Search (48 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"chi"
  1. Pu, H.-T.: Exploration of personalized information service for OPAC (1997) 0.04
    0.041313805 = product of:
      0.068856336 = sum of:
        0.018650195 = weight(_text_:on in 1772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018650195 = score(doc=1772,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 1772, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1772)
        0.02656714 = weight(_text_:information in 1772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02656714 = score(doc=1772,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 1772, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1772)
        0.023639 = product of:
          0.047278 = sum of:
            0.047278 = weight(_text_:22 in 1772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047278 = score(doc=1772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1772)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Library OPACs have long been the gateways between users and information. They present to users the achievements of library automation, and are the most widely available automated retrieval systems and the first that many user encounter. Current trends in OPAC design are toward a user oriented, individual information service which can meet the different needs of users with a variety of background and interests. Compared with the rather inactive, short term and general information service of conventional systems, this type of system focuses on active, long term and personalized service. Proposes a framework for the design of such an OPAC and discusses some recent developments in personalized information service
    Date
    4. 8.1998 19:36:22
  2. Lee, Y.-R.: ¬A study on the conditions of using OPAC access points and subject searching by users (1997) 0.04
    0.037145406 = product of:
      0.061909005 = sum of:
        0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02131451 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
        0.013578499 = weight(_text_:information in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013578499 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
        0.027015999 = product of:
          0.054031998 = sum of:
            0.054031998 = weight(_text_:22 in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054031998 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1997, no.22, S.39-55
  3. Tseng, Y.-H.: Keyword extraction techniques and relevance feedback (1997) 0.04
    0.03616686 = product of:
      0.060278103 = sum of:
        0.02637536 = weight(_text_:on in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02637536 = score(doc=1830,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
        0.016802534 = weight(_text_:information in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016802534 = score(doc=1830,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
        0.017100206 = product of:
          0.03420041 = sum of:
            0.03420041 = weight(_text_:technology in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03420041 = score(doc=1830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Automatic keyword extraction is an important and fundamental technology in an advanced information retrieval systems. Briefly compares several major keyword extraction methods, lists their advantages and disadvantages, and reports recent research progress in Taiwan. Also describes the application of a keyword extraction algorithm in an information retrieval system for relevance feedback. Preliminary analysis shows that the error rate of extracting relevant keywords is 18%, and that the precision rate is over 50%. The main disadvantage of this approach is that the extraction results depend on the retrieval results, which in turn depend on the data held by the database. Apart from collecting more data, this problem can be alleviated by the application of a thesaurus constructed by the same keyword extraction algorithm
  4. Fu, Y.-h.: ¬The theory and empirical studies on information seeking (1997) 0.03
    0.032413926 = product of:
      0.08103481 = sum of:
        0.04262902 = weight(_text_:on in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04262902 = score(doc=397,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
        0.038405795 = weight(_text_:information in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038405795 = score(doc=397,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Defines information seeking as using information to satisfy one's needs. Traditionally, quantitative research has focused on objective information and the external behaviour of users, while the alternative paradigm in user studies focused on subjective information and the internal cognition of users. In the context of the paradigm shift, scholars are calling for supplementing quantitative approaches with qualitative approaches. Reviews the literature and presents theories and empirical studies on information needs and information seeking behaviour
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1997, no.20, S.13-28
  5. Wu, C.-J.: Experiments on using the Dublin Core to reduce the retrieval error ratio (1998) 0.02
    0.024912773 = product of:
      0.06228193 = sum of:
        0.04170311 = weight(_text_:on in 5201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04170311 = score(doc=5201,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.38036036 = fieldWeight in 5201, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5201)
        0.02057882 = weight(_text_:information in 5201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02057882 = score(doc=5201,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 5201, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5201)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In order to test the power of metadata on information retrieval, an experiment was designed and conducted on a group of 7 graduate students using the Dublin Core as the cataloguing metadata. Results show that, on average, the retrieval error rate is only 2.9 per cent for the MES system (http://140.136.85.194), which utilizes the Dublin Core to describe the documents on the World Wide Web, in contrast to 20.7 per cent for the 7 famous search engines including HOTBOT, GAIS, LYCOS, EXCITE, INFOSEEK, YAHOO, and OCTOPUS. The very low error rate indicates that the users can use the information of the Dublin Core to decide whether to retrieve the documents or not
    Source
    Journal of library and information science. 24(1998) no.1, S.50-64
  6. Lu, S.J.: ¬A study on the principles of Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (2000) 0.02
    0.024425104 = product of:
      0.06106276 = sum of:
        0.03730039 = weight(_text_:on in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03730039 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
        0.023762373 = weight(_text_:information in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023762373 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 2000, no.32, S.16-44
  7. Jin, Z.; Yuan, C.: On the ambiguity of information retrieval for visualization (1998) 0.02
    0.022920107 = product of:
      0.05730027 = sum of:
        0.03014327 = weight(_text_:on in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03014327 = score(doc=3216,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
        0.027156997 = weight(_text_:information in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027156997 = score(doc=3216,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Addresses the issue of ambiguity of information retrieval for visualization in respect of distance and angle retrieval. Analyzes the cause of the ambiguitiy, its impact on information retrieval, and its resolution. Describes a system where the techniques described are realized
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.3, S.175-179
  8. Xiong, L.J.: On the compiling of cataloguing rules for Chinese document(s) (1997) 0.02
    0.021860885 = product of:
      0.05465221 = sum of:
        0.037679087 = weight(_text_:on in 3199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037679087 = score(doc=3199,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.3436586 = fieldWeight in 3199, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3199)
        0.016973123 = weight(_text_:information in 3199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016973123 = score(doc=3199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3199)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Based on the author's practice and experience in compiling 'Cataloguing rules for Chinese documents', explains the background to the rules and their style, highlighting various points which need attention when using them
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1997) no.1, S.32-37
  9. Yi, H.; Shubai, L.: Application of classification in information organization under the networking environment (1998) 0.02
    0.0216692 = product of:
      0.054172996 = sum of:
        0.027156997 = weight(_text_:information in 3236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027156997 = score(doc=3236,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3236, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3236)
        0.027015999 = product of:
          0.054031998 = sum of:
            0.054031998 = weight(_text_:22 in 3236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054031998 = score(doc=3236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Classification plays a very important role in the traditional organization and manual retrieval of documents. The advantages of classification are becoming evident again in the networked environment, in the areas of online browsing, organization of non text information, management of hypertext, and as a common language for the organization of information, which will promote the integration of classification schemes and thesauri
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.1, S.19-22
  10. Longshu, L.; Xia, Z.: On an aproximate fuzzy information retrieval agent (1998) 0.02
    0.021464769 = product of:
      0.05366192 = sum of:
        0.03014327 = weight(_text_:on in 3294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03014327 = score(doc=3294,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 3294, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3294)
        0.023518652 = weight(_text_:information in 3294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023518652 = score(doc=3294,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3294, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3294)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses online approximate information retrieval based on fuzzy mathematics. Defines fuzzy semantics. Presents an approximate fuzzy matching algorithm and an algorithm for a fuzzy word indexing agent for approximate retrieval. Also presents a case study demonstrating approximate fuzzy matching
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.3, S.180-184
  11. Huang, W.-J.: ¬The definition of ontological and applied information and the trend of information service (1997) 0.02
    0.021081744 = product of:
      0.052704357 = sum of:
        0.015985882 = weight(_text_:on in 849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015985882 = score(doc=849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=849)
        0.036718477 = weight(_text_:information in 849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036718477 = score(doc=849,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.41958824 = fieldWeight in 849, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=849)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Attempts to circumscribe 'information' by means of etymology and the semantics of Chinese characters rather than the traditional way, and also to define several other terms related to information. Discusses the characteristics of information and its movement, and reviews some issues about information science. Information science recognizes information and uses it for making decisions and solving problems. Yi-Jeng (the Book of Changes), the oldest book about the world system, not only explains the relationship between human beings and the universe, but also focuses on how to recognize and use information to improve quality of life and avoid calamity. Derives some conclusions useful for the development of information science from Yi-Jeng. Also discusses the chaotic state caused by rapidly developing networks without a precise concept. Considers some desirable characteristics for the design of information service systems
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 3(1997) no.4, S.55-74
    Theme
    Information
  12. Yang, H.-W.: Information-seeking behavior of the scientists (1998) 0.02
    0.020033944 = product of:
      0.05008486 = sum of:
        0.018650195 = weight(_text_:on in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018650195 = score(doc=2992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
        0.031434666 = weight(_text_:information in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031434666 = score(doc=2992,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A review of studies related to the information needs and communication behaviour of scientists which aims to explore the factors that influence their needs and methods of problem solving. Particular work environments affect needs. Information seeking and basic requirements are comprehensiveness, precision and availability. convenience of information access has a direct effect on the efficiency of a scientist's research but a lack of confidence in applying the solutions to information problems which are employed by librarians limits scientists to the more traditional ways of finding information in libraries. An awareness of this should lead librarians to improve collections and user services for the benefit of scientists and thus win their trust
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1998, no.25, S.24-43
  13. Tsai, B.-s.: Infomapping in information retrieval (1997) 0.02
    0.018151715 = product of:
      0.04537929 = sum of:
        0.022607451 = weight(_text_:on in 2877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022607451 = score(doc=2877,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 2877, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2877)
        0.022771835 = weight(_text_:information in 2877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022771835 = score(doc=2877,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 2877, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2877)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Capability and capacity in handling the topology of a special subject information field has made infomapping techniques and systems instrumental in information searching, monitoring and navigation. Applying the technique to communication networks can reveal the intellectual relationships among junior and senior researchers in the field, and can also show the continuing popularity of a particular researcher's citation record over time. Reports the use of Java in making a cartoon series of chronological maps based on citation analysis on a special subject field (nutrition and dietetics). The map making methods, Java programming, and statistical analysis of the map data are presented, and the advantage and significance of constructing Java maps in enhancing information retrieval discussed. Further technical developments in applying VRML to link together a 3-D spatial indexing system and a 2-D HTML Web site are suggested
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1997) no.2, S.3-13
  14. Huang, M.-h.: End-users' searching behaviour : changes in search type over time (1996) 0.02
    0.017488709 = product of:
      0.04372177 = sum of:
        0.03014327 = weight(_text_:on in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03014327 = score(doc=5128,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
        0.013578499 = weight(_text_:information in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013578499 = score(doc=5128,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Identifies 6 types of searches on the basis of paudsing behaviour by using cluster analysis. The 6 types of search were highly associated with search fleuncy and the construction of a mental model. Examines learning during multiple searches on the basis of the 6 types. Finds that searchers gain more experience, increase their searching proficiency and become more fluent at searching while online. The changes of search level in multiple searches showed that most searchers moved towards greater fleuncy
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1996, no.16, S.7-20
  15. Li, Z.: Research on dynamic morphological indexing (1998) 0.02
    0.017488709 = product of:
      0.04372177 = sum of:
        0.03014327 = weight(_text_:on in 3242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03014327 = score(doc=3242,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 3242, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3242)
        0.013578499 = weight(_text_:information in 3242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013578499 = score(doc=3242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3242)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Notes that in automatic indexing of Chinese words using dictionary matching methods, there is some difficulty in the indexing of proper nouns. Presents a solution called dynamic morphological indexing, based on work using automatic indexing of archive documents. Presents the algorithm for this solution
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.3, S.226-229
  16. Yongcheng, W.; Xiaoming, G.; Lixia, W.: Automatic indexing on subject of Chinese text (1998) 0.02
    0.017446503 = product of:
      0.043616258 = sum of:
        0.026643137 = weight(_text_:on in 3241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026643137 = score(doc=3241,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 3241, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3241)
        0.016973123 = weight(_text_:information in 3241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016973123 = score(doc=3241,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3241, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3241)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.3, S.219-225
  17. Wu, C.-J.: Metadata and future developments in cataloguing (1997) 0.02
    0.01727116 = product of:
      0.043177895 = sum of:
        0.02637536 = weight(_text_:on in 2826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02637536 = score(doc=2826,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 2826, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2826)
        0.016802534 = weight(_text_:information in 2826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016802534 = score(doc=2826,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2826, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2826)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata is a resource which can assist the information retrieval of digital documents on the Internet. In designing a metadata system, it is necessary to consider the characteristics of digital documents, such as the variety of file formats, frequent format transformation and the difficulty of distinguishing between the different versions. Provides a brief analysis of some existing metadata formats, and introduces several pronciples for the future development of cataloguing on the Internet. Briefly describes the Metadata Experimental System (MES) currently under development, and located at the author's homepage
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1997) no.2, S.42-52
  18. Meng, L.: ¬The creation of [the] Chinese Science Citation Database : status quo and future development (1997) 0.02
    0.016206963 = product of:
      0.040517405 = sum of:
        0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02131451 = score(doc=954,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
        0.019202897 = weight(_text_:information in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019202897 = score(doc=954,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) is a significant document database on mainland China, which has been built up by the Documentation and Information Centre of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Briefly introduces the background to CSCD, and discusses in detail its development and application, source journals and citation data, data processing methods, subject scope, compilation regulations, stylistic rules and layout, and usage directions for both the printed and CD-ROM editions of CSCD which have been published from the data
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 3(1997) no.4, S.39-54
  19. Cheng, L.-y.: On bibliographic(al) control (1998) 0.02
    0.016206963 = product of:
      0.040517405 = sum of:
        0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02131451 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
        0.019202897 = weight(_text_:information in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019202897 = score(doc=3376,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic(al) control is important for retrieving documents in the library. Reviews previous studies in order to understand bibliographic(al) control from its very beginnings up to the present information age. The history, meaning, scope and functions of bibliographic(al) control are included. Finally, various catalogues are reviewed and discussed
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1998) no.3, S.58-67
  20. Liu, H.-M.C.: Selection and comparison of WWW search tools (1996) 0.01
    0.013957202 = product of:
      0.034893006 = sum of:
        0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02131451 = score(doc=617,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 617, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=617)
        0.013578499 = weight(_text_:information in 617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013578499 = score(doc=617,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 617, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=617)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    WWW search engines or surfing tools provide users with catalogues or indexes on the Internet and different ways of searching these catalogues or indexes. There is as yet no standard operation for search tools so that users have to understand the way each one works to use them effectively. Describes, compares and evaluates some of these tools including Infoseek, Lycos, OpenText, WebCrawler, Yahoo!, AltaVista, Inktomi, Excite, Magellan, GAIS, and YAM
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 2(1996) no.4, S.41-63