Search (719 results, page 1 of 36)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Dirnagl, U.: Kulturwandel in der Biomedizin (2020) 0.06
    0.056164686 = product of:
      0.093607806 = sum of:
        0.028179545 = weight(_text_:h in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028179545 = score(doc=3226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
        0.04894958 = weight(_text_:u in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04894958 = score(doc=3226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13530266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
        0.016478678 = weight(_text_:d in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016478678 = score(doc=3226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Language
    d
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.10, S.37-43
  2. Fechler, H.-U.: ¬Eine üble Macht (2020) 0.06
    0.056164686 = product of:
      0.093607806 = sum of:
        0.028179545 = weight(_text_:h in 5791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028179545 = score(doc=5791,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 5791, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5791)
        0.04894958 = weight(_text_:u in 5791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04894958 = score(doc=5791,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13530266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 5791, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5791)
        0.016478678 = weight(_text_:d in 5791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016478678 = score(doc=5791,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 5791, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5791)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Language
    d
  3. Herb, U.; Geith, U.: Kriterien der qualitativen Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen : Befunde aus dem Projekt visOA (2020) 0.05
    0.054664027 = product of:
      0.091106705 = sum of:
        0.022543635 = weight(_text_:h in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022543635 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.05538013 = weight(_text_:u in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05538013 = score(doc=108,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13530266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.40930554 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.013182943 = weight(_text_:d in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013182943 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Language
    d
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 71(2020) H.2/3, S.77-85
  4. Ibrahim, G.M.; Taylor, M.: Krebszellen manipulieren Neurone : Gliome (2023) 0.05
    0.052308157 = product of:
      0.08718026 = sum of:
        0.03381545 = weight(_text_:h in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03381545 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
        0.019774415 = weight(_text_:d in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019774415 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
        0.033590388 = product of:
          0.067180775 = sum of:
            0.067180775 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067180775 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14469841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0413208 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Language
    d
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24
  5. Baecker, D.: ¬Der Frosch, die Fliege und der Mensch : zum Tod von Humberto Maturana (2021) 0.05
    0.04768555 = product of:
      0.07947591 = sum of:
        0.028179545 = weight(_text_:h in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028179545 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
        0.023304373 = weight(_text_:d in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023304373 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.296855 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
        0.027991991 = product of:
          0.055983983 = sum of:
            0.055983983 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055983983 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14469841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0413208 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Biographed
    Maturana, H.
    Date
    7. 5.2021 22:10:24
    Language
    d
  6. Wiesenmüller, H.: Formale Erschließung (2023) 0.05
    0.046598904 = product of:
      0.07766484 = sum of:
        0.016907725 = weight(_text_:h in 784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016907725 = score(doc=784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=784)
        0.050869904 = weight(_text_:u in 784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050869904 = score(doc=784,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13530266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.3759712 = fieldWeight in 784, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=784)
        0.009887207 = weight(_text_:d in 784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009887207 = score(doc=784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=784)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Bei der formalen Erschließung bzw. Formalerschließung, die auch als formale Analyse, formale Erfassung, Formalbeschreibung oder (Formal-)Katalogisierung bezeichnet wird, "werden Ressourcen gemäß festgelegten Regeln nach äußerlichen, formalen Kriterien beschrieben und auffindbar gemacht". Diese Ressourcen können alle Arten von physischen und digitalen Objekten sein, die z. B. in Bibliotheken, Archiven, Museen oder Dokumentationsstellen gesammelt oder verzeichnet werden. Formale Aspekte bei einem gedruckten Buch sind u. a. der*die Autor*in, der Titel, der Verlag, das Erscheinungsdatum, der Umfang und die ISBN. Bei einer Skulptur sind es u. a. der*die Künstler*in, das Entstehungsdatum, Werkstoff und Technik, die Maße und die Besitzgeschichte. Bei einem im Internet zur Verfügung gestellten digitalen Foto sind es u. a. der*die Fotograf*in, der Zeitpunkt der Aufnahme und die Koordinaten des Aufnahmeorts, technische Daten zur Aufnahme (z. B. Belichtungszeit), der Dateiname, das Dateiformat und die Dateigröße sowie die URL und ggf. ein Persistent Identifier (z. B. DOI oder URN).
    Language
    d
  7. Koch, C.: Was ist Bewusstsein? (2020) 0.04
    0.04359013 = product of:
      0.07265021 = sum of:
        0.028179545 = weight(_text_:h in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028179545 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
        0.016478678 = weight(_text_:d in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016478678 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
        0.027991991 = product of:
          0.055983983 = sum of:
            0.055983983 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055983983 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14469841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0413208 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    17. 1.2020 22:15:11
    Language
    d
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.2, S.12-17
  8. Eyert, F.: Mathematische Wissenschaftskommunikation in der digitalen Gesellschaft (2023) 0.04
    0.04359013 = product of:
      0.07265021 = sum of:
        0.028179545 = weight(_text_:h in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028179545 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
        0.016478678 = weight(_text_:d in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016478678 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
        0.027991991 = product of:
          0.055983983 = sum of:
            0.055983983 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055983983 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14469841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0413208 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Language
    d
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2023, H.1, S.22-25
  9. Reimer, U.: Empfehlungssysteme (2023) 0.04
    0.04218207 = product of:
      0.07030345 = sum of:
        0.01972568 = weight(_text_:h in 519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01972568 = score(doc=519,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 519, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=519)
        0.034264706 = weight(_text_:u in 519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034264706 = score(doc=519,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13530266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 519, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=519)
        0.016313061 = weight(_text_:d in 519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016313061 = score(doc=519,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 519, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=519)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Mit der wachsenden Informationsflut steigen die Anforderungen an Informationssysteme, aus der Menge potenziell relevanter Information die in einem bestimmten Kontext relevanteste zu selektieren. Empfehlungssysteme spielen hier eine besondere Rolle, da sie personalisiert - d. h. kontextspezifisch und benutzerindividuell - relevante Information herausfiltern können. Definition: Ein Empfehlungssystem empfiehlt einem Benutzer bzw. einer Benutzerin in einem definierten Kontext aus einer gegebenen Menge von Empfehlungsobjekten eine Teilmenge als relevant. Empfehlungssysteme machen Benutzer auf Objekte aufmerksam, die sie möglicherweise nie gefunden hätten, weil sie nicht danach gesucht hätten oder sie in der schieren Menge an insgesamt relevanter Information untergegangen wären.
    Language
    d
  10. Praxishandbuch Forschungsdatenmanagement (2021) 0.04
    0.039315276 = product of:
      0.06552546 = sum of:
        0.01972568 = weight(_text_:h in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01972568 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
        0.034264706 = weight(_text_:u in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034264706 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13530266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
        0.011535075 = weight(_text_:d in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011535075 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Editor
    Putnings, M., H. Neuroth u. J. Neumann
    Language
    d
  11. Felgner, U.: ¬Die Begriffe der Äquivalenz, der Gleichheit und der Identität (2020) 0.04
    0.037900858 = product of:
      0.06316809 = sum of:
        0.023911135 = weight(_text_:h in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023911135 = score(doc=348,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
        0.029369747 = weight(_text_:u in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029369747 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13530266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
        0.009887207 = weight(_text_:d in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009887207 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl. die Ergänzung zur Verfügbarkeit unter Open access unter: Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 123(2021) H.3, S.217-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s13291-020-00214-0.
    Language
    d
    Source
    Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 122(2020) H.2, S.109-129
  12. Fassbender, J.: Register / Indexe (2023) 0.04
    0.03615606 = product of:
      0.060260095 = sum of:
        0.016907725 = weight(_text_:h in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016907725 = score(doc=785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
        0.029369747 = weight(_text_:u in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029369747 = score(doc=785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13530266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
        0.013982623 = weight(_text_:d in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013982623 = score(doc=785,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.178113 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Der Fokus dieses Artikels liegt auf der Indexerstellung von Publikationen, d. h. der detaillierten Indexierung der Inhalte von Dokumenten statt der Indexierung auf Dokumentebene, welche sich auf das Gesamtthema von Dokumenten beschränkt. Zu letzterer zählen z. B. das Hauptthema von Artikeln, die Sachkatalogisierung von Büchern oder die Erschließung von Objekten in der Museumsdokumentation. Die Worte Index und Register werden synonym benutzt. Das Wort Index ist nicht nur ein Homonym aus unterschiedlichen Bereichen (z. B. Finanzwesen, Mathematik), sondern auch ein Polysem im Publikationswesen, da es in romanischen Sprachen sowohl Inhaltsverzeichnis als auch Register meinen kann. Während im Finanzwesen, Mathematik u. a. die Pluralform Indizes benutzt wird, ist im bibliographischen Sinn Indexe der korrekte Plural (engl.: indexes), es sei denn, es geht um Indices zu alten Werken in lateinischer Sprache (index rerum, index nominum, index verborum). Etymologie, Bedeutung und Plural des Wortes Index erläutert Wellisch ausführlich.
    Language
    d
  13. Heisig, P.: Informationswissenschaft für Wissensmanager : Was Wissensmanager von der informationswissenschaftlichen Forschung lernen können (2021) 0.03
    0.034872103 = product of:
      0.05812017 = sum of:
        0.022543635 = weight(_text_:h in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022543635 = score(doc=223,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
        0.013182943 = weight(_text_:d in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013182943 = score(doc=223,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
        0.022393594 = product of:
          0.044787187 = sum of:
            0.044787187 = weight(_text_:22 in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044787187 = score(doc=223,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14469841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0413208 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2021 14:38:21
    Language
    d
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 72(2021) H.1, S.10-18
  14. Bager, J.: ¬Die Text-KI ChatGPT schreibt Fachtexte, Prosa, Gedichte und Programmcode (2023) 0.03
    0.034872103 = product of:
      0.05812017 = sum of:
        0.022543635 = weight(_text_:h in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022543635 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
        0.013182943 = weight(_text_:d in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013182943 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
        0.022393594 = product of:
          0.044787187 = sum of:
            0.044787187 = weight(_text_:22 in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044787187 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14469841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0413208 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    29.12.2022 18:22:55
    Language
    d
    Source
    c't. 2023, H.1, S.46- [https://www.heise.de/select/ct/2023/1/2233908274346530870]
  15. Neuroth, H.: Forschungsdaten (2023) 0.03
    0.03369881 = product of:
      0.05616468 = sum of:
        0.016907725 = weight(_text_:h in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016907725 = score(doc=795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
        0.029369747 = weight(_text_:u in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029369747 = score(doc=795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13530266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
        0.009887207 = weight(_text_:d in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009887207 = score(doc=795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Der Begriff Forschungsdaten wird mittlerweile völlig selbstverständlich in verschiedenen Kontexten genutzt, trotzdem ist es schwierig, eine einheitliche und abgestimmte Definition zu finden. In den Leitlinien zum Umgang mit Forschungsdaten der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG 2015) findet sich eine umfassende Beschreibung, welche Forschungsobjekte Gegenstand der wissenschaftlichen Tätigkeit sein können und als Forschungsdaten gelten: Forschungsdaten sind eine wesentliche Grundlage für das wissenschaftliche Arbeiten. Die Vielfalt solcher Daten entspricht der Vielfalt unterschiedlicher wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen, Erkenntnisinteressen und Forschungsverfahren. Zu Forschungsdaten zählen u. a. Messdaten, Laborwerte, audiovisuelle Informationen, Texte, Surveydaten, Objekte aus Sammlungen oder Proben, die in der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit entstehen, entwickelt oder ausgewertet werden. Methodische Testverfahren, wie Fragebögen, Software und Simulationen können ebenfalls zentrale Ergebnisse wissenschaftlicher Forschung darstellen und sollten daher ebenfalls unter den Begriff Forschungsdaten gefasst werden. (S. 1)
    Language
    d
  16. P-L-U-R-V : das sind die häufigsten Methoden der Desinformation. Neue Infografik im Posterformat (2020) 0.03
    0.032403793 = product of:
      0.081009485 = sum of:
        0.06782654 = weight(_text_:u in 70) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06782654 = score(doc=70,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13530266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.5012949 = fieldWeight in 70, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=70)
        0.013182943 = weight(_text_:d in 70) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013182943 = score(doc=70,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 70, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=70)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://www.klimafakten.de/meldung/p-l-u-r-v-dies-sind-die-haeufigsten-desinformations-tricks-von-wissenschafts-leugnern.
    Language
    d
    Source
    https://www.klimafakten.de/meldung/p-l-u-r-v-das-sind-die-haeufigsten-methoden-der-desinformation-neue-infografik-im
  17. Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung (2021) 0.03
    0.031771544 = product of:
      0.052952573 = sum of:
        0.015940757 = weight(_text_:h in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015940757 = score(doc=753,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.15527807 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.027690064 = weight(_text_:u in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027690064 = score(doc=753,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13530266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.20465277 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.009321748 = weight(_text_:d in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009321748 = score(doc=753,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.118742 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Editor
    Franke-Maier, M., A. Kasprzik, A. Ledl u. H. Schürmann
    Footnote
    Vgl.: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110691597/html. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110691597. Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 73(2022) H.2-3, S.131-132 (B. Lorenz u. V. Steyer). Weitere Rezension in: o-bib 9(20229 Nr.3. (Martin Völkl) [https://www.o-bib.de/bib/article/view/5843/8714].
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
  18. Bargmann, S.; Blumesberger, S.; Gruber, A.; Luef, E.; Steltzer, R.: Sacherschließung geschlechtergerecht?! : Rückblick auf den Online-Workshop am 11. Mai 2022 und Aufruf zu gemeinsamen Aktivitäten (2022) 0.03
    0.030513091 = product of:
      0.05085515 = sum of:
        0.01972568 = weight(_text_:h in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01972568 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
        0.011535075 = weight(_text_:d in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011535075 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
        0.019594394 = product of:
          0.039188787 = sum of:
            0.039188787 = weight(_text_:22 in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039188787 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14469841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0413208 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    15. 2.2023 14:30:22
    Language
    d
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 75(2022) H.2, S.499-516
  19. Rösch, H.: Informationsethik (2023) 0.03
    0.028082343 = product of:
      0.046803903 = sum of:
        0.0140897725 = weight(_text_:h in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0140897725 = score(doc=821,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10265943 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
        0.02447479 = weight(_text_:u in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02447479 = score(doc=821,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13530266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
        0.008239339 = weight(_text_:d in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008239339 = score(doc=821,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Der Terminus Informationsethik (information ethics) wurde Ende der 1980er Jahre im bibliothekarischen Umfeld geprägt und tauchte etwa zeitgleich in den USA und Deutschland auf. Informationsethik umfasst alle ethisch relevanten Fragen, die im Zusammenhang mit Produktion, Speicherung, Erschließung, Verteilung und Nutzung von Informationen auftreten. Informationsethik gehört zu den angewandten oder Bereichsethiken, die sich in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten in großer Zahl gebildet haben. Dazu zählen etwa Wirtschaftsethik, Medizinethik, Technikethik, Computerethik oder Medienethik. Zu beobachten ist ein Trend zu immer spezifischeren Bereichsethiken wie z. B. der Lebensmittelethik oder der Algorithmenethik. Aufteilung und Abgrenzung der Bereichsethiken folgen keinem einheitlichen Prinzip. Daher schwanken ihre Anzahl und ihre Benennungen in der Fachliteratur erheblich. Bereichsethiken überlappen sich z. T. oder stehen bisweilen in einem komplementären Verhältnis. So hat die Informationsethik ohne Zweifel u. a. Bezüge zur Medienethik, zur Technikethik (Computerethik), zur Wirtschaftsethik, zur Wissenschaftsethik und natürlich zur Sozialethik. Im Unterschied zur Allgemeinen Ethik, die sich mit übergreifenden, allgemeinen Aspekten wie Freiheit, Gerechtigkeit oder Wahrhaftigkeit auseinandersetzt, übertragen angewandte Ethiken zum einen allgemeine ethische Prinzipien und Methoden auf bestimmte Lebensbereiche und Handlungsfelder. Zum anderen arbeiten sie spezifische Fragestellungen und Probleme heraus, die charakteristisch für den jeweiligen Bereich sind und die in der Allgemeinen Ethik keine Berücksichtigung finden. Angewandte Ethiken sind grundsätzlich praxisorientiert. Sie zielen darauf, die Akteure der jeweiligen Handlungsfelder für ethische Fragestellungen zu sensibilisieren und das Bewusstsein um eine gemeinsame Wertebasis, die idealerweise in einem Ethikkodex dokumentiert ist, zu stabilisieren.
    Language
    d
  20. Ilhan, A.; Fietkiewicz, K.J.: Data privacy-related behavior and concerns of activity tracking technology users from Germany and the USA (2021) 0.03
    0.028026076 = product of:
      0.046710126 = sum of:
        0.02447479 = weight(_text_:u in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02447479 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13530266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
        0.008239339 = weight(_text_:d in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008239339 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07850423 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0413208 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
        0.013995996 = product of:
          0.027991991 = sum of:
            0.027991991 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027991991 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14469841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0413208 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose This investigation aims to examine the differences and similarities between activity tracking technology users from two regions (the USA and Germany) in their intended privacy-related behavior. The focus lies on data handling after hypothetical discontinuance of use, data protection and privacy policy seeking, and privacy concerns. Design/methodology/approach The data was collected through an online survey in 2019. In order to identify significant differences between participants from Germany and the USA, the chi-squared test and the Mann-Whitney U test were applied. Findings The intensity of several privacy-related concerns was significantly different between the two groups. The majority of the participants did not inform themselves about the respective data privacy policies or terms and conditions before installing an activity tracking application. The majority of the German participants knew that they could request the deletion of all their collected data. In contrast, only 35% out of 68 participants from the US knew about this option. Research limitations/implications This study intends to raise awareness about managing the collected health and fitness data after stopping to use activity tracking technologies. Furthermore, to reduce privacy and security concerns, the involvement of the government, companies and users is necessary to handle and share data more considerably and in a sustainable way. Originality/value This study sheds light on users of activity tracking technologies from a broad perspective (here, participants from the USA and Germany). It incorporates not only concerns and the privacy paradox but (intended) user behavior, including seeking information on data protection and privacy policy and handling data after hypothetical discontinuance of use of the technology.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Location
    D

Languages

  • d 470
  • e 247
  • m 2
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 589
  • el 258
  • m 51
  • s 9
  • p 5
  • x 3
  • A 1
  • EL 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications