-
Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012)
0.06
0.0637777 = product of:
0.10629617 = sum of:
0.013321568 = weight(_text_:on in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013321568 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.121501654 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.020787746 = weight(_text_:information in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020787746 = score(doc=4888,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.07218685 = sum of:
0.024428863 = weight(_text_:technology in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024428863 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.047757987 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047757987 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- This paper centres on the tools for the management of new digital documents, which are not only textual, but also visual-video, audio or multimedia in the full sense. Among the aims is to demonstrate that operating within the terms of generic Information Retrieval through textual language only is limiting, and it is instead necessary to consider ampler criteria, such as those of MultiMedia Information Retrieval, according to which, every type of digital document can be analyzed and searched by the proper elements of language for its proper nature. MMIR is presented as the organic complex of the systems of Text Retrieval, Visual Retrieval, Video Retrieval, and Audio Retrieval, each of which has an approach to information management that handles the concrete textual, visual, audio, or video content of the documents directly, here defined as content-based. In conclusion, the limits of this content-based objective access to documents is underlined. The discrepancy known as the semantic gap is that which occurs between semantic-interpretive access and content-based access. Finally, the integration of these conceptions is explained, gathering and composing the merits and the advantages of each of the approaches and of the systems to access to information.
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:02:10
- Footnote
- Bezugnahme auf: Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval. In: Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.3-42.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980)
0.06
0.05727163 = product of:
0.09545271 = sum of:
0.037679087 = weight(_text_:on in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037679087 = score(doc=5835,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.3436586 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.024003621 = weight(_text_:information in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024003621 = score(doc=5835,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.03377 = product of:
0.06754 = sum of:
0.06754 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06754 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:44
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u, L. Kajberg
-
Shaw, R.: Information organization and the philosophy of history (2013)
0.04
0.037390526 = product of:
0.062317543 = sum of:
0.018650195 = weight(_text_:on in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018650195 = score(doc=946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
0.02656714 = weight(_text_:information in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02656714 = score(doc=946,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
0.017100206 = product of:
0.03420041 = sum of:
0.03420041 = weight(_text_:technology in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03420041 = score(doc=946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The philosophy of history can help articulate problems relevant to information organization. One such problem is "aboutness": How do texts relate to the world? In response to this problem, philosophers of history have developed theories of colligation describing how authors bind together phenomena under organizing concepts. Drawing on these ideas, I present a theory of subject analysis that avoids the problematic illusion of an independent "landscape" of subjects. This theory points to a broad vision of the future of information organization and some specific challenges to be met.
- Series
- Advances in information science
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1092-1103
-
Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992)
0.04
0.037145406 = product of:
0.061909005 = sum of:
0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02131451 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.013578499 = weight(_text_:information in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013578499 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.027015999 = product of:
0.054031998 = sum of:
0.054031998 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054031998 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:08
- Source
- Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
-
Fairthorne, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification (1985)
0.04
0.035456702 = product of:
0.059094504 = sum of:
0.046009623 = weight(_text_:section in 3651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046009623 = score(doc=3651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.17490591 = fieldWeight in 3651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3651)
0.007992941 = weight(_text_:on in 3651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007992941 = score(doc=3651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.072900996 = fieldWeight in 3651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3651)
0.0050919373 = weight(_text_:information in 3651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050919373 = score(doc=3651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.058186423 = fieldWeight in 3651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3651)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The fan of past documents may be seen across time as a philosophical "wake," translated documents as a sideways relationship and future documents as another fan spreading forward from a given document (p. 365). The "overlap of reading histories can be used to detect common interests among readers," (p. 365) and readers may be classified accordingly. Finally, Fairthorne rejects the notion of a "general" classification, which he regards as a mirage, to be replaced by a citation-type network to identify classes. An interesting feature of his work lies in his linkage between old and new documents via a bibliographic method-citations, authors' names, imprints, style, and vocabulary - rather than topical (subject) terms. This is an indirect method of creating classes. The subject (aboutness) is conceived as a finite, common sharing of knowledge over time (past, present, and future) as opposed to the more common hierarchy of topics in an infinite schema assumed to be universally useful. Fairthorne, a mathematician by training, is a prolific writer an the foundations of classification and information. His professional career includes work with the Royal Engineers Chemical Warfare Section and the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE). He was the founder of the Computing Unit which became the RAE Mathematics Department.
- Footnote
- Original in: Ottawa Conference on the Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge, Ottawa, 1971. Ed.: Jerzy A Wojceichowski. Pullach: Verlag Dokumentation 1974. S.404-412.
-
Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014)
0.03
0.03488054 = product of:
0.058134235 = sum of:
0.027688364 = weight(_text_:on in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027688364 = score(doc=1416,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.25253648 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.0101838745 = weight(_text_:information in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0101838745 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.020261997 = product of:
0.040523995 = sum of:
0.040523995 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040523995 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the preliminary findings of a study that explores mental associations made by novices viewing art images. In a controlled environment, 20 Taiwanese college students responded to the question "What does the painting remind you of?" after viewing each digitized image of 15 oil paintings by a famous Taiwanese artist. Rather than focusing on the representation or interpretation of art, the study attempted to solicit information about how non-experts are stimulated by art. This paper reports on the analysis of participant responses to three of the images, and describes a12-type taxonomy of association emerged from the analysis. While 9 of the types are derived and adapted from facets in the Art & Architecture Thesaurus, three new types - Artistic Influence Association, Reactive Association, and Prototype Association - are discovered. The conclusion briefly discusses both the significance of the findings and the implications for future research.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Rorissa, A.; Iyer, H.: Theories of cognition and image categorization : what category labels reveal about basic level theory (2008)
0.03
0.033353098 = product of:
0.055588495 = sum of:
0.015985882 = weight(_text_:on in 1958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015985882 = score(doc=1958,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 1958, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1958)
0.024945294 = weight(_text_:information in 1958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024945294 = score(doc=1958,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 1958, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1958)
0.014657319 = product of:
0.029314637 = sum of:
0.029314637 = weight(_text_:technology in 1958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029314637 = score(doc=1958,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1958, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1958)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Information search and retrieval interactions usually involve information content in the form of document collections, information retrieval systems and interfaces, and the user. To fully understand information search and retrieval interactions between users' cognitive space and the information space, researchers need to turn to cognitive models and theories. In this article, the authors use one of these theories, the basic level theory. Use of the basic level theory to understand human categorization is both appropriate and essential to user-centered design of taxonomies, ontologies, browsing interfaces, and other indexing tools and systems. Analyses of data from two studies involving free sorting by 105 participants of 100 images were conducted. The types of categories formed and category labels were examined. Results of the analyses indicate that image category labels generally belong to superordinate to the basic level, and are generic and interpretive. Implications for research on theories of cognition and categorization, and design of image indexing, retrieval and browsing systems are discussed.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1383-1392
-
Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002)
0.03
0.03295981 = product of:
0.054933015 = sum of:
0.04337829 = weight(_text_:section in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04337829 = score(doc=1858,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.16490288 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.0048007243 = weight(_text_:information in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0048007243 = score(doc=1858,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.054858685 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.0067539997 = product of:
0.0135079995 = sum of:
0.0135079995 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0135079995 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Footnote
- Rez. in JASIST 54(2003) no.4, S.356-357 (S.J. Lincicum): "Reliance upon shared cataloging in academic libraries in the United States has been driven largely by the need to reduce the expense of cataloging operations without muck regard for the Impact that this approach might have an the quality of the records included in local catalogs. In recent years, ever increasing pressures have prompted libraries to adopt practices such as "rapid" copy cataloging that purposely reduce the scrutiny applied to bibliographic records downloaded from shared databases, possibly increasing the number of errors that slip through unnoticed. Errors in bibliographic records can lead to serious problems for library catalog users. If the data contained in bibliographic records is inaccurate, users will have difficulty discovering and recognizing resources in a library's collection that are relevant to their needs. Thus, it has become increasingly important to understand the extent and nature of errors that occur in the records found in large shared bibliographic databases, such as OCLC WorldCat, to develop cataloging practices optimized for the shared cataloging environment. Although this monograph raises a few legitimate concerns about recent trends in cataloging practice, it fails to provide the "detailed look" at misinformation in library catalogs arising from linguistic errors and mistakes in subject analysis promised by the publisher. A basic premise advanced throughout the text is that a certain amount of linguistic and subject knowledge is required to catalog library materials effectively. The author emphasizes repeatedly that most catalogers today are asked to catalog an increasingly diverse array of materials, and that they are often required to work in languages or subject areas of which they have little or no knowledge. He argues that the records contributed to shared databases are increasingly being created by catalogers with inadequate linguistic or subject expertise. This adversely affects the quality of individual library catalogs because errors often go uncorrected as records are downloaded from shared databases to local catalogs by copy catalogers who possess even less knowledge. Calling misinformation an "evil phenomenon," Bade states that his main goal is to discuss, "two fundamental types of misinformation found in bibliographic and authority records in library catalogs: that arising from linguistic errors, and that caused by errors in subject analysis, including missing or wrong subject headings" (p. 2). After a superficial discussion of "other" types of errors that can occur in bibliographic records, such as typographical errors and errors in the application of descriptive cataloging rules, Bade begins his discussion of linguistic errors. He asserts that sharing bibliographic records created by catalogers with inadequate linguistic or subject knowledge has, "disastrous effects an the library community" (p. 6). To support this bold assertion, Bade provides as evidence little more than a laundry list of errors that he has personally observed in bibliographic records over the years. When he eventually cites several studies that have addressed the availability and quality of records available for materials in languages other than English, he fails to describe the findings of these studies in any detail, let alone relate the findings to his own observations in a meaningful way. Bade claims that a lack of linguistic expertise among catalogers is the "primary source for linguistic misinformation in our databases" (p. 10), but he neither cites substantive data from existing studies nor provides any new data regarding the overall level of linguistic knowledge among catalogers to support this claim. The section concludes with a brief list of eight sensible, if unoriginal, suggestions for coping with the challenge of cataloging materials in unfamiliar languages.
Bade begins his discussion of errors in subject analysis by summarizing the contents of seven records containing what he considers to be egregious errors. The examples were drawn only from items that he has encountered in the course of his work. Five of the seven records were full-level ("I" level) records for Eastern European materials created between 1996 and 2000 in the OCLC WorldCat database. The final two examples were taken from records created by Bade himself over an unspecified period of time. Although he is to be commended for examining the actual items cataloged and for examining mostly items that he claims to have adequate linguistic and subject expertise to evaluate reliably, Bade's methodology has major flaws. First and foremost, the number of examples provided is completely inadequate to draw any conclusions about the extent of the problem. Although an in-depth qualitative analysis of a small number of records might have yielded some valuable insight into factors that contribute to errors in subject analysis, Bade provides no Information about the circumstances under which the live OCLC records he critiques were created. Instead, he offers simplistic explanations for the errors based solely an his own assumptions. He supplements his analysis of examples with an extremely brief survey of other studies regarding errors in subject analysis, which consists primarily of criticism of work done by Sheila Intner. In the end, it is impossible to draw any reliable conclusions about the nature or extent of errors in subject analysis found in records in shared bibliographic databases based an Bade's analysis. In the final third of the essay, Bade finally reveals his true concern: the deintellectualization of cataloging. It would strengthen the essay tremendously to present this as the primary premise from the very beginning, as this section offers glimpses of a compelling argument. Bade laments, "Many librarians simply do not sec cataloging as an intellectual activity requiring an educated mind" (p. 20). Commenting an recent trends in copy cataloging practice, he declares, "The disaster of our time is that this work is being done more and more by people who can neither evaluate nor correct imported errors and offen are forbidden from even thinking about it" (p. 26). Bade argues that the most valuable content found in catalog records is the intellectual content contributed by knowledgeable catalogers, and he asserts that to perform intellectually demanding tasks such as subject analysis reliably and effectively, catalogers must have the linguistic and subject knowledge required to gain at least a rudimentary understanding of the materials that they describe. He contends that requiring catalogers to quickly dispense with materials in unfamiliar languages and subjects clearly undermines their ability to perform the intellectual work of cataloging and leads to an increasing number of errors in the bibliographic records contributed to shared databases.
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
-
Wilson, M.J.; Wilson, M.L.: ¬A comparison of techniques for measuring sensemaking and learning within participant-generated summaries (2013)
0.03
0.029992333 = product of:
0.04998722 = sum of:
0.023073634 = weight(_text_:on in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023073634 = score(doc=612,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.21044704 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
0.014699157 = weight(_text_:information in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014699157 = score(doc=612,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
0.012214432 = product of:
0.024428863 = sum of:
0.024428863 = weight(_text_:technology in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024428863 = score(doc=612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- While it is easy to identify whether someone has found a piece of information during a search task, it is much harder to measure how much someone has learned during the search process. Searchers who are learning often exhibit exploratory behaviors, and so current research is often focused on improving support for exploratory search. Consequently, we need effective measures of learning to demonstrate better support for exploratory search. Some approaches, such as quizzes, measure recall when learning from a fixed source of information. This research, however, focuses on techniques for measuring open-ended learning, which often involve analyzing handwritten summaries produced by participants after a task. There are two common techniques for analyzing such summaries: (a) counting facts and statements and (b) judging topic coverage. Both of these techniques, however, can be easily confounded by simple variables such as summary length. This article presents a new technique that measures depth of learning within written summaries based on Bloom's taxonomy (B.S. Bloom & M.D. Engelhart, 1956). This technique was generated using grounded theory and is designed to be less susceptible to such confounding variables. Together, these three categories of measure were compared by applying them to a large collection of written summaries produced in a task-based study, and our results provide insights into each of their strengths and weaknesses. Both fact-to-statement ratio and our own measure of depth of learning were effective while being less affected by confounding variables. Recommendations and clear areas of future work are provided to help continued research into supporting sensemaking and learning.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.2, S.291-306
-
Chen, H.: ¬An analysis of image queries in the field of art history (2001)
0.03
0.028578952 = product of:
0.047631584 = sum of:
0.018650195 = weight(_text_:on in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018650195 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
0.011881187 = weight(_text_:information in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011881187 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
0.017100206 = product of:
0.03420041 = sum of:
0.03420041 = weight(_text_:technology in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03420041 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Chen arranged with an Art History instructor to require 20 medieval art images in papers received from 29 students. Participants completed a self administered presearch and postsearch questionnaire, and were interviewed after questionnaire analysis, in order to collect both the keywords and phrases they planned to use, and those actually used. Three MLIS student reviewers then mapped the queries to Enser and McGregor's four categories, Jorgensen's 12 classes, and Fidel's 12 feature data and object poles providing a degree of match on a seven point scale (one not at all to 7 exact). The reviewers give highest scores to Enser and McGregor;'s categories. Modifications to both the Enser and McGregor and Jorgensen schemes are suggested
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.3, S.260-273
-
Rosso, M.A.: User-based identification of Web genres (2008)
0.03
0.028406477 = product of:
0.047344126 = sum of:
0.026643137 = weight(_text_:on in 1863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026643137 = score(doc=1863,freq=8.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 1863, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1863)
0.0084865615 = weight(_text_:information in 1863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0084865615 = score(doc=1863,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1863, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1863)
0.012214432 = product of:
0.024428863 = sum of:
0.024428863 = weight(_text_:technology in 1863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024428863 = score(doc=1863,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 1863, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1863)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- This research explores the use of genre as a document descriptor in order to improve the effectiveness of Web searching. A major issue to be resolved is the identification of what document categories should be used as genres. As genre is a kind of folk typology, document categories must enjoy widespread recognition by their intended user groups in order to qualify as genres. Three user studies were conducted to develop a genre palette and show that it is recognizable to users. (Palette is a term used to denote a classification, attributable to Karlgren, Bretan, Dewe, Hallberg, and Wolkert, 1998.) To simplify the users' classification task, it was decided to focus on Web pages from the edu domain. The first study was a survey of user terminology for Web pages. Three participants separated 100 Web page printouts into stacks according to genre, assigning names and definitions to each genre. The second study aimed to refine the resulting set of 48 (often conceptually and lexically similar) genre names and definitions into a smaller palette of user-preferred terminology. Ten participants classified the same 100 Web pages. A set of five principles for creating a genre palette from individuals' sortings was developed, and the list of 48 was trimmed to 18 genres. The third study aimed to show that users would agree on the genres of Web pages when choosing from the genre palette. In an online experiment in which 257 participants categorized a new set of 55 pages using the 18 genres, on average, over 70% agreed on the genre of each page. Suggestions for improving the genre palette and future directions for the work are discussed.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.7, S.1053-1072
-
White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006)
0.03
0.027859053 = product of:
0.046431754 = sum of:
0.015985882 = weight(_text_:on in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015985882 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.0101838745 = weight(_text_:information in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0101838745 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.020261997 = product of:
0.040523995 = sum of:
0.040523995 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040523995 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Content analysis is a highly flexible research method that has been widely used in library and information science (LIS) studies with varying research goals and objectives. The research method is applied in qualitative, quantitative, and sometimes mixed modes of research frameworks and employs a wide range of analytical techniques to generate findings and put them into context. This article characterizes content analysis as a systematic, rigorous approach to analyzing documents obtained or generated in the course of research. It briefly describes the steps involved in content analysis, differentiates between quantitative and qualitative content analysis, and shows that content analysis serves the purposes of both quantitative research and qualitative research. The authors draw on selected LIS studies that have used content analysis to illustrate the concepts addressed in the article. The article also serves as a gateway to methodological books and articles that provide more detail about aspects of content analysis discussed only briefly in the article.
- Source
- Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
-
Belkin, N.J.: ¬The problem of 'matching' in information retrieval (1980)
0.03
0.026899895 = product of:
0.06724974 = sum of:
0.031971764 = weight(_text_:on in 1329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031971764 = score(doc=1329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 1329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1329)
0.035277974 = weight(_text_:information in 1329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035277974 = score(doc=1329,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 1329, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1329)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
-
Baxendale, P.: Content analysis, specification and control (1966)
0.03
0.026497273 = product of:
0.06624318 = sum of:
0.027156997 = weight(_text_:information in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027156997 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
0.03908618 = product of:
0.07817236 = sum of:
0.07817236 = weight(_text_:technology in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07817236 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 1(1966), S.71-106
-
Sharp, J.R.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1967)
0.03
0.026497273 = product of:
0.06624318 = sum of:
0.027156997 = weight(_text_:information in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027156997 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
0.03908618 = product of:
0.07817236 = sum of:
0.07817236 = weight(_text_:technology in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07817236 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 2(1967), S.87-122
-
Taulbee, O.E.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1968)
0.03
0.026497273 = product of:
0.06624318 = sum of:
0.027156997 = weight(_text_:information in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027156997 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.03908618 = product of:
0.07817236 = sum of:
0.07817236 = weight(_text_:technology in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07817236 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 3(1968), S.105-136
-
Fairthorne, R.A.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1969)
0.03
0.026497273 = product of:
0.06624318 = sum of:
0.027156997 = weight(_text_:information in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027156997 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
0.03908618 = product of:
0.07817236 = sum of:
0.07817236 = weight(_text_:technology in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07817236 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 4(1969), S.73-110
-
Wyllie, J.: Concept indexing : the world beyond the windows (1990)
0.02
0.024514562 = product of:
0.0612864 = sum of:
0.031971764 = weight(_text_:on in 2977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031971764 = score(doc=2977,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 2977, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2977)
0.029314637 = product of:
0.058629274 = sum of:
0.058629274 = weight(_text_:technology in 2977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058629274 = score(doc=2977,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 2977, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2977)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper argues that the realisation of the electronic hypermedia of the future depends on integrating the technology of free text retrieval with the classification-based discipline of content analysis
-
Bi, Y.: Sentiment classification in social media data by combining triplet belief functions (2022)
0.02
0.024496244 = product of:
0.040827073 = sum of:
0.015985882 = weight(_text_:on in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015985882 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.0101838745 = weight(_text_:information in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0101838745 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.014657319 = product of:
0.029314637 = sum of:
0.029314637 = weight(_text_:technology in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029314637 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Sentiment analysis is an emerging technique that caters for semantic orientation and opinion mining. It is increasingly used to analyze online reviews and posts for identifying people's opinions and attitudes to products and events in order to improve business performance of companies and aid to make better organizing strategies of events. This paper presents an innovative approach to combining the outputs of sentiment classifiers under the framework of belief functions. It consists of the formulation of sentiment classifier outputs in the triplet evidence structure and the development of general formulas for combining triplet functions derived from sentiment classification results via three evidential combination rules along with comparative analyses. The empirical studies have been conducted on examining the effectiveness of our method for sentiment classification individually and in combination, and the results demonstrate that the best combined classifiers by our method outperforms the best individual classifiers over five review datasets.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.7, S.968-991
-
Hjoerland, B.: Subject representation and information seeking : contributions to a theory based on the theory of knowledge (1993)
0.02
0.024425104 = product of:
0.06106276 = sum of:
0.03730039 = weight(_text_:on in 7555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03730039 = score(doc=7555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 7555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7555)
0.023762373 = weight(_text_:information in 7555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023762373 = score(doc=7555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 7555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7555)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
