Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hartel, J."
  1. Hjoerland, B.; Hartel, J.: Introduction to a Special Issue of Knowledge Organization (2003) 0.04
    0.038593113 = product of:
      0.051457483 = sum of:
        0.012192038 = weight(_text_:j in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012192038 = score(doc=3013,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.08776677 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
        0.026584173 = weight(_text_:et in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026584173 = score(doc=3013,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.12959956 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
        0.012681273 = product of:
          0.025362546 = sum of:
            0.025362546 = weight(_text_:al in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025362546 = score(doc=3013,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.12658678 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    It is with very great pleasure that we introduce this special issue of Knowledge Organization on Domain Analysis (DA). Domain analysis is an approach to information science (IS) that emphasizes the social, historical, and cultural dimensions of information. It asserts that collective fields of knowledge, or "domains," form the unit of analysis of information science (IS). DA, elsewhere referred to as a sociocognitive (Hjoerland, 2002b; Jacob & Shaw, 1998) or collectivist (Talja et al, 2004) approach, is one of the major metatheoretical perspectives available to IS scholars to orient their thinking and research. DA's focus an domains stands in contrast to the alternative metatheories of cognitivism and information systems, which direct attention to psychological processes and technological processes, respectively. The first comprehensive international formulation of DA as an explicit point of view was Hjoerland and Albrechtsen (1995). However, a concern for information in the context of a community can be traced back to American library historian and visionary Jesse Shera, and is visible a century ago in the earliest practices of special librarians and European documentalists. More recently, Hjoerland (1998) produced a domain analytic study of the field of psychology; Jacob and Shaw (1998) made an important interpretation and historical review of DA; while Hjoerland (2002a) offered a seminal formulation of eleven approaches to the study of domains, receiving the ASLIB 2003 Award. Fjordback Soendergaard; Andersen and Hjoerland (2003) suggested an approach based an an updated version of the UNISIST-model of scientific communication. In fall 2003, under the conference theme of "Humanizing Information Technology" DA was featured in a keynote address at the annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Hjorland, 2004). These publications and events are evidence of growth in representation of the DA view. To date, informal criticism of domain analysis has followed two tracks. Firstly, that DA assumes its communities to be academic in nature, leaving much of human experience unexplored. Secondly, that there is a lack of case studies illustrating the methods of domain analytic empirical research. Importantly, this special collection marks progress by addressing both issues. In the articles that follow, domains are perceived to be hobbies, professions, and realms of popular culture. Further, other papers serve as models of different ways to execute domain analytic scholarship, whether through traditional empirical methods, or historical and philosophical techniques. Eleven authors have contributed to this special issue, and their backgrounds reflect the diversity of interest in DA. Contributors come from North America, Europe, and the Middle East. Academics from leading research universities are represented. One writer is newly retired, several are in their heyday as scholars, and some are doctoral students just entering this field. This range of perspectives enriches the collection. The first two papers in this issue are invited papers and are, in our opinion, very important. Anders Oerom was a senior lecturer at the Royal Scbool of 'Library and Information Science in Denmark, Aalborg Branch. He retired from this position an March 1, 2004, and this paper is his last contribution in this position. We are grateful that he took the time to complete "Knowledge Organization in the Domain of Art Studies - History, Transition and Conceptual Changes" in spite of many other duties. Versions of the paper have previously been presented at a Ph.D-course in knowledge organization and related versions have been published in Danish and Spanish. In many respects, it represents a model of how a domain could, or should, be investigated from the DA point of view.
  2. Hartel, J.: ¬The red thread of information (2020) 0.02
    0.02464614 = product of:
      0.04929228 = sum of:
        0.03448429 = weight(_text_:j in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03448429 = score(doc=5839,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
        0.014807994 = product of:
          0.029615987 = sum of:
            0.029615987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029615987 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1530933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose In The Invisible Substrate of Information Science, a landmark article about the discipline of information science, Marcia J. Bates wrote that ".we are always looking for the red thread of information in the social texture of people's lives" (1999a, p. 1048). To sharpen our understanding of information science and to elaborate Bates' idea, the work at hand answers the question: Just what does the red thread of information entail? Design/methodology/approach Through a close reading of Bates' oeuvre and by applying concepts from the reference literature of information science, nine composite entities that qualify as the red thread of information are identified, elaborated, and related to existing concepts in the information science literature. In the spirit of a scientist-poet (White, 1999), several playful metaphors related to the color red are employed. Findings Bates' red thread of information entails: terms, genres, literatures, classification systems, scholarly communication, information retrieval, information experience, information institutions, and information policy. This same constellation of phenomena can be found in resonant visions of information science, namely, domain analysis (Hjørland, 2002), ethnography of infrastructure (Star, 1999), and social epistemology (Shera, 1968). Research limitations/implications With the vital vermilion filament in clear view, newcomers can more easily engage the material, conceptual, and social machinery of information science, and specialists are reminded of what constitutes information science as a whole. Future researchers and scientist-poets may wish to supplement the nine composite entities with additional, emergent information phenomena. Originality/value Though the explication of information science that follows is relatively orthodox and time-bound, the paper offers an imaginative, accessible, yet technically precise way of understanding the field.
    Date
    30. 4.2020 21:03:22
  3. Kari, J.; Hartel, J.: Information and higher things in life : addressing the pleasurable and the profound in information science (2007) 0.01
    0.010345289 = product of:
      0.041381154 = sum of:
        0.041381154 = weight(_text_:j in 446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041381154 = score(doc=446,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 446, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=446)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  4. Hjoerland, B.; Hartel, J.: Afterword: ontological, epistemological and sociological dimensions of domains (2003) 0.01
    0.008534427 = product of:
      0.034137707 = sum of:
        0.034137707 = weight(_text_:j in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034137707 = score(doc=3014,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  5. Hartel, J.: ¬The serious leisure frontier in library and information science : hobby domains (2003) 0.01
    0.007315223 = product of:
      0.029260892 = sum of:
        0.029260892 = weight(_text_:j in 3009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029260892 = score(doc=3009,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3009, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3009)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  6. Hartel, J.; Thomson, L.: Visual approaches and photography for the study of immediate information space (2011) 0.01
    0.007315223 = product of:
      0.029260892 = sum of:
        0.029260892 = weight(_text_:j in 4923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029260892 = score(doc=4923,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4923, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4923)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  7. Hartel, J.: Managing documents at home for serious leisure : a case study of the hobby of gourmet cooking (2010) 0.01
    0.006096019 = product of:
      0.024384076 = sum of:
        0.024384076 = weight(_text_:j in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024384076 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  8. Hartel, J.: ¬An arts-informed study of information using the draw-and-write technique (2014) 0.01
    0.006096019 = product of:
      0.024384076 = sum of:
        0.024384076 = weight(_text_:j in 1303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024384076 = score(doc=1303,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1303, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1303)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  9. Hartel, J.; Savolainen, R.: Pictorial metaphors for information (2016) 0.01
    0.006096019 = product of:
      0.024384076 = sum of:
        0.024384076 = weight(_text_:j in 3163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024384076 = score(doc=3163,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 3163, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3163)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  10. Hartel, J.: ¬The case against Information and the Body in Library and Information Science (2018) 0.00
    0.0030480095 = product of:
      0.012192038 = sum of:
        0.012192038 = weight(_text_:j in 5523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012192038 = score(doc=5523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.08776677 = fieldWeight in 5523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5523)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)