Search (194 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.07
    0.07275943 = product of:
      0.1212657 = sum of:
        0.07917517 = product of:
          0.2375255 = sum of:
            0.2375255 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2375255 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42262965 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.027688364 = weight(_text_:on in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027688364 = score(doc=2918,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.25253648 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.0144021725 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0144021725 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Boyle, J.: ¬A blueprint for managing documents (1997) 0.05
    0.052249085 = product of:
      0.13062271 = sum of:
        0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02131451 = score(doc=814,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 814, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=814)
        0.10930821 = sum of:
          0.05527621 = weight(_text_:technology in 814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05527621 = score(doc=814,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049850095 = queryNorm
              0.3722984 = fieldWeight in 814, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=814)
          0.054031998 = weight(_text_:22 in 814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054031998 = score(doc=814,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049850095 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 814, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=814)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic document management systems are a collection of 3 complementary technologies: the repository, the workflow engine and the searching-and-indexing technology. The document repository stores, controls and manages documents. Workflow can eliminate the dead time a document spends in transition between works and integrates with the repository and electronic mail system. Search and indexing technology enables more efficient searching than standard full text technologies by configuring searches to specific attributes. Discusses how the technologies can be combined to manage a WWW site and offers advice on choosing an appropriate solution
    Source
    Byte. 22(1997) no.5, S.75-76,78,80
  3. Valentine, I.: Document management and workflow systems : how they research the SME and workgroup (1997) 0.04
    0.04462022 = product of:
      0.07436703 = sum of:
        0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02131451 = score(doc=808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
        0.019202897 = weight(_text_:information in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019202897 = score(doc=808,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
        0.03384963 = product of:
          0.06769926 = sum of:
            0.06769926 = weight(_text_:technology in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06769926 = score(doc=808,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.45597056 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the practicalities of introducing document management and workflow technology, based on commercially available software products, in a small-to-medium sized business. Produces a workflow model for a hypothetical organization to purchase goods or services associated with its business and examines the enabling technology, and set up costs. There are no generic solutions. Each process needs to be evaluated to determine the automation needs
    Source
    Information management and technology. 30(1997) no.3, S.117-121
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  4. Hare, C.E.; McLeaod, J.; King, L.A.: Continuing professional development for the information discipline of records management : pt.1: context and initial indications of current activities (1996) 0.04
    0.044234317 = product of:
      0.07372386 = sum of:
        0.018650195 = weight(_text_:on in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018650195 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
        0.031434666 = weight(_text_:information in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031434666 = score(doc=5049,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
        0.023639 = product of:
          0.047278 = sum of:
            0.047278 = weight(_text_:22 in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047278 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the newly emerging information discipline of records management, focusing on its current status in the UK where it is represented by a range of sector specific and general organizations for information professionals. While records management involves some skills and knowledge which are different from those already mastered by library and information professionals, there are significant overlaps in terms of cataloguing, classification, indexing, identifying and meeting user needs and the challenge of dealing with information in electronic form. Concludes that, in the changing and sometimes shrinking market of of some of the more traditional library sectors, records management may offer the opportunity for information professionals to develop or shift their career path while remaining within the discipline of information management
    Source
    Librarian career development. 4(1996) no.2, S.22-27
  5. Bikson, T.K.; Law, S.A.: Electronic information media and records management methods : a survey of practices in UN organizations (1993) 0.04
    0.04273203 = product of:
      0.07122005 = sum of:
        0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02131451 = score(doc=983,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 983, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=983)
        0.030362446 = weight(_text_:information in 983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030362446 = score(doc=983,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 983, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=983)
        0.01954309 = product of:
          0.03908618 = sum of:
            0.03908618 = weight(_text_:technology in 983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03908618 = score(doc=983,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 983, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=983)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on an investigation of electronic records management practices emerging within UN organizations as the use of electronic information and communication technologies grows. A survey examined: the role of telex, facsimile and electronic mail in organizational information handling systems; the properties of computer-based information exchange among organizations that have introduced electronic mail; associated technology options and constraints as well as standards that have been adopted or are being considered: policies, guidelines, training programmes, and plans UN organizations are implementing with respect to electronic records management issues
    Source
    Information society. 9(1993) no.2, S.125-144
  6. Jain, R.: Visual information retrieval in digital libraries (1997) 0.04
    0.04235591 = product of:
      0.07059318 = sum of:
        0.02637536 = weight(_text_:on in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02637536 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
        0.02057882 = weight(_text_:information in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02057882 = score(doc=760,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
        0.023639 = product of:
          0.047278 = sum of:
            0.047278 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047278 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The growth of interest in the electronic library concept and increasing reliance on multimedia materials has increased the demand for image databases as functional parts of digital libraries. Discusses the requirements for these emerging information systems and presents query methods and data models suitable for such systems. Presents selected practical examples of approaches that provide a preview of how digital libraries may operate in the near future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  7. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.04
    0.03772081 = product of:
      0.062868014 = sum of:
        0.018650195 = weight(_text_:on in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018650195 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
        0.02057882 = weight(_text_:information in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02057882 = score(doc=758,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
        0.023639 = product of:
          0.047278 = sum of:
            0.047278 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047278 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  8. Heijst, A.L.M. v.: Records management : the art of making choices (1995) 0.04
    0.037145406 = product of:
      0.061909005 = sum of:
        0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02131451 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
        0.013578499 = weight(_text_:information in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013578499 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
        0.027015999 = product of:
          0.054031998 = sum of:
            0.054031998 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054031998 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the problems associated with electronic archiving and draws attention to work by the University of Pittsburgh on developing a standard for archiving electronic documents. Examines elements of effective archival and records management and considers the problems associated with archives such as backlogs and time taken to search for information. The basis of good records management lies in making responsible choices
    Date
    22. 2.1996 9:30:18
  9. Gonzalez, A.C.: Analisis y diseno de sistemas de gestion electronica de documentacion en grandes entidades (1997) 0.04
    0.037145406 = product of:
      0.061909005 = sum of:
        0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02131451 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
        0.013578499 = weight(_text_:information in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013578499 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
        0.027015999 = product of:
          0.054031998 = sum of:
            0.054031998 = weight(_text_:22 in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054031998 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The successful implementation of Electronic Document Management Systems (EDMS) requires a previous design based on a methodology that includes key steps as follows: capture of critical information and analysis of the current document situation: functional and/or technical options that involve the treatment of the document fonds considered; document management applications design (data, text, images, audio, video) under a functional, technical and economic focus; global and modular project defined as a strategic EDMS plan
    Date
    11. 2.1999 21:02:22
  10. Bondarenko, O.; Janssen, R.; Driessen, S.: Requirements for the design of a personal document-management system (2010) 0.04
    0.03616686 = product of:
      0.060278103 = sum of:
        0.02637536 = weight(_text_:on in 3430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02637536 = score(doc=3430,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 3430, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3430)
        0.016802534 = weight(_text_:information in 3430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016802534 = score(doc=3430,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3430, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3430)
        0.017100206 = product of:
          0.03420041 = sum of:
            0.03420041 = weight(_text_:technology in 3430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03420041 = score(doc=3430,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 3430, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    In this article a set of requirements for the design of a personal document management system is presented, based on the results of three research studies (Bondarenko, [2006]; Bondarenko & Janssen, [2005]; Bondarenko & Janssen, [2009]). We propose a framework, based on layers of task decomposition, that helps to understand the needs of information workers with regard to personal document and task management. Relevant user processes are described and requirements for a document-management system are derived for each layer. The derived requirements are compared to related studies, and implications for system design are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.3, S.468-482
  11. Ruesta, C.B.: ¬Los sistemas de gestion electronica de la documentacion y la teoria de ciclo vital de los documentaos an las organizaciones (1997) 0.04
    0.036036298 = product of:
      0.060060494 = sum of:
        0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 2924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02131451 = score(doc=2924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 2924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2924)
        0.019202897 = weight(_text_:information in 2924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019202897 = score(doc=2924,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2924, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2924)
        0.01954309 = product of:
          0.03908618 = sum of:
            0.03908618 = weight(_text_:technology in 2924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03908618 = score(doc=2924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 2924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The use of information technology in creation and electronic document management rquires a reformulation of the performance of the information and documentation specialist. Proposes changes in the concept of records and archives and in the theory of the life cycle of records and on a practical level, strategies for the preservation and management of the electronic documents
  12. Dootson, P.; Tate, M.; Desouza, K.C.; Townson, P.: Transforming public records management : six key insights (2021) 0.04
    0.036036298 = product of:
      0.060060494 = sum of:
        0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02131451 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
        0.019202897 = weight(_text_:information in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019202897 = score(doc=214,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
        0.01954309 = product of:
          0.03908618 = sum of:
            0.03908618 = weight(_text_:technology in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03908618 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Records management in the public sector is integral for delivering public good. However, several institutional challenges inhibit the required implementation of innovative and information-centric tools to transform records management in response to the challenges of digitization and to capitalize on new opportunities in the digital economy. In this article, we make recommendations to overcome institutional and legislative barriers to transform records management in the public sector.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.5, S.643-648
  13. Meer, K. van der: Document information systems (2009) 0.03
    0.03455232 = product of:
      0.0575872 = sum of:
        0.015985882 = weight(_text_:on in 3771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015985882 = score(doc=3771,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 3771, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3771)
        0.026943998 = weight(_text_:information in 3771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026943998 = score(doc=3771,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 3771, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3771)
        0.014657319 = product of:
          0.029314637 = sum of:
            0.029314637 = weight(_text_:technology in 3771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029314637 = score(doc=3771,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3771, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3771)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    From characteristics of information, documents and document information systems (document IS), motives to use document IS are described. A few cases are presented. The functional aspects of document IS are described, derived from ISO standard 15489 on records management and the Sarbanes-Oxley law, and made operational in MoReq and DoD standard 5015.2. Explicit attention is given to related subjects from a viewpoint of document management: information sharing (workflow, knowledge management), and interoperability of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools; authenticity because of the possible evidential value of documents; and digital longevity because of the possible long-time function of archival documents. The technical aspects answer functional demands; important information science standards, and standard components for 12 characteristics of document IS are described, among others ODMA, the XML family, OAIS, and metadata schemes. The design methodological aspects answer functional demands and technical possibilities. Models are introduced and the way of working of, e.g., a digitization project is described.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  14. Cory, K.A.: ¬The imaging industry wants us! (1992) 0.03
    0.033797532 = product of:
      0.05632922 = sum of:
        0.018650195 = weight(_text_:on in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018650195 = score(doc=535,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
        0.02057882 = weight(_text_:information in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02057882 = score(doc=535,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
        0.017100206 = product of:
          0.03420041 = sum of:
            0.03420041 = weight(_text_:technology in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03420041 = score(doc=535,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Paper-based manual filing systems are inadequate to handle the flood of information found in most commercial offices and government agencies. Examples are included to delineate the dimensions of the problem. In response, imaging technology, which converts information in paper format to computer-readable binary format, is creating a multitude of electronic databases. However, imaging vendors are minimizing the difficulties of database organization. The author, drawing on personal experience, recounts instances of inadequate database organization. Because classification and indexing principles are only imparted in schools of library and/or information science, the imaging industry is highly dependent upon expertise possessed by library science graduates. In order to take advantage of this new job market, recommendations for library science students and faculty are included.
  15. Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995) 0.03
    0.032661658 = product of:
      0.054436095 = sum of:
        0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02131451 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
        0.013578499 = weight(_text_:information in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013578499 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
        0.01954309 = product of:
          0.03908618 = sum of:
            0.03908618 = weight(_text_:technology in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03908618 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
    Source
    Information management and technology. 28(1995) no.1, S.28-32
  16. Aldrich, M.J.: Document image processing (1996) 0.03
    0.032661658 = product of:
      0.054436095 = sum of:
        0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 4558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02131451 = score(doc=4558,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 4558, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4558)
        0.013578499 = weight(_text_:information in 4558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013578499 = score(doc=4558,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4558, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4558)
        0.01954309 = product of:
          0.03908618 = sum of:
            0.03908618 = weight(_text_:technology in 4558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03908618 = score(doc=4558,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 4558, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4558)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Document image processing (DIP) was introduced as part of the search for the paperless office. It seemed to offer many advantages but failed to be justified on cost grounds and entailed a number of far reaching sociological implications. It involved radical change in work practices and became allied to the business reengineering movement. Discusses lessons learnt from the failure of DIP applications and offers suggestions for situations in which they can be best applied
    Source
    Information management and technology. 29(1996) no.1, S.32-34
  17. Kilov, H.; Cuthbert, L.: ¬A model for document management (1995) 0.03
    0.031000165 = product of:
      0.05166694 = sum of:
        0.022607451 = weight(_text_:on in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022607451 = score(doc=2646,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
        0.0144021725 = weight(_text_:information in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0144021725 = score(doc=2646,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
        0.014657319 = product of:
          0.029314637 = sum of:
            0.029314637 = weight(_text_:technology in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029314637 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a document management model used to understand and manage documents of any kind. The model is essential, in particular, for those who wish to become content providers. It applies both to traditional paper documents and to hypertext and hypermedia ones, but concentrates on currently used traditional documents. The model clearly distinguishes between 3 viewpoints: the intellectual content; the logical layout; and the physical presentation. The model clearly separates the concerns of document semantics (explicit concept map) from the concerns of document architectonics (logical layout); the business meaning of the information does not depend upon its presentation. The concepts and approach presented here are neutral with respect to tools and technology used for document management. This model is based on general information modelling concepts successfully used in other application areas, most notably in telecommunications, with the goal of exposing appropriate business rules
  18. Cox, R.J.: Access in the digital information age and the archival mission : the United States (1998) 0.03
    0.028416147 = product of:
      0.07104037 = sum of:
        0.023762373 = weight(_text_:information in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023762373 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
        0.047278 = product of:
          0.094556 = sum of:
            0.094556 = weight(_text_:22 in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094556 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    2. 3.1999 9:22:24
  19. Hu, P.J.-H.; Hsu, F.-M.; Hu, H.-f.; Chen, H.: Agency satisfaction with electronic record management systems : a large-scale survey (2010) 0.03
    0.028406477 = product of:
      0.047344126 = sum of:
        0.026643137 = weight(_text_:on in 4115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026643137 = score(doc=4115,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 4115, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4115)
        0.0084865615 = weight(_text_:information in 4115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0084865615 = score(doc=4115,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4115, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4115)
        0.012214432 = product of:
          0.024428863 = sum of:
            0.024428863 = weight(_text_:technology in 4115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024428863 = score(doc=4115,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4115, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4115)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    We investigated agency satisfaction with an electronic record management system (ERMS) that supports the electronic creation, archival, processing, transmittal, and sharing of records (documents) among autonomous government agencies. A factor model, explaining agency satisfaction with ERMS functionalities, offers hypotheses, which we tested empirically with a large-scale survey that involved more than 1,600 government agencies in Taiwan. The data showed a good fit to our model and supported all the hypotheses. Overall, agency satisfaction with ERMS functionalities appears jointly determined by regulatory compliance, job relevance, and satisfaction with support services. Among the determinants we studied, agency satisfaction with support services seems the strongest predictor of agency satisfaction with ERMS functionalities. Regulatory compliance also has important influences on agency satisfaction with ERMS, through its influence on job relevance and satisfaction with support services. Further analyses showed that satisfaction with support services partially mediated the impact of regulatory compliance on satisfaction with ERMS functionalities, and job relevance partially mediated the influence of regulatory compliance on satisfaction with ERMS functionalities. Our findings have important implications for research and practice, which we also discuss.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.12, S.2559-2574
  20. Thiel, T.J.: Automated indexing of information stored on optical disk electronic document image management systems (1994) 0.03
    0.028362185 = product of:
      0.07090546 = sum of:
        0.03730039 = weight(_text_:on in 1260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03730039 = score(doc=1260,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 1260, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1260)
        0.03360507 = weight(_text_:information in 1260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03360507 = score(doc=1260,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 1260, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1260)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.54, [=Suppl.17]

Years

Languages

  • e 128
  • d 58
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 162
  • m 17
  • x 8
  • s 6
  • r 3
  • b 1
  • More… Less…