Search (108 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.03 
    0.02899087 = product of:
  0.10146804 = sum of:
    0.06313023 = weight(_text_:j in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06313023 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
    0.038337808 = product of:
      0.076675616 = sum of:
        0.076675616 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076675616 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  2. Umstätter, W.: Szientometrische Verfahren (2004) 0.02 
    0.021613125 = product of:
  0.050430626 = sum of:
    0.011350393 = product of:
      0.022700787 = sum of:
        0.022700787 = weight(_text_:w in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022700787 = score(doc=2920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.16841541 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.016760327 = weight(_text_:u in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016760327 = score(doc=2920,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
    0.022319907 = weight(_text_:j in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022319907 = score(doc=2920,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.19859353 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    Die Szientometrie beschäftigt sich mit der Messbarkeit wissenschaftlicher Leistungen anhand bibliothekarisch nachweisbarer Publikationsergebnisse. Bei genauer Betrachtung ist es ihr Ziel, die Wissenszunahme der Wissenschaft zu messen. Die wissenschaftliche Produktion in Form von Publikationen wächst seit über dreihundert Jahren konstant mit ca. 3,5% pro Jahr. Das entspricht einerVerdopplungsrate von 20 Jahren, die zuerst dem Bibliothekar Fremont Rider 1948 bei Büchern auffiel und die 1963 von Derek J. de Solla Price auch für das Wachstum von Zeitschriften und Bibliografien bestätigt wurde. Die Konstanz dieser Evolution, unabhängig aller sich ereignenden Katastrophen, ist nur zum Teil verstanden, macht aber den unaufhaltsamen Fortschritt der Wissenschaft deutlich. Alle 20 Jahre wird so viel publiziert wie in allen Jahrhunderten davor. Eine etwa gleiche Zunahme verzeichnen die Wissenschaftler, die damit etwa gleich produktiv bleiben. Von ihnen allen sind damit ca. 87% unsere heutigen Zeitgenossen. Aus diesem Wachstum heraus können wir abschätzen, dass in 100.000 laufenden Zeitschriften heute etwa 10 Mio. Publikationen jährlich erscheinen, die von 10 Mio. Wissenschaftlern verfasst werden. Dabei definieren sich nur die als Wissenschaftler, die durchschnittlich eine Publikation jährlich verfassen. Die gesamte Produktion an Buchtiteln, die bisher erschien, dürfte bei etwa 100 Mio. liegen. Davon sind etwa 20 Mio. als wissenschaftlich einzustufen. Wenn folglich 87% aller Wissenschaftler noch heute leben, so betrug die Gesamtzahl der Wissenschaftler in der Welt bisher 11,5 Mio., die in ihrem Leben durchschnittlich 1,5 Bücher pro Kopf verfassten, und etwa das 10-20fache an Zeitschriftenbeiträgen leisteten. Ein Teil dieser Bücher sind allerdings Neuauflagen und Übersetzungen. Nach Lotka, A. J. ist die Produktivität der Wissenschaftler eine schiefe Verteilung von der Form A/n**2, wobei A die Zahl der Autoren mit nur einer Publikation ist und n die Publikationen pro Autor. Während Price in seinen "Networks of Scientific Papers" Vergleichswerte von n**2,5 bis n**3 angab, zeigten Untersuchungen am Science Citation Index (SCI), die auf die gesamte naturwissenschaftliche Literatur hochgerechnet wurden, eher einen Wert von n**1,7. Auf die Tatsache, dass eine Verdopplungsrate der Wissenschaftler von 20 Jahren und eine solche der Menschheit von etwa 50 Jahren dazu führt, dass eines Tages alle Menschen Wissenschaftler werden, hat Price bereits 1963 hingewiesen. Dieser Zustand müsste bei 10 Mio. Wissenschaftlern und 6 Mrd. Menschen in etwa 300 Jahren eintreten, ein nur scheinbar absurder Gedanke, wenn man bedenkt, dass man sich vor 300 Jahren auch kaum vorstellen konnte, dass alle Menschen Lesen, Schreiben und Rechnen lernen können, und dass wir uns ungebildete Menschen immer weniger leisten können.
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
  3. Boyack; K.W.; Börner, K.: Indicator-assisted evaluation and funding of research : visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers (2003) 0.02 
    0.01837461 = product of:
  0.12862226 = sum of:
    0.12862226 = weight(_text_:k.w in 1471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12862226 = score(doc=1471,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2619697 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.49098146 = fieldWeight in 1471, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1471)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  4. McCain, K.W.: Assessing an author's influence using time series historiographic mapping : the oeuvre of Conrad Hal Waddington (2008) 0.02 
    0.01837461 = product of:
  0.12862226 = sum of:
    0.12862226 = weight(_text_:k.w in 1375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12862226 = score(doc=1375,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2619697 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.49098146 = fieldWeight in 1375, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1375)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  5. Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001) 0.02 
    0.015312173 = product of:
  0.10718521 = sum of:
    0.10718521 = weight(_text_:k.w in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10718521 = score(doc=5767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2619697 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.4091512 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  6. Klavans, R.; Boyack, K.W.: Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science (2006) 0.02 
    0.015312173 = product of:
  0.10718521 = sum of:
    0.10718521 = weight(_text_:k.w in 5252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10718521 = score(doc=5252,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2619697 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.4091512 = fieldWeight in 5252, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5252)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  7. Osareh, F.; McCain, K.W.: ¬The structure of Iranian chemistry research, 1990-2006 : an author cocitation analysis (2008) 0.02 
    0.015312173 = product of:
  0.10718521 = sum of:
    0.10718521 = weight(_text_:k.w in 2388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10718521 = score(doc=2388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2619697 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.4091512 = fieldWeight in 2388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2388)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  8. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.02 
    0.015054161 = product of:
  0.05268956 = sum of:
    0.033520654 = weight(_text_:u in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033520654 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
    0.019168904 = product of:
      0.038337808 = sum of:
        0.038337808 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038337808 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
  9. Janssens, F.; Leta, J.; Glänzel, W.; Moor, B. de: Towards mapping library and information science (2006) 0.01 
    0.011628409 = product of:
  0.04069943 = sum of:
    0.01702559 = product of:
      0.03405118 = sum of:
        0.03405118 = weight(_text_:w in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03405118 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.023673838 = weight(_text_:j in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023673838 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
  10. Hjoerland, B.; Nicolaisen, J.: Bradford's law of scattering : ambiguities in the concept of "subject" (2005) 0.01 
    0.01162246 = product of:
  0.040678605 = sum of:
    0.020950409 = weight(_text_:u in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020950409 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
    0.019728197 = weight(_text_:j in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019728197 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Source
    Context: nature, impact and role. 5th International Conference an Conceptions of Library and Information Sciences, CoLIS 2005 Glasgow, UK, June 2005. Ed. by F. Crestani u. I. Ruthven
  11. Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008) 0.01 
    0.011290619 = product of:
  0.039517164 = sum of:
    0.025140489 = weight(_text_:u in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025140489 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
    0.014376678 = product of:
      0.028753355 = sum of:
        0.028753355 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028753355 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:03:12
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Costas, R., M. Bordons u. T.N. van Leeuwen u.a.: Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.740-753.
  12. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01 
    0.010871577 = product of:
  0.038050517 = sum of:
    0.023673838 = weight(_text_:j in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023673838 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
    0.014376678 = product of:
      0.028753355 = sum of:
        0.028753355 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028753355 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  13. Raan, A.F.J. van; Noyons, E.C.M.: Discovery of patterns of scientific and technological development and knowledge transfer (2002) 0.01 
    0.010039543 = product of:
  0.0351384 = sum of:
    0.014187992 = product of:
      0.028375983 = sum of:
        0.028375983 = weight(_text_:w in 3603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028375983 = score(doc=3603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 3603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3603)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.020950409 = weight(_text_:u in 3603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020950409 = score(doc=3603,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 3603, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3603)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  14. De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008) 0.01 
    0.009297967 = product of:
  0.032542884 = sum of:
    0.016760327 = weight(_text_:u in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016760327 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
    0.015782557 = weight(_text_:j in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015782557 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
  15. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01 
    0.008972077 = product of:
  0.031402268 = sum of:
    0.01702559 = product of:
      0.03405118 = sum of:
        0.03405118 = weight(_text_:w in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03405118 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.014376678 = product of:
      0.028753355 = sum of:
        0.028753355 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028753355 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  16. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.01 
    0.0084652435 = product of:
  0.0592567 = sum of:
    0.0592567 = weight(_text_:u in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0592567 = score(doc=461,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.5116319 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Editor
    Cronin, B. u. H.B. Atkins
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.1, S.45-46 (M.J. López Huertas u. E. Jiménez-Contreras); Password 2002, H.3, S.14-19 (W.G. Stock)
  17. Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002) 0.01 
    0.007810341 = product of:
  0.054672386 = sum of:
    0.054672386 = weight(_text_:j in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054672386 = score(doc=3765,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.48645282 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.
  18. Wettlauf der Wissenschaft (2004) 0.01 
    0.0072477176 = product of:
  0.02536701 = sum of:
    0.015782557 = weight(_text_:j in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015782557 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
    0.009584452 = product of:
      0.019168904 = sum of:
        0.019168904 = weight(_text_:22 in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019168904 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.i-med.ac.at/mypoint/news/2004051201.xml (cf) (Quelle: U.S. Is Losing Its Dominance In the Sciences, by WI LLIAM J. BROAD, New York Times, May 3, 2004)
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.79, S.22-23 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.2]
  19. Chen, C.-M.: Classification of scientific networks using aggregated journal-journal citation relations in the Journal Citation Reports (2008) 0.01 
    0.0069034314 = product of:
  0.04832402 = sum of:
    0.04832402 = weight(_text_:j in 2690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04832402 = score(doc=2690,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.4299676 = fieldWeight in 2690, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2690)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    I propose an approach to classifying scientific networks in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations of the ISI Journal Citation Reports using the affinity propagation method. This algorithm is applied to obtain the classification of SCI and SSCI journals by minimizing intracategory journal-journal (J-J) distances in the database, where distance between journals is calculated from the similarity of their annual citation patterns with a cutoff parameter, t, to restrain the maximal J-J distance. As demonstrated in the classification of SCI journals, classification of scientific networks with different resolution is possible by choosing proper values of t. Twenty journal categories in SCI are found to be stable despite a difference of an order of magnitude in t. In our classifications, the level of specificity of a category can be found by looking at its value of RJ (the average distance of members of a category to its representative journal), and relatedness of category members is implied by the value of DJ-J (the average DJ-J distance within a category). Our results are consistent with the ISI classification scheme, and the level of relatedness for most categories in our classification is higher than their counterpart in the ISI classification scheme.
  20. Egghe, L.: Empirical and combinatorial study of country occurrences in multi-authored papers (2006) 0.01 
    0.0067639537 = product of:
  0.047347672 = sum of:
    0.047347672 = weight(_text_:j in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047347672 = score(doc=81,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.42128047 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Papers written by several authors can be classified according to the countries of the author affiliations. The empirical part of this paper consists of two datasets. One dataset consists of 1,035 papers retrieved via the search "pedagog*" in the years 2004 and 2005 (up to October) in Academic Search Elite which is a case where phi(m) = the number of papers with m =1, 2,3 ... authors is decreasing, hence most of the papers have a low number of authors. Here we find that #, m = the number of times a country occurs j times in a m-authored paper, j =1, ..., m-1 is decreasing and that # m, m is much higher than all the other #j, m values. The other dataset consists of 3,271 papers retrieved via the search "enzyme" in the year 2005 (up to October) in the same database which is a case of a non-decreasing phi(m): most papers have 3 or 4 authors and we even find many papers with a much higher number of authors. In this case we show again that # m, m is much higher than the other #j, m values but that #j, m is not decreasing anymore in j =1, ..., m-1, although #1, m is (apart from # m, m) the largest number amongst the #j,m. The combinatorial part gives a proof of the fact that #j,m decreases for j = 1, m-1, supposing that all cases are equally possible. This shows that the first dataset is more conform with this model than the second dataset. Explanations for these findings are given. From the data we also find the (we think: new) distribution of number of papers with n =1, 2,3,... countries (i.e. where there are n different countries involved amongst the m (a n) authors of a paper): a fast decreasing function e.g. as a power law with a very large Lotka exponent.

Authors

Languages

  • e 89
  • d 19

Types

  • a 105
  • el 3
  • m 2
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications