-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and controlled languages in indexing (1995)
0.16
0.15736327 = product of:
0.2098177 = sum of:
0.052885033 = weight(_text_:r in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052885033 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
0.10624927 = weight(_text_:et in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10624927 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.5183982 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
0.05068339 = product of:
0.10136678 = sum of:
0.10136678 = weight(_text_:al in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10136678 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.5063471 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and indexing languages (1985)
0.06
0.06294531 = product of:
0.08392708 = sum of:
0.021154014 = weight(_text_:r in 3641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021154014 = score(doc=3641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 3641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3641)
0.042499706 = weight(_text_:et in 3641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042499706 = score(doc=3641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3641)
0.020273356 = product of:
0.04054671 = sum of:
0.04054671 = weight(_text_:al in 3641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04054671 = score(doc=3641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3641)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Bean, C.: ¬The semantics of hierarchy : explicit parent-child relationships in MeSH tree structures (1998)
0.05
0.054926433 = product of:
0.109852865 = sum of:
0.07437449 = weight(_text_:et in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07437449 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.035478372 = product of:
0.070956744 = sum of:
0.070956744 = weight(_text_:al in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070956744 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
-
Hudon, M.: ¬A preliminary investigation of the usefulness of semantic relations and of standardized definitions for the purpose of specifying meaning in a thesaurus (1998)
0.05
0.047079798 = product of:
0.094159596 = sum of:
0.06374956 = weight(_text_:et in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06374956 = score(doc=55,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
0.030410035 = product of:
0.06082007 = sum of:
0.06082007 = weight(_text_:al in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06082007 = score(doc=55,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.05
0.046689883 = product of:
0.093379766 = sum of:
0.037187245 = weight(_text_:et in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037187245 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.18143937 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.056192517 = sum of:
0.035478372 = weight(_text_:al in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035478372 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.17722149 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.020714147 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020714147 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15296744 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Maniez, J.: Actualité des langages documentaires : fondements théoriques de la recherche d'information (2002)
0.03
0.03187478 = product of:
0.12749912 = sum of:
0.12749912 = weight(_text_:et in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12749912 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.6220778 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- Collections Sciences de l'Information, série Etudes et techniques
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Gilchrist, A.; Will, L.: Revision and extension of thesaurus standards (2004)
0.03
0.031386532 = product of:
0.062773064 = sum of:
0.042499706 = weight(_text_:et in 2615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042499706 = score(doc=2615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 2615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2615)
0.020273356 = product of:
0.04054671 = sum of:
0.04054671 = weight(_text_:al in 2615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04054671 = score(doc=2615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 2615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2615)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The current standards for monolingual and multilingual thesauri are long overdue for an update. This applies to the international standards ISO 2788 and ISO 5964, as well as the corresponding national standards in several countries and the American standard ANSI/NISO Z39.19. Work is now under way in the UK and in the USA to revise and extend the standards, with particular emphasis on interoperability needs in our world of vast electronic networks. Work in the UK is starting with the British Standards, in the hope of leading on to one international standard to serve all. Some of the issues still under discussion include the treatment of facet analysis, coverage of additional types of controlled vocabulary such as classification schemes, taxonomies and ontologies, and mapping from one vocabulary to another. 1. Are thesaurus standards still needed? Since the 1960s, even before the renowned Cranfield experiments (Cleverdon et al., 1966; Cleverdon, 1967) arguments have raged over the usefulness or otherwise of controlled vocabularies. The case has never been proved definitively one way or the other. At the same time, a recognition has become widespread that no one search method can answer all retrieval requirements. In today's environment of very large networks of resources, the skilled information professional uses a range of techniques. Among these, controlled vocabularies are valued alongside others. The first international standard for monolingual thesauri was issued in 1974. In those days, the main application was for postcoordinate indexing and retrieval from document collections or bibliographic databases. For many information professionals the only practicable alternative to a thesaurus was a classification scheme. And so the thesaurus developed a strong following. After computer systems with full text search capability became widely available, however, the arguments against controlled vocabularies gained more followers. The cost of building and maintaining a thesaurus or a classification scheme was a strong disincentive. Today's databases are typically immense compared with those three decades ago. Full text searching is taken for granted, not just in discrete databases but across all the resources in an intranet or even the Internet. But intranets have brought particular frustration as users discover that despite all the computer power, they cannot find items which they know to be present an the network. So the trend against controlled vocabularies is now being reversed, as many information professionals are turning to them for help. Standards to guide them are still in demand.
-
Coates, E.J.: Significance and term relationship in compound headings (1985)
0.03
0.031386532 = product of:
0.062773064 = sum of:
0.042499706 = weight(_text_:et in 3634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042499706 = score(doc=3634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3634)
0.020273356 = product of:
0.04054671 = sum of:
0.04054671 = weight(_text_:al in 3634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04054671 = score(doc=3634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3634)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Rolling, L.: ¬The role of graphic display of concept relationships in indexing and retrieval vocabularies (1985)
0.03
0.031386532 = product of:
0.062773064 = sum of:
0.042499706 = weight(_text_:et in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042499706 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
0.020273356 = product of:
0.04054671 = sum of:
0.04054671 = weight(_text_:al in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04054671 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Mazzocchi, F.: Relations in KOS : is it possible to couple a common nature with different roles? (2017)
0.03
0.031386532 = product of:
0.062773064 = sum of:
0.042499706 = weight(_text_:et in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042499706 = score(doc=78,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
0.020273356 = product of:
0.04054671 = sum of:
0.04054671 = weight(_text_:al in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04054671 = score(doc=78,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this paper, which increases and deepens what was expressed in a previous work (Mazzocchi et al., 2007), is to scrutinize the underlying assumptions of the types of relations included in thesauri, particularly the genus-species relation. Logicist approaches to information organization, which are still dominant, will be compared with hermeneutically oriented approaches. In the light of these approaches, the nature and features of the relations, and what the notion of a priori could possibly mean with regard to them, are examined, together with the implications for designing and implementing knowledge organizations systems (KOS). Design/methodology/approach The inquiry is based on how the relations are described in literature, engaging in particular a discussion with Hjørland (2015) and Svenonius (2004). The philosophical roots of today's leading views are briefly illustrated, in order to put them under perspective and deconstruct the uncritical reception of their authority. To corroborate the discussion a semantic analysis of specific terms and relations is provided too. Findings All relations should be seen as "perspectival" (not as a priori). On the other hand, different types of relations, depending on the conceptual features of the terms involved, can hold a different degree of "stability." On this basis, they could be used to address different information concerns (e.g. interoperability vs expressiveness). Research limitations/implications Some arguments that the paper puts forth at the conceptual level need to be tested in application contexts. Originality/value This paper considers that the standpoint of logic and of hermeneutic (usually seen as conflicting) are both significant for information organization, and could be pragmatically integrated. In accordance with this view, an extension of thesaurus relations' set is advised, meaning that perspective hierarchical relations (i.e. relations that are not logically based but function contingently) should be also included in such a set.
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001)
0.03
0.028866835 = product of:
0.05773367 = sum of:
0.037019525 = weight(_text_:r in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037019525 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.020714147 = product of:
0.041428294 = sum of:
0.041428294 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041428294 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15296744 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:45:57
- Source
- Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
-
Foskett, D.J.: Classification and integrative levels (1985)
0.03
0.027463216 = product of:
0.054926433 = sum of:
0.037187245 = weight(_text_:et in 3639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037187245 = score(doc=3639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.18143937 = fieldWeight in 3639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3639)
0.017739186 = product of:
0.035478372 = sum of:
0.035478372 = weight(_text_:al in 3639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035478372 = score(doc=3639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.17722149 = fieldWeight in 3639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3639)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Farradane, J.E.L.: Fundamental fallacies and new needs in classification (1985)
0.02
0.023539899 = product of:
0.047079798 = sum of:
0.03187478 = weight(_text_:et in 3642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03187478 = score(doc=3642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.15551946 = fieldWeight in 3642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3642)
0.015205017 = product of:
0.030410035 = sum of:
0.030410035 = weight(_text_:al in 3642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030410035 = score(doc=3642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.15190414 = fieldWeight in 3642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3642)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬Die Aufgabenteilung zwischen Wortschatz und Grammatik in einer Indexsprache (1979)
0.02
0.021154014 = product of:
0.08461606 = sum of:
0.08461606 = weight(_text_:r in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08461606 = score(doc=3,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬Die Grenzen des Thesaurus-Verfahrens bei der Wiedergabe von Begriffsrelationen (1975)
0.02
0.021154014 = product of:
0.08461606 = sum of:
0.08461606 = weight(_text_:r in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08461606 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and indexing languages (1982)
0.02
0.021154014 = product of:
0.08461606 = sum of:
0.08461606 = weight(_text_:r in 7648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08461606 = score(doc=7648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 7648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7648)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Kuhlen, R.: Linguistische Grundlagen (1980)
0.02
0.018509762 = product of:
0.07403905 = sum of:
0.07403905 = weight(_text_:r in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07403905 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
DIN 31623: Indexierung zur inhaltlichen Erschließung von Dokumenten : T.1: Begriffe, Grundlagen; T.2: Gleichordnende Indexierung mit Deskriptoren; T.3: Syntaktische Indexierung mit Deskriptoren (1988)
0.02
0.015865512 = product of:
0.06346205 = sum of:
0.06346205 = weight(_text_:r in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06346205 = score(doc=832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Jansen, R.: Intentionen der Indexierungsnorm 31623 und Überlegungen zum Verhältnis gleichordnende/syntaktische Indexierung
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬Der Mangel an Grammatik bei Indexsprachen und seine Folgen (1987)
0.02
0.015865512 = product of:
0.06346205 = sum of:
0.06346205 = weight(_text_:r in 257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06346205 = score(doc=257,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 257, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=257)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Fugmann, R.: Theoretische Grundlagen der Indexierungspraxis (1985)
0.01
0.013221258 = product of:
0.052885033 = sum of:
0.052885033 = weight(_text_:r in 280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052885033 = score(doc=280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.043682147 = queryNorm
0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=280)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
