Search (194 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Visualisierung"
  1. Palm, F.: QVIZ : Query and context based visualization of time-spatial cultural dynamics (2007) 0.10
    0.10008175 = product of:
      0.17156872 = sum of:
        0.012329709 = product of:
          0.036989126 = sum of:
            0.036989126 = weight(_text_:f in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036989126 = score(doc=1289,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.012427893 = weight(_text_:information in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012427893 = score(doc=1289,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
        0.011607553 = weight(_text_:for in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011607553 = score(doc=1289,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.17601961 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
        0.014197307 = weight(_text_:the in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014197307 = score(doc=1289,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25619698 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
        0.012731214 = weight(_text_:of in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012731214 = score(doc=1289,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
        0.014197307 = weight(_text_:the in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014197307 = score(doc=1289,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25619698 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
        0.09407773 = sum of:
          0.065525755 = weight(_text_:communities in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.065525755 = score(doc=1289,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.35167316 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
          0.028551972 = weight(_text_:22 in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028551972 = score(doc=1289,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
      0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
    
    Abstract
    QVIZ will research and create a framework for visualizing and querying archival resources by a time-space interface based on maps and emergent knowledge structures. The framework will also integrate social software, such as wikis, in order to utilize knowledge in existing and new communities of practice. QVIZ will lead to improved information sharing and knowledge creation, easier access to information in a user-adapted context and innovative ways of exploring and visualizing materials over time, between countries and other administrative units. The common European framework for sharing and accessing archival information provided by the QVIZ project will open a considerably larger commercial market based on archival materials as well as a richer understanding of European history.
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  2. Rolling, L.: ¬The role of graphic display of concept relationships in indexing and retrieval vocabularies (1985) 0.10
    0.09990676 = product of:
      0.17126873 = sum of:
        0.0067648874 = weight(_text_:information in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067648874 = score(doc=3646,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
        0.014477162 = weight(_text_:for in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014477162 = score(doc=3646,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.21953502 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
        0.018531177 = weight(_text_:the in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018531177 = score(doc=3646,freq=46.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3344037 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
              6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
                46.0 = termFreq=46.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
        0.07501857 = weight(_text_:commission in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07501857 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24417253 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.30723593 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9519553 = idf(docFreq=114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
        0.016103853 = weight(_text_:of in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016103853 = score(doc=3646,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
        0.018531177 = weight(_text_:the in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018531177 = score(doc=3646,freq=46.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3344037 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
              6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
                46.0 = termFreq=46.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
        0.021841917 = product of:
          0.043683834 = sum of:
            0.043683834 = weight(_text_:communities in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043683834 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.23444878 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
    
    Abstract
    The use of diagrams to express relationships in classification is not new. Many classificationists have used this approach, but usually in a minor display to make a point or for part of a difficult relational situation. Ranganathan, for example, used diagrams for some of his more elusive concepts. The thesaurus in particular and subject headings in general, with direct and indirect crossreferences or equivalents, need many more diagrams than normally are included to make relationships and even semantics clear. A picture very often is worth a thousand words. Rolling has used directed graphs (arrowgraphs) to join terms as a practical method for rendering relationships between indexing terms lucid. He has succeeded very weIl in this endeavor. Four diagrams in this selection are all that one needs to explain how to employ the system; from initial listing to completed arrowgraph. The samples of his work include illustration of off-page connectors between arrowgraphs. The great advantage to using diagrams like this is that they present relations between individual terms in a format that is easy to comprehend. But of even greater value is the fact that one can use his arrowgraphs as schematics for making three-dimensional wire-and-ball models, in which the relationships may be seen even more clearly. In fact, errors or gaps in relations are much easier to find with this methodology. One also can get across the notion of the threedimensionality of classification systems with such models. Pettee's "hand reaching up and over" (q.v.) is not a figment of the imagination. While the actual hand is a wire or stick, the concept visualized is helpful in illuminating the three-dimensional figure that is latent in all systems that have cross-references or "broader," "narrower," or, especially, "related" terms. Classification schedules, being hemmed in by the dimensions of the printed page, also benefit from such physical illustrations. Rolling, an engineer by conviction, was the developer of information systems for the Cobalt Institute, the European Atomic Energy Community, and European Coal and Steel Community. He also developed and promoted computer-aided translation at the Commission of the European Communities in Luxembourg. One of his objectives has always been to increase the efficiency of mono- and multilingual thesauri for use in multinational information systems.
    Footnote
    Original in: Classification research: Proceedings of the Second International Study Conference held at Hotel Prins Hamlet, Elsinore, Denmark, 14th-18th Sept. 1964. Ed.: Pauline Atherton. Copenhagen: Munksgaard 1965. S.295-310.
    Source
    Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
  3. Thissen, F.: Screen-Design-Manual : Communicating Effectively Through Multimedia (2003) 0.07
    0.07229147 = product of:
      0.1084372 = sum of:
        0.010274758 = product of:
          0.030824272 = sum of:
            0.030824272 = weight(_text_:f in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030824272 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.014646411 = weight(_text_:information in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014646411 = score(doc=1397,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
        0.013479172 = weight(_text_:und in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013479172 = score(doc=1397,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
        0.00967296 = weight(_text_:for in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00967296 = score(doc=1397,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.14668301 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
        0.016731687 = weight(_text_:the in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016731687 = score(doc=1397,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.30193105 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
        0.015003879 = weight(_text_:of in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015003879 = score(doc=1397,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
        0.016731687 = weight(_text_:the in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016731687 = score(doc=1397,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.30193105 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
        0.011896656 = product of:
          0.023793312 = sum of:
            0.023793312 = weight(_text_:22 in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023793312 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(8/12)
    
    Abstract
    The "Screen Design Manual" provides designers of interactive media with a practical working guide for preparing and presenting information that is suitable for both their target groups and the media they are using. It describes background information and relationships, clarifies them with the help of examples, and encourages further development of the language of digital media. In addition to the basics of the psychology of perception and learning, ergonomics, communication theory, imagery research, and aesthetics, the book also explores the design of navigation and orientation elements. Guidelines and checklists, along with the unique presentation of the book, support the application of information in practice.
    Classification
    ST 253 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Web-Programmierwerkzeuge (A-Z)
    Content
    From the contents:.- Basics of screen design.- Navigation and orientation.- Information.- Screen layout.Interaction.- Motivation.- Innovative prospects.- Appendix.Glossary.- Literature.- Index
    Date
    22. 3.2008 14:29:25
    LCSH
    Information display systems / Formatting
    RVK
    ST 253 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Web-Programmierwerkzeuge (A-Z)
    Subject
    Information display systems / Formatting
  4. Eckert, K: ¬The ICE-map visualization (2011) 0.06
    0.0570556 = product of:
      0.1141112 = sum of:
        0.016570523 = weight(_text_:information in 4743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016570523 = score(doc=4743,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4743, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4743)
        0.015249942 = weight(_text_:und in 4743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015249942 = score(doc=4743,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 4743, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4743)
        0.010943705 = weight(_text_:for in 4743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010943705 = score(doc=4743,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 4743, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4743)
        0.025630994 = weight(_text_:the in 4743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025630994 = score(doc=4743,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.46252316 = fieldWeight in 4743, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4743)
        0.020085035 = weight(_text_:of in 4743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020085035 = score(doc=4743,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 4743, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4743)
        0.025630994 = weight(_text_:the in 4743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025630994 = score(doc=4743,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.46252316 = fieldWeight in 4743, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4743)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we describe in detail the Information Content Evaluation Map (ICE-Map Visualization, formerly referred to as IC Difference Analysis). The ICE-Map Visualization is a visual data mining approach for all kinds of concept hierarchies that uses statistics about the concept usage to help a user in the evaluation and maintenance of the hierarchy. It consists of a statistical framework that employs the the notion of information content from information theory, as well as a visualization of the hierarchy and the result of the statistical analysis by means of a treemap.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. Trentin, G.: Graphic tools for knowledge representation and informal problem-based learning in professional online communities (2007) 0.06
    0.05582786 = product of:
      0.11165572 = sum of:
        0.005979372 = weight(_text_:information in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005979372 = score(doc=1463,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
        0.01184691 = weight(_text_:for in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01184691 = score(doc=1463,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.17964928 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
        0.020492045 = weight(_text_:the in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020492045 = score(doc=1463,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36978847 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
        0.014233928 = weight(_text_:of in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014233928 = score(doc=1463,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
        0.020492045 = weight(_text_:the in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020492045 = score(doc=1463,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36978847 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
        0.03861142 = product of:
          0.07722284 = sum of:
            0.07722284 = weight(_text_:communities in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07722284 = score(doc=1463,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.4144508 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    The use of graphical representations is very common in information technology and engineering. Although these same tools could be applied effectively in other areas, they are not used because they are hardly known or are completely unheard of. This article aims to discuss the results of the experimentation carried out on graphical approaches to knowledge representation during research, analysis and problem-solving in the health care sector. The experimentation was carried out on conceptual mapping and Petri Nets, developed collaboratively online with the aid of the CMapTool and WoPeD graphic applications. Two distinct professional communities have been involved in the research, both pertaining to the Local Health Units in Tuscany. One community is made up of head physicians and health care managers whilst the other is formed by technical staff from the Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene. It emerged from the experimentation that concept maps arc considered more effective in analyzing knowledge domain related to the problem to be faced (description of what it is). On the other hand, Petri Nets arc more effective in studying and formalizing its possible solutions (description of what to do to). For the same reason, those involved in the experimentation have proposed the complementary rather than alternative use of the two knowledge representation methods as a support for professional problem-solving.
  6. Moya-Anegón, F. de; Vargas-Quesada, B.; Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z.; Corera-Álvarez, E.; Munoz-Fernández, F.J.; Herrero-Solana, V.; SCImago Group: Visualizing the marrow of science (2007) 0.06
    0.05533152 = product of:
      0.11066304 = sum of:
        0.01438466 = product of:
          0.04315398 = sum of:
            0.04315398 = weight(_text_:f in 1313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04315398 = score(doc=1313,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 1313, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1313)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0118385535 = weight(_text_:information in 1313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0118385535 = score(doc=1313,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1313, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1313)
        0.016585674 = weight(_text_:for in 1313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016585674 = score(doc=1313,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.25150898 = fieldWeight in 1313, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1313)
        0.023424363 = weight(_text_:the in 1313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023424363 = score(doc=1313,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.42270347 = fieldWeight in 1313, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1313)
        0.021005431 = weight(_text_:of in 1313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021005431 = score(doc=1313,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 1313, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1313)
        0.023424363 = weight(_text_:the in 1313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023424363 = score(doc=1313,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.42270347 = fieldWeight in 1313, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1313)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    This study proposes a new methodology that allows for the generation of scientograms of major scientific domains, constructed on the basis of cocitation of Institute of Scientific Information categories, and pruned using PathfinderNetwork, with a layout determined by algorithms of the spring-embedder type (Kamada-Kawai), then corroborated structurally by factor analysis. We present the complete scientogram of the world for the Year 2002. It integrates the natural sciences, the social sciences, and arts and humanities. Its basic structure and the essential relationships therein are revealed, allowing us to simultaneously analyze the macrostructure, microstructure, and marrow of worldwide scientific output.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.14, S.2167-2179
  7. Representation in scientific practice revisited (2014) 0.05
    0.052994847 = product of:
      0.09084831 = sum of:
        0.004783498 = weight(_text_:information in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004783498 = score(doc=3543,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
        0.015249942 = weight(_text_:und in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015249942 = score(doc=3543,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
        0.0054718526 = weight(_text_:for in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054718526 = score(doc=3543,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.08297644 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
        0.01545607 = weight(_text_:the in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01545607 = score(doc=3543,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27891195 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
        0.012588961 = weight(_text_:of in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012588961 = score(doc=3543,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2292085 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
        0.01545607 = weight(_text_:the in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01545607 = score(doc=3543,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27891195 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
        0.021841917 = product of:
          0.043683834 = sum of:
            0.043683834 = weight(_text_:communities in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043683834 = score(doc=3543,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.23444878 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
    
    Abstract
    Representation in Scientific Practice, published by the MIT Press in 1990, helped coalesce a long-standing interest in scientific visualization among historians, philosophers, and sociologists of science and remains a touchstone for current investigations in science and technology studies. This volume revisits the topic, taking into account both the changing conceptual landscape of STS and the emergence of new imaging technologies in scientific practice. It offers cutting-edge research on a broad array of fields that study information as well as short reflections on the evolution of the field by leading scholars, including some of the contributors to the 1990 volume. The essays consider the ways in which viewing experiences are crafted in the digital era; the embodied nature of work with digital technologies; the constitutive role of materials and technologies -- from chalkboards to brain scans -- in the production of new scientific knowledge; the metaphors and images mobilized by communities of practice; and the status and significance of scientific imagery in professional and popular culture. ContributorsMorana Alac, Michael Barany, Anne Beaulieu, Annamaria Carusi, Catelijne Coopmans, Lorraine Daston, Sarah de Rijcke, Joseph Dumit, Emma Frow, Yann Giraud, Aud Sissel Hoel, Martin Kemp, Bruno Latour, John Law, Michael Lynch, Donald MacKenzie, Cyrus Mody, Natasha Myers, Rachel Prentice, Arie Rip, Martin Ruivenkamp, Lucy Suchman, Janet Vertesi, Steve Woolgar
    BK
    30.02 Philosophie und Theorie der Naturwissenschaften
    30.03 Methoden und Techniken in den Naturwissenschaften
    Classification
    30.02 Philosophie und Theorie der Naturwissenschaften
    30.03 Methoden und Techniken in den Naturwissenschaften
  8. Kraker, P.; Kittel, C,; Enkhbayar, A.: Open Knowledge Maps : creating a visual interface to the world's scientific knowledge based on natural language processing (2016) 0.05
    0.052961998 = product of:
      0.105923995 = sum of:
        0.011437457 = weight(_text_:und in 3205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011437457 = score(doc=3205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 3205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3205)
        0.014216291 = weight(_text_:for in 3205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014216291 = score(doc=3205,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.21557912 = fieldWeight in 3205, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3205)
        0.01738808 = weight(_text_:the in 3205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01738808 = score(doc=3205,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31377596 = fieldWeight in 3205, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3205)
        0.012731214 = weight(_text_:of in 3205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012731214 = score(doc=3205,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 3205, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3205)
        0.01738808 = weight(_text_:the in 3205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01738808 = score(doc=3205,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.31377596 = fieldWeight in 3205, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3205)
        0.032762878 = product of:
          0.065525755 = sum of:
            0.065525755 = weight(_text_:communities in 3205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065525755 = score(doc=3205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.35167316 = fieldWeight in 3205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3205)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    The goal of Open Knowledge Maps is to create a visual interface to the world's scientific knowledge. The base for this visual interface consists of so-called knowledge maps, which enable the exploration of existing knowledge and the discovery of new knowledge. Our open source knowledge mapping software applies a mixture of summarization techniques and similarity measures on article metadata, which are iteratively chained together. After processing, the representation is saved in a database for use in a web visualization. In the future, we want to create a space for collective knowledge mapping that brings together individuals and communities involved in exploration and discovery. We want to enable people to guide each other in their discovery by collaboratively annotating and modifying the automatically created maps.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenschwerpunkt 'Computerlinguistik und Bibliotheken'. Vgl.: http://0277.ch/ojs/index.php/cdrs_0277/article/view/157/355.
  9. Catarci, T.; Spaccapietra, S.: Visual information querying (2002) 0.05
    0.0520157 = product of:
      0.1040314 = sum of:
        0.018641839 = weight(_text_:information in 4268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018641839 = score(doc=4268,freq=54.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3023455 = fieldWeight in 4268, product of:
              7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
                54.0 = termFreq=54.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4268)
        0.014796784 = weight(_text_:for in 4268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014796784 = score(doc=4268,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.22438185 = fieldWeight in 4268, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4268)
        0.019440461 = weight(_text_:the in 4268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019440461 = score(doc=4268,freq=90.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.35081214 = fieldWeight in 4268, product of:
              9.486833 = tf(freq=90.0), with freq of:
                90.0 = termFreq=90.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4268)
        0.0153304115 = weight(_text_:of in 4268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0153304115 = score(doc=4268,freq=58.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27912235 = fieldWeight in 4268, product of:
              7.615773 = tf(freq=58.0), with freq of:
                58.0 = termFreq=58.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4268)
        0.019440461 = weight(_text_:the in 4268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019440461 = score(doc=4268,freq=90.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.35081214 = fieldWeight in 4268, product of:
              9.486833 = tf(freq=90.0), with freq of:
                90.0 = termFreq=90.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4268)
        0.016381439 = product of:
          0.032762878 = sum of:
            0.032762878 = weight(_text_:communities in 4268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032762878 = score(doc=4268,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.17583658 = fieldWeight in 4268, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4268)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Computers have become our companions in many of the activities we pursue in our life. They assist us, in particular, in searching relevant information that is needed to perform a variety of tasks, from professional usage to personal entertainment. They hold this information in a huge number of heterogeneous sources, either dedicated to a specific user community (e.g., enterprise databases) or maintained for the general public (e.g., websites and digital libraries). Whereas progress in basic information technology is nowadays capable of guaranteeing effective information management, information retrieval and dissemination has become a core issue that needs further accomplishments to achieve user satisfaction. The research communities in databases, information retrieval, information visualization, and human-computer interaction have already largely investigated these domains. However, the technical environment has so dramatically evolved in recent years, inducing a parallel and very significant evolution in user habits and expectations, that new approaches are definitely needed to meet current demand. One of the most evident and significant changes is the human-computer interaction paradigm. Traditional interactions relayed an programming to express user information requirements in formal code and an textual output to convey to users the information extracted by the system. Except for professional data-intensive application frameworks, still in the hands of computer speciahsts, we have basically moved away from this pattern both in terms of expressing information requests and conveying results. The new goal is direct interaction with the final user (the person who is looking for information and is not necessarily familiar with computer technology). The key motto to achieve this is "go visual." The well-known high bandwidth of the human-vision channel allows both recognition and understanding of large quantities of information in no more than a few seconds. Thus, for instance, if the result of an information request can be organized as a visual display, or a sequence of visual displays, the information throughput is immensely superior to the one that can be achieved using textual support. User interaction becomes an iterative query-answer game that very rapidly leads to the desired final result. Conversely, the system can provide efficient visual support for easy query formulation. Displaying a visual representation of the information space, for instance, lets users directly point at the information they are looking for, without any need to be trained into the complex syntax of current query languages. Alternatively, users can navigate in the information space, following visible paths that will lead them to the targeted items. Again, thanks to the visual support, users are able to easily understand how to formulate queries and they are likely to achieve the task more rapidly and less prone to errors than with traditional textual interaction modes.
    The two facets of "going visual" are usually referred to as visual query systems, for query formulation, and information visualization, for result display. Visual Query Systems (VQSs) are defined as systems for querying databases that use a visual representation to depict the domain of interest and express related requests. VQSs provide both a language to express the queries in a visual format and a variety of functionalities to facilitate user-system interaction. As such, they are oriented toward a wide spectrum of users, especially novices who have limited computer expertise and generally ignore the inner structure of the accessed database. Information visualization, an increasingly important subdiscipline within the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), focuses an visual mechanisms designed to communicate clearly to the user the structure of information and improve an the cost of accessing large data repositories. In printed form, information visualization has included the display of numerical data (e.g., bar charts, plot charts, pie charts), combinatorial relations (e.g., drawings of graphs), and geographic data (e.g., encoded maps). In addition to these "static" displays, computer-based systems, such as the Information Visualizer and Dynamic Queries, have coupled powerful visualization techniques (e.g., 3D, animation) with near real-time interactivity (i.e., the ability of the system to respond quickly to the user's direct manipulation commands). Information visualization is tightly combined with querying capabilities in some recent database-centered approaches. More opportunities for information visualization in a database environment may be found today in data mining and data warehousing applications, which typically access large data repositories. The enormous quantity of information sources an the World-Wide Web (WWW) available to users with diverse capabilities also calls for visualization techniques. In this article, we survey the main features and main proposals for visual query systems and touch upon the visualization of results mainly discussing traditional visualization forms. A discussion of modern database visualization techniques may be found elsewhere. Many related articles by Daniel Keim are available at http://www. informatik.uni-halle.de/dbs/publications.html.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.72, [=Suppl.35]
  10. Information visualization in data mining and knowledge discovery (2002) 0.05
    0.049528927 = product of:
      0.09905785 = sum of:
        0.008949105 = weight(_text_:information in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008949105 = score(doc=1789,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.14514244 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
        0.009074041 = weight(_text_:for in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009074041 = score(doc=1789,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.13760085 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
        0.01661977 = weight(_text_:the in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01661977 = score(doc=1789,freq=148.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.29991144 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
              12.165525 = tf(freq=148.0), with freq of:
                148.0 = termFreq=148.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
        0.016435927 = weight(_text_:of in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016435927 = score(doc=1789,freq=150.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
              12.247449 = tf(freq=150.0), with freq of:
                150.0 = termFreq=150.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
        0.01661977 = weight(_text_:the in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01661977 = score(doc=1789,freq=148.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.29991144 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
              12.165525 = tf(freq=148.0), with freq of:
                148.0 = termFreq=148.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
        0.03135924 = sum of:
          0.021841917 = weight(_text_:communities in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021841917 = score(doc=1789,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.11722439 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
          0.009517324 = weight(_text_:22 in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009517324 = score(doc=1789,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035122856 = queryNorm
              0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Date
    23. 3.2008 19:10:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 54(2003) no.9, S.905-906 (C.A. Badurek): "Visual approaches for knowledge discovery in very large databases are a prime research need for information scientists focused an extracting meaningful information from the ever growing stores of data from a variety of domains, including business, the geosciences, and satellite and medical imagery. This work presents a summary of research efforts in the fields of data mining, knowledge discovery, and data visualization with the goal of aiding the integration of research approaches and techniques from these major fields. The editors, leading computer scientists from academia and industry, present a collection of 32 papers from contributors who are incorporating visualization and data mining techniques through academic research as well application development in industry and government agencies. Information Visualization focuses upon techniques to enhance the natural abilities of humans to visually understand data, in particular, large-scale data sets. It is primarily concerned with developing interactive graphical representations to enable users to more intuitively make sense of multidimensional data as part of the data exploration process. It includes research from computer science, psychology, human-computer interaction, statistics, and information science. Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) most often refers to the process of mining databases for previously unknown patterns and trends in data. Data mining refers to the particular computational methods or algorithms used in this process. The data mining research field is most related to computational advances in database theory, artificial intelligence and machine learning. This work compiles research summaries from these main research areas in order to provide "a reference work containing the collection of thoughts and ideas of noted researchers from the fields of data mining and data visualization" (p. 8). It addresses these areas in three main sections: the first an data visualization, the second an KDD and model visualization, and the last an using visualization in the knowledge discovery process. The seven chapters of Part One focus upon methodologies and successful techniques from the field of Data Visualization. Hoffman and Grinstein (Chapter 2) give a particularly good overview of the field of data visualization and its potential application to data mining. An introduction to the terminology of data visualization, relation to perceptual and cognitive science, and discussion of the major visualization display techniques are presented. Discussion and illustration explain the usefulness and proper context of such data visualization techniques as scatter plots, 2D and 3D isosurfaces, glyphs, parallel coordinates, and radial coordinate visualizations. Remaining chapters present the need for standardization of visualization methods, discussion of user requirements in the development of tools, and examples of using information visualization in addressing research problems.
    In 13 chapters, Part Two provides an introduction to KDD, an overview of data mining techniques, and examples of the usefulness of data model visualizations. The importance of visualization throughout the KDD process is stressed in many of the chapters. In particular, the need for measures of visualization effectiveness, benchmarking for identifying best practices, and the use of standardized sample data sets is convincingly presented. Many of the important data mining approaches are discussed in this complementary context. Cluster and outlier detection, classification techniques, and rule discovery algorithms are presented as the basic techniques common to the KDD process. The potential effectiveness of using visualization in the data modeling process are illustrated in chapters focused an using visualization for helping users understand the KDD process, ask questions and form hypotheses about their data, and evaluate the accuracy and veracity of their results. The 11 chapters of Part Three provide an overview of the KDD process and successful approaches to integrating KDD, data mining, and visualization in complementary domains. Rhodes (Chapter 21) begins this section with an excellent overview of the relation between the KDD process and data mining techniques. He states that the "primary goals of data mining are to describe the existing data and to predict the behavior or characteristics of future data of the same type" (p. 281). These goals are met by data mining tasks such as classification, regression, clustering, summarization, dependency modeling, and change or deviation detection. Subsequent chapters demonstrate how visualization can aid users in the interactive process of knowledge discovery by graphically representing the results from these iterative tasks. Finally, examples of the usefulness of integrating visualization and data mining tools in the domain of business, imagery and text mining, and massive data sets are provided. This text concludes with a thorough and useful 17-page index and lengthy yet integrating 17-page summary of the academic and industrial backgrounds of the contributing authors. A 16-page set of color inserts provide a better representation of the visualizations discussed, and a URL provided suggests that readers may view all the book's figures in color on-line, although as of this submission date it only provides access to a summary of the book and its contents. The overall contribution of this work is its focus an bridging two distinct areas of research, making it a valuable addition to the Morgan Kaufmann Series in Database Management Systems. The editors of this text have met their main goal of providing the first textbook integrating knowledge discovery, data mining, and visualization. Although it contributes greatly to our under- standing of the development and current state of the field, a major weakness of this text is that there is no concluding chapter to discuss the contributions of the sum of these contributed papers or give direction to possible future areas of research. "Integration of expertise between two different disciplines is a difficult process of communication and reeducation. Integrating data mining and visualization is particularly complex because each of these fields in itself must draw an a wide range of research experience" (p. 300). Although this work contributes to the crossdisciplinary communication needed to advance visualization in KDD, a more formal call for an interdisciplinary research agenda in a concluding chapter would have provided a more satisfying conclusion to a very good introductory text.
    With contributors almost exclusively from the computer science field, the intended audience of this work is heavily slanted towards a computer science perspective. However, it is highly readable and provides introductory material that would be useful to information scientists from a variety of domains. Yet, much interesting work in information visualization from other fields could have been included giving the work more of an interdisciplinary perspective to complement their goals of integrating work in this area. Unfortunately, many of the application chapters are these, shallow, and lack complementary illustrations of visualization techniques or user interfaces used. However, they do provide insight into the many applications being developed in this rapidly expanding field. The authors have successfully put together a highly useful reference text for the data mining and information visualization communities. Those interested in a good introduction and overview of complementary research areas in these fields will be satisfied with this collection of papers. The focus upon integrating data visualization with data mining complements texts in each of these fields, such as Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Fayyad et al., MIT Press) and Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think (Card et. al., Morgan Kauffman). This unique work is a good starting point for future interaction between researchers in the fields of data visualization and data mining and makes a good accompaniment for a course focused an integrating these areas or to the main reference texts in these fields."
    LCSH
    Information visualization
    RSWK
    Information Retrieval (BVB)
    Subject
    Information Retrieval (BVB)
    Information visualization
  11. Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015) 0.05
    0.048125114 = product of:
      0.0825002 = sum of:
        0.010147331 = weight(_text_:information in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010147331 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
        0.016175007 = weight(_text_:und in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016175007 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
        0.008207779 = weight(_text_:for in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008207779 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.12446466 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
        0.008196819 = weight(_text_:the in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008196819 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1479154 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
        0.011387144 = weight(_text_:of in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011387144 = score(doc=3355,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
        0.008196819 = weight(_text_:the in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008196819 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1479154 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
        0.020189295 = product of:
          0.04037859 = sum of:
            0.04037859 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04037859 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
    
    BK
    02.10 Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft
    Classification
    02.10 Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft
    Content
    One of a series of three publications influenced by the travelling exhibit Places & Spaces: Mapping Science, curated by the Cyberinfrastructure for Network Science Center at Indiana University. - Additional materials can be found at http://http://scimaps.org/atlas2. Erweitert durch: Börner, Katy. Atlas of Science: Visualizing What We Know.
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:54:03
    22. 1.2017 17:10:56
    LCSH
    Information visualization
    Subject
    Information visualization
  12. Julien, C.-A.; Leide, J.E.; Bouthillier, F.: Controlled user evaluations of information visualization interfaces for text retrieval : literature review and meta-analysis (2008) 0.05
    0.04674428 = product of:
      0.09348856 = sum of:
        0.012329709 = product of:
          0.036989126 = sum of:
            0.036989126 = weight(_text_:f in 1718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036989126 = score(doc=1718,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 1718, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1718)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.014350494 = weight(_text_:information in 1718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014350494 = score(doc=1718,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1718, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1718)
        0.016415559 = weight(_text_:for in 1718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016415559 = score(doc=1718,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.24892932 = fieldWeight in 1718, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1718)
        0.015334844 = weight(_text_:the in 1718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015334844 = score(doc=1718,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27672437 = fieldWeight in 1718, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1718)
        0.019723112 = weight(_text_:of in 1718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019723112 = score(doc=1718,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 1718, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1718)
        0.015334844 = weight(_text_:the in 1718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015334844 = score(doc=1718,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27672437 = fieldWeight in 1718, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1718)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    This review describes experimental designs (users, search tasks, measures, etc.) used by 31 controlled user studies of information visualization (IV) tools for textual information retrieval (IR) and a meta-analysis of the reported statistical effects. Comparable experimental designs allow research designers to compare their results with other reports, and support the development of experimentally verified design guidelines concerning which IV techniques are better suited to which types of IR tasks. The studies generally use a within-subject design with 15 or more undergraduate students performing browsing to known-item tasks on sets of at least 1,000 full-text articles or Web pages on topics of general interest/news. Results of the meta-analysis (N = 8) showed no significant effects of the IV tool as compared with a text-only equivalent, but the set shows great variability suggesting an inadequate basis of comparison. Experimental design recommendations are provided which would support comparison of existing IV tools for IR usability testing.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.6, S.1012-1024
  13. Osinska, V.; Bala, P.: New methods for visualization and improvement of classification schemes : the case of computer science (2010) 0.05
    0.046241004 = product of:
      0.09248201 = sum of:
        0.010147331 = weight(_text_:information in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010147331 = score(doc=3693,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
        0.011607553 = weight(_text_:for in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011607553 = score(doc=3693,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.17601961 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
        0.019223245 = weight(_text_:the in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019223245 = score(doc=3693,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34689236 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
        0.018004656 = weight(_text_:of in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018004656 = score(doc=3693,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
        0.019223245 = weight(_text_:the in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019223245 = score(doc=3693,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.34689236 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
        0.014275986 = product of:
          0.028551972 = sum of:
            0.028551972 = weight(_text_:22 in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028551972 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Generally, Computer Science (CS) classifications are inconsistent in taxonomy strategies. t is necessary to develop CS taxonomy research to combine its historical perspective, its current knowledge and its predicted future trends - including all breakthroughs in information and communication technology. In this paper we have analyzed the ACM Computing Classification System (CCS) by means of visualization maps. The important achievement of current work is an effective visualization of classified documents from the ACM Digital Library. From the technical point of view, the innovation lies in the parallel use of analysis units: (sub)classes and keywords as well as a spherical 3D information surface. We have compared both the thematic and semantic maps of classified documents and results presented in Table 1. Furthermore, the proposed new method is used for content-related evaluation of the original scheme. Summing up: we improved an original ACM classification in the Computer Science domain by means of visualization.
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:36:46
  14. Eckert, K.: Thesaurus analysis and visualization in semantic search applications (2007) 0.05
    0.046167877 = product of:
      0.09233575 = sum of:
        0.010356578 = weight(_text_:information in 3222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010356578 = score(doc=3222,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 3222, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3222)
        0.013479172 = weight(_text_:und in 3222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013479172 = score(doc=3222,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07784514 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 3222, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3222)
        0.015294294 = weight(_text_:for in 3222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015294294 = score(doc=3222,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2319262 = fieldWeight in 3222, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3222)
        0.017414892 = weight(_text_:the in 3222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017414892 = score(doc=3222,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3142598 = fieldWeight in 3222, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3222)
        0.018375926 = weight(_text_:of in 3222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018375926 = score(doc=3222,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 3222, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3222)
        0.017414892 = weight(_text_:the in 3222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017414892 = score(doc=3222,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3142598 = fieldWeight in 3222, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3222)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    The use of thesaurus-based indexing is a common approach for increasing the performance of information retrieval. In this thesis, we examine the suitability of a thesaurus for a given set of information and evaluate improvements of existing thesauri to get better search results. On this area, we focus on two aspects: 1. We demonstrate an analysis of the indexing results achieved by an automatic document indexer and the involved thesaurus. 2. We propose a method for thesaurus evaluation which is based on a combination of statistical measures and appropriate visualization techniques that support the detection of potential problems in a thesaurus. In this chapter, we give an overview of the context of our work. Next, we briefly outline the basics of thesaurus-based information retrieval and describe the Collexis Engine that was used for our experiments. In Chapter 3, we describe two experiments in automatically indexing documents in the areas of medicine and economics with corresponding thesauri and compare the results to available manual annotations. Chapter 4 describes methods for assessing thesauri and visualizing the result in terms of a treemap. We depict examples of interesting observations supported by the method and show that we actually find critical problems. We conclude with a discussion of open questions and future research in Chapter 5.
    Imprint
    Mannheim : Fakultät für Mathematik und Informatik
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  15. Osinska, V.; Kowalska, M.; Osinski, Z.: ¬The role of visualization in the shaping and exploration of the individual information space : part 1 (2018) 0.04
    0.04372287 = product of:
      0.08744574 = sum of:
        0.008456109 = weight(_text_:information in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008456109 = score(doc=4641,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
        0.00967296 = weight(_text_:for in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00967296 = score(doc=4641,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.14668301 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
        0.020492045 = weight(_text_:the in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020492045 = score(doc=4641,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36978847 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
        0.016435927 = weight(_text_:of in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016435927 = score(doc=4641,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
        0.020492045 = weight(_text_:the in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020492045 = score(doc=4641,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.36978847 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
        0.011896656 = product of:
          0.023793312 = sum of:
            0.023793312 = weight(_text_:22 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023793312 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Studies on the state and structure of digital knowledge concerning science generally relate to macro and meso scales. Supported by visualizations, these studies can deliver knowledge about emerging scientific fields or collaboration between countries, scientific centers, or groups of researchers. Analyses of individual activities or single scientific career paths are rarely presented and discussed. The authors decided to fill this gap and developed a web application for visualizing the scientific output of particular researchers. This free software based on bibliographic data from local databases, provides six layouts for analysis. Researchers can see the dynamic characteristics of their own writing activity, the time and place of publication, and the thematic scope of research problems. They can also identify cooperation networks, and consequently, study the dependencies and regularities in their own scientific activity. The current article presents the results of a study of the application's usability and functionality as well as attempts to define different user groups. A survey about the interface was sent to select researchers employed at Nicolaus Copernicus University. The results were used to answer the question as to whether such a specialized visualization tool can significantly augment the individual information space of the contemporary researcher.
    Date
    21.12.2018 17:22:13
  16. Olawuyi, N.J.; Akhigbe, B.I.; Afolabi, B.S.: Knowledge organization system interoperability : the cogitation of user interfaces for better interactivity (2018) 0.04
    0.043457612 = product of:
      0.086915225 = sum of:
        0.016439613 = product of:
          0.049318835 = sum of:
            0.049318835 = weight(_text_:f in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049318835 = score(doc=4870,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009566996 = score(doc=4870,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
        0.018955056 = weight(_text_:for in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018955056 = score(doc=4870,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
        0.01338535 = weight(_text_:the in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01338535 = score(doc=4870,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.24154484 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
        0.015182858 = weight(_text_:of in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015182858 = score(doc=4870,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
        0.01338535 = weight(_text_:the in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01338535 = score(doc=4870,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.24154484 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  17. Visual thesaurus (2005) 0.04
    0.042085256 = product of:
      0.101004615 = sum of:
        0.018526407 = weight(_text_:information in 1292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018526407 = score(doc=1292,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3004734 = fieldWeight in 1292, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1292)
        0.018955056 = weight(_text_:for in 1292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018955056 = score(doc=1292,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 1292, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1292)
        0.022859836 = weight(_text_:the in 1292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022859836 = score(doc=1292,freq=70.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.41251633 = fieldWeight in 1292, product of:
              8.3666 = tf(freq=70.0), with freq of:
                70.0 = termFreq=70.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1292)
        0.01780348 = weight(_text_:of in 1292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01780348 = score(doc=1292,freq=44.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3241498 = fieldWeight in 1292, product of:
              6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
                44.0 = termFreq=44.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1292)
        0.022859836 = weight(_text_:the in 1292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022859836 = score(doc=1292,freq=70.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.41251633 = fieldWeight in 1292, product of:
              8.3666 = tf(freq=70.0), with freq of:
                70.0 = termFreq=70.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1292)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    A visual thesaurus system and method for displaying a selected term in association with its one or more meanings, other words to which it is related, and further relationship information. The results of a search are presented in a directed graph that provides more information than an ordered list. When a user selects one of the results, the display reorganizes around the user's search allowing for further searches, without the interruption of going to additional pages.
    Content
    Traditional print reference guides often have two methods of finding information: an order (alphabetical for dictionaries and encyclopedias, by subject hierarchy in the case of thesauri) and indices (ordered lists, with a more complete listing of words and concepts, which refers back to original content from the main body of the book). A user of such traditional print reference guides who is looking for information will either browse through the ordered information in the main body of the reference book, or scan through the indices to find what is necessary. The advent of the computer allows for much more rapid electronic searches of the same information, and for multiple layers of indices. Users can either search through information by entering a keyword, or users can browse through the information through an outline index, which represents the information contained in the main body of the data. There are two traditional user interfaces for such applications. First, the user may type text into a search field and in response, a list of results is returned to the user. The user then selects a returned entry and may page through the resulting information. Alternatively, the user may choose from a list of words from an index. For example, software thesaurus applications, in which a user attempts to find synonyms, antonyms, homonyms, etc. for a selected word, are usually implemented using the conventional search and presentation techniques discussed above. The presentation of results only allows for a one-dimensional order of data at any one time. In addition, only a limited number of results can be shown at once, and selecting a result inevitably leads to another page-if the result is not satisfactory, the users must search again. Finally, it is difficult to present information about the manner in which the search results are related, or to present quantitative information about the results without causing confusion. Therefore, there exists a need for a multidimensional graphical display of information, in particular with respect to information relating to the meaning of words and their relationships to other words. There further exists a need to present large amounts of information in a way that can be manipulated by the user, without the user losing his place. And there exists a need for more fluid, intuitive and powerful thesaurus functionality that invites the exploration of language.
  18. Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006) 0.04
    0.041615717 = product of:
      0.083231434 = sum of:
        0.008456109 = weight(_text_:information in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008456109 = score(doc=5272,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
        0.00967296 = weight(_text_:for in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00967296 = score(doc=5272,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.14668301 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
        0.017414892 = weight(_text_:the in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017414892 = score(doc=5272,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3142598 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
        0.018375926 = weight(_text_:of in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018375926 = score(doc=5272,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
        0.017414892 = weight(_text_:the in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017414892 = score(doc=5272,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.3142598 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
        0.011896656 = product of:
          0.023793312 = sum of:
            0.023793312 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023793312 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12299426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the latest development of a generic approach to detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. The work makes substantial theoretical and methodological contributions to progressive knowledge domain visualization. A specialty is conceptualized and visualized as a time-variant duality between two fundamental concepts in information science: research fronts and intellectual bases. A research front is defined as an emergent and transient grouping of concepts and underlying research issues. The intellectual base of a research front is its citation and co-citation footprint in scientific literature - an evolving network of scientific publications cited by research-front concepts. Kleinberg's (2002) burst-detection algorithm is adapted to identify emergent research-front concepts. Freeman's (1979) betweenness centrality metric is used to highlight potential pivotal points of paradigm shift over time. Two complementary visualization views are designed and implemented: cluster views and time-zone views. The contributions of the approach are that (a) the nature of an intellectual base is algorithmically and temporally identified by emergent research-front terms, (b) the value of a co-citation cluster is explicitly interpreted in terms of research-front concepts, and (c) visually prominent and algorithmically detected pivotal points substantially reduce the complexity of a visualized network. The modeling and visualization process is implemented in CiteSpace II, a Java application, and applied to the analysis of two research fields: mass extinction (1981-2004) and terrorism (1990-2003). Prominent trends and pivotal points in visualized networks were verified in collaboration with domain experts, who are the authors of pivotal-point articles. Practical implications of the work are discussed. A number of challenges and opportunities for future studies are identified.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:11:05
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.359-377
  19. Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F.: Science mapping software tools : review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011) 0.04
    0.041522656 = product of:
      0.08304531 = sum of:
        0.016439613 = product of:
          0.049318835 = sum of:
            0.049318835 = weight(_text_:f in 4486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049318835 = score(doc=4486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13999219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 4486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4486)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 4486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009566996 = score(doc=4486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4486)
        0.010943705 = weight(_text_:for in 4486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010943705 = score(doc=4486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 4486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4486)
        0.01545607 = weight(_text_:the in 4486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01545607 = score(doc=4486,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27891195 = fieldWeight in 4486, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4486)
        0.015182858 = weight(_text_:of in 4486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015182858 = score(doc=4486,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4486, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4486)
        0.01545607 = weight(_text_:the in 4486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01545607 = score(doc=4486,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.27891195 = fieldWeight in 4486, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4486)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Science mapping aims to build bibliometric maps that describe how specific disciplines, scientific domains, or research fields are conceptually, intellectually, and socially structured. Different techniques and software tools have been proposed to carry out science mapping analysis. The aim of this article is to review, analyze, and compare some of these software tools, taking into account aspects such as the bibliometric techniques available and the different kinds of analysis.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1382-1402
  20. Wainer, H.: Picturing the uncertain world : how to understand, communicate, and control uncertainty through graphical display (2009) 0.04
    0.04002575 = product of:
      0.0800515 = sum of:
        0.008285262 = weight(_text_:information in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008285262 = score(doc=1451,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
        0.0054718526 = weight(_text_:for in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054718526 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.08297644 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
        0.015931752 = weight(_text_:the in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015931752 = score(doc=1451,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.28749585 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
        0.012588961 = weight(_text_:of in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012588961 = score(doc=1451,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.2292085 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
        0.015931752 = weight(_text_:the in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015931752 = score(doc=1451,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035122856 = queryNorm
            0.28749585 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
        0.021841917 = product of:
          0.043683834 = sum of:
            0.043683834 = weight(_text_:communities in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043683834 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18632571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035122856 = queryNorm
                0.23444878 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3049703 = idf(docFreq=596, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    In his entertaining and informative book "Graphic Discovery", Howard Wainer unlocked the power of graphical display to make complex problems clear. Now he's back with Picturing the Uncertain World, a book that explores how graphs can serve as maps to guide us when the information we have is ambiguous or incomplete. Using a visually diverse sampling of graphical display, from heartrending autobiographical displays of genocide in the Kovno ghetto to the 'Pie Chart of Mystery' in a "New Yorker" cartoon, Wainer illustrates the many ways graphs can be used - and misused - as we try to make sense of an uncertain world. "Picturing the Uncertain World" takes readers on an extraordinary graphical adventure, revealing how the visual communication of data offers answers to vexing questions yet also highlights the measure of uncertainty in almost everything we do. Are cancer rates higher or lower in rural communities? How can you know how much money to sock away for retirement when you don't know when you'll die? And where exactly did nineteenth-century novelists get their ideas? These are some of the fascinating questions Wainer invites readers to consider. Along the way he traces the origins and development of graphical display, from William Playfair, who pioneered the use of graphs in the eighteenth century, to instances today where the public has been misled through poorly designed graphs. We live in a world full of uncertainty, yet it is within our grasp to take its measure. Read "Picturing the Uncertain World" and learn how.
    LCSH
    Uncertainty (Information theory) / Graphic methods
    Subject
    Uncertainty (Information theory) / Graphic methods

Years

Languages

  • e 148
  • d 45
  • a 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 154
  • el 33
  • m 17
  • x 13
  • r 3
  • s 3
  • b 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications