-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.07
0.06855515 = product of:
0.11752311 = sum of:
0.016439613 = product of:
0.049318835 = sum of:
0.049318835 = weight(_text_:f in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049318835 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.013529775 = weight(_text_:information in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013529775 = score(doc=7247,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.015476737 = weight(_text_:for in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015476737 = score(doc=7247,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.018929742 = weight(_text_:the in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018929742 = score(doc=7247,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.34159598 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.015182858 = weight(_text_:of in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015182858 = score(doc=7247,freq=8.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.018929742 = weight(_text_:the in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018929742 = score(doc=7247,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.34159598 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.019034648 = product of:
0.038069297 = sum of:
0.038069297 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038069297 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
- Abstract
- Describes an experiment comparing the performance of automatic full-text indexing software for personal computers with the human intellectual assignment of indexing terms in each document in a collection. Considers the times required to index the document, to retrieve documents satisfying 5 typical foreseen information needs, and the recall and precision ratios of searching. The software used is QuickFinder facility in WordPerfect 6.1 for Windows
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Warheit, I.A.: ¬A study of coordinate indexing as applied to U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Reports (1955)
0.05
0.052542858 = product of:
0.31525713 = sum of:
0.30007428 = weight(_text_:commission in 6229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30007428 = score(doc=6229,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24417253 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
1.2289437 = fieldWeight in 6229, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6229)
0.015182858 = weight(_text_:of in 6229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015182858 = score(doc=6229,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 6229, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6229)
0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
-
Peset, F.; Garzón-Farinós, F.; González, L.M.; García-Massó, X.; Ferrer-Sapena, A.; Toca-Herrera, J.L.; Sánchez-Pérez, E.A.: Survival analysis of author keywords : an application to the library and information sciences area (2020)
0.05
0.050511196 = product of:
0.10102239 = sum of:
0.014530702 = product of:
0.043592103 = sum of:
0.043592103 = weight(_text_:f in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043592103 = score(doc=5774,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.010356578 = weight(_text_:information in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010356578 = score(doc=5774,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
0.01184691 = weight(_text_:for in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01184691 = score(doc=5774,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.17964928 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
0.022654813 = weight(_text_:the in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022654813 = score(doc=5774,freq=44.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.4088166 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
44.0 = termFreq=44.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
0.018978573 = weight(_text_:of in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018978573 = score(doc=5774,freq=32.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
0.022654813 = weight(_text_:the in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022654813 = score(doc=5774,freq=44.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.4088166 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
44.0 = termFreq=44.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- Our purpose is to adapt a statistical method for the analysis of discrete numerical series to the keywords appearing in scientific articles of a given area. As an example, we apply our methodological approach to the study of the keywords in the Library and Information Sciences (LIS) area. Our objective is to detect the new author keywords that appear in a fixed knowledge area in the period of 1 year in order to quantify the probabilities of survival for 10 years as a function of the impact of the journals where they appeared. Many of the new keywords appearing in the LIS field are ephemeral. Actually, more than half are never used again. In general, the terms most commonly used in the LIS area come from other areas. The average survival time of these keywords is approximately 3 years, being slightly higher in the case of words that were published in journals classified in the second quartile of the area. We believe that measuring the appearance and disappearance of terms will allow understanding some relevant aspects of the evolution of a discipline, providing in this way a new bibliometric approach.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.4, S.462-473
-
Bellamy, L.M.; Bickham, L.: Thesaurus development for subject cataloging (1989)
0.05
0.04691434 = product of:
0.09382868 = sum of:
0.007175247 = weight(_text_:information in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007175247 = score(doc=2262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
0.011437457 = weight(_text_:und in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011437457 = score(doc=2262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
0.014216291 = weight(_text_:for in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014216291 = score(doc=2262,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.21557912 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
0.022447916 = weight(_text_:the in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022447916 = score(doc=2262,freq=30.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.40508303 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
0.016103853 = weight(_text_:of in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016103853 = score(doc=2262,freq=16.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
0.022447916 = weight(_text_:the in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022447916 = score(doc=2262,freq=30.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.40508303 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- The biomedical book collection in the Genetech Library and Information Services was first inventoried and cataloged in 1983 when it totaled about 2000 titles. Cataloging records were retrieved from the OCLC system and used as a basis for cataloging. A year of cataloging produced a list of 1900 subject terms. More than one term describing the same concept often appears on the list, and no hierarchical structure related the terms to one another. As the collection grew, the subject catalog became increasingly inconsistent. To bring consistency to subject cataloging, a thesaurus of biomedical terms was constructed using the list of subject headings as a basis. This thesaurus follows the broad categories of the National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings and, with some exceptions, the Guidelines for the Establishment and Development of Monolingual Thesauri. It has enabled the cataloger in providing greater in-depth subject analysis of materials added to the collection and in consistently assigning subject headings to cataloging record.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.04
0.04449163 = product of:
0.08898326 = sum of:
0.007175247 = weight(_text_:information in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007175247 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.014216291 = weight(_text_:for in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014216291 = score(doc=3565,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.21557912 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.016393637 = weight(_text_:the in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016393637 = score(doc=3565,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2958308 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.020528466 = weight(_text_:of in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020528466 = score(doc=3565,freq=26.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.016393637 = weight(_text_:the in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016393637 = score(doc=3565,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2958308 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.014275986 = product of:
0.028551972 = sum of:
0.028551972 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028551972 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- In this article recording evidence for data values in addition to the values themselves in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata is proposed, with the aim of improving the expressiveness and reliability of those records and metadata. Recorded evidence indicates why and how data values are recorded for elements. Recording the history of changes in data values is also proposed, with the aim of reinforcing recorded evidence. First, evidence that can be recorded is categorized into classes: identifiers of rules or tasks, action descriptions of them, and input and output data of them. Dates of recording values and evidence are an additional class. Then, the relative usefulness of evidence classes and also levels (i.e., the record, data element, or data value level) to which an individual evidence class is applied, is examined. Second, examples that can be viewed as recorded evidence in existing bibliographic records and current cataloging rules are shown. Third, some examples of bibliographic records and descriptive metadata with notes of evidence are demonstrated. Fourth, ways of using recorded evidence are addressed.
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.8, S.872-882
-
Soergel, D.: Indexing and retrieval performance : the logical evidence (1994)
0.04
0.040667456 = product of:
0.0976019 = sum of:
0.008371122 = weight(_text_:information in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008371122 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
0.013542145 = weight(_text_:for in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013542145 = score(doc=579,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
0.027880566 = weight(_text_:the in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027880566 = score(doc=579,freq=34.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.50311774 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
34.0 = termFreq=34.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
0.0199275 = weight(_text_:of in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0199275 = score(doc=579,freq=18.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
0.027880566 = weight(_text_:the in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027880566 = score(doc=579,freq=34.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.50311774 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
34.0 = termFreq=34.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- This article presents a logical analysis of the characteristics of indexing and their effects on retrieval performance.It establishes the ability to ask the questions one needs to ask as the foundation of performance evaluation, and recall and discrimination as the basic quantitative performance measures for binary noninteractive retrieval systems. It then defines the characteristics of indexing that affect retrieval - namely, indexing devices, viewpoint-based and importance-based indexing exhaustivity, indexing specifity, indexing correctness, and indexing consistency - and examines in detail their effects on retrieval. It concludes that retrieval performance depends chiefly on the match between indexing and the requirements of the individual query and on the adaption of the query formulation to the characteristics of the retrieval system, and that the ensuing complexity must be considered in the design and testing of retrieval systems
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.8, S.589-599
-
Harter, S.P.; Cheng, Y.-R.: Colinked descriptors : improving vocabulary selection for end-user searching (1996)
0.04
0.04023459 = product of:
0.08046918 = sum of:
0.010147331 = weight(_text_:information in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010147331 = score(doc=4216,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.011437457 = weight(_text_:und in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011437457 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.018353151 = weight(_text_:for in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018353151 = score(doc=4216,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.27831143 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.015334844 = weight(_text_:the in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015334844 = score(doc=4216,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.27672437 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.009861556 = weight(_text_:of in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009861556 = score(doc=4216,freq=6.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.17955035 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.015334844 = weight(_text_:the in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015334844 = score(doc=4216,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.27672437 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- This article introduces a new concept and technique for information retrieval called 'colinked descriptors'. Borrowed from an analogous idea in bibliometrics - cocited references - colinked descriptors provide a theory and method for identifying search terms that, by hypothesis, will be superior to those entered initially by a searcher. The theory suggests a means of moving automatically from 2 or more initial search terms, to other terms that should be superior in retrieval performance to the 2 original terms. A research project designed to test this colinked descriptor hypothesis is reported. The results suggest that the approach is effective, although methodological problems in testing the idea are reported. Algorithms to generate colinked descriptors can be incorporated easily into system interfaces, front-end or pre-search systems, or help software, in any database that employs a thesaurus. The potential use of colinked descriptors is a strong argument for building richer and more complex thesauri that reflect as many legitimate links among descriptors as possible
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.311-325
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Evedove, P.R. Dal; Evedove Tartarotti, R.C. Dal; Lopes Fujita, M.S.: Verbal protocols in Brazilian information science : a perspective from indexing studies (2018)
0.04
0.040226527 = product of:
0.08045305 = sum of:
0.016439613 = product of:
0.049318835 = sum of:
0.049318835 = weight(_text_:f in 4783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049318835 = score(doc=4783,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 4783, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4783)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.013529775 = weight(_text_:information in 4783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013529775 = score(doc=4783,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 4783, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4783)
0.015476737 = weight(_text_:for in 4783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015476737 = score(doc=4783,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 4783, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4783)
0.010929092 = weight(_text_:the in 4783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010929092 = score(doc=4783,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.19722053 = fieldWeight in 4783, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4783)
0.013148742 = weight(_text_:of in 4783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013148742 = score(doc=4783,freq=6.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 4783, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4783)
0.010929092 = weight(_text_:the in 4783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010929092 = score(doc=4783,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.19722053 = fieldWeight in 4783, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4783)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014)
0.04
0.039393324 = product of:
0.07878665 = sum of:
0.005979372 = weight(_text_:information in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005979372 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.01184691 = weight(_text_:for in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01184691 = score(doc=1781,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.17964928 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.017414892 = weight(_text_:the in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017414892 = score(doc=1781,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3142598 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.014233928 = weight(_text_:of in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014233928 = score(doc=1781,freq=18.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.017414892 = weight(_text_:the in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017414892 = score(doc=1781,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3142598 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.011896656 = product of:
0.023793312 = sum of:
0.023793312 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023793312 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 70(2014) no.3, S.307-329
-
Deaves, J.C.; Pache, J.E.: Chemical and numerical indexing for the INSPEC database (1989)
0.04
0.037790567 = product of:
0.09069736 = sum of:
0.0118385535 = weight(_text_:information in 2289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0118385535 = score(doc=2289,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2289, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2289)
0.019151485 = weight(_text_:for in 2289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019151485 = score(doc=2289,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 2289, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2289)
0.02242712 = weight(_text_:the in 2289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02242712 = score(doc=2289,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.40470776 = fieldWeight in 2289, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2289)
0.0148530835 = weight(_text_:of in 2289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0148530835 = score(doc=2289,freq=10.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 2289, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2289)
0.02242712 = weight(_text_:the in 2289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02242712 = score(doc=2289,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.40470776 = fieldWeight in 2289, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2289)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- The wealth of chemical information on the INSPEC database is easily retrieved using the printed subject indexes to the associated abstract journals. However, this subject indexing is insufficient for machine retrieval, and free-text searching has special difficulties. An easy-to-use retrieval system has been developed which overcomes many problems, especially the retrieval of non-stoichiometric compositions, which are a feature solid-state chemistry. The scheme is limited to inorganic material, but allows flexibility and identification of dopants, interfaces and surfaces or substrates. At the same time, a system has been introduced for the online retrieval of numerical data included in the data base. This has successfully standardized the way in which such data is held for searching, enabling further refinement of searches where numerical information is significant
-
Kedar, R.; Shoham, S.: ¬The subject cataloging of monographs with the use of a thesaurus (2003)
0.04
0.037662484 = product of:
0.09038997 = sum of:
0.011437457 = weight(_text_:und in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011437457 = score(doc=2700,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
0.021715743 = weight(_text_:for in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021715743 = score(doc=2700,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.32930255 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
0.020078024 = weight(_text_:the in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020078024 = score(doc=2700,freq=24.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36231726 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
0.017080715 = weight(_text_:of in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017080715 = score(doc=2700,freq=18.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
0.020078024 = weight(_text_:the in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020078024 = score(doc=2700,freq=24.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36231726 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- This paper presents the findings of a study of indexing procedure with the use of a thesaurus for post-coordination. In the first phase of the study, the indexing records of 50 books, prepared by a central cataloging service (the Israeli Center for Libraries), were compared with the indexing records for these books prepared by three independent indexers. In the second phase, indexing records for three books prepared by 51 librarians were studied. In both phases, indexing records were analyzed for mistakes and possible reasons for these mistakes are offered.
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Chan, L.M.: Inter-indexer consistency in subject cataloging (1989)
0.04
0.036633622 = product of:
0.073267244 = sum of:
0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009566996 = score(doc=2276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
0.015249942 = weight(_text_:und in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015249942 = score(doc=2276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
0.010943705 = weight(_text_:for in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010943705 = score(doc=2276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
0.01338535 = weight(_text_:the in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01338535 = score(doc=2276,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.24154484 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
0.010735902 = weight(_text_:of in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010735902 = score(doc=2276,freq=4.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
0.01338535 = weight(_text_:the in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01338535 = score(doc=2276,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.24154484 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- The purpose of the current study has been twofold: (1) to develop a valid methodology for studying indexing consistency in MARC records and, (2) to study such consistency in subject cataloging practice between non-LC libraries and the Library of Congress
- Content
- Die Studie enthält Konsistenzzahlen bezogen auf die LCSH. Diese Zahlen sind kategorienbezogen und können teilweise auf die RSWK übertragen werden
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 8(1989), S.349-358
-
Saarti, J.: Consistency of subject indexing of novels by public library professionals and patrons (2002)
0.04
0.035698958 = product of:
0.085677505 = sum of:
0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009566996 = score(doc=4473,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
0.015476737 = weight(_text_:for in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015476737 = score(doc=4473,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
0.018929742 = weight(_text_:the in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018929742 = score(doc=4473,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.34159598 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
0.022774287 = weight(_text_:of in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022774287 = score(doc=4473,freq=18.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.41465375 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
0.018929742 = weight(_text_:the in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018929742 = score(doc=4473,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.34159598 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- The paper discusses the consistency of fiction indexing of library professionals and patrons based on an empirical test. Indexing was carried out with a Finnish fictional thesaurus and all of the test persons indexed the same five novels. The consistency of indexing was determined to be low; several reasons are postulated. Also an algorithm for typified indexing of fiction is given as well as some suggestions for the development of fiction information retrieval systems and content representation.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.1, S.49-65
-
Zunde, P.; Dexter, M.E.: Factors affecting indexing performance (1969)
0.04
0.03566723 = product of:
0.08560135 = sum of:
0.020294663 = weight(_text_:information in 7496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020294663 = score(doc=7496,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 7496, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7496)
0.016415559 = weight(_text_:for in 7496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016415559 = score(doc=7496,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.24892932 = fieldWeight in 7496, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7496)
0.016393637 = weight(_text_:the in 7496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016393637 = score(doc=7496,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2958308 = fieldWeight in 7496, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7496)
0.016103853 = weight(_text_:of in 7496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016103853 = score(doc=7496,freq=4.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 7496, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7496)
0.016393637 = weight(_text_:the in 7496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016393637 = score(doc=7496,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2958308 = fieldWeight in 7496, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7496)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Source
- Cooperating information societies: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, San Francisco, CA, 1.-4.10.1969. Ed.: J.B. North
-
Tonta, Y.: ¬A study of indexing consistency between Library of Congress and British Library catalogers (1991)
0.04
0.035655685 = product of:
0.08557364 = sum of:
0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009566996 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.02447087 = weight(_text_:for in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02447087 = score(doc=2277,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.37108192 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.017280413 = weight(_text_:the in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017280413 = score(doc=2277,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.31183305 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.016974952 = weight(_text_:of in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016974952 = score(doc=2277,freq=10.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.017280413 = weight(_text_:the in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017280413 = score(doc=2277,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.31183305 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- Indexing consistency between Library of Congress and British Library catalogers using the LCSH is compared.82 titles published in 1987 in the field of library and information science were identified for comparison, and for each title its LC subject headings, assigned by both LC and BL catalogers, were compared. By applying Hooper's 'consistency of a pair' equation, the average indexing consistency value was calculated for the 82 titles. The average indexing value between LC and BL catalogers is 16% for exact matches, and 36% for partial matches
-
David, C.; Giroux, L.; Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.; Lanteigne, D.: Indexing as problem solving : a cognitive approach to consistency (1995)
0.04
0.035575874 = product of:
0.0853821 = sum of:
0.016570523 = weight(_text_:information in 3833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016570523 = score(doc=3833,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3833, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3833)
0.010943705 = weight(_text_:for in 3833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010943705 = score(doc=3833,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 3833, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3833)
0.020446459 = weight(_text_:the in 3833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020446459 = score(doc=3833,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36896583 = fieldWeight in 3833, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3833)
0.016974952 = weight(_text_:of in 3833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016974952 = score(doc=3833,freq=10.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 3833, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3833)
0.020446459 = weight(_text_:the in 3833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020446459 = score(doc=3833,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36896583 = fieldWeight in 3833, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3833)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- Presents results of an experiment in which 8 indexers (4 beginners and 4 experts) were asked to index the same 4 documents with 2 different thesauri. The 3 kind of verbal reports provide complementary data on strategic behaviour. it is of prime importance to consider the indexing task as an ill-defined problem, where the solutionm is partly defined by the indexer
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Learned Information
- Source
- Forging new partnerships in information: converging technologies. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'95, Chicago, IL, 9-12 October 1995. Ed.: T. Kinney
-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.04
0.0355493 = product of:
0.08531833 = sum of:
0.016585674 = weight(_text_:for in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016585674 = score(doc=3510,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.25150898 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.020286093 = weight(_text_:the in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020286093 = score(doc=3510,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36607194 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.011505148 = weight(_text_:of in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011505148 = score(doc=3510,freq=6.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.020286093 = weight(_text_:the in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020286093 = score(doc=3510,freq=18.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36607194 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.016655317 = product of:
0.033310633 = sum of:
0.033310633 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033310633 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- A known-item search for abstracts to previously retrieved references revealed that 2 documents from the same annual volume had been indexed twice. Working from the premise that the whole volume may have been double-indexed, a search strategy was devised that limited the journal code to the year in question. 57 references were retrieved, comprising 28 pairs of duplicates plus a citation for the whole volume. Author, title, source and descriptors were requested off-line and the citations were paired with their duplicates. The 4 categories of descriptors-major descriptors, minor descriptors, subheadings and check-tags-were compared for depth and consistency of indexing and lessons that might be learnt from the study are discussed.
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
-
Larson, R.R.: Experiments in automatic Library of Congress Classification (1992)
0.03
0.03477915 = product of:
0.083469965 = sum of:
0.007175247 = weight(_text_:information in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007175247 = score(doc=1054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
0.016415559 = weight(_text_:for in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016415559 = score(doc=1054,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.24892932 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
0.020078024 = weight(_text_:the in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020078024 = score(doc=1054,freq=24.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36231726 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
0.019723112 = weight(_text_:of in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019723112 = score(doc=1054,freq=24.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
0.020078024 = weight(_text_:the in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020078024 = score(doc=1054,freq=24.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36231726 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- This article presents the results of research into the automatic selection of Library of Congress Classification numbers based on the titles and subject headings in MARC records. The method used in this study was based on partial match retrieval techniques using various elements of new recors (i.e., those to be classified) as "queries", and a test database of classification clusters generated from previously classified MARC records. Sixty individual methods for automatic classification were tested on a set of 283 new records, using all combinations of four different partial match methods, five query types, and three representations of search terms. The results indicate that if the best method for a particular case can be determined, then up to 86% of the new records may be correctly classified. The single method with the best accuracy was able to select the correct classification for about 46% of the new records.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 43(1992), S.130-148
-
Tseng, Y.-H.: Keyword extraction techniques and relevance feedback (1997)
0.03
0.034391362 = product of:
0.08253927 = sum of:
0.0118385535 = weight(_text_:information in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0118385535 = score(doc=1830,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
0.009575742 = weight(_text_:for in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009575742 = score(doc=1830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.14520876 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
0.02242712 = weight(_text_:the in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02242712 = score(doc=1830,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.40470776 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
0.016270736 = weight(_text_:of in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016270736 = score(doc=1830,freq=12.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
0.02242712 = weight(_text_:the in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02242712 = score(doc=1830,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.40470776 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- Automatic keyword extraction is an important and fundamental technology in an advanced information retrieval systems. Briefly compares several major keyword extraction methods, lists their advantages and disadvantages, and reports recent research progress in Taiwan. Also describes the application of a keyword extraction algorithm in an information retrieval system for relevance feedback. Preliminary analysis shows that the error rate of extracting relevant keywords is 18%, and that the precision rate is over 50%. The main disadvantage of this approach is that the extraction results depend on the retrieval results, which in turn depend on the data held by the database. Apart from collecting more data, this problem can be alleviated by the application of a thesaurus constructed by the same keyword extraction algorithm
- Source
- Bulletin of the Library Association of China. 1997, no.59, Dec., S.59-64
-
Ellis, D.; Furner, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of retrieval effectiveness (1996)
0.03
0.03434886 = product of:
0.08243727 = sum of:
0.005979372 = weight(_text_:information in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005979372 = score(doc=4214,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
0.006839816 = weight(_text_:for in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006839816 = score(doc=4214,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.103720546 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
0.021600515 = weight(_text_:the in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021600515 = score(doc=4214,freq=40.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3897913 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
40.0 = termFreq=40.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
0.026417056 = weight(_text_:of in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026417056 = score(doc=4214,freq=62.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.480978 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
7.8740077 = tf(freq=62.0), with freq of:
62.0 = termFreq=62.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
0.021600515 = weight(_text_:the in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021600515 = score(doc=4214,freq=40.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3897913 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
40.0 = termFreq=40.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- An important stage in the process or retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of internodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objects; this operation is often undertaken manually, just as index terms are often manually assigned to documents in a conventional retrieval system. In an earlier article (1994), the results were published of a study in which several different sets of links were inserted, each by a different person, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full-text documents. These results showed little similarity between the link-sets, a finding that was comparable with those of studies of inter-indexer consistency, which suggest that there is generally only a low level of agreement between the sets of index terms assigned to a document by different indexers. In this article, a description is provided of an investigation into the nature of the relationship existing between (i) the levels of inter-linker consistency obtaining among the group of hypertext databases used in our earlier experiments, and (ii) the levels of effectiveness of a number of searches carried out in those databases. An account is given of the implementation of the searches and of the methods used in the calculation of numerical values expressing their effectiveness. Analysis of the results of a comparison between recorded levels of consistency and those of effectiveness does not allow us to draw conclusions about the consistency - effectiveness relationship that are equivalent to those drawn in comparable studies of inter-indexer consistency
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.287-300
