Search (96 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  1. Atherton, P.: Books are for use : Final report of the Subject Access Project to the Council of Library Resources (1978) 0.04
    0.0404816 = product of:
      0.09715585 = sum of:
        0.016742244 = weight(_text_:information in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016742244 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
        0.019151485 = weight(_text_:for in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019151485 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
        0.01912591 = weight(_text_:the in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01912591 = score(doc=844,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34513593 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
        0.023010297 = weight(_text_:of in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023010297 = score(doc=844,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
        0.01912591 = weight(_text_:the in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01912591 = score(doc=844,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34513593 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Imprint
    Syracuse, NY : Syracuse Univ., School of Information Studies
  2. Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000) 0.04
    0.040025905 = product of:
      0.08005181 = sum of:
        0.007175247 = weight(_text_:information in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007175247 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
        0.008207779 = weight(_text_:for in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008207779 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.12446466 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
        0.015334844 = weight(_text_:the in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015334844 = score(doc=1187,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27672437 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
        0.019723112 = weight(_text_:of in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019723112 = score(doc=1187,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
        0.015334844 = weight(_text_:the in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015334844 = score(doc=1187,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27672437 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
        0.014275986 = product of:
          0.028551972 = sum of:
            0.028551972 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028551972 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access to monographs through online public access catalogs (OPACs) has always been a major concern for large research and/or academic libraries. Academic library practice of providing subject access to monographs has proven inadequate, especially in the case of composite works. Many techniques have been proposed to enhance subject treatment of monographs in OPACs. This article briefly reviews these efforts in the past and presents the case of adding Tables of Contents as one of the Most useful and probably also one of the Most costeffective ways of improving subject access to Monographs in an academic environment.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler
  3. Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991) 0.04
    0.03933967 = product of:
      0.07867934 = sum of:
        0.0117171295 = weight(_text_:information in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0117171295 = score(doc=520,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.19003606 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
        0.009477528 = weight(_text_:for in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009477528 = score(doc=520,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.14371942 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
        0.015931752 = weight(_text_:the in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015931752 = score(doc=520,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.28749585 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
        0.016103853 = weight(_text_:of in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016103853 = score(doc=520,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
        0.015931752 = weight(_text_:the in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015931752 = score(doc=520,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.28749585 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
        0.009517324 = product of:
          0.019034648 = sum of:
            0.019034648 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019034648 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Myriad new information resources are available to contemporary library users. While print remains the foundation of most collections, libraries are also beginning to provide access to an array of bibliographic, numeric, and full-text databases. As more and more information is produced in electronic form and presented at computer workstations, the library catalog is being given an expanded role. The expanded catalog will play a crucial part in organizing information in electronic libraries, and in providing navigational assistance to library users. Like the traditional card catalog, the expanded catalog will not only lead to specific items or groups of sources, but also will provide connections to related materials. These connections will uses standard data elements to link the results of a search in one database with related material in another. For example, links will show local library holdings of sources in citation databases. Cornell University's Mann Library serves the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, the College of Human Ecology, and the Division of Biological Sciences. As part of electronic library development, Mann staff have been analyzing issues involved in making it possible for Agricola and BIOSIS users to see, automatically, which of their retrieved citations are from sources available in the Cornell libraries. Samples of citations from Agricola and BIOSIS were drawn, and data elements present in these records were compared with bibliographic records of the library's holdings. In some cases, links would be provided by ISSNs. The study shows, however, that the presence of standard identifiers such as ISSN, USBN, or CODEN cannot be assumed, and other linking algorithms must be developed. This article presents study results, provides an overview of several linking systems, and identifies some of the difficulties caused by lack of standardization between different bibliographic databases. It is clear that the concept of an expanded catalog will require not only links between information resources but agreements among information professionals on standard data elements.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:25
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century
  4. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.04
    0.03866468 = product of:
      0.09279524 = sum of:
        0.019151485 = weight(_text_:for in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019151485 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
        0.013524061 = weight(_text_:the in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013524061 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.24404795 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
        0.013285002 = weight(_text_:of in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013285002 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
        0.013524061 = weight(_text_:the in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013524061 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.24404795 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
        0.033310633 = product of:
          0.06662127 = sum of:
            0.06662127 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06662127 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  5. Wormell, I.: Subject access redefinied : how new technology changes the conception of subject representation (1994) 0.04
    0.038043126 = product of:
      0.091303505 = sum of:
        0.008371122 = weight(_text_:information in 7741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008371122 = score(doc=7741,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 7741, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7741)
        0.013542145 = weight(_text_:for in 7741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013542145 = score(doc=7741,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 7741, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7741)
        0.025301201 = weight(_text_:the in 7741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025301201 = score(doc=7741,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.4565719 = fieldWeight in 7741, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7741)
        0.01878783 = weight(_text_:of in 7741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01878783 = score(doc=7741,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 7741, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7741)
        0.025301201 = weight(_text_:the in 7741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025301201 = score(doc=7741,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.4565719 = fieldWeight in 7741, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7741)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    The paper examines the developmentss that have taken place during the last decade with respect to the provision of intellectual subject access in information databases storage. The principles of the SAP indexing methodology are outlined and exemplified, leading to a discussion of the consequences for the conception of the physical 'document' versus 'semantic entities' as the basic constructs for storage and multi-dimensional representation of subject matter. Finally, the paper analyzes the impact of very recent technologies which make achievable such access conceptions and mechanisms
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
  6. Mandel, C.: Enriching the library catalog record for subject access (1985) 0.04
    0.036409047 = product of:
      0.08738171 = sum of:
        0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009566996 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
        0.026806494 = weight(_text_:for in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026806494 = score(doc=1067,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.40649986 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
        0.018929742 = weight(_text_:the in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018929742 = score(doc=1067,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34159598 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
        0.013148742 = weight(_text_:of in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013148742 = score(doc=1067,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
        0.018929742 = weight(_text_:the in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018929742 = score(doc=1067,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34159598 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    This paper analyzes proposals for augmenting library bibliographic records for improved subject searching in online catalogs. Possible fields for enrichment are described and their likely value assessed. The assessment determines that the main value of enriched records would be to provide access to parts of books. The paper presents arguments for and against adding book content indexing to the online catalog and analyzes the feasibility of eleven alternatives for providing such information
  7. Diodato, V.P.: Author indexing (1981) 0.04
    0.03562385 = product of:
      0.08549724 = sum of:
        0.011958744 = weight(_text_:information in 6983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011958744 = score(doc=6983,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 6983, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6983)
        0.013679632 = weight(_text_:for in 6983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013679632 = score(doc=6983,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20744109 = fieldWeight in 6983, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6983)
        0.019320088 = weight(_text_:the in 6983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019320088 = score(doc=6983,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34863994 = fieldWeight in 6983, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6983)
        0.02121869 = weight(_text_:of in 6983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02121869 = score(doc=6983,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 6983, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6983)
        0.019320088 = weight(_text_:the in 6983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019320088 = score(doc=6983,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34863994 = fieldWeight in 6983, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6983)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    Indexing terms supplied by authors can increase subject control of their documents. The terms can be used in the creation of indexes, abstracts, and other devices for information retrieval in the special library. An examination of the American Mathematical Society author indexing program suggests that contributions of authors enhance indexing efforts of editors
  8. Ihadjadene, M.: ¬Les tables des matières dans les catalogues en ligne : opportunités, méthodes et couts (1998) 0.04
    0.035576817 = product of:
      0.07115363 = sum of:
        0.016439613 = product of:
          0.049318835 = sum of:
            0.049318835 = weight(_text_:f in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049318835 = score(doc=2234,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009566996 = score(doc=2234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
        0.018955056 = weight(_text_:for in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018955056 = score(doc=2234,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
        0.007728035 = weight(_text_:the in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007728035 = score(doc=2234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.13945597 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
        0.010735902 = weight(_text_:of in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010735902 = score(doc=2234,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
        0.007728035 = weight(_text_:the in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007728035 = score(doc=2234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.13945597 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Analysis of research to date on improving subject access by including contents tables in bibliographic records. Results indicate the need for clear methodology (criteria for selecting notoces for enrichment, manual and semi automated methods, cost). Evaluations, based on recall, precision and rate of circulation, indicate manifest benefits, especially in virtual libraries where information is superabundant; but enrichment is a complex process
    Language
    f
  9. Diodato, V.: Tables of contents and book indexes : how well do they match readers' descriptions of books? (1986) 0.04
    0.035242796 = product of:
      0.08458271 = sum of:
        0.007175247 = weight(_text_:information in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007175247 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
        0.011607553 = weight(_text_:for in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011607553 = score(doc=376,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.17601961 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
        0.023897627 = weight(_text_:the in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023897627 = score(doc=376,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.43124378 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
        0.018004656 = weight(_text_:of in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018004656 = score(doc=376,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
        0.023897627 = weight(_text_:the in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023897627 = score(doc=376,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.43124378 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    The author collected information about tables of content and index terms in 125 books borrowed by patrons in a medium-sized academic library. To learn how useful the term would be as subject terms in a library catalog, he determined which of these terms were the same as the words used by the patrons to describe the books. For 72,4% of the books assigned LCSH, the patron's term matched the LCheading. The patron's term matched the table of contents term for (1,3% of the books with tables of contents. If the catalog had included terms from the tables of contents and the indexes in addition to the LCSH, the success rate would have been 97,3%. One problem in using terms from books in a library catalog is that many books lack indexes and/or tables of context
  10. Peis, E.; Fernandez-Molina, J.C.: Enrichment of bibliographic records of online catalogs through ORC and SGML technology (1998) 0.03
    0.032809503 = product of:
      0.07874281 = sum of:
        0.014499208 = weight(_text_:information in 3385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014499208 = score(doc=3385,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 3385, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3385)
        0.013542145 = weight(_text_:for in 3385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013542145 = score(doc=3385,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 3385, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3385)
        0.016563525 = weight(_text_:the in 3385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016563525 = score(doc=3385,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2988965 = fieldWeight in 3385, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3385)
        0.017574405 = weight(_text_:of in 3385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017574405 = score(doc=3385,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 3385, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3385)
        0.016563525 = weight(_text_:the in 3385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016563525 = score(doc=3385,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2988965 = fieldWeight in 3385, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3385)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of research into the feasibility of using OCR scanner technology to capture contents pages of collective monographs and to extract the bibliographic information of each individual work and process this using a standardized language, such as SGML, for tagging electronic documents. By this means, data can be used as electronic information or stored in OPACs, thus providing additional access points. Outlines a pilot system to test the initial hypotheses, show the feasibility of achieving the suggested goals and develop the tasks required for them to be carried out as automatically as possible
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 17(1998) no.3, S.161-172
  11. Syracuse, R.O.; Poyer, R.K.: Enhancing access to the library's collections : a view from an academy health center library (1991) 0.03
    0.032224387 = product of:
      0.07733853 = sum of:
        0.008371122 = weight(_text_:information in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008371122 = score(doc=516,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
        0.013542145 = weight(_text_:for in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013542145 = score(doc=516,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
        0.020286093 = weight(_text_:the in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020286093 = score(doc=516,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36607194 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
        0.0148530835 = weight(_text_:of in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0148530835 = score(doc=516,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
        0.020286093 = weight(_text_:the in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020286093 = score(doc=516,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36607194 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    With the advent of online public access catalogs, catalog librarians and their staffs have been freed from the labor-intensive processes involved in the creation and maintenance of card catalogs. At the Medical University of South Carolina Library, this new found time has been devoted to enhancing access to the library's collections. Enhancements discussed include the creation of bibliographic records for vertical file materials, the National Library of Medicine bibliographies, and reserve items, as well as providing subject access to individual chapters in books and articles in monographic serials.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century
  12. Wormell, I.: Subject Access Project : the use of book indexes for subject retrieval systems in libraries (1981) 0.03
    0.03176119 = product of:
      0.07622686 = sum of:
        0.016742244 = weight(_text_:information in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016742244 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
        0.019151485 = weight(_text_:for in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019151485 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
        0.013524061 = weight(_text_:the in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013524061 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.24404795 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
        0.013285002 = weight(_text_:of in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013285002 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
        0.013524061 = weight(_text_:the in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013524061 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.24404795 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 6(1981), S.24-28
  13. Weintraub, T.S.; Shimoguchi, W.: Catalog record contents enhancement (1993) 0.03
    0.031156838 = product of:
      0.07477641 = sum of:
        0.014499208 = weight(_text_:information in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014499208 = score(doc=4650,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
        0.009575742 = weight(_text_:for in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009575742 = score(doc=4650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.14520876 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
        0.016563525 = weight(_text_:the in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016563525 = score(doc=4650,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2988965 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
        0.017574405 = weight(_text_:of in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017574405 = score(doc=4650,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
        0.016563525 = weight(_text_:the in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016563525 = score(doc=4650,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2988965 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    Contents enhancement of catalog records may increase access to books in collections and aid in effective resource sharing by providing more detailed descriptions about library holdings in the catalog. A sample of monographs in San Diego State Univ. Library was studied to determine the extent to which information in books from parts of the collection could be represented better by content notes, and to determine how much of this information has subject or analytical applications. The study revealed that approximately 23% of the books contain discrete content information not already represented in catalog records that could be added. Of those, 52% would be citation-based enhancements and 48% would be subject-based. Nearly 65% would require fewer than 25 enhancements, with an average of 8.03 enhancements per book for the total population
  14. Tseng, Y.-H.: Automatic cataloguing and searching for retrospective data by use of OCR text (2001) 0.03
    0.029401166 = product of:
      0.0705628 = sum of:
        0.012427893 = weight(_text_:information in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012427893 = score(doc=5421,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
        0.018353151 = weight(_text_:for in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018353151 = score(doc=5421,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27831143 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
        0.014197307 = weight(_text_:the in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014197307 = score(doc=5421,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25619698 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
        0.011387144 = weight(_text_:of in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011387144 = score(doc=5421,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
        0.014197307 = weight(_text_:the in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014197307 = score(doc=5421,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25619698 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes our efforts in supporting information retrieval from OCR degraded text. In particular, we report our approach to an automatic cataloging and searching contest for books in multiple languages. In this contest, 500 books in English, German, French, and Italian published during the 1770s to 1970s are scanned into images and OCRed to digital text. The goal is to use only automatic ways to extract information for sophisticated searching. We adopted the vector space retrieval model, an n-gram indexing method, and a special weighting scheme to tackle this problem. Although the performance by this approach is slightly inferior to the best approach, which is mainly based on regular expression match, one advantage of our approach is that it is less language dependent and less layout sensitive, thus is readily applicable to other languages and document collections. Problems of OCR text retrieval for some Asian languages are also discussed in this article, and solutions are suggested
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.5, S.378-390
  15. Advances in online public access catalogs : Vol.1 (1992) 0.03
    0.029119305 = product of:
      0.069886334 = sum of:
        0.005979372 = weight(_text_:information in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005979372 = score(doc=4653,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
        0.01184691 = weight(_text_:for in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01184691 = score(doc=4653,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.17964928 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
        0.019320088 = weight(_text_:the in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019320088 = score(doc=4653,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34863994 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
        0.013419878 = weight(_text_:of in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013419878 = score(doc=4653,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
        0.019320088 = weight(_text_:the in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019320088 = score(doc=4653,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34863994 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: USER INTERFACES: HULSER, R.P.: Overview of graphical user interfaces; TROUTMA, L.: The online public access catalog and music materials: issues for system and interface design; MISCHO, W.H. u. T.W. COLE: The Illinois extended OPAC: library information workstation design and development; BALLARD, T. u. J. SMITH: The human interface: an ongoing study of OPAC usage at Adelphi University; Pt.2: ENHANCING THE TRADITIONAL CATALOG RECORD: WITTENBACH; S.A.: Building a better mousetrap: enhanced cataloging and access for the online catalog; BEATTY, S.: Subject enrichment using contents or index terms: the Australian Defence Force Academy experience; Enhancing USMARC records with table of contents (MARBI discussion paper; no.46); Pt.3: REDEFINING THE SCOPE OF THE OPAC AND MOVING BEYOND THE LIBRARY WALLS: TROLL, D.A.: The Mercury Project: meeting the expectations of electronc library patrons; JAMIESON, R.C.: Oriental language materials in online public access catalogues; JUZNIC, P. u. H. PAAR: Cooperative cataloguing in Yugoslavia and the development of the OPAC; PERRY, A.: The PACLink Project at the State University of New York: leveraging collections for the future
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 19(1993) no.3, S.170 (R.P. Holley); Library revies 42(1993) no.5, S.70-71 (D. Anderson) // Jährliche Publikation angekündigt
  16. Enhancing USMARC records with table of contents (1992) 0.03
    0.02891543 = product of:
      0.06939703 = sum of:
        0.011958744 = weight(_text_:information in 2124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011958744 = score(doc=2124,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2124, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2124)
        0.013679632 = weight(_text_:for in 2124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013679632 = score(doc=2124,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20744109 = fieldWeight in 2124, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2124)
        0.013661366 = weight(_text_:the in 2124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013661366 = score(doc=2124,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.24652568 = fieldWeight in 2124, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2124)
        0.016435927 = weight(_text_:of in 2124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016435927 = score(doc=2124,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 2124, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2124)
        0.013661366 = weight(_text_:the in 2124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013661366 = score(doc=2124,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.24652568 = fieldWeight in 2124, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2124)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    Considers methods of enriching bibliographic USMARC records for OPACs via a subject enhancement process involving the inclusion of subject information derived from the books' contents tables
  17. ¬The subject enhancement of OPAC records and the need for multilingual access (1993) 0.03
    0.027702069 = product of:
      0.083106205 = sum of:
        0.01934592 = weight(_text_:for in 4259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01934592 = score(doc=4259,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.29336601 = fieldWeight in 4259, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4259)
        0.023662178 = weight(_text_:the in 4259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023662178 = score(doc=4259,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.42699498 = fieldWeight in 4259, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4259)
        0.016435927 = weight(_text_:of in 4259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016435927 = score(doc=4259,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 4259, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4259)
        0.023662178 = weight(_text_:the in 4259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023662178 = score(doc=4259,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.42699498 = fieldWeight in 4259, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4259)
      0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the potential of providing enhanced content indexing of document records either by natural language or PRECIS controlled vocabulary in order to provide more effective subject access to OPACs. Considers multilingual access OPACs. Controlled vocabulary is the best option for the latter in the short terms
  18. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Colenbrander-Dijkman, A.-M.: Subject access to central catalogues : incompatibility issues of library classification systems and subject headings in subject cataloguing (1986) 0.03
    0.026737848 = product of:
      0.06417084 = sum of:
        0.011437457 = weight(_text_:und in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011437457 = score(doc=3926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
        0.011607553 = weight(_text_:for in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011607553 = score(doc=3926,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.17601961 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
        0.014197307 = weight(_text_:the in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014197307 = score(doc=3926,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25619698 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
        0.012731214 = weight(_text_:of in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012731214 = score(doc=3926,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
        0.014197307 = weight(_text_:the in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014197307 = score(doc=3926,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25619698 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    Traditional subject cataloguing hampers subject retrieval in central catalogues, because of the lack of a common indexing and retrieval language in these catalogues. This study investigates the possibilities to use the various individual subject access systems, present in the catalogues, for subject access. A search procedure based on 'citation pearl growing' and 'user relevance feedback', which can be applied in a public access interface to central data bases, has been developed. From an experiment it can be concluded, that automated expert assistance, provided with a search strategy, will improve search response for unexperienced searchers. It reduces the number of zero-hits and increases the number of relevant items retrieved
    Source
    Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld: Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P.O. Degens
  19. Smith, I.A.; O'Brien, A.: Signposts to information : keywords, indexes and thesauri (1993) 0.03
    0.026164372 = product of:
      0.07849311 = sum of:
        0.013529775 = weight(_text_:information in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013529775 = score(doc=8116,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
        0.023184106 = weight(_text_:the in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023184106 = score(doc=8116,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.41836792 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
        0.018595127 = weight(_text_:of in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018595127 = score(doc=8116,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
        0.023184106 = weight(_text_:the in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023184106 = score(doc=8116,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.41836792 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
      0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
    
    Abstract
    Shortened and revised version of a paper presented during an Education Librarian's Group session at the Under One Umbrella Two Conference, organized by the Library Association in Manchester, 9-11 Jul 93. With the possibility of free text searching and easy access to CD-ROM databases, users often do not realise that subject searching is enhanced by familiarity with the controlled vocabulary underlying the indexing system of the database. Discusses the construction of information retrieval thesauri, the problems of terminology and how the use of thesauri can make searching more effective, using education thesauri as examples
  20. Dwyer, J.: Bibliographic records enhancement : from the drawing board to the catalog screen (1991) 0.03
    0.026109565 = product of:
      0.06266296 = sum of:
        0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009566996 = score(doc=514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
        0.010943705 = weight(_text_:for in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010943705 = score(doc=514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
        0.017280413 = weight(_text_:the in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017280413 = score(doc=514,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31183305 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
        0.007591429 = weight(_text_:of in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007591429 = score(doc=514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
        0.017280413 = weight(_text_:the in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017280413 = score(doc=514,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31183305 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    Contents notes can improve online access to works containing essays, short stories, and significantly titles chapters. Few records in bibliographic utilities include contents notes. The OCLC PRISM service may provide an opportunity to cooperatively build a contents-enriched database. This paper discusses some issues related to the creation of enhanced records and their display in online cataloges. It also describes one library's efforts to add contents notes lically and to participate in an anticipated OCLC pilot project
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century

Years

Languages

  • e 50
  • d 42
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 86
  • x 5
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…