Heckner, M.; Mühlbacher, S.; Wolff, C.: Tagging tagging : a classification model for user keywords in scientific bibliography management systems (2007)
0.03
0.031412356 = product of:
0.06282471 = sum of:
0.042534675 = weight(_text_:et in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042534675 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
0.020290038 = product of:
0.040580075 = sum of:
0.040580075 = weight(_text_:al in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040580075 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Therefore our main research questions are as follows: - Is it possible to discover regular patterns in tag usage and to establish a stable category model? - Does a specific tagging language comparable to internet slang or chatspeak evolve? - How do social tags differ from traditional (author / expert) keywords? - To what degree are social tags taken from or findable in the full text of the tagged resource? - Do tags in a research literature context go beyond simple content description (e.g. tags indicating time or task-related information, cf. Kipp et al. 2006)?