
- Source
- Classification research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Study Conf. ... Elsinore, 14.-18.9.1964. Ed. by P. Atherton
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : some factors concerning its origins, development, and influence (1997)
0.03
0.03178791 = product of:
0.07629099 = sum of:
0.008456109 = weight(_text_:information in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008456109 = score(doc=141,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
0.01184691 = weight(_text_:for in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01184691 = score(doc=141,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.17964928 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
0.020492045 = weight(_text_:the in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020492045 = score(doc=141,freq=36.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36978847 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
0.015003879 = weight(_text_:of in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015003879 = score(doc=141,freq=20.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
0.020492045 = weight(_text_:the in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020492045 = score(doc=141,freq=36.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36978847 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- Outlines the bibliographic enterprise envisaged by Otlet and LaFontaine, which resulted in the UDC being developed in 1895, and the subsequent history of the scheme. Relationship with DDC from which it was derived deteriorated in the early 20th century and changes in funding, location, and editorship of Duyvis from 1929-59 had a profound effect on the scheme's development and management. Lloyd, Duyvis successor, reformed the revision structure, and further management changes from 1975 to the present day, culminated in the formation of the UDC Consortium in 1992. Notes the subsequent creation of a machine-readable Master Reference File and speedier revision procedures. Examines the scheme's structure, development, and influence on classification theory, problems caused by longevity and lack of standrad procedures, and highlights proposals for their reform to improve the scheme's suitability for an automated world. Explores research projects in 1960s which foreshadowed possibilities today, such as a complementary thesaurus and individualisation of single concepts notationally. Emphasizes the value of classification in a multilingual environment and outlines the future developments
- Footnote
- Contribution to part 1 of a 2 part series on the history of documentation and information science
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.4, S.331-339
-
Dousa, T.M.: ¬The simple and the complex in E. C. Richardson's theory of classification : observations on an early KO model of the relationship between ontology and epistemology (2010)
0.03
0.031783115 = product of:
0.07627948 = sum of:
0.006839816 = weight(_text_:for in 3509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006839816 = score(doc=3509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.103720546 = fieldWeight in 3509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3509)
0.018706596 = weight(_text_:the in 3509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018706596 = score(doc=3509,freq=30.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.33756918 = fieldWeight in 3509, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3509)
0.020129817 = weight(_text_:of in 3509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020129817 = score(doc=3509,freq=36.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36650562 = fieldWeight in 3509, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3509)
0.018706596 = weight(_text_:the in 3509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018706596 = score(doc=3509,freq=30.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.33756918 = fieldWeight in 3509, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3509)
0.011896656 = product of:
0.023793312 = sum of:
0.023793312 = weight(_text_:22 in 3509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023793312 = score(doc=3509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- In light of ongoing debates about ontological vs. epistemological approaches to knowledge organization (KO), this paper examines E. C. Richardson's treatment of ontology and epistemology in his theory of classification. According to Richardson, there is a natural order of things in the world accessible to human cognition, which may be expressed in two classificatory orders: evolutionary classification, which ranges classes of things from the most simple to the most complex, and logical classification, which ranges classes of things in the inverse order, from the most complex to the most simple. Evolutionary classification reflects ontological order and logical classification reflects epistemological order: both are faces of a single natural order. Such a view requires adherence to a representationalist, or, in Hjorland's (2008) terms, positivist understanding of epistemology, wherein human knowledge faithfully mirrors the structure of the external world. Richardson's harmonization of ontology and epistemology will find little favor among proponents of the currently fashionable pragmatist approach to KO. Nevertheless, it constitutes an early version of what Gnoli (2004) terms a naturalistic epistemology, which, once deepened and clarified, offers the best prospects for an explicit expression of both the ontological and epistemological dimensions of knowledge within a single classification of general scope.
- Pages
- S.15-22
- Source
- Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO Conference, 23-26 February 2010 Rome, Italy. Edited by Claudio Gnoli and Fulvio Mazzocchi
-
Satija, M.P.: Abridged Dewey-15 (2012) in historical perspectives (2012)
0.03
0.031303946 = product of:
0.07512947 = sum of:
0.006839816 = weight(_text_:for in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006839816 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.103720546 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
0.019320088 = weight(_text_:the in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019320088 = score(doc=116,freq=32.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.34863994 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
0.01775283 = weight(_text_:of in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01775283 = score(doc=116,freq=28.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.32322758 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
0.019320088 = weight(_text_:the in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019320088 = score(doc=116,freq=32.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.34863994 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
0.011896656 = product of:
0.023793312 = sum of:
0.023793312 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023793312 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- The origin of the abridged edition of the Dewey system goes back to 1894 when an outline of 192 pages based on the full 5th Edition (1894) was issued for small public and school libraries of North America. New editions have appeared regularly following closely the publication of new full editions. An abridged version, which is always in one volume, comprises an introduction, schedules, four tables (namely 1, 2, 3 and 4) only, and the relative index and other minor features of the full edition, and has shorter numbers. Abridged 15 is a logical abridgement of the DDC23 (2011) and is a product of a new approach to development of an abridged edition of the DDC. Its content has been derived from the DDC database applying a set of rules to extract the edition using the new (2010) version of the editorial support system. The revision process has been informed by interaction with an always widening and diversified Dewey community at home and abroad. It aims to improve the currency of the schedules continuing to serve as shelving tool while recognizing its 'other' uses as a spinoff of its simplicity and inexpensiveness.
- Date
- 3. 3.2016 18:59:22
