-
EIIA; EUSIDIC; EIRENE: Code of practice for information brokers (1994)
0.12
0.12153231 = product of:
0.24306463 = sum of:
0.021392453 = weight(_text_:information in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021392453 = score(doc=1441,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
0.010943705 = weight(_text_:for in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010943705 = score(doc=1441,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
0.021858184 = weight(_text_:the in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021858184 = score(doc=1441,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.39444107 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
0.15003714 = weight(_text_:commission in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15003714 = score(doc=1441,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24417253 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.61447185 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
0.016974952 = weight(_text_:of in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016974952 = score(doc=1441,freq=10.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
0.021858184 = weight(_text_:the in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021858184 = score(doc=1441,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.39444107 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Content
- A: Ethical priciples: Integrity - Confidentiality - Business ethics / B: Quality of service to the client: Good business practice - Professional competence - Confidentiality - Liability - Advertising and competition
- Footnote
- The views in this document are those of the compiling parties and do not engage the Commission of the EC. - EIIA = The European Information Industray Association / EUSIDIC = The European Association of Information Services / EIRENE = The European Information Researchers Network
- Source
- Information services and use. 14(1994) no.2, S.115-121
-
Cornish, G.: ¬The ethics of information (1997)
0.11
0.11254885 = product of:
0.2250977 = sum of:
0.018718397 = weight(_text_:information in 84) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018718397 = score(doc=84,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 84, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=84)
0.013542145 = weight(_text_:for in 84) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013542145 = score(doc=84,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 84, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=84)
0.02138342 = weight(_text_:the in 84) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02138342 = score(doc=84,freq=20.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3858737 = fieldWeight in 84, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=84)
0.1312825 = weight(_text_:commission in 84) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1312825 = score(doc=84,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24417253 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.53766286 = fieldWeight in 84, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=84)
0.01878783 = weight(_text_:of in 84) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01878783 = score(doc=84,freq=16.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 84, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=84)
0.02138342 = weight(_text_:the in 84) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02138342 = score(doc=84,freq=20.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3858737 = fieldWeight in 84, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=84)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- Reports on 'Info-Ethics', the 1st International Congress on Ethical, Legal and Societal Aspects of Digital Information' held at Monte Carlo in MAr 1997. Some 200 delegates from many countries attended: topics covered included the Internet and its control, and the problems of access to it for developing countries with inadequate telecommunications infrastructure. 2 main themes of the conference were the problems of multilingual information provision, and preservation and conservation in the digital environment. Discussions on the nature of ethics and the ethics of cyberspace led to consideration of whether a 'right to communicate' should be added to the International Convention on Human Rights: there may also be pressure for Unesco to establish a Commission on information ethics
- Source
- Information management report. 1997, Jun, S.17-19
-
Benedetto, C. di; Leone, L.; Seta, M. Della: Semantic approach to bioethics in the Ethicsweb project : building a semantic architecture for a European documentation system
0.10
0.096875496 = product of:
0.19375099 = sum of:
0.010147331 = weight(_text_:information in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010147331 = score(doc=3548,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
0.014216291 = weight(_text_:for in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014216291 = score(doc=3548,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.21557912 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
0.020897869 = weight(_text_:the in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020897869 = score(doc=3548,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.37711173 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
0.112527855 = weight(_text_:commission in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.112527855 = score(doc=3548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24417253 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.46085387 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
0.015063776 = weight(_text_:of in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015063776 = score(doc=3548,freq=14.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
0.020897869 = weight(_text_:the in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020897869 = score(doc=3548,freq=26.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.37711173 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this paper is to present the activities of the European project Ethicsweb, funded under the 7th Framework Program of the European Commission, placing special emphasis on the semantic approach provided by this project. The objectives of Ethicsweb are basically those of: (a) facilitating access to information on ethics in science through an integrated infrastructure; (b) developing sophisticated tools, both technical and semantic to establish the above mentioned infrastructure; (c) creating a European Reference Center for Bioethics, in order to collect the information provided by various local centers and international organizations; (d) developing multilingual tools (thesauri and ontologies) for indexing and searching of documents in bioethics. In this paper the authors will present the steps undertaken until now, such as application profiles, XML schemes and examples.
- Source
- Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
-
Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005)
0.08
0.08387907 = product of:
0.1258186 = sum of:
0.014022872 = weight(_text_:information in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014022872 = score(doc=2392,freq=44.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2274321 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
44.0 = termFreq=44.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
0.006739586 = weight(_text_:und in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006739586 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.086576834 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
0.029938808 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029938808 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16407113 = queryWeight, product of:
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.18247457 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
0.013245246 = weight(_text_:for in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013245246 = score(doc=2392,freq=30.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.20085397 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
0.018861838 = weight(_text_:the in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018861838 = score(doc=2392,freq=122.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3403706 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
11.045361 = tf(freq=122.0), with freq of:
122.0 = termFreq=122.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
0.015736202 = weight(_text_:of in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015736202 = score(doc=2392,freq=88.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
9.380832 = tf(freq=88.0), with freq of:
88.0 = termFreq=88.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
0.018861838 = weight(_text_:the in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018861838 = score(doc=2392,freq=122.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3403706 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
11.045361 = tf(freq=122.0), with freq of:
122.0 = termFreq=122.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
0.008412206 = product of:
0.016824411 = sum of:
0.016824411 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016824411 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(8/12)
- BK
- 06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
- Classification
- 323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
- DDC
- 323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.2, S.302 (L.A. Ennis):"This is an important and timely anthology of articles "on the normative issues surrounding information control" (p. 11). Using an interdisciplinary approach, Moore's work takes a broad look at the relatively new field of information ethics. Covering a variety of disciplines including applied ethics, intellectual property, privacy, free speech, and more, the book provides information professionals of all kinds with a valuable and thought-provoking resource. Information Ethics is divided into five parts and twenty chapters or articles. At the end of each of the five parts, the editor has included a few "discussion cases," which allows the users to apply what they just read to potential real life examples. Part I, "An Ethical Framework for Analysis," provides readers with an introduction to reasoning and ethics. This complex and philosophical section of the book contains five articles and four discussion cases. All five of the articles are really thought provoking and challenging writings on morality. For instance, in the first article, "Introduction to Moral Reasoning," Tom Regan examines how not to answer a moral question. For example, he thinks using what the majority believes as a means of determining what is and is not moral is flawed. "The Metaphysics of Morals" by Immanuel Kant looks at the reasons behind actions. According to Kant, to be moral one has to do the right thing for the right reasons. By including materials that force the reader to think more broadly and deeply about what is right and wrong, Moore has provided an important foundation and backdrop for the rest of the book. Part II, "Intellectual Property: Moral and Legal Concerns," contains five articles and three discussion cases for tackling issues like ownership, patents, copyright, and biopiracy. This section takes a probing look at intellectual and intangible property from a variety of viewpoints. For instance, in "Intellectual Property is Still Property," Judge Frank Easterbrook argues that intellectual property is no different than physical property and should not be treated any differently by law. Tom Palmer's article, "Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified," however, uses historical examples to show how intellectual and physical properties differ.
Part III, "Privacy and Information Control," has four articles and three discussion cases beginning with an 1890 article from the Harvard Law Review, "The Right to Privacy," written by Samuel A Warren and Louis D. Brandeis. Moore then includes an article debating whether people own their genes, an article on caller I.D., and an article on computer surveillance. While all four articles pose some very interesting questions, Margaret Everett's article "The Social Life of Genes: Privacy, Property, and the New Genetics" is incredible. She does a great job of demonstrating how advances in genetics have led to increased concerns over ownership and privacy of genetic codes. For instance, if someone's genetic code predisposes them to a deadly disease, should insurance companies have access to that information? Part IV, "Freedom of Speech and Information Control," has three articles and two discussion cases that examine speech and photography issues. Moore begins this section with Kent Greenawalt's "Rationales for Freedom of Speech," which looks at a number of arguments favoring free speech. Then the notion of free speech is carried over into the digital world in "Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society" by Jack M. Balkin. At 59 pages, this is the work's longest article and demonstrates how complex the digital environment has made freedom of speech issues. Finally, Part V, "Governmental and Societal Control of Information," contains three articles and three discussion cases which provide an excellent view into the conflict between security and privacy. For instance, the first article, "Carnivore, the FBI's E-mail Surveillance System: Devouring Criminals, Not Privacy" by Griffin S. Durham, examines the FBI's e-mail surveillance program called Carnivore. Durham does an excellent job of demonstrating that Carnivore is a necessary and legitimate system used in limited circumstances and with a court order. Librarians will find the final article in the book, National Security at What Price? A Look into Civil Liberty Concerns in the Information Age under the USA Patriot Act by Jacob R. Lilly, of particular interest. In this article, Lilly uses historical examples of events that sacrificed civil liberties for national security such as the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II and the McCarthyism of the Cold War era to examine the PATRIOT Act.
The book also includes an index, a selected bibliography, and endnotes for each article. More information on the authors of the articles would have been useful, however. One of the best features of Information Ethics is the discussion cases at the end of each chapter. For instance, in the discussion cases, Moore asks questions like: Would you allow one person to die to save nine? Should a scientist be allowed to experiment on people without their knowledge if there is no harm? Should marriages between people carrying a certain gene be outlawed? These discussion cases really add to the value of the readings. The only suggestion would be to have put them at the beginning of each section so the reader could have the questions floating in their heads as they read the material. Information Ethics is a well thought out and organized collection of articles. Moore has done an excellent job of finding articles to provide a fair and balanced look at a variety of complicated and far-reaching topics. Further, the work has breadth and depth. Moore is careful to include enough historical articles, like the 1890 Warren article, to give balance and perspective to new and modern topics like E-mail surveillance, biopiracy, and genetics. This provides a reader with just enough philosophy and history theory to work with the material. The articles are written by a variety of authors from differing fields so they range in length, tone, and style, creating a rich tapestry of ideas and arguments. However, this is not a quick or easy read. The subject matter is complex and one should plan to spend time with the book. The book is well worth the effort though. Overall, this is a highly recommended work for all libraries especially academic ones."
- Imprint
- Seattle, WA : University of Washington Press
- LCSH
- Freedom of information
Information society
Privacy, Right of
Information technology / Social aspects
- Subject
- Freedom of information
Information society
Privacy, Right of
Information technology / Social aspects
-
Ethics and the librarian : [papers presented at the Allerton Park Institute held October 29-31,1989, Allerton Conference Center, Robert Allerton Park, Monticello, Illinois] (1991)
0.07
0.07152894 = product of:
0.14305788 = sum of:
0.0118385535 = weight(_text_:information in 1538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0118385535 = score(doc=1538,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1538, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1538)
0.018870842 = weight(_text_:und in 1538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018870842 = score(doc=1538,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 1538, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1538)
0.083828665 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 1538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083828665 = score(doc=1538,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16407113 = queryWeight, product of:
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.5109288 = fieldWeight in 1538, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1538)
0.009562955 = weight(_text_:the in 1538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009562955 = score(doc=1538,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.17256796 = fieldWeight in 1538, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1538)
0.009393915 = weight(_text_:of in 1538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009393915 = score(doc=1538,freq=4.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 1538, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1538)
0.009562955 = weight(_text_:the in 1538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009562955 = score(doc=1538,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.17256796 = fieldWeight in 1538, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1538)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- BK
- 06.04 / Ausbildung, Beruf, Organisationen <Information und Dokumentation>
- Classification
- 06.04 / Ausbildung, Beruf, Organisationen <Information und Dokumentation>
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 18(1992) S.45 (T.L. Shoptaugh); Libraries and culture 27(1992) S.219-220 (A.E. Prentice)
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, Ill. : University of Illinois, GSLIS
-
Van der Walt, M.S.: Ethics in indexing and clssification (2006)
0.07
0.06957477 = product of:
0.11927104 = sum of:
0.020850783 = weight(_text_:information in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020850783 = score(doc=5876,freq=38.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.33817163 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
38.0 = termFreq=38.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.010783338 = weight(_text_:und in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010783338 = score(doc=5876,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.13852294 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.009477528 = weight(_text_:for in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009477528 = score(doc=5876,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.14371942 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.020808373 = weight(_text_:the in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020808373 = score(doc=5876,freq=58.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.37549672 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
7.615773 = tf(freq=58.0), with freq of:
58.0 = termFreq=58.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.014700741 = weight(_text_:of in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014700741 = score(doc=5876,freq=30.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.26765788 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.020808373 = weight(_text_:the in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020808373 = score(doc=5876,freq=58.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.37549672 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
7.615773 = tf(freq=58.0), with freq of:
58.0 = termFreq=58.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.021841917 = product of:
0.043683834 = sum of:
0.043683834 = weight(_text_:communities in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043683834 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.23444878 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
- Abstract
- To start off I would like to briefly address the relationship between indexing and classification, which are very technical activities performed by information professionals, and the concept of social responsibility (the focus of this conference), which refer to the human side of the profession. Although indexing and classification involve many technicalities, the basic objective of these activities is to provide access to informationbearing objects, thereby contributing to the social process of information transfer. Information transfer takes place between authors (creators of information- bearing objects) and information users. The authors have something to communicate, and the users have information needs that must be satisfied by the information professional acting as intermediary. In the process of facilitating this information transfer the indexer and classifier therefore has a responsibility towards both authors and information users. Authors can expect the information professional to represent their creations as accurately and exhaustively as possible in retrieval systems, within the constraints of time and cost. Users can expect the information professional to index and classify in such a way as to ensure that information that can satisfy their information needs will be retrievable within the shortest time and with the least effort possible. One can also see the social responsibility of indexers and classifiers in a broader context. They do not only have a responsibility towards specific authors and users, but also towards communities as a whole, e.g. the scientific community, the business community, or society at large. In the case of the scientific community effective transfer of information about advances in research can be seen as essential for the progress of science. Providing effective and suitable information retrieval systems to make this transfer possible can therefore be seen as a responsibility of information professionals. In a business enterprise the effective organization of business records and other business information sources can make a significant contribution to the smooth operation of the enterprise, may be essential for legal purposes, and can enable management to use the information for decision-making at all levels. The information manager therefore has a responsibility towards the enterprise to properly organize and index all these resources.
- Source
- Wissensorganisation und Verantwortung: Gesellschaftliche, ökonomische und technische Aspekte. Proceedings der 9. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Duisburg, 5.-7. November 2004. Hrsg. von H.P. Ohly u.a
-
Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008)
0.05
0.053061247 = product of:
0.106122494 = sum of:
0.008456109 = weight(_text_:information in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008456109 = score(doc=1868,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
0.015294294 = weight(_text_:for in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015294294 = score(doc=1868,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2319262 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
0.024628375 = weight(_text_:the in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024628375 = score(doc=1868,freq=52.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.44443044 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
7.2111025 = tf(freq=52.0), with freq of:
52.0 = termFreq=52.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
0.02121869 = weight(_text_:of in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02121869 = score(doc=1868,freq=40.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
40.0 = termFreq=40.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
0.024628375 = weight(_text_:the in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024628375 = score(doc=1868,freq=52.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.44443044 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
7.2111025 = tf(freq=52.0), with freq of:
52.0 = termFreq=52.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
0.011896656 = product of:
0.023793312 = sum of:
0.023793312 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023793312 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- This article introduces a normative principle for the behavior of contemporary computing and communication systems and considers some of its consequences. The principle, named the principle of distribution, says that in a distributed multi-agent system, control resides as much as possible with the individuals constituting the system rather than in centralized agents; and when that is unfeasible or becomes inappropriate due to environmental changes, control evolves upwards from the individuals to an appropriate intermediate level rather than being imposed from above. The setting for the work is the dynamically changing global space resulting from ubiquitous communication. Accordingly, the article begins by determining the characteristics of the distributed multi-agent space it spans. It then fleshes out the principle of distribution, with examples from daily life as well as from Computer Science. The case is made for the principle of distribution to work at various levels of abstraction of system behavior: to inform the high-level discussion that ought to precede the more low-level concerns of technology, protocols, and standardization, but also to facilitate those lower levels. Of the more substantial applications given here of the principle of distribution, a technical example concerns the design of secure ad hoc networks of mobile devices, achievable without any form of centralized authentication or identification but in a solely distributed manner. Here, the context is how the principle can be used to provide new and provably secure protocols for genuinely ubiquitous communication. A second, more managerial example concerns the distributed production and management of open-source software, and a third investigates some pertinent questions involving the dynamic restructuring of control in distributed systems, important in times of disaster or malevolence.
- Date
- 1. 6.2008 12:22:41
- Footnote
- Beitrag innerhalb eines Themenschwerpunkts: Perspectives on global information ethics
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.7, S.1134-1142
-
O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998)
0.05
0.048650194 = product of:
0.09730039 = sum of:
0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009566996 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
0.018955056 = weight(_text_:for in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018955056 = score(doc=248,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
0.017280413 = weight(_text_:the in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017280413 = score(doc=248,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.31183305 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
0.015182858 = weight(_text_:of in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015182858 = score(doc=248,freq=8.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
0.017280413 = weight(_text_:the in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017280413 = score(doc=248,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.31183305 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
0.019034648 = product of:
0.038069297 = sum of:
0.038069297 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038069297 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- Having reached the US Supreme Court in 1997, the Communications Decency Act (1996) has strong implications for Internet service providers. How to protect children while not denying adult rights of access is an issue which has impacted successively upon motion pictures, reading materials, radio, television and cable. The case for freedom of electronic speech appears compelling. The problems of obscenity, encryption (cryptography) and provocative 'cyberspeech' on the Internet offers a field day for litigation
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 15:50:50
- Source
- Journal of information ethics. 7(1998) no.1, S.15-23
-
Capurro, R.: Information ethics for and from Africa (2008)
0.05
0.047379833 = product of:
0.1137116 = sum of:
0.023917489 = weight(_text_:information in 1869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023917489 = score(doc=1869,freq=32.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 1869, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1869)
0.01675406 = weight(_text_:for in 1869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01675406 = score(doc=1869,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2540624 = fieldWeight in 1869, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1869)
0.026455121 = weight(_text_:the in 1869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026455121 = score(doc=1869,freq=60.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.4773949 = fieldWeight in 1869, product of:
7.745967 = tf(freq=60.0), with freq of:
60.0 = termFreq=60.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1869)
0.020129817 = weight(_text_:of in 1869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020129817 = score(doc=1869,freq=36.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36650562 = fieldWeight in 1869, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1869)
0.026455121 = weight(_text_:the in 1869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026455121 = score(doc=1869,freq=60.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.4773949 = fieldWeight in 1869, product of:
7.745967 = tf(freq=60.0), with freq of:
60.0 = termFreq=60.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1869)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- The first part of this article deals with some initiatives concerning the role of information ethics for Africa, such as the New Partnership for Africa's Development, United Nations Information Communications Technology (ICT), and the African Information Society Initiative particularly since the World Summit on the Information Society. Information Ethics from Africa is a young academic field, and not much has been published so far on the impact of ICT on African societies and cultures from a philosophical perspective. The second part of the article analyzes some recent research on this matter particularly with regard to the concept of ubuntu. Finally, the article addresses some issues of the African Conference on Information Ethics held February 3-5, 2007, in Pretoria, South Africa.[The following essay is adapted from a keynote address delivered at the Africa Information Ethics Conference in Pretoria, South Africa, February 5-7, 2007. Under the patronage of UNESCO, sponsored by the South African government, and organized with assistance from the Department of Information Science at the University of Pretoria, the School of Information Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and the supporters and members of the International Center for Information Ethics (ICIE), the theme of the conference was Ethical Challenges in the Information Age: The Joy of Sharing Knowledge. The full version of the address as well as selected articles from the conference were published in Vol. 7 of ICIE's online journal, International Review of Information Ethics (for more information, visit http://icie.zkm.de)]
- Footnote
- Beitrag innerhalb eines Themenschwerpunkts: Perspectives on global information ethics
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.7, S.1162-1170
-
Weckert, J.; Ferguson, S.: Ethics, reference librarians and expert systems (1993)
0.05
0.04553264 = product of:
0.109278336 = sum of:
0.016570523 = weight(_text_:information in 8156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016570523 = score(doc=8156,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 8156, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8156)
0.02447087 = weight(_text_:for in 8156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02447087 = score(doc=8156,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.37108192 = fieldWeight in 8156, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8156)
0.025630994 = weight(_text_:the in 8156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025630994 = score(doc=8156,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.46252316 = fieldWeight in 8156, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8156)
0.016974952 = weight(_text_:of in 8156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016974952 = score(doc=8156,freq=10.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 8156, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8156)
0.025630994 = weight(_text_:the in 8156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025630994 = score(doc=8156,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.46252316 = fieldWeight in 8156, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8156)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- The issue of whether or not a librarian should attempt to answer all requests for information, regardless of the use to which the information may be put, is a vexed one. This paper discusses the issue in the context of expert systems in reference work, and suggests that the need for the reference librarian to use discretion has implications for expert system development. It examines the role of the reference librarian, discusses the cases for and against answering all requests for information, outlines the behaviour of expert systems in reference, and discusses possible problems and solutions
-
Information cultures in the digital age : a Festschrift in Honor of Rafael Capurro (2016)
0.04
0.0446096 = product of:
0.0892192 = sum of:
0.0061648544 = product of:
0.018494563 = sum of:
0.018494563 = weight(_text_:f in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018494563 = score(doc=4127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.13211139 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.02091926 = weight(_text_:information in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02091926 = score(doc=4127,freq=68.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3392822 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
8.246211 = tf(freq=68.0), with freq of:
68.0 = termFreq=68.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
0.010052435 = weight(_text_:for in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010052435 = score(doc=4127,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.15243745 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
0.017864555 = weight(_text_:the in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017864555 = score(doc=4127,freq=76.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.32237417 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
8.717798 = tf(freq=76.0), with freq of:
76.0 = termFreq=76.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
0.016353542 = weight(_text_:of in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016353542 = score(doc=4127,freq=66.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2977506 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
8.124039 = tf(freq=66.0), with freq of:
66.0 = termFreq=66.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
0.017864555 = weight(_text_:the in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017864555 = score(doc=4127,freq=76.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.32237417 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
8.717798 = tf(freq=76.0), with freq of:
76.0 = termFreq=76.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- For several decades Rafael Capurro has been at the forefront of defining the relationship between information and modernity through both phenomenological and ethical formulations. In exploring both of these themes Capurro has re-vivified the transcultural and intercultural expressions of how we bring an understanding of information to bear on scientific knowledge production and intermediation. Capurro has long stressed the need to look deeply into how we contextualize the information problems that scientific society creates for us and to re-incorporate a pragmatic dimension into our response that provides a balance to the cognitive turn in information science. With contributions from 35 scholars from 15 countries, Information Cultures in the Digital Age focuses on the culture and philosophy of information, information ethics, the relationship of information to message, the historic and semiotic understanding of information, the relationship of information to power and the future of information education. This Festschrift seeks to celebrate Rafael Capurro's important contribution to a global dialogue on how information conceptualization, use and technology impact human culture and the ethical questions that arise from this dynamic relationship.
- Content
- Inhalt: Super-Science, Fundamental Dimension, Way of Being: Library and Information Science in an Age of Messages / Bawden, David (et al.) (S.31-43) - The "Naturalization" of the Philosophy of Rafael Capurro: Logic, Information and Ethics / Brenner, Joseph E. (S.45-64) - Turing's Cyberworld / Eldred, Michael (S.65-81) - Hermeneutics and Information Science: The Ongoing Journey From Simple Objective Interpretation to Understanding Data as a Form of Disclosure / Kelly, Matthew (S.83-110) - The Epistemological Maturity of Information Science and the Debate Around Paradigms / Ribeiro, Fernanda (et al.) (S.111-124) - A Methodology for Studying Knowledge Creation in Organizational Settings: A Phenomenological Viewpoint / Suorsa, Anna (et al.) (S.125-142) - The Significance of Digital Hermeneutics for the Philosophy of Technology / Tripathi, Arun Kumar (S.143-157) - Reconciling Social Responsibility and Neutrality in LIS Professional Ethics: A Virtue Ethics Approach / Burgess, John T F (S.161-172) - Information Ethics in the Age of Digital Labour and the Surveillance-Industrial Complex / Fuchs, Christian (S.173-190) - Intercultural Information Ethics: A Pragmatic Consideration / Hongladarom, Soraj (S.191-206) - Ethics of European Institutions as Normative Foundation of Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT / Stahl, Bernd Carsten (S.207-219) - Raphael's / Holgate, John D. (S.223-245) - Understanding the Pulse of Existence: An Examination of Capurro's Angeletics / Morador, Fernando Flores (S.247-252) - The Demon in the Gap of Language: Capurro, Ethics and language in Divided Germany / Saldanha, Gustavo Silva (S.253-268) - General Intellect, Communication and Contemporary Media Theory / Frohmann, Bernd (S.271-286) - "Data": The data / Furner, Jonathan (S.287-306) - On the Pre-History of Library Ethics: Documents and Legitimacy / Hansson, Joacim (S.307-319) -
Ethico-Philosophical Reflection on Overly Self-Confident or Even Arrogant Humanism Applied to a Possible History-oriented Rationality of the Library and Librarianship / Suominen, Vesa (S.321-338) - Culture Clash or Transformation? Some Thoughts Concerning the Onslaught of Market economy on the Internet and its Retaliation / Hausmanninger, Thomas (S.341-358) - Magicians and Guerrillas: Transforming Time and Space / Lodge, Juliet (et al.) (.359-371) - Gramsci, Golem, Google: A Marxist Dialog with Rafael Capurro's Intercultural Information Ethics / Schneider, Marco (S.373-383) - From Culture Industry to Information Society: How Horkheimer and Adorno's Conception of the Culture Industry Can Help Us Examine Information Overload in the Capitalist Information Society / Spier, Shaked (S.385-396) - Ethical and Legal Use of Information by University Students: The Core Content of a Training Program / Fernández-Molina, Juan-Carlos (et al.) (S.399-412) - Reflections on Rafael Capurro's Thoughts in Education and Research of Information Science in Brazil / Pinheiro, Lena Vania (S.413-425) - Content Selection in Undergraduate LIS Education / Zins, Chaim (et al.) (S.427-453) - The Train Has Left the Station: Chronicles of the African Network for Information Ethics and the African Centre of Excellence for Information Ethics / Fischer, Rachel (et al.) (S.455-467).
- LCSH
- Information science
Language arts & disciplines / Library & Information Science / General
- RSWK
- Kommunikation / Information / Diskursethik
- Subject
- Kommunikation / Information / Diskursethik
Information science
Language arts & disciplines / Library & Information Science / General
- Theme
- Information
-
Kuhlen, R.: Informationsethik (2004)
0.04
0.044011567 = product of:
0.08802313 = sum of:
0.0118385535 = weight(_text_:information in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0118385535 = score(doc=2905,freq=16.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.029081918 = weight(_text_:und in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029081918 = score(doc=2905,freq=38.0), product of:
0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3735868 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
38.0 = termFreq=38.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.029637909 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029637909 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16407113 = queryWeight, product of:
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.18064061 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.0058560907 = weight(_text_:the in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058560907 = score(doc=2905,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.10567587 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.005752574 = weight(_text_:of in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005752574 = score(doc=2905,freq=6.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.10473771 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.0058560907 = weight(_text_:the in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058560907 = score(doc=2905,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.10567587 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- Informationsethik ist Ethik von und für Menschen, deren Verhalten und Werte sich allerdings immer mehr in der Infosphere, in den Informationsumgebungen, entwickeln. Diese wiederum werden immer mehr von dem geprägt, was Telemediatisierung aller, auch und gerade der intellektuellen Lebenswelten genannt werden kann, also die Durchdringung dieser Lebenswelten mit Informations-, Kommunikations-, und Multi-/Hypermedia-Technologien. Daher kann in einem ersten Zugriff Informationsethik bestimmt werden als ein offenes Ensemble von Aussagen über normatives Verhalten gegenüber Wissen und Information, das sich in fortschreitend telemediatisierten Lebenswelten und in der Auseinandersetzung mit den in bisherigen Lebenswelten gültigen Werten und normativen Verhalten entwickelt. Die Abhängigkeit von dem Telemediatisierungsprozess könnte dazu verleiten, Informationsethik mit Computerethik oder Netzethik gleichzusetzen. Nicht alles, was am Thema Computer ethisch relevant sein könnte, sollte die Informationsethik für sich reklamieren - so wie die Informationswissenschaft ja auch einen spezifischeren Begriff von Information hat als die Informatik (vgl. Kap. A 1). Informationsethik ist Ethik in elektronischen Räumen. Das klingt spektakulär, ist aber doch keine Cyberethik, keine Ethik von epers(ons) (electronic personas), durch die in der virtuellen Realität z.B. Rechte und Pflichten von intelligenten Informationsassistenten (Cyborgs, Bots, Agenten) geregelt werden könnten. Solche Rechte von epers, wie z.B. "epers' rights include those of privacy, autonomy and anonymity" wurden und werden durchaus formuliert, so in einer ACM-Konferenz zum Thema Ethics in the Computer Age von 1995. Referenziert werden konnte diese Cyber-/Eper-Ethik auf die drei Asimovschen Gesetze für Roboter, die sich aber letztlich, anders als die Cyborgs and anders als die den Menschen ablösenden Maschinen von Hans Moravec, noch nicht von ihren Schöp fern, den Menschen, emanzipieren durften, sondern, im Sinne der ersten beiden Asimovschen Roboter-Gesetze, sich an den Interessen der Menschen auszurichten hatten. Erst dann, wenn diesen Interessen Genüge geleistet ist, dürften die Roboter auch an sich denken und Rechte und Freiheiten für sich reklamieren. Für Martha M. Smith in ihrem Information-Ethics-Artikel aus dem 32. Band der Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) ist Informationsethik "concerned with the ethical conflicts and issues that arise in the use of information, information technologies, and information systems", und zwar will sie dabei vor allem professionelle Aspekte angesprochen sehen, nicht Fragen persönlicher Ethik. Letztere können wir hier im Jahr 2004 nicht mehr so deutlich ausgrenzen, zumal die Bereiche professioneller Fachinformation und informationeller Alltagswelten auf den Publikumsmärkten durch die Telemediatisierung, durch die Ubiquität des Internet ineinander übergehen. Der Universalisierung der Informationsethik haben auch die drei UNESCO-INFOethics-Konferenzen (1997, 1990 und 2000) Rechnung getragen, bei denen das Ethos der Informationsspezialisten nur am Rande eine Rolle spielte. Vielmehr spiegelten die INFOethics-Themen die ethischen (und - im Sinne einer auf Aristoteles bezogenen Trias - zugleich die politischen und ökonomischen) Herausforderungen der (globalen) Informationsgesellschaft wider - die UNESCO bevorzugt eher den Plural und Wissensgesellschaften
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
-
Brody, R.: ¬The problem of information naïveté (2008)
0.04
0.043128625 = product of:
0.1035087 = sum of:
0.030253498 = weight(_text_:information in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030253498 = score(doc=1865,freq=20.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.490671 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
0.010943705 = weight(_text_:for in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010943705 = score(doc=1865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
0.021858184 = weight(_text_:the in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021858184 = score(doc=1865,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.39444107 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
0.018595127 = weight(_text_:of in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018595127 = score(doc=1865,freq=12.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
0.021858184 = weight(_text_:the in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021858184 = score(doc=1865,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.39444107 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- With the rapidly changing Web-enabled world, the already existing dichotomy between knowing of and knowing about, or information naïveté, widens daily. This article explores the ethical dilemmas that can result from the lack of information literacy. The article also discusses conditions and consequences of information naïveté, media bias, possessive memory, and limited contexts and abilities. To help avoid information failure, the author recommends producers, contributors, disseminators, and aggregators of information be less information naïve.
- Footnote
- Beitrag innerhalb eines Themenschwerpunkts: Perspectives on global information ethics
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.7, S.1124-1127
- Theme
- Information
-
Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993)
0.04
0.043039564 = product of:
0.08607913 = sum of:
0.008371122 = weight(_text_:information in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008371122 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
0.019151485 = weight(_text_:for in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019151485 = score(doc=2453,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
0.013524061 = weight(_text_:the in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013524061 = score(doc=2453,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.24404795 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
0.0148530835 = weight(_text_:of in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0148530835 = score(doc=2453,freq=10.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
0.013524061 = weight(_text_:the in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013524061 = score(doc=2453,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.24404795 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
0.016655317 = product of:
0.033310633 = sum of:
0.033310633 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033310633 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- An awareness exists among Italian librarians of the need for an established code of ethics for library reference services. Considers the principles that such a code should incorporate; the US Commitment to Information services, for example, affirms users' rights of access to library books and resources, regardless of content and opinions expressed. Censoship is opposed and people are not barred from library use for ethnis, social or religious reasons. An ethical code would require library staff to be impartial, give attention and respect to users, allocate time properly, and avoid prejudice. Discusses the problems of library ethics which arise when user requests relate to sensitive topics e.g. euthansia, cocaine refining
- Date
- 6. 4.1996 13:22:31
-
Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.: ¬"The dearest of our possessions" : applying Floridi's information privacy concept in models of information behavior and information literacy (2020)
0.04
0.042218413 = product of:
0.10132419 = sum of:
0.026847316 = weight(_text_:information in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026847316 = score(doc=5939,freq=28.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.4354273 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
0.021715743 = weight(_text_:for in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021715743 = score(doc=5939,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.32930255 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
0.018328644 = weight(_text_:the in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018328644 = score(doc=5939,freq=20.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3307489 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
0.016103853 = weight(_text_:of in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016103853 = score(doc=5939,freq=16.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
0.018328644 = weight(_text_:the in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018328644 = score(doc=5939,freq=20.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3307489 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- This conceptual article argues for the value of an approach to privacy in the digital information environment informed by Luciano Floridi's philosophy of information and information ethics. This approach involves achieving informational privacy, through the features of anonymity and obscurity, through an optimal balance of ontological frictions. This approach may be used to modify models for information behavior and for information literacy, giving them a fuller and more effective coverage of privacy issues in the infosphere. For information behavior, the Information Seeking and Communication Model and the Information Grounds conception are most appropriate for this purpose. For information literacy, the metaliteracy model, using a modification a privacy literacy framework, is most suitable.
- Series
- Special issue: Information privacy in the digital age
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.9, S.1030-1043
-
Van der Walt, M.S.: Normative ethics in knowledge organisation (2008)
0.04
0.041074686 = product of:
0.08214937 = sum of:
0.010356578 = weight(_text_:information in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010356578 = score(doc=1696,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
0.009531214 = weight(_text_:und in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009531214 = score(doc=1696,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
0.01184691 = weight(_text_:for in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01184691 = score(doc=1696,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.17964928 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
0.016019372 = weight(_text_:the in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016019372 = score(doc=1696,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.28907698 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
0.018375926 = weight(_text_:of in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018375926 = score(doc=1696,freq=30.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
0.016019372 = weight(_text_:the in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016019372 = score(doc=1696,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.28907698 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- The paper addresses the problem of whether the information profession needs ethical norms or guidelines specifically aimed at situations that may arise during knowledge organisation processes, and, if so, which specific norms should be included in codes of conduct. To explore this issue the following three specific questions are addressed: - Which forms of unethical conduct actually occur in knowledge organisation? - Which specific guidelines are required for promoting ethical practices in knowledge organisation? - To what extent does existing ethical codes make provision for knowledge organization practices? Four categories of unethical conduct in knowledge organisation are identified: - The use of terms with negative connotations - Misrepresentation of the subject - Censorship of "undesirable materials" - Bias in verbal indexing languages, classification schemes, evaluative comments in bibliographic records and subject analysis. Guidelines in codes of conduct should be aimed at encouraging information professionals to avoid these unethical practices. An examination of a number of existing ethical codes for the information profession shows that, although general ethical statements, that can be seen as applicable to knowledge organisation tasks, do occur in these codes, this is by no means a general trend. It is also clear that very few of the codes give explicit attention to knowledge organisation.
- Source
- Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012)
0.04
0.040882062 = product of:
0.081764124 = sum of:
0.008456109 = weight(_text_:information in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008456109 = score(doc=420,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
0.01184691 = weight(_text_:for in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01184691 = score(doc=420,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.17964928 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
0.018072287 = weight(_text_:the in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018072287 = score(doc=420,freq=28.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3261228 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
0.013419878 = weight(_text_:of in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013419878 = score(doc=420,freq=16.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
0.018072287 = weight(_text_:the in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018072287 = score(doc=420,freq=28.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3261228 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
0.011896656 = product of:
0.023793312 = sum of:
0.023793312 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023793312 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- The conflict between librarians' ethics and their responsibilities in the process of progressive collection management, which applies the principles of cost accounting to libraries, to call attention to the "bad books" in their collections that are compromised by age, error, abridgement, expurgation, plagiarism, copyright violation, libel, or fraud, is discussed. According to Charles Cutter, notes in catalog records should call attention to the best books but ignore the bad ones. Libraries that can afford to keep their "bad books," however, which often have a valuable second life, must call attention to their intellectual contexts in notes in the catalog records. Michael Bellesiles's Arming America, the most famous case of academic fraud at the turn of the twenty-first century, is used as a test case. Given the bias of content enhancement that automatically pulls content from the Web into library catalogs, catalog notes for "bad books" may be the only way for librarians to uphold their ethical principles regarding collection management while fulfilling their professional responsibilities to their users in calling attention to their "bad books."
- Content
- Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_f.pdf.
- Date
- 27. 9.2012 14:22:00
-
Britz, J.J.: Making the global information society good : A social justice perspective on the ethical dimensions of the global information society (2008)
0.04
0.040412176 = product of:
0.09698922 = sum of:
0.022690123 = weight(_text_:information in 1870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022690123 = score(doc=1870,freq=20.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.36800325 = fieldWeight in 1870, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1870)
0.008207779 = weight(_text_:for in 1870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008207779 = score(doc=1870,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.12446466 = fieldWeight in 1870, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1870)
0.023184106 = weight(_text_:the in 1870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023184106 = score(doc=1870,freq=32.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.41836792 = fieldWeight in 1870, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1870)
0.019723112 = weight(_text_:of in 1870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019723112 = score(doc=1870,freq=24.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 1870, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1870)
0.023184106 = weight(_text_:the in 1870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023184106 = score(doc=1870,freq=32.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.41836792 = fieldWeight in 1870, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1870)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- This article discusses social justice as a moral norm that can be used to address the ethical challenges facing us in the global Information Society. The global Information Society is seen as a continuation of relationships which have been altered by the use of modern information and communication technologies (ICTs). Four interrelated characteristics of the global Information Society also are identified. After a brief overview of the main socioethical issues facing the global Information Society, the article discusses the application of social justice as a moral tool that has universal moral validity and which can be used to address these ethical challenges. It is illustrated that the scope of justice is no longer limited to domestic issues. Three core principles of justice are furthermore distinguished, and based on these three principles, seven categories of justice are introduced. It is illustrated how these categories of justice can be applied to address the main ethical challenges of the Information Society.
- Footnote
- Beitrag innerhalb eines Themenschwerpunkts: Perspectives on global information ethics
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.7, S.1171-1183
-
Marco, G.A.: Ethics for librarians : a narrow view (1996)
0.04
0.040289335 = product of:
0.09669441 = sum of:
0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009566996 = score(doc=3706,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
0.015476737 = weight(_text_:for in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015476737 = score(doc=3706,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
0.024438193 = weight(_text_:the in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024438193 = score(doc=3706,freq=20.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.44099852 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
0.022774287 = weight(_text_:of in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022774287 = score(doc=3706,freq=18.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.41465375 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
0.024438193 = weight(_text_:the in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024438193 = score(doc=3706,freq=20.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.44099852 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- Offers a definition of ethics for librarians by recent concerns in the uSA about the Code of Ethics (1981) of the ALA and by examination of other codes of ethics, such as that produced by the Library Association, UK, and the writings of librarians and ethicists. Concludes with notes on the revision of the 1981 Code of Ethics, adopted by the ALA on 28 June 95, comparing the 2 codes and noting the differences where applicable
- Source
- Journal of librarianship and information science. 28(1996) no.1, S.33-38
-
Information society : new media, ethics and postmodernism (1996)
0.04
0.040089887 = product of:
0.08017977 = sum of:
0.0082198065 = product of:
0.024659418 = sum of:
0.024659418 = weight(_text_:f in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024659418 = score(doc=2451,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.17614852 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.015126749 = weight(_text_:information in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015126749 = score(doc=2451,freq=20.0), product of:
0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2453355 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
0.012235435 = weight(_text_:for in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012235435 = score(doc=2451,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.18554096 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
0.01545607 = weight(_text_:the in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01545607 = score(doc=2451,freq=32.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.27891195 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
0.013685644 = weight(_text_:of in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013685644 = score(doc=2451,freq=26.0), product of:
0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.2491759 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
0.01545607 = weight(_text_:the in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01545607 = score(doc=2451,freq=32.0), product of:
0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.035122856 = queryNorm
0.27891195 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
0.5 = coord(6/12)
- Abstract
- This volume examines 3 critical debates of the post-industrial society: culture and technology, information society, and postmodernism. It aims to provide theoretical and methodological underpinnings for the analysis and design of information, communication and multimedia technologies. It is a thoroughly interdisciplinara volume, which will be of interest to students, researchers and practitioners in a wide area of disciplines including information and communication systems, education and social sciences
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: COOLEY, M.: Visions and problems of the post-industrial society; GILL, K.S.: Knowledge and the post-industrial society; LYTJE, I.: Media and the cultural condition: language and education; WHISTON, T.: Knowledge and sustainable development: towards the furtherance of a global communication system; SHIPLEY, P.: The keyboard blues: modern technology and the rights and risks of people at work; LEAL, F.: Ethics is fragile, goodness is not; HIROSE, L.M.: Organisational spaces and intelligent machines: a metaphorical approach to ethics; THORPE, J.: Information system design: human centres approaches; BESSELAAR, P. van den u. T. MOM: Technological change, social innovation and employment; JONES, M.: Empowerment and enslavement: business process reeingineering and the transformation of work; LEVY, P.: The role of creativity in post-industrial society: exploring the implications of non-conventional technologies for work and management organisation; JANSEN, A.: The global information society and rural economics; DAY, P.: Information communication technology and society: a community-based approach; CYSNE, F.P.: Technology transfer and development; COOPER, J.: Information, knowledge and empowerment: the role of information in rural development; CLAY, J.: Participative citizenry in the information ages: the role of science and technology towards democratic education in a multicultural society; TAYLOR, J.: New media and cultural representation; BLACK, M.T.: Consensus and authenticity in representations: simulation as participative theatre; GORAYSKA, B. u. J.L. MEY: Cognitive technology; BOYNE, C.W.: Electronic mail, IT productivity and workplace culture; Squires, P.: Deadly technology in the post-industrial society: a case study of firearms and firearms control; COLE, M. u. D. HILL: Resitance postmodernism: emancipatory politics for a new era or academic chic for a defeatist intelligentsia?; McFEE, G.: Postmodernism, dance and post-industrial society; MULLER, R.C.: Creativity constellation for innovation and cooperation
