Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Rousseau, R."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Shi, D.; Rousseau, R.; Yang, L.; Li, J.: ¬A journal's impact factor is influenced by changes in publication delays of citing journals (2017) 0.01
    0.013946951 = product of:
      0.048814327 = sum of:
        0.025140489 = weight(_text_:u in 3441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025140489 = score(doc=3441,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 3441, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3441)
        0.023673838 = weight(_text_:j in 3441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023673838 = score(doc=3441,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3441, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3441)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    In this article we describe another problem with journal impact factors by showing that one journal's impact factor is dependent on other journals' publication delays. The proposed theoretical model predicts a monotonically decreasing function of the impact factor as a function of publication delay, on condition that the citation curve of the journal is monotone increasing during the publication window used in the calculation of the journal impact factor; otherwise, this function has a reversed U shape. Our findings based on simulations are verified by examining three journals in the information sciences: the Journal of Informetrics, Scientometrics, and the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
  2. Hu, X.; Rousseau, R.; Chen, J.: ¬A new approach for measuring the value of patents based on structural indicators for ego patent citation networks (2012) 0.00
    0.00394564 = product of:
      0.027619477 = sum of:
        0.027619477 = weight(_text_:j in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027619477 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  3. Rousseau, R.; Ding, J.: Does international collaboration yield a higher citation potential for US scientists publishing in highly visible interdisciplinary Journals? (2016) 0.00
    0.00394564 = product of:
      0.027619477 = sum of:
        0.027619477 = weight(_text_:j in 2860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027619477 = score(doc=2860,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2860, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2860)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  4. Zhang, L.; Rousseau, R.; Glänzel, W.: Document-type country profiles (2011) 0.00
    0.0032429697 = product of:
      0.022700787 = sum of:
        0.022700787 = product of:
          0.045401573 = sum of:
            0.045401573 = weight(_text_:w in 4487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045401573 = score(doc=4487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035370585 = queryNorm
                0.33683082 = fieldWeight in 4487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  5. Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: Fundamental properties of rhythm sequences (2008) 0.00
    0.0028375986 = product of:
      0.019863188 = sum of:
        0.019863188 = product of:
          0.039726377 = sum of:
            0.039726377 = weight(_text_:w in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039726377 = score(doc=1965,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035370585 = queryNorm
                0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Fundamental mathematical properties of rhythm sequences are studied. In particular, a set of three axioms for valid rhythm indicators is proposed, and it is shown that the R-indicator satisfies only two out of three but that the R-indicator satisfies all three. This fills a critical, logical gap in the study of these indicator sequences. Matrices leading to a constant R-sequence are called baseline matrices. They are characterized as matrices with constant w-year diachronous impact factors. The relation with classical impact factors is clarified. Using regression analysis matrices with a rhythm sequence that is on average equal to 1 (smaller than 1, larger than 1) are characterized.
  6. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.00
    0.0020538112 = product of:
      0.014376678 = sum of:
        0.014376678 = product of:
          0.028753355 = sum of:
            0.028753355 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028753355 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035370585 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  7. Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.00
    0.0020538112 = product of:
      0.014376678 = sum of:
        0.014376678 = product of:
          0.028753355 = sum of:
            0.028753355 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028753355 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035370585 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:26:24
  8. Zhang, L.; Rousseau, R.; Glänzel, W.: Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals : taking similarity between subject fields into account (2016) 0.00
    0.002026856 = product of:
      0.014187992 = sum of:
        0.014187992 = product of:
          0.028375983 = sum of:
            0.028375983 = weight(_text_:w in 2902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028375983 = score(doc=2902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035370585 = queryNorm
                0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 2902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  9. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.00
    0.0013692075 = product of:
      0.009584452 = sum of:
        0.009584452 = product of:
          0.019168904 = sum of:
            0.019168904 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019168904 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035370585 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35