Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Formale Begriffsanalyse"
  1. Hereth, J.; Stumme, G.; Wille, R.; Wille, U.: Conceptual knowledge discovery and data analysis (2000) 0.08
    0.08476139 = product of:
      0.11301518 = sum of:
        0.03448429 = weight(_text_:j in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03448429 = score(doc=5083,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
        0.053168345 = weight(_text_:et in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053168345 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
        0.025362546 = product of:
          0.05072509 = sum of:
            0.05072509 = weight(_text_:al in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05072509 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we discuss Conceptual Knowledge Discovery in Databases (CKDD) in its connection with Data Analysis. Our approach is based on Formal Concept Analysis, a mathematical theory which has been developed and proven useful during the last 20 years. Formal Concept Analysis has led to a theory of conceptual information systems which has been applied by using the management system TOSCANA in a wide range of domains. In this paper, we use such an application in database marketing to demonstrate how methods and procedures of CKDD can be applied in Data Analysis. In particular, we show the interplay and integration of data mining and data analysis techniques based on Formal Concept Analysis. The main concern of this paper is to explain how the transition from data to knowledge can be supported by a TOSCANA system. To clarify the transition steps we discuss their correspondence to the five levels of knowledge representation established by R. Brachman and to the steps of empirically grounded theory building proposed by A. Strauss and J. Corbin
    Source
    Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
  2. Sedelow, S.Y.; Sedelow, W.A.: Thesauri and concept-lattice semantic nets (1994) 0.06
    0.06282471 = product of:
      0.12564942 = sum of:
        0.08506935 = weight(_text_:et in 7733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08506935 = score(doc=7733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 7733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7733)
        0.040580075 = product of:
          0.08116015 = sum of:
            0.08116015 = weight(_text_:al in 7733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08116015 = score(doc=7733,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 7733, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7733)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
  3. Kent, R.E.: Implications and rules in thesauri (1994) 0.06
    0.06282471 = product of:
      0.12564942 = sum of:
        0.08506935 = weight(_text_:et in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08506935 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
        0.040580075 = product of:
          0.08116015 = sum of:
            0.08116015 = weight(_text_:al in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08116015 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
  4. Priss, U.: Comparing classification systems using facets (2000) 0.06
    0.06282471 = product of:
      0.12564942 = sum of:
        0.08506935 = weight(_text_:et in 6485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08506935 = score(doc=6485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 6485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6485)
        0.040580075 = product of:
          0.08116015 = sum of:
            0.08116015 = weight(_text_:al in 6485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08116015 = score(doc=6485,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 6485, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6485)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  5. Priss, U.: ¬A graphical interface for conceptually navigating faceted thesauri (1998) 0.05
    0.05497162 = product of:
      0.10994324 = sum of:
        0.07443568 = weight(_text_:et in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07443568 = score(doc=6658,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
        0.035507564 = product of:
          0.07101513 = sum of:
            0.07101513 = weight(_text_:al in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07101513 = score(doc=6658,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
  6. Wille, R.: Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung in der Wirtschaft (2002) 0.05
    0.05497162 = product of:
      0.10994324 = sum of:
        0.07443568 = weight(_text_:et in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07443568 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
        0.035507564 = product of:
          0.07101513 = sum of:
            0.07101513 = weight(_text_:al in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07101513 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung ist einem pragmatischen Wissensverständnis verpflichtet, nach dem menschliches Wissen in einem offenen Prozess menschlichen Denkens, Argumentierens und Kommunizierens entsteht und weiterlebt. Sie gründet sich auf eine mathematische Begriffstheorie, die auf das wechselseitige Zusammenwirken von Formalem und Inhaltlichem ausgerichtet ist. Wie diese theoretische Konzeption in der wirtschaftlichen Praxis zur Wirkung kommt wird erläutert anhand der Kernprozesse des organisationalen Wissensmanagements, d.h. nach G. Probst et al. anhand von Wissensidentifikation, Wissenserwerb, Wissensentwicklung, Wissens(ver)teilung, Wissensnutzung und Wissensbewahrung; jeweils an einem Beispiel wird der Einsatz spezifischer Methoden der Begrifflichen Wissensverarbeitung demonstriert. Abschließend wird auf den prozesshaften Wirkungszusammenhang von Wissenszielen und Wissensbewertungen mit den Kernprozessen aus Sicht der Begrifflichen Wissensverarbeitung eingegangen.
  7. Eklund, P.; Groh, B.; Stumme, G.; Wille, R.: ¬A conceptual-logic extension of TOSCANA (2000) 0.05
    0.047118533 = product of:
      0.09423707 = sum of:
        0.06380201 = weight(_text_:et in 5082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06380201 = score(doc=5082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 5082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5082)
        0.030435055 = product of:
          0.06087011 = sum of:
            0.06087011 = weight(_text_:al in 5082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06087011 = score(doc=5082,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 5082, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5082)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
  8. Eklund. P.W.: Logic-based networks : concept graphs and conceptual structures (2000) 0.05
    0.047118533 = product of:
      0.09423707 = sum of:
        0.06380201 = weight(_text_:et in 5084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06380201 = score(doc=5084,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 5084, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5084)
        0.030435055 = product of:
          0.06087011 = sum of:
            0.06087011 = weight(_text_:al in 5084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06087011 = score(doc=5084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 5084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
  9. Burmeister, P.; Holzer, R.: On the treatment of incomplete knowledge in formal concept analysis (2000) 0.05
    0.047118533 = product of:
      0.09423707 = sum of:
        0.06380201 = weight(_text_:et in 5085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06380201 = score(doc=5085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 5085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5085)
        0.030435055 = product of:
          0.06087011 = sum of:
            0.06087011 = weight(_text_:al in 5085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06087011 = score(doc=5085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 5085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
  10. Ganter, B.: Computing with conceptual structures (2000) 0.05
    0.047118533 = product of:
      0.09423707 = sum of:
        0.06380201 = weight(_text_:et in 5088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06380201 = score(doc=5088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 5088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5088)
        0.030435055 = product of:
          0.06087011 = sum of:
            0.06087011 = weight(_text_:al in 5088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06087011 = score(doc=5088,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 5088, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5088)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
  11. Priss, U.; Jacob, E.: Utilizing faceted structures for information systems design (1999) 0.03
    0.031412356 = product of:
      0.06282471 = sum of:
        0.042534675 = weight(_text_:et in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042534675 = score(doc=2470,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
        0.020290038 = product of:
          0.040580075 = sum of:
            0.040580075 = weight(_text_:al in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040580075 = score(doc=2470,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The writers show that a faceted navigation structure makes web sites easier to use. They begin by analyzing the web sites of three library and information science faculties, and seeing if the sites easily provide the answers to five specific questions, e.g., how the school ranks in national evaluations. (It is worth noting that the web site of the Faculty of Information Studies and the University of Toronto, where this bibliography is being written, would fail on four of the five questions.) Using examples from LIS web site content, they show how facets can be related and constructed, and use concept diagrams for illustration. They briefly discuss constraints necessary when joining facets: for example, enrolled students can be full- or part-time, but prospective and alumni students cannot. It should not be possible to construct terms such as "part-time alumni" (see Yannis Tzitzikas et al, below in Background). They conclude that a faceted approach is best for web site navigation, because it can clearly show where the user is in the site, what the related pages are, and how to get to them. There is a short discussion of user interfaces, and the diagrams in the paper will be of interest to anyone making a facet-based web site. This paper is clearly written, informative, and thought-provoking. Uta Priss's web site lists her other publications, many of which are related and some of which are online: http://www.upriss.org.uk/top/research.html.
  12. Ganter, B.; Stahl, J.; Wille, R.: Conceptual measurement and many-valued contexts (1986) 0.02
    0.017068854 = product of:
      0.068275414 = sum of:
        0.068275414 = weight(_text_:j in 3137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068275414 = score(doc=3137,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 3137, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3137)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  13. Kollewe, W.; Sander, C.; Schmiede, R.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA als Instrument der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung (1995) 0.01
    0.012192038 = product of:
      0.04876815 = sum of:
        0.04876815 = weight(_text_:j in 927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04876815 = score(doc=927,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 927, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=927)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Aufbau und Erschließung begrifflicher Datenbanken: Beiträge zur bibliothekarischen Klassifikation. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der Jahrestagungen 1993 (Kaiserslautern) und 1994 (Oldenburg) der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Hrsg.: H. Havekost u. H.-J. Wätjen
  14. Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000) 0.01
    0.011289986 = product of:
      0.045159943 = sum of:
        0.045159943 = weight(_text_:j in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045159943 = score(doc=5089,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.32509267 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)
  15. Kipke, U.; Wille, R.: Begriffsverbände als Ablaufschemata zur Gegenstandsbestimmung (1986) 0.01
    0.0097536305 = product of:
      0.039014522 = sum of:
        0.039014522 = weight(_text_:j in 3039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039014522 = score(doc=3039,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3039, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3039)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld. Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P. Degens, H.-J. Hermes, O. Opitz
  16. Kumar, C.A.; Radvansky, M.; Annapurna, J.: Analysis of Vector Space Model, Latent Semantic Indexing and Formal Concept Analysis for information retrieval (2012) 0.01
    0.008534427 = product of:
      0.034137707 = sum of:
        0.034137707 = weight(_text_:j in 2710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034137707 = score(doc=2710,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2710, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2710)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  17. Prediger, S.: Kontextuelle Urteilslogik mit Begriffsgraphen : Ein Beitrag zur Restrukturierung der mathematischen Logik (1998) 0.01
    0.007403997 = product of:
      0.029615987 = sum of:
        0.029615987 = product of:
          0.059231974 = sum of:
            0.059231974 = weight(_text_:22 in 3142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059231974 = score(doc=3142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1530933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    26. 2.2008 15:58:22
  18. Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung : Methoden und Anwendungen. Mit Beiträgen zahlreicher Fachwissenschaftler (2000) 0.01
    0.006096019 = product of:
      0.024384076 = sum of:
        0.024384076 = weight(_text_:j in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024384076 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: GANTER, B.: Begriffe und Implikationen; BURMEISTER, P.: ConImp: Ein Programm zur Fromalen Begriffsanalyse; Lengnink, K.: Ähnlichkeit als Distanz in Begriffsverbänden; POLLANDT, S.: Datenanalyse mit Fuzzy-Begriffen; PREDIGER, S.: Terminologische Merkmalslogik in der Formalen Begriffsanalyse; WILLE, R. u. M. ZICKWOLFF: Grundlagen einer Triadischen Begriffsanalyse; LINDIG, C. u. G. SNELTING: Formale Begriffsanalyse im Software Engineering; STRACK, H. u. M. SKORSKY: Zugriffskontrolle bei Programmsystemen und im Datenschutz mittels Formaler Begriffsanalyse; ANDELFINGER, U.: Inhaltliche Erschließung des Bereichs 'Sozialorientierte Gestaltung von Informationstechnik': Ein begriffsanalytischer Ansatz; GÖDERT, W.: Wissensdarstellung in Informationssystemen, Fragetypen und Anforderungen an Retrievalkomponenten; ROCK, T. u. R. WILLE: Ein TOSCANA-Erkundungssystem zur Literatursuche; ESCHENFELDER, D. u.a.: Ein Erkundungssystem zum Baurecht: Methoden der Entwicklung eines TOSCANA-Systems; GROßKOPF, A. u. G. HARRAS: Begriffliche Erkundung semantischer Strukturen von Sprechaktverben; ZELGER, J.: Grundwerte, Ziele und Maßnahmen in einem regionalen Krankenhaus: Eine Anwendung des Verfahrens GABEK; KOHLER-KOCH, B. u. F. VOGT: Normen- und regelgeleitete internationale Kooperationen: Formale Begriffsanalyse in der Politikwissenschaft; HENNING, H.J. u. W. KEMMNITZ: Entwicklung eines kontextuellen Methodenkonzeptes mit Hilfer der Formalen Begriffsanalyse an Beispielen zum Risikoverständnis; BARTEL, H.-G.: Über Möglichkeiten der Formalen Begriffsanalyse in der Mathematischen Archäochemie
  19. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.01
    0.005923197 = product of:
      0.023692789 = sum of:
        0.023692789 = product of:
          0.047385577 = sum of:
            0.047385577 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047385577 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1530933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81
  20. Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000) 0.01
    0.0051827976 = product of:
      0.02073119 = sum of:
        0.02073119 = product of:
          0.04146238 = sum of:
            0.04146238 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04146238 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1530933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:47:06