Mally, A.K.; Stengel, F.: Zur Diskussion um den 202 der RSWK (1998)
0.02
0.024094902 = product of:
0.08433215 = sum of:
0.03405118 = product of:
0.06810236 = sum of:
0.06810236 = weight(_text_:w in 1227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06810236 = score(doc=1227,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.035370585 = queryNorm
0.5052462 = fieldWeight in 1227, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1227)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.050280977 = weight(_text_:u in 1227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050280977 = score(doc=1227,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.035370585 = queryNorm
0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 1227, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1227)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Footnote
- Fortsetzung der Diskussion durch 2 österreichische Bibliothekare, die bislang von W. Unte u. F. Geißelmann bestritten wurde
