Search (118 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Schöne Literatur"
  1. Chan, L.M.: Social bookmarking and subject indexing (2011) 0.08
    0.076417804 = product of:
      0.19104451 = sum of:
        0.15336542 = weight(_text_:section in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15336542 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.58301973 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
        0.037679087 = weight(_text_:on in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037679087 = score(doc=1806,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.3436586 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Series
    IFLA series on bibliographic control; vol. 42
    Source
    Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al
  2. Denehy, C.C.: Subject cataloguing of fiction (1993) 0.06
    0.061134245 = product of:
      0.15283561 = sum of:
        0.12269233 = weight(_text_:section in 7211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12269233 = score(doc=7211,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.46641576 = fieldWeight in 7211, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7211)
        0.03014327 = weight(_text_:on in 7211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03014327 = score(doc=7211,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 7211, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7211)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A subcommittee of the Subject Analysis Committee of the Cataloging and Classification Section, Resources and Technical Services Division of the ALA produced recommendations published in 'Guidelines on subject access to individual works of fiction, drama etc.' in 1990. Outlines 4 areas of subject analysis to be applied to fiction: form/genre, character, setting, and topic. Describes the implementation of these guidelines in the US environment and suggests some improvements
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 10th National Cataloguing Conference on Subject to change: subject access and the role of the cataloguer, Freemantle, Western Australia, 4-6 Nov 93
  3. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.06
    0.05727163 = product of:
      0.09545271 = sum of:
        0.037679087 = weight(_text_:on in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037679087 = score(doc=5835,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.3436586 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
        0.024003621 = weight(_text_:information in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024003621 = score(doc=5835,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
        0.03377 = product of:
          0.06754 = sum of:
            0.06754 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06754 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
    Source
    Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u, L. Kajberg
  4. Velthoven, A.: 'Heeft u nog een mooi boek voor mij?' : het adviseren van romanlezers (1994) 0.05
    0.0491569 = product of:
      0.081928164 = sum of:
        0.03014327 = weight(_text_:on in 8191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03014327 = score(doc=8191,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 8191, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8191)
        0.013578499 = weight(_text_:information in 8191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013578499 = score(doc=8191,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 8191, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8191)
        0.03820639 = product of:
          0.07641278 = sum of:
            0.07641278 = weight(_text_:22 in 8191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07641278 = score(doc=8191,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 8191, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8191)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    On 19 Aug 94 a group of readers' advisers met to discuss their problems in Utrecht Provincial Central Library in the Netherlands. The panel felt that too much emphasis had been placed on libraries' information role and that more effort should be devoted to recreational reading through organising lectures and reading groups. It was felt that training sessions should be organised and a network created for the exchange of ideas
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 22(1994) no.11, S.22-23
  5. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.04
    0.037145406 = product of:
      0.061909005 = sum of:
        0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02131451 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
        0.013578499 = weight(_text_:information in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013578499 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
        0.027015999 = product of:
          0.054031998 = sum of:
            0.054031998 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054031998 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
  6. Saarti, J.: Fiction indexing and the development of fiction thesauri (1999) 0.04
    0.03545504 = product of:
      0.059091732 = sum of:
        0.018650195 = weight(_text_:on in 2983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018650195 = score(doc=2983,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 2983, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2983)
        0.016802534 = weight(_text_:information in 2983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016802534 = score(doc=2983,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2983, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2983)
        0.023639 = product of:
          0.047278 = sum of:
            0.047278 = weight(_text_:22 in 2983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047278 = score(doc=2983,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2983, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2983)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the theoretical questions involved in the indexing of fiction from several viewpoints: general principles of fiction indexing, and the making of book indexes for novels and other fictional works. Describes the work undertaken to develop fiction thesauri with particular reference to work done in Scandinavia, notably in the development of Kaunokki: the Finnish Thesaurus for Fiction, by Helsinki University Library and BTJ Group Ltd. Briefly presents notes on the structure of Kaunokkis with some examples of its practical use and user feedback from several years' experience of its use in Finnish public libraries. Concludes that the widest field for additional studies would be in the building up of special information systems for fiction.
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information science. 31(1999) no.2, S.85-92
  7. Ward, M.; Saarti, J.: Reviewing, rebutting, and reimagining fiction classification (2018) 0.03
    0.034702633 = product of:
      0.17351316 = sum of:
        0.17351316 = weight(_text_:section in 5164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17351316 = score(doc=5164,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.6596115 = fieldWeight in 5164, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5164)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the topic of fiction classification. The first section attempts to define the field, discussing fiction classification, its schemes, objectivity, aboutness, and shelf classification. The second section suggests three new ideas building upon the foundation of the first: a faceted multi-warrant classification, controlled term affective dimension searching, and the design of a user-oriented recommendation-based system.
  8. Förster, F.: Bibliographischer und universeller Zugriff : Schriftliche historische Quellen und Werke der fiktionalen Literatur in FRBR (2010) 0.03
    0.03406771 = product of:
      0.08516927 = sum of:
        0.07668271 = weight(_text_:section in 3963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07668271 = score(doc=3963,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.29150987 = fieldWeight in 3963, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3963)
        0.0084865615 = weight(_text_:information in 3963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0084865615 = score(doc=3963,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3963, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3963)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die fortgesetzte Entwicklung des bibliographischen Datenmodells FRBROO steht auf der Agenda des Strategischen Plans der IFLA Cataloguing Section. Als Teil des CIDOC Conceptual Reference Models (CIDOC CRM; ISO 21127:2006, letzte Version: v.5.0.2.) können damit verschieden strukturierte Informationen aus dem Bereich des kulturellen Erbes integriert und ausgetauscht werden; durch FRBROO werden bibliographische Informationen eingebunden. Aufgrund sichtbarer Veränderungen in der Publikationspraxis sind die bisherigen Bibliothekskataloge mit ihrer bibliographischen Fixierung auf das Buch als zentrales zu erschließendes Element nicht mehr zeitgemäß. Eine umfassende Erschließung des kulturellen Erbes gemeinsam mit Museen und Archiven und deren "Objekten" und damit eine ontologisch fundierte Abbildung der in naher Zukunft komplett digital vorliegenden publikatorischen Vielfalt in kollaborativ gepflegten Katalogen wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken gelingt nur, wenn zum einen der einzelne Text als "bibliographisches Objekt", was sowohl historische Quellen, fiktionale Werke als auch wissenschaftliche Aufsätze umfasst, formal und sachlich erschlossen wird und zum anderen das Ereignis als Ausgangspunkt der Erschließungsarbeit betrachtet wird. Zwei Folgerungen ergeben sich daraus: 1) Die semantischen Ebenen der Wissensrepräsentation nach Erwin Panofsky sollten um eine vierte Ebene erweitert werden, die als "acrossness" bezeichnet wird. 2) Die Aufgabe des wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekars sollte in einer intellektuellen Verwaltung der Neuerscheinungen, aber auch einer intellektuellen Durchdringung des eigenen Fachgebietes bestehen.
    Content
    Vortrag im Rahmen der Session 93. Cataloguing der WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 76TH IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND ASSEMBLY, 10-15 August 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden
  9. Becnel, K.; Moeller, R.A.: Graphic novels in the school library : questions of cataloging, classification, and arrangement (2022) 0.03
    0.02880137 = product of:
      0.072003424 = sum of:
        0.061346166 = weight(_text_:section in 1107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061346166 = score(doc=1107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.23320788 = fieldWeight in 1107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1107)
        0.010657255 = weight(_text_:on in 1107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010657255 = score(doc=1107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.097201325 = fieldWeight in 1107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1107)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, many school librarians have been scrambling to build and expand their graphic novel collections to meet the large and growing demand for these materials. For the purposes of this study, the term graphic novels refers to volumes in which the content is provided through sequential art, including fiction, nonfiction, and biographical material. As the library field has not yet arrived at a set of best practices or guidelines for institutions working to classify and catalog graphic novels, this study seeks to record the ways in which school librarians are handling these materials as well as issues and questions at the forefront of their minds. A survey of school librarians in the United States revealed that almost all of them collect fiction and nonfiction graphic novels, while 67% collect manga. Most respondents indicated that they are partly or solely responsible for the cataloging and classification decisions made in their media centers. For classification purposes, most have elected to create separate graphic novel collections to house their fictional graphic novels. Some include nonfiction graphic novels in this section, while others create a nonfiction graphic novel collection nearby or shelve nonfiction graphic novels with other items that deal with similar subject matter. Many school librarians express uncertainty about how best to catalog and classify longer series, adapted classics, superhero stories, and the increasing number and variety of inventive titles that defy categorization. They also struggle with inconsistent vendor records and past practices and suffer from a lack of full confidence in their knowledge of how to best classify and catalog graphic novels so that they are both searchable in the library catalog and easily accessible on the shelves.
  10. Choi, N.; Joo, S.: Booklovers' world : an examination of factors affecting continued usage of social cataloging sites (2016) 0.03
    0.027451878 = product of:
      0.04575313 = sum of:
        0.018839544 = weight(_text_:on in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018839544 = score(doc=3224,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1718293 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
        0.014699157 = weight(_text_:information in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014699157 = score(doc=3224,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
        0.012214432 = product of:
          0.024428863 = sum of:
            0.024428863 = weight(_text_:technology in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024428863 = score(doc=3224,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Little is known about what factors influence users' continued use of social cataloging sites. This study therefore examines the impacts of key factors from theories of information systems (IS) success and sense of community (SOC) on users' continuance intention in the social cataloging context. Data collected from an online survey of 323 social cataloging users provide empirical support for the research model. The findings indicate that both information quality (IQ) and system quality (SQ) are significant predictors of satisfaction and SOC, which in turn lead to users' intentions to continue using these sites. In addition, SOC was found to affect continuance intention not only directly, but also indirectly through satisfaction. Theoretically, this study draws attention to a largely unexplored but essential area of research in the social cataloging literature and provides a fundamental basis to understand the determinants of continued social cataloging usage. From a managerial perspective, the findings suggest that social cataloging service providers should constantly focus their efforts on the quality control of their contents and system, and the enhancement of SOC among their users.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.12, S.3022-3035
  11. Estrada, L.M.; Hildebrand, M.; Boer, V. de; Ossenbruggen, J. van: Time-based tags for fiction movies : comparing experts to novices using a video labeling game (2017) 0.03
    0.026264777 = product of:
      0.043774627 = sum of:
        0.023073634 = weight(_text_:on in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023073634 = score(doc=3347,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.21044704 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
        0.0084865615 = weight(_text_:information in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0084865615 = score(doc=3347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
        0.012214432 = product of:
          0.024428863 = sum of:
            0.024428863 = weight(_text_:technology in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024428863 = score(doc=3347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The cultural heritage sector has embraced social tagging as a way to increase both access to online content and to engage users with their digital collections. In this article, we build on two current lines of research. (a) We use Waisda?, an existing labeling game, to add time-based annotations to content. (b) In this context, we investigate the role of experts in human-based computation (nichesourcing). We report on a small-scale experiment in which we applied Waisda? to content from film archives. We study the differences in the type of time-based tags between experts and novices for film clips in a crowdsourcing setting. The findings show high similarity in the number and type of tags (mostly factual). In the less frequent tags, however, experts used more domain-specific terms. We conclude that competitive games are not suited to elicit real expert-level descriptions. We also confirm that providing guidelines, based on conceptual frameworks that are more suited to moving images in a time-based fashion, could result in increasing the quality of the tags, thus allowing for creating more tag-based innovative services for online audiovisual heritage.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.2, S.348-364
  12. Yu, L.; O'Brien, A.: Constructing references from the book to the reader in fiction searching : an experiment on the construction of information cues from the reading context approach (1997) 0.03
    0.025629926 = product of:
      0.064074814 = sum of:
        0.036917817 = weight(_text_:on in 1828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036917817 = score(doc=1828,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.33671528 = fieldWeight in 1828, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1828)
        0.027156997 = weight(_text_:information in 1828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027156997 = score(doc=1828,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1828, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1828)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on research that aims to test the effect of information cues constructed from the reading context approach on fiction searching and selection in public libraries. Assesses problems associated with the construction of information cues for fiction searching from the pragmatic approach, literary warrant approach and user-enquiries-analysis approach
    Source
    Information services and use. 17(1997) nos.2/3, S.187-199
  13. Mikkonen, A.; Vakkari, P.: Reader characteristics, behavior, and success in fiction book search (2017) 0.02
    0.023724323 = product of:
      0.039540537 = sum of:
        0.018839544 = weight(_text_:on in 3789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018839544 = score(doc=3789,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1718293 = fieldWeight in 3789, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3789)
        0.0084865615 = weight(_text_:information in 3789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0084865615 = score(doc=3789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3789)
        0.012214432 = product of:
          0.024428863 = sum of:
            0.024428863 = weight(_text_:technology in 3789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024428863 = score(doc=3789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 3789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    We examined the search behaviors of diverse fiction readers in different search scenarios. The aim was to understand how fiction readers with varied reading preferences are selecting interesting novels in library catalogs. We conducted a controlled user study with 80 participants. Two reader groups were elicited according to similar reading preference patterns. The readers enjoyed the entertainment, escape, and comfort that reading as a pleasurable activity offered. The aesthetic readers valued the artistic and aesthetic pleasures, widening vocabulary, and ability to express oneself through fiction books. We compared the search queries and search actions between the 2 reader groups. Our results demonstrated that preference patterns were associated with readers' search behavior, that is, the number of viewed search result pages, opened book pages, dwell time on book pages, and the type of search queries. Based on the findings, we present 3 search tactics for fiction books in library catalogs: i) focused querying, ii) topical browsing, and iii) similarity-based tactic. The most popular search tactic in each search scenario was "focused querying" with known author in both reader groups.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.9, S.2154-2165
  14. Birdi, B.; Ford, N.: Towards a new sociological model of fiction reading (2018) 0.02
    0.022522688 = product of:
      0.037537813 = sum of:
        0.013321568 = weight(_text_:on in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013321568 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.121501654 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
        0.012001811 = weight(_text_:information in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012001811 = score(doc=4540,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
        0.012214432 = product of:
          0.024428863 = sum of:
            0.024428863 = weight(_text_:technology in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024428863 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Although much previous research has considered how we read, less attention has been paid to why we read, and the influence not only of individual or text-related factors on a reader's intention to read, but also of broader societal factors. This article presents a novel, empirically-based model of fiction reading in a public library context, taking into account the characteristics differentiating the readers of individual fiction genres. It begins with a literature review of factors motivating a reading choice or habit, and of the effects of reading different fiction genres, before introducing three previous studies by the first author into readers' attitudes towards, and engagement with, fiction and selected fiction genres. The methodologies are then summarized both for the three previous studies and the present study. The authors present a combined analysis that integrates the findings of the previous studies in order to generate a new, evidence-based model for the reading of fiction genres. Incorporating both demographic and motivational aspects, this model illustrates how the broad themes of the fiction reader profile interrelate, giving them a new causal ordering. Finally, there is a discussion of the implications of this work for library and information science research and practitioner communities.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.11, S.1291-1303
  15. Morehead, D.R.; Pejtersen, A.M.; Rouse, W.B.: ¬The value of information and computer-aided information seeking : problem formulation and application to fiction retrieval (1984) 0.02
    0.022191282 = product of:
      0.055478204 = sum of:
        0.02637536 = weight(_text_:on in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02637536 = score(doc=5828,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
        0.029102843 = weight(_text_:information in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029102843 = score(doc=5828,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Issues concerning the formulation and application of a model of how humans value information are examined. Formulation of a value function is based on research from modelling, value assessment, human information seeking behavior, and human decision making. The proposed function is incorporated into a computer-based fiction retrieval system and evaluated using data from nine searches. Evaluation is based on the ability of an individual's value function to discriminate among novels selected, rejected, and not considered. The results are discussed in terms of both formulation and utilization of a value function as well as the implications for extending the proposed formulation to other information seeking environments
    Source
    Information processing and management. 20(1984), S.583-601
  16. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a computer-aided user-system dialogue based on an analysis of users' search behaviour (1984) 0.02
    0.020935806 = product of:
      0.052339513 = sum of:
        0.031971764 = weight(_text_:on in 1044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031971764 = score(doc=1044,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 1044, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1044)
        0.020367749 = weight(_text_:information in 1044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020367749 = score(doc=1044,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1044, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1044)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Social science information studies. 4(1984), S.167-183
  17. Pejtersen, A.M.: Implications of users' value perception for the design of knowledge based bibliographic retrieval systems (1985) 0.02
    0.020935806 = product of:
      0.052339513 = sum of:
        0.031971764 = weight(_text_:on in 2088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031971764 = score(doc=2088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 2088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2088)
        0.020367749 = weight(_text_:information in 2088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020367749 = score(doc=2088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2088)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    2nd Symposium on Empirical Foundations of Information and Software Science, 3.-5.10.84, Atlanta
  18. Burton, P.F.: On reading "The banning of books in libraries" (2007) 0.02
    0.020059077 = product of:
      0.050147694 = sum of:
        0.03574552 = weight(_text_:on in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03574552 = score(doc=623,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.32602316 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
        0.0144021725 = weight(_text_:information in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0144021725 = score(doc=623,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To reflect on an editorial from an earlier issue entitled "The banning of books in libraries". Design/methodology/approach - A discussion of the argument presented in the original editorial and its connection to present-day concerns over the use and dissemination of information and links to other issues, together with the maintenance of a professional ethos in the face of those concerns. Findings - A set of moral absolutes does exist from which librarians can derive an ethos for the operation of their services. Such absolutes take on a greater significance in the complex moral climate in which we now live, but are now under threat. Practical implications - This article calls on library and information professionals to maintain their stand in the face of increasing pressures to compromise attitudes. Originality/value - Reflects on the continuing (and increased) importance of professional values.
  19. MacEwan, A.: Promoting fiction through the catalogue (1997) 0.02
    0.020005746 = product of:
      0.05001436 = sum of:
        0.02637536 = weight(_text_:on in 5843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02637536 = score(doc=5843,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 5843, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5843)
        0.023639 = product of:
          0.047278 = sum of:
            0.047278 = weight(_text_:22 in 5843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047278 = score(doc=5843,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5843, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5843)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the recent trend towards the promotion, by public libraries, of literary fiction with particular reference to a new fiction initiative by the British Library which seeks to redress the imbalance between the level of access provided for fiction and non fiction in library catalogues. From January 1997, the BNB catalogue records for works of fiction will be indexed using the LCSH in conjunction with a range of genre and form headings derived from the American Library Association' Guidelines on Subject Access to Individual Works on Fiction, Drama etc. (GSAFD). Access provided by the GSAFD approach encompass access by genre and access by subject
    Source
    Librarians world. 6(1997) no.2, S.22-24
  20. Saarti, J.: Feeding with the spoon, or the effects of shelf classification of fiction on the loaning of fiction (1997) 0.02
    0.01967263 = product of:
      0.049181577 = sum of:
        0.03730039 = weight(_text_:on in 1745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03730039 = score(doc=1745,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 1745, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1745)
        0.011881187 = weight(_text_:information in 1745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011881187 = score(doc=1745,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1745, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1745)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates what effect the shelf classification of fiction had on the way that library users in the 2 branch libraries of Kajanni, Finland, use the library's stock of fiction and how they loan fiction. In 1 library the fiction stock was divided in 11 shelf categories, based on genres of fiction - in the other no changes were made. The books were also indexed and classified in the library's database. The project lasted for 3 years and the results were gathered by interviewing clients and making statistical analysis on loans in both libraries
    Source
    Information services and use. 17(1997) nos.2/3, S.159-169

Authors

Languages

  • e 106
  • d 7
  • nl 2
  • ? 1
  • fi 1
  • ja 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 105
  • x 5
  • el 3
  • m 3
  • ? 1
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications