-
Woods, E.W.; IFLA Section on classification and Indexing and Indexing and Information Technology; Joint Working Group on a Classification Format: Requirements for a format of classification data : Final report, July 1996 (1996)
0.22
0.22314863 = product of:
0.2789358 = sum of:
0.18403849 = weight(_text_:section in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18403849 = score(doc=3008,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.69962364 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
0.045214903 = weight(_text_:on in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045214903 = score(doc=3008,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.4123903 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
0.020367749 = weight(_text_:information in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020367749 = score(doc=3008,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
0.029314637 = product of:
0.058629274 = sum of:
0.058629274 = weight(_text_:technology in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058629274 = score(doc=3008,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8 = coord(4/5)
-
Vizine-Goetz, D.; Thompson, R.: Towards DDC-classified displays of Netfirst search results : subject access issues (2003)
0.09
0.092985645 = product of:
0.15497607 = sum of:
0.13013488 = weight(_text_:section in 3815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13013488 = score(doc=3815,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.49470866 = fieldWeight in 3815, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3815)
0.0101838745 = weight(_text_:information in 3815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0101838745 = score(doc=3815,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3815, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3815)
0.014657319 = product of:
0.029314637 = sum of:
0.029314637 = weight(_text_:technology in 3815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029314637 = score(doc=3815,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3815, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3815)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Source
- Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The UDC and the World Wide Web (2003)
0.08
0.077488035 = product of:
0.12914672 = sum of:
0.10844573 = weight(_text_:section in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10844573 = score(doc=3814,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.4122572 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
0.0084865615 = weight(_text_:information in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0084865615 = score(doc=3814,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
0.012214432 = product of:
0.024428863 = sum of:
0.024428863 = weight(_text_:technology in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024428863 = score(doc=3814,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Source
- Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; Kammerer, K.; Vizine-Goetz, D.; Chan, L.M.; El-Hoshy, L.: FAST: faceted application of subject terminology (2003)
0.08
0.077488035 = product of:
0.12914672 = sum of:
0.10844573 = weight(_text_:section in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10844573 = score(doc=3816,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.4122572 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
0.0084865615 = weight(_text_:information in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0084865615 = score(doc=3816,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
0.012214432 = product of:
0.024428863 = sum of:
0.024428863 = weight(_text_:technology in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024428863 = score(doc=3816,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Source
- Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Louie, A.J.; Maddox, E.L.; Washington, W.: Using faceted classification to provide structure for information architecture (2003)
0.08
0.07538647 = product of:
0.12564412 = sum of:
0.092019245 = weight(_text_:section in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092019245 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.34981182 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
0.015985882 = weight(_text_:on in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015985882 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
0.017638987 = weight(_text_:information in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017638987 = score(doc=2471,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- This is a short, but very thorough and very interesting, report on how the writers built a faceted classification for some legal information and used it to structure a web site with navigation and searching. There is a good summary of why facets work well and how they fit into bibliographic control in general. The last section is about their implementation of a web site for the Washington State Bar Association's Council for Legal Public Education. Their classification uses three facets: Purpose (the general aim of the document, e.g. Resources for K-12 Teachers), Topic (the subject of the document), and Type (the legal format of the document). See Example Web Sites, below, for a discussion of the site and a problem with its design.
- Footnote
- Paper presented at the ASIS&T 2003 Information Architecture Summit, Portland, OR, 21-23 March 2003.
-
Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing application for organizing and accessing internet resources (2003)
0.06
0.06199043 = product of:
0.10331738 = sum of:
0.08675658 = weight(_text_:section in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08675658 = score(doc=3966,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.32980576 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
0.0067892494 = weight(_text_:information in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067892494 = score(doc=3966,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
0.009771545 = product of:
0.01954309 = sum of:
0.01954309 = weight(_text_:technology in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01954309 = score(doc=3966,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.13162735 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Source
- Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Drabenstott, K.M.; Riester, L.C.; Dede, B.A.: Shelflisting using expert systems (1992)
0.06
0.05760274 = product of:
0.14400685 = sum of:
0.12269233 = weight(_text_:section in 2101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12269233 = score(doc=2101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.46641576 = fieldWeight in 2101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2101)
0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 2101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02131451 = score(doc=2101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 2101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2101)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- A prototype expert system for the computer science section (QA75 to QA76.95) of Library of Congress Classification was built using the Mahogany Professional expert system shell. The prototype demonstrates an expert systes application in which the system is enlisted as an intelligent job aid to assist users during the actual performance of shelflisting
- Source
- Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
-
Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989)
0.05
0.05346269 = product of:
0.08910448 = sum of:
0.04170311 = weight(_text_:on in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04170311 = score(doc=2509,freq=10.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.38036036 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.023762373 = weight(_text_:information in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023762373 = score(doc=2509,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.023639 = product of:
0.047278 = sum of:
0.047278 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047278 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
- Date
- 8.11.1995 11:52:22
-
Ellis, D.; Vasconcelos, A.: ¬The relevance of facet analysis for World Wide Web subject organization and searching (2000)
0.05
0.04585068 = product of:
0.1146267 = sum of:
0.092019245 = weight(_text_:section in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092019245 = score(doc=2477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.34981182 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
0.022607451 = weight(_text_:on in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022607451 = score(doc=2477,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Different forms of indexing and search facilities available on the Web are described. Use of facet analysis to structure hypertext concept structures is outlined in relation to work on (1) development of hypertext knowledge bases for designers of learning materials and (2) construction of knowledge based hypertext interfaces. The problem of lack of closeness between page designers and potential users is examined. Facet analysis is suggested as a way of alleviating some difficulties associated with this problem of designing for the unknown user.
This is a revised version of the earlier article by Ellis and Vasconcelos (1999) (see Not Relevant, below), though that is not indicated, and much of it is identical, word for word. There is a new section covering the work of Elizabeth Duncan, which is useful and informative, but the reader is better advised to go to the originals if available.
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.04
0.0431095 = product of:
0.07184916 = sum of:
0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02131451 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.023518652 = weight(_text_:information in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023518652 = score(doc=4869,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.027015999 = product of:
0.054031998 = sum of:
0.054031998 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054031998 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
- Source
- Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.46-48
- Theme
- Information Gateway
-
Dhyani, P.: Library classification in computer age (1999)
0.04
0.042815924 = product of:
0.07135987 = sum of:
0.03014327 = weight(_text_:on in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03014327 = score(doc=3153,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
0.013578499 = weight(_text_:information in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013578499 = score(doc=3153,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
0.027638106 = product of:
0.05527621 = sum of:
0.05527621 = weight(_text_:technology in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05527621 = score(doc=3153,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.3722984 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Library classification is constantly being influenced by multifaceted, multidimensional, and infinite growth of literature on one hand and the users needs on the other. Dewey pioneered in devising a scheme of classification for the documentation utility of the organised knowledge. Subsequent schemes of classification worked purely without any theoretical foundation, colon classification being the exception. With the emergence of computer technology the library classification is being metamorphised. This paper attempts to delve a state-of-the-art of library classification in the new computer age.
- Source
- DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 19(1999) no.3, S.5-13
-
Vizine-Goetz, D.: OCLC investigates using classification tools to organize Internet data (1998)
0.04
0.04235591 = product of:
0.07059318 = sum of:
0.02637536 = weight(_text_:on in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02637536 = score(doc=2342,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
0.02057882 = weight(_text_:information in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02057882 = score(doc=2342,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
0.023639 = product of:
0.047278 = sum of:
0.047278 = weight(_text_:22 in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047278 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The knowledge structures that form traditional library classification schemes hold great potential for improving resource description and discovery on the Internet and for organizing electronic document collections. The advantages of assigning subject tokens (classes) to documents from a scheme like the DDC system are well documented
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
- Source
- Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
-
Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies in the context of emerging technologies (1988)
0.04
0.04089331 = product of:
0.06815551 = sum of:
0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02131451 = score(doc=762,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.019202897 = weight(_text_:information in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019202897 = score(doc=762,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.027638106 = product of:
0.05527621 = sum of:
0.05527621 = weight(_text_:technology in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05527621 = score(doc=762,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.3722984 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Delineates on the changing role of vocabulary control devices such as classification, subject headings, and thesaurus. Identifies the basic issue in the design and development of these devices and their role in the changing information technology. The paper identifies the differentiations needed in the new roles of these devices in data base technology
- Source
- Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 25(1988), S.215-227
-
Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003)
0.04
0.037145406 = product of:
0.061909005 = sum of:
0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02131451 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.013578499 = weight(_text_:information in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013578499 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.027015999 = product of:
0.054031998 = sum of:
0.054031998 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054031998 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Van Dijck builds up an example of actual XFML by showing how to organize tourist information about what restaurants in what cities feature which kind of music: <facet id="city">City</facet> and <topic id="ny" facetid="city"><name>New York</name></topic> combine to mean that New York is the name of a city internally represented as "ny". It is written in the usual clear and practical style of articles on xml.com. Highly recommended as an introduction for anyone interested in XFML.
- Source
- http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
-
Wang, Z.; Khoo, C.S.G.; Chaudhry, A.S.: Evaluation of the navigation effectiveness of an organizational taxonomy built on a general classification scheme and domain thesauri (2014)
0.03
0.031000165 = product of:
0.05166694 = sum of:
0.022607451 = weight(_text_:on in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022607451 = score(doc=1251,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
0.0144021725 = weight(_text_:information in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0144021725 = score(doc=1251,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
0.014657319 = product of:
0.029314637 = sum of:
0.029314637 = weight(_text_:technology in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029314637 = score(doc=1251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an evaluation study of the navigation effectiveness of a multifaceted organizational taxonomy that was built on the Dewey Decimal Classification and several domain thesauri in the area of library and information science education. The objective of the evaluation was to detect deficiencies in the taxonomy and to infer problems of applied construction steps from users' navigation difficulties. The evaluation approach included scenario-based navigation exercises and postexercise interviews. Navigation exercise errors and underlying reasons were analyzed in relation to specific components of the taxonomy and applied construction steps. Guidelines for the construction of the hierarchical structure and categories of an organizational taxonomy using existing general classification schemes and domain thesauri were derived from the evaluation results.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.5, S.948-963
-
Ardo, A.; Lundberg, S.: ¬A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service : the DESIRE way (1998)
0.03
0.030390033 = product of:
0.050650053 = sum of:
0.015985882 = weight(_text_:on in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015985882 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.0144021725 = weight(_text_:information in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0144021725 = score(doc=4190,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.020261997 = product of:
0.040523995 = sum of:
0.040523995 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040523995 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Creates an open, metadata aware system for distributed, collaborative WWW indexing. The system has 3 main components: a harvester (for collecting information), a database (for making the collection searchable), and a user interface (for making the information available). all components can be distributed across networked computers, thus supporting scalability. The system is metadata aware and thus allows searches on several fields including title, document author and URL. Nordic Web Index (NWI) is an application using this system to create a regional Nordic Web-indexing service. NWI is built using 5 collaborating service points within the Nordic countries. The NWI databases can be used to build additional services
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Bar-Ilan, J.; Belous, Y.: Children as architects of Web directories : an exploratory study (2007)
0.03
0.028373929 = product of:
0.047289878 = sum of:
0.023073634 = weight(_text_:on in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023073634 = score(doc=289,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.21044704 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
0.012001811 = weight(_text_:information in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012001811 = score(doc=289,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
0.012214432 = product of:
0.024428863 = sum of:
0.024428863 = weight(_text_:technology in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024428863 = score(doc=289,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Children are increasingly using the Web. Cognitive theory tells us that directory structures are especially suited for information retrieval by children; however, empirical results show that they prefer keyword searching. One of the reasons for these findings could be that the directory structures and terminology are created by grown-ups. Using a card-sorting method and an enveloping system, we simulated the structure of a directory. Our goal was to try to understand what browsable, hierarchical subject categories children create when suggested terms are supplied and they are free to add or delete terms. Twelve groups of four children each (fourth and fifth graders) participated in our exploratory study. The initial terminology presented to the children was based on names of categories used in popular directories, in the sections on Arts, Television, Music, Cinema, and Celebrities. The children were allowed to introduce additional cards and change the terms appearing on the 61 cards. Findings show that the different groups reached reasonable consensus; the majority of the category names used by existing directories were acceptable by them and only a small minority of the terms caused confusion. Our recommendation is to include children in the design process of directories, not only in designing the interface but also in designing the content structure as well.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.6, S.895-907
-
Poynder, R.: Web research engines? (1996)
0.03
0.028139003 = product of:
0.046898335 = sum of:
0.015985882 = weight(_text_:on in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015985882 = score(doc=5698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
0.0101838745 = weight(_text_:information in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0101838745 = score(doc=5698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
0.02072858 = product of:
0.04145716 = sum of:
0.04145716 = weight(_text_:technology in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04145716 = score(doc=5698,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Describes the shortcomings of search engines for the WWW comparing their current capabilities to those of the first generation CD-ROM products. Some allow phrase searching and most are improving their Boolean searching. Few allow truncation, wild cards or nested logic. They are stateless, losing previous search criteria. Unlike the indexing and classification systems for today's CD-ROMs, those for Web pages are random, unstructured and of variable quality. Considers that at best Web search engines can only offer free text searching. Discusses whether automatic data classification systems such as Infoseek Ultra can overcome the haphazard nature of the Web with neural network technology, and whether Boolean search techniques may be redundant when replaced by technology such as the Euroferret search engine. However, artificial intelligence is rarely successful on huge, varied databases. Relevance ranking and automatic query expansion still use the same simple inverted indexes. Most Web search engines do nothing more than word counting. Further complications arise with foreign languages
- Source
- Information world review. 1996, no.120, S.47-48
-
Chandler, A.; LeBlanc, J.: Exploring the potential of a virtual undergraduate library collection based on the hierarchical interface to LC Classification (2006)
0.03
0.027859053 = product of:
0.046431754 = sum of:
0.015985882 = weight(_text_:on in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015985882 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
0.0101838745 = weight(_text_:information in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0101838745 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
0.020261997 = product of:
0.040523995 = sum of:
0.040523995 = weight(_text_:22 in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040523995 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The Hierarchical Interface to Library of Congress Classification (HILCC) is a system developed by the Columbia University Library to leverage call number data from the MARC holdings records in Columbia's online catalog to create a structured, hierarchical menuing system that provides subject access to the library's electronic resources. In this paper, the authors describe a research initiative at the Cornell University Library to discover if the Columbia HILCC scheme can be used as developed or in modified form to create a virtual undergraduate print collection outside the context of the traditional online catalog. Their results indicate that, with certain adjustments, an HILCC model can indeed, be used to represent the holdings of a large research library's undergraduate collection of approximately 150,000 titles, but that such a model is not infinitely scalable and may require a new approach to browsing such a large information space.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007)
0.03
0.027859053 = product of:
0.046431754 = sum of:
0.015985882 = weight(_text_:on in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015985882 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.0101838745 = weight(_text_:information in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0101838745 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.020261997 = product of:
0.040523995 = sum of:
0.040523995 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040523995 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049850095 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Networked orientated standards for vocabulary publishing and exchange and proposals for terminological services and terminology registries will improve sharing and use of all knowledge organization systems in the networked information environment. This means that documentary classifications may also become more applicable for use outside their original domain of application. The paper summarises some characteristics common to documentary classifications and explains some terminological, functional and implementation aspects. The original purpose behind each classification scheme determines the functions that the vocabulary is designed to facilitate. These functions influence the structure, semantics and syntax, scheme coverage and format in which classification data are published and made available. The author suggests that attention should be paid to the differences between documentary classifications as these may determine their suitability for a certain purpose and may impose different requirements with respect to their use online. As we speak, many classifications are being created for knowledge organization and it may be important to promote expertise from the bibliographic domain with respect to building and using classification systems.
- Date
- 22.12.2007 17:22:31
