-
Ou, S.; Khoo, C.; Goh, D.H.; Heng, H.-Y.: Automatic discourse parsing of sociology dissertation abstracts as sentence categorization (2004)
0.03
0.031412356 = product of:
0.06282471 = sum of:
0.042534675 = weight(_text_:et in 2676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042534675 = score(doc=2676,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 2676, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2676)
0.020290038 = product of:
0.040580075 = sum of:
0.040580075 = weight(_text_:al in 2676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040580075 = score(doc=2676,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 2676, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2676)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- 1. Introduction This paper reports our initial effort to develop an automatic method for parsing the discourse structure of sociology dissertation abstracts. This study is part of a broader study to develop a method for multi-document summarization. Accurate discourse parsing will make it easier to perform automatic multi-document summarization of dissertation abstracts. In a previous study, we determined that the macro-level structure of dissertation abstracts typically has five sections (Khoo et al., 2002). In this study, we treated discourse parsing as a text categorization problem - assigning each sentence in a dissertation abstract to one of the five predefined sections or categories. Decision tree induction, a machine-learning method, was applied to word tokens found in the abstracts to construct a decision tree model for the categorization purpose. Decision tree induction was selected primarily because decision tree models are easy to interpret and can be converted to rules that can be incorporated in other computer programs. A well-known decision-tree induction program, C5.0 (Quinlan, 1993), was used in this study.
-
Monday, I.: ¬Les processus cognitifs et la redaction de résumes (1996)
0.03
0.03007656 = product of:
0.12030624 = sum of:
0.12030624 = weight(_text_:et in 6917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12030624 = score(doc=6917,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.58650064 = fieldWeight in 6917, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6917)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Documentation et bibliothèques. 42(1996) no.2, S.55-63
-
Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006)
0.03
0.029575374 = product of:
0.059150748 = sum of:
0.041381154 = weight(_text_:j in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041381154 = score(doc=2421,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.017769592 = product of:
0.035539184 = sum of:
0.035539184 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035539184 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1530933 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Koblitz, J.: Methoden des Referierens von Dokumenten (1964)
0.02
0.024384076 = product of:
0.0975363 = sum of:
0.0975363 = weight(_text_:j in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0975363 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.70213413 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.02
0.023515243 = product of:
0.047030486 = sum of:
0.029260892 = weight(_text_:j in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029260892 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.017769592 = product of:
0.035539184 = sum of:
0.035539184 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035539184 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1530933 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.02
0.019596035 = product of:
0.03919207 = sum of:
0.024384076 = weight(_text_:j in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024384076 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.014807994 = product of:
0.029615987 = sum of:
0.029615987 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029615987 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1530933 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
-
Hutchins, J.: Summarization: some problems and methods (1987)
0.02
0.019507261 = product of:
0.078029044 = sum of:
0.078029044 = weight(_text_:j in 2738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078029044 = score(doc=2738,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 2738, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2738)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Hartley, J.: Do structured abstracts take more space? : And does it matter? (2002)
0.02
0.017068854 = product of:
0.068275414 = sum of:
0.068275414 = weight(_text_:j in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068275414 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Reischer, J.; Lottes, D.; Meier, F.; Stirner, M.: Evaluation von Summarizing-Systemen : Kommerzielle und freie Systeme im Vergleich (2010)
0.01
0.013793717 = product of:
0.05517487 = sum of:
0.05517487 = weight(_text_:j in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05517487 = score(doc=492,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.39718705 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
-
Farrow, J.: All in the mind : concept analysis in indexing (1995)
0.01
0.0097536305 = product of:
0.039014522 = sum of:
0.039014522 = weight(_text_:j in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039014522 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals? (1997)
0.01
0.0097536305 = product of:
0.039014522 = sum of:
0.039014522 = weight(_text_:j in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039014522 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals? (1998)
0.01
0.0097536305 = product of:
0.039014522 = sum of:
0.039014522 = weight(_text_:j in 2999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039014522 = score(doc=2999,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 2999, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2999)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995)
0.01
0.007403997 = product of:
0.029615987 = sum of:
0.029615987 = product of:
0.059231974 = sum of:
0.059231974 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059231974 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1530933 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 27. 1.1996 18:22:06
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Structured abstracts in the social sciences : presentation, readability and recall (1995)
0.01
0.007315223 = product of:
0.029260892 = sum of:
0.029260892 = weight(_text_:j in 2383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029260892 = score(doc=2383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2383)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1998)
0.01
0.007315223 = product of:
0.029260892 = sum of:
0.029260892 = weight(_text_:j in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029260892 = score(doc=4141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 50(1999) no.8, S.728-730 (J.-E. Mai); Indexer 21(1999) no.3, S.148 (P.F. Booth); Managing information 6(1999) no.1, S.48 (S.T. Clarke); Electronic library 17(1999) no.3, S.193 (F. Parry)
-
Hartley, J.; Betts, L.: Common weaknesses in traditional abstracts in the social sciences (2009)
0.01
0.007315223 = product of:
0.029260892 = sum of:
0.029260892 = weight(_text_:j in 3115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029260892 = score(doc=3115,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3115, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3115)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Montesi, M.; Mackenzie Owen, J.: Revision of author abstracts : how it is carried out by LISA editors (2007)
0.01
0.006096019 = product of:
0.024384076 = sum of:
0.024384076 = weight(_text_:j in 807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024384076 = score(doc=807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=807)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Hartley, J.; Betts, L.: ¬The effects of spacing and titles on judgments of the effectiveness of structured abstracts (2007)
0.01
0.006096019 = product of:
0.024384076 = sum of:
0.024384076 = weight(_text_:j in 1325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024384076 = score(doc=1325,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1325, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1325)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Sauperl, A.; Klasinc, J.; Luzar, S.: Components of abstracts : logical structure of scholarly abstracts in pharmacology, sociology, and linguistics and literature (2008)
0.01
0.006096019 = product of:
0.024384076 = sum of:
0.024384076 = weight(_text_:j in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024384076 = score(doc=1961,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Hartley, J.; Betts, L.: Revising and polishing a structured abstract : is it worth the time and effort? (2008)
0.01
0.006096019 = product of:
0.024384076 = sum of:
0.024384076 = weight(_text_:j in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024384076 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04371809 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
