Search (436 results, page 1 of 22)

0.14210415 = product of:
  0.1894722 = sum of:
    0.029260892 = weight(_text_:j in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029260892 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
    0.06380201 = weight(_text_:et in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06380201 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
    0.09640929 = sum of:
      0.06087011 = weight(_text_:al in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06087011 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04371809 = queryNorm
          0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
      0.035539184 = weight(_text_:22 in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035539184 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1530933 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04371809 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Pages

S.15-22

Source

Proceedings of the 15th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems Workshop (NKOS 2016) co-located with the 20th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries 2016 (TPDL 2016), Hannover, Germany, September 9, 2016. Edi. by Philipp Mayr et al. [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1676/=urn:nbn:de:0074-1676-5]

0.09262347 = product of:
  0.12349796 = sum of:
    0.029260892 = weight(_text_:j in 4260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029260892 = score(doc=4260,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4260, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4260)
    0.06380201 = weight(_text_:et in 4260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06380201 = score(doc=4260,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 4260, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4260)
    0.030435055 = product of:
      0.06087011 = sum of:
        0.06087011 = weight(_text_:al in 4260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06087011 = score(doc=4260,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 4260, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4260)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Source

¬The Semantic Web : 6th International Semantic Web Conference, 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2007 + ASWC 2007, Busan, Korea, November 11-15, 2007 : proceedings. Ed.: Karl Aberer et al

0.09262347 = product of:
  0.12349796 = sum of:
    0.029260892 = weight(_text_:j in 476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029260892 = score(doc=476,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 476, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=476)
    0.06380201 = weight(_text_:et in 476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06380201 = score(doc=476,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 476, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=476)
    0.030435055 = product of:
      0.06087011 = sum of:
        0.06087011 = weight(_text_:al in 476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06087011 = score(doc=476,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 476, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=476)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Source

Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Digital Archives held in conjunction with the 16th Int. Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL) on September 27, 2012 in Paphos, Cyprus [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-912/proceedings.pdf]. Eds.: A. Mitschik et al

0.07718623 = product of:
  0.10291497 = sum of:
    0.024384076 = weight(_text_:j in 4705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024384076 = score(doc=4705,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4705, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4705)
    0.053168345 = weight(_text_:et in 4705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053168345 = score(doc=4705,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 4705, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4705)
    0.025362546 = product of:
      0.05072509 = sum of:
        0.05072509 = weight(_text_:al in 4705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05072509 = score(doc=4705,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 4705, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4705)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Source

The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010. 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. Eds.: Peter F. Patel-Schneider et al

0.07718623 = product of:
  0.10291497 = sum of:
    0.024384076 = weight(_text_:j in 231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024384076 = score(doc=231,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 231, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=231)
    0.053168345 = weight(_text_:et in 231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053168345 = score(doc=231,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 231, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=231)
    0.025362546 = product of:
      0.05072509 = sum of:
        0.05072509 = weight(_text_:al in 231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05072509 = score(doc=231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=231)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Source

Proceeding ISWC'07/ASWC'07 : Proceedings of the 6th international The semantic web and 2nd Asian conference on Asian semantic web conference. Ed.: K. Aberer et al

0.07718623 = product of:
  0.10291497 = sum of:
    0.024384076 = weight(_text_:j in 5799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024384076 = score(doc=5799,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5799, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5799)
    0.053168345 = weight(_text_:et in 5799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053168345 = score(doc=5799,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 5799, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5799)
    0.025362546 = product of:
      0.05072509 = sum of:
        0.05072509 = weight(_text_:al in 5799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05072509 = score(doc=5799,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 5799, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5799)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Footnote

Volltext unter: hyvonen-et-al-eswc-2019.pdf.

0.06778152 = product of:
  0.13556305 = sum of:
    0.0867949 = product of:
      0.3471796 = sum of:
        0.3471796 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3471796 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37064245 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.04876815 = weight(_text_:j in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04876815 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.06282471 = product of:
  0.12564942 = sum of:
    0.08506935 = weight(_text_:et in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08506935 = score(doc=398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
    0.040580075 = product of:
      0.08116015 = sum of:
        0.08116015 = weight(_text_:al in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08116015 = score(doc=398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl. den inhaltlichen Bezug zu dem Buch von Newberg et al.

0.06174898 = product of:
  0.08233198 = sum of:
    0.019507261 = weight(_text_:j in 1185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019507261 = score(doc=1185,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 1185, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1185)
    0.042534675 = weight(_text_:et in 1185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042534675 = score(doc=1185,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 1185, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1185)
    0.020290038 = product of:
      0.040580075 = sum of:
        0.040580075 = weight(_text_:al in 1185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040580075 = score(doc=1185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 1185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1185)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

From their earliest encounters with the Web, museums have seen an opportunity to move beyond uni-directional communication into an environment that engages their users and reflects a multiplicity of perspectives. Shedding the "Unassailable Voice" (Walsh 1997) in favor of many "Points of View" (Sledge 1995) has challenged traditional museum approaches to the creation and delivery of content. Novel approaches are required in order to develop and sustain user engagement (Durbin 2004). New models of exhibit creation that democratize the curatorial functions of object selection and interpretation offer one way of opening up the museum (Coldicutt and Streten 2005). Another is to use the museum as a forum and focus for community story-telling (Howard, Pratty et al. 2005). Unfortunately, museum collections remain relatively inaccessible even when 'made available' through searchable on-line databases. Museum documentation seldom satisfies the on-line access needs of the broad public, both because it is written using professional terminology and because it may not address what is important to - or remembered by - the museum visitor. For example, an exhibition now on-line at The Metropolitan Museum of Art acknowledges "Coco" Chanel only in the brief, textual introduction (The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2005a). All of the images of her delightful fashion designs are attributed to "Gabrielle Chanel" (The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2005a). Interfaces that organize collections along axes of time or place - such of that of the Timeline of Art History (The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2005e) - often fail to match users' world-views, despite the care that went into their structuring or their significant pedagogical utility. Critically, as professionals working with art museums we realize that when cataloguers and curators describe works of art, they usually do not include the "subject" of the image itself. Simply put, we rarely answer the question "What is it a picture of?" Unfortunately, visitors will often remember a work based on its visual characteristics, only to find that Web-based searches for any of the things they recall do not produce results.

0.06174898 = product of:
  0.08233198 = sum of:
    0.019507261 = weight(_text_:j in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019507261 = score(doc=3312,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
    0.042534675 = weight(_text_:et in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042534675 = score(doc=3312,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
    0.020290038 = product of:
      0.040580075 = sum of:
        0.040580075 = weight(_text_:al in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040580075 = score(doc=3312,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Content

Inhalt: Metrics in Research - For better or worse? / Jozica Dolenc, Philippe Hünenberger Oliver Renn - A brief visual history of research metrics / Oliver Renn, Jozica Dolenc, Joachim Schnabl - Bibliometry: The wizard of O's / Philippe Hünenberger - The grip of bibliometrics - A student perspective / Matthias Tinzl - Honesty and transparency to taxpayers is the long-term fundament for stable university funding / Wendelin J. Stark - Beyond metrics: Managing the performance of your work / Charlie Rapple - Scientific profiling instead of bibliometrics: Key performance indicators of the future / Rafael Ball - More knowledge, less numbers / Carl Philipp Rosenau - Do we really need BIBLIO-metrics to evaluate individual researchers? / Rüdiger Mutz - Using research metrics responsibly and effectively as a researcher / Peter I. Darroch, Lisa H. Colledge - Metrics in research: More (valuable) questions than answers / Urs Hugentobler - Publication of research results: Use and abuse / Wilfred F. van Gunsteren - Wanted: Transparent algorithms, interpretation skills, common sense / Eva E. Wille - Impact factors, the h-index, and citation hype - Metrics in research from the point of view of a journal editor / Renato Zenobi - Rashomon or metrics in a publisher's world / Gabriella Karger - The impact factor and I: A love-hate relationship / Jean-Christophe Leroux - Personal experiences bringing altmetrics to the academic market / Ben McLeish - Fatally attracted by numbers? / Oliver Renn - On computable numbers / Gerd Folkers, Laura Folkers - ScienceMatters - Single observation science publishing and linking observations to create an internet of science / Lawrence Rajendran.

Editor

Hünenberger, P. et al.

0.06174898 = product of:
  0.08233198 = sum of:
    0.019507261 = weight(_text_:j in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019507261 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
    0.042534675 = weight(_text_:et in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042534675 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
    0.020290038 = product of:
      0.040580075 = sum of:
        0.040580075 = weight(_text_:al in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040580075 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Source

Data visualization and knowledge engineering. Eds. J. Hemanth, et al

0.05552973 = product of:
  0.11105946 = sum of:
    0.07519139 = weight(_text_:et in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07519139 = score(doc=3868,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.3665629 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
    0.03586806 = product of:
      0.07173612 = sum of:
        0.07173612 = weight(_text_:al in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07173612 = score(doc=3868,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.3580415 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This paper reports on an analysis of the loss levels that would result if a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI), were missing the subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by its professional indexers, employing the methodology developed by Gross and Taylor (2005), and later by Gross et al. (2015). The results indicate that AEI users would lose a similar proportion of hits per query to that experienced by library catalog users: on average, 27% of the resources found by a sample of keyword queries on the AEI database would not have been found without the subject indexing, based on the Australian Thesaurus of Education Descriptors (ATED). The paper also discusses the methodological limitations of these studies, pointing out that real-life users might still find some of the resources missed by a particular query through follow-up searches, while additional resources might also be found through iterative searching on the subject vocabulary. The paper goes on to describe a new research design, based on a before - and - after experiment, which addresses some of these limitations. It is argued that this alternative design will provide a more realistic picture of the value that professionally assigned subject indexing and controlled subject vocabularies can add to literature searching of a more scholarly and thorough kind.

0.05497162 = product of:
  0.10994324 = sum of:
    0.07443568 = weight(_text_:et in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07443568 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
    0.035507564 = product of:
      0.07101513 = sum of:
        0.07101513 = weight(_text_:al in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07101513 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The recent article by McKay et al. on browsing (2019) provides a valuable addition to the empirical literature of information science on this topic, and I read the descriptions of the various browsing cases with interest. However, the authors refer to my article on browsing (Bates, 2007) in ways that do not make sense to me and which do not at all conform to what I actually said.

0.05497162 = product of:
  0.10994324 = sum of:
    0.07443568 = weight(_text_:et in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07443568 = score(doc=822,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
    0.035507564 = product of:
      0.07101513 = sum of:
        0.07101513 = weight(_text_:al in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07101513 = score(doc=822,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The intricate 3D structure of the CNS lends itself to multimedia presentation, and is depicted here by way of dynamic 3D models that can be freely rotated, and in over 200 illustrations taken from the successful book "The Human Central Nervous System" by R. Nieuwenhuys et al, allowing the user to explore all aspects of this complex and fascinating subject. All this fully hyperlinked with over 2000 specialist terms. Optimal exam revision is guaranteed with the self-study option. For further information please contact: http://www.brainmedia.de/html/frames/pr/pr<BL>5/pr<BL>5<BL>02.html

0.05497162 = product of:
  0.10994324 = sum of:
    0.07443568 = weight(_text_:et in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07443568 = score(doc=753,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
    0.035507564 = product of:
      0.07101513 = sum of:
        0.07101513 = weight(_text_:al in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07101513 = score(doc=753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl. die Studie "Maurer, H. et al: Report on dangers and opportunities posed by large search engines, particularly Google" unter: http://www.iicm.tugraz.at/iicm_papers/dangers_google.pdf.

0.05497162 = product of:
  0.10994324 = sum of:
    0.07443568 = weight(_text_:et in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07443568 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
    0.035507564 = product of:
      0.07101513 = sum of:
        0.07101513 = weight(_text_:al in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07101513 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

In this paper, we present Dynamic Category Sets, a novel approach that addresses the vocabulary problem for faceted data. In their paper on the vocabulary problem, Furnas et al. note that "the keywords that are assigned by indexers are often at odds with those tried by searchers." Faceted search systems exhibit an interesting aspect of this problem: users do not necessarily understand an information space in terms of the same facets as the indexers who designed it. Our approach addresses this problem by employing a data-driven approach to discover sets of values across multiple facets that best match the query. When there are multiple candidates, we offer a clarification dialog that allows the user to disambiguate them.

0.05497162 = product of:
  0.10994324 = sum of:
    0.07443568 = weight(_text_:et in 3922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07443568 = score(doc=3922,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 3922, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3922)
    0.035507564 = product of:
      0.07101513 = sum of:
        0.07101513 = weight(_text_:al in 3922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07101513 = score(doc=3922,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 3922, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3922)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

WordHoard defines a multiword unit as a special type of collocate in which the component words comprise a meaningful phrase. For example, "Knight of the Round Table" is a meaningful multiword unit or phrase. WordHoard uses the notion of a pseudo-bigram to generalize the computation of bigram (two word) statistical measures to phrases (n-grams) longer than two words, and to allow comparisons of these measures for phrases with different word counts. WordHoard applies the localmaxs algorithm of Silva et al. to the pseudo-bigrams to identify potential compositional phrases that "stand out" in a text. WordHoard can also filter two and three word phrases using the word class filters suggested by Justeson and Katz.

0.05497162 = product of:
  0.10994324 = sum of:
    0.07443568 = weight(_text_:et in 1123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07443568 = score(doc=1123,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 1123, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1123)
    0.035507564 = product of:
      0.07101513 = sum of:
        0.07101513 = weight(_text_:al in 1123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07101513 = score(doc=1123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 1123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1123)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

WordHoard defines a multiword unit as a special type of collocate in which the component words comprise a meaningful phrase. For example, "Knight of the Round Table" is a meaningful multiword unit or phrase. WordHoard uses the notion of a pseudo-bigram to generalize the computation of bigram (two word) statistical measures to phrases (n-grams) longer than two words, and to allow comparisons of these measures for phrases with different word counts. WordHoard applies the localmaxs algorithm of Silva et al. to the pseudo-bigrams to identify potential compositional phrases that "stand out" in a text. WordHoard can also filter two and three word phrases using the word class filters suggested by Justeson and Katz.

0.05497162 = product of:
  0.10994324 = sum of:
    0.07443568 = weight(_text_:et in 5798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07443568 = score(doc=5798,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 5798, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5798)
    0.035507564 = product of:
      0.07101513 = sum of:
        0.07101513 = weight(_text_:al in 5798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07101513 = score(doc=5798,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 5798, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5798)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

¬The Semantic Web: ESWC 2019 Satellite Events. ESWC 2019. Ed.: P. Hitzler et al

0.054407805 = product of:
  0.10881561 = sum of:
    0.07367223 = weight(_text_:et in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07367223 = score(doc=1192,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04371809 = queryNorm
        0.35915685 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
    0.03514338 = product of:
      0.07028676 = sum of:
        0.07028676 = weight(_text_:al in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07028676 = score(doc=1192,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.3508076 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

In the June 2003 issue of D-Lib Magazine, Kenney et al. (2003) discuss a comparative study between Cornell's email reference staff and Google's Answers service. This interesting study provided insights on the potential impact of "computing and simple algorithms combined with human intelligence" for library reference services. As mentioned in the Kenney et al. article, Bill Arms (2000) had discussed the possibilities of automated digital libraries in an even earlier D-Lib article. Arms discusses not only automating reference services, but also another library function that seems to inspire lively debates about automation-metadata creation. While intended to illuminate, these debates sometimes generate more heat than light. In an effort to explore the potential for automating metadata generation, the Digital Knowledge Center (DKC) of the Sheridan Libraries at The Johns Hopkins University developed and tested an automated name authority control (ANAC) tool. ANAC represents a component of a digital workflow management system developed in connection with the digital Lester S. Levy Collection of Sheet Music. The evaluation of ANAC followed the spirit of the Kenney et al. study that was, as they stated, "more exploratory than scientific." These ANAC evaluation results are shared with the hope of fostering constructive dialogue and discussions about the potential for semi-automated techniques or frameworks for library functions and services such as metadata creation. The DKC's research agenda emphasizes the development of tools that combine automated processes and human intervention, with the overall goal of involving humans at higher levels of analysis and decision-making. Others have looked at issues regarding the automated generation of metadata. A session at the 2003 Joint Conference on Digital Libraries was devoted to automatic metadata creation, and a session at the 2004 conference addressed automated name disambiguation. Commercial vendors such as OCLC, Marcive, and LTI have long used automated techniques for matching names to Library of Congress authority records. We began developing ANAC as a component of a larger suite of open source tools to support workflow management for digital projects. This article describes the goals for the ANAC tool, provides an overview of the metadata records used for testing, describes the architecture for ANAC, and concludes with discussions of the methodology and evaluation of the experiment comparing human cataloging and ANAC-generated results.