Search (130 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Huvila, I.: Mining qualitative data on human information behaviour from the Web (2010) 0.06
    0.058647122 = product of:
      0.117294244 = sum of:
        0.04498204 = weight(_text_:t in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04498204 = score(doc=4676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
        0.031077946 = weight(_text_:u in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031077946 = score(doc=4676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
        0.041234262 = weight(_text_:i in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041234262 = score(doc=4676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
  2. Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.; Chamis, A.Y.: ¬A study of information seeking and retrieving : pt.1: Background and methodology (1988) 0.05
    0.050268967 = product of:
      0.10053793 = sum of:
        0.038556036 = weight(_text_:t in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038556036 = score(doc=1963,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
        0.02663824 = weight(_text_:u in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02663824 = score(doc=1963,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
        0.035343654 = weight(_text_:i in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035343654 = score(doc=1963,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    The objectives of the study were to conduct a series of observations and experiments under as real-life a situation as possible related to: (i) user context of questions in information retrieval; (ii) the structure and classification of questions; (iii) cognitive traits and decision making of searchers; and (iv) different searches of the same question. The study is presented in three parts: part 1 presents the background of the study and describes the models, measures, methods, procedures and statistical analyses used. Pt.2 is devoted to results related to users, questions, and effectiveness measures, and pt.3 to results related to searchers, searches, and overlap studies. A concluding summary of all results is presented in pt.3
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. Sam Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.175-190.
  3. Fourie, I.: ¬A theoretical model for studying Web information seeking / searching behaviour (2003) 0.03
    0.034434386 = product of:
      0.10330315 = sum of:
        0.044397067 = weight(_text_:u in 3539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044397067 = score(doc=3539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 3539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3539)
        0.058906082 = weight(_text_:i in 3539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058906082 = score(doc=3539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 3539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3539)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimient: IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación , VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research. Eds.: J.A. Frias u. C. Travieso
  4. Bucknall, T.; Mangrum, R.: U-search : a user study of the CD-ROM service at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1992) 0.03
    0.033879198 = product of:
      0.10163759 = sum of:
        0.051408045 = weight(_text_:t in 3640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051408045 = score(doc=3640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 3640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3640)
        0.050229546 = weight(_text_:u in 3640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050229546 = score(doc=3640,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.40930554 = fieldWeight in 3640, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3640)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Members of the reference staff of the North Carolina University at Chapel Hill, Davis Library, conducted a month-long electronic survey of users of the U-search CD-ROM service in spring 91. Evaluates the 1.135 responses to a variety of questions pertaining to public service issues, user attitudes towards CD-ROM searching, and the place of CD-ROM within the overall research strategy
  5. Scholle, U.: Kann ich Ihnen behilflich sein? : Erhebung am zentralen Auskunftsplatz der ULB Münster (2000) 0.03
    0.03256665 = product of:
      0.097699955 = sum of:
        0.06215589 = weight(_text_:u in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06215589 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
        0.035544068 = product of:
          0.071088135 = sum of:
            0.071088135 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071088135 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037477795 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 17:52:11
  6. Fidel, R.: ¬The user-centered approach (2000) 0.03
    0.031421326 = product of:
      0.09426398 = sum of:
        0.079030804 = weight(_text_:i in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079030804 = score(doc=917,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.55909014 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
        0.015233172 = product of:
          0.030466344 = sum of:
            0.030466344 = weight(_text_:22 in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030466344 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037477795 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    I started my professional career in library and information science because of my great interest in knowledge organization. The more experience I gained in the profession, the more I realized how crucial it is to understand which organization would be best for each group of users. This in turn requires an understanding of how users seek information. And so now my focus is an studying information seeking and searching behavior. Throughout the relatively long course of changing my focus, I followed Pauline Cochrane's writings. Now I can say that she has been among the first to have a "user-centered approach" to knowledge organization, and she has used the term three years before it became a mainstream phrase. The following is a short discussion about the usercentered approach which was presented in a workshop in 1997.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  7. Wilson, T.D.: Exploring models of information behaviour : the 'uncertainty' project (1999) 0.03
    0.029797334 = product of:
      0.089392 = sum of:
        0.031077946 = weight(_text_:u in 6785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031077946 = score(doc=6785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 6785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6785)
        0.05831405 = weight(_text_:i in 6785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05831405 = score(doc=6785,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.41253293 = fieldWeight in 6785, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6785)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    My original intention in this Keynote Paper was to talk about models of information behaviour, and I shall do that to some extent. However, both Carol Kuhlthau and Amanda Spink address this general conceptual level of research into information-seeking behaviour and I thought it would more appropriate to present my current research.
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, Sheffield, UK, 1998. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  8. Benutzung von Katalogen und Freihandbeständen in deutschen Universalbibliotheken : Bd.1: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung von Benutzer-Recherchen. Vorgelegt von D. Fischer-Knappe ... Bd.2: Einige Ergebnisse in bibliothekarischer Interpretation. Vorgelegt von J. Stoltzenburg u. K.W. Neubauer. - Bd.3: Methoden- und Dokumentationsband. Vorgelegt von P. Helfen u. B. Laufer (1984) 0.03
    0.028395038 = product of:
      0.08518511 = sum of:
        0.043950852 = weight(_text_:u in 1526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043950852 = score(doc=1526,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.35814235 = fieldWeight in 1526, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1526)
        0.041234262 = weight(_text_:i in 1526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041234262 = score(doc=1526,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 1526, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1526)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Forschungsbericht ist die überarbeitete Fassung des 1979 fertiggestellten Ergebnisberichts über die zweite Phase des von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft finanzierten Projekts "Benutzerforschung II". Während im Projekt I mit einer schriftlichen Befragung die Benutzer-Orientierungen, wie Verhaltensweisen, Einstellungen und Bewertungen bezüglich aller Funktionsbereiche von wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken erkundet wurden, konzentriert sich das Projekt II auf die Benutzung der von den wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken erstellten Informationsmittel, wobei es um Recherchen an alphabetischen Katalogen, Sachkatalogen und Freihandbeständen geht
  9. Kilgour, F.G.: Online retrieval of single-screen miniature catalogues by university library users (1995) 0.03
    0.027547507 = product of:
      0.08264252 = sum of:
        0.03551765 = weight(_text_:u in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03551765 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
        0.047124866 = weight(_text_:i in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047124866 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the findings of an experiment simulating use of a university OPAC by academic library users. Examines how effective are online searches by university library users employing surname plus first title word, or last title word, or first and last title words in producing miniature catalogues of i screen. The searches were known item searches for books
    Source
    Online information 95: Proceedings of the 19th International online information meeting, London, 5-7 December 1995. Ed.: D.I. Raitt u. B. Jeapes
  10. Coles, C.: Information seeking behaviour of public library users : use and non-use of electronic media (1999) 0.03
    0.025738355 = product of:
      0.05147671 = sum of:
        0.017758826 = weight(_text_:u in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017758826 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
        0.023562433 = weight(_text_:i in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023562433 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
        0.010155449 = product of:
          0.020310897 = sum of:
            0.020310897 = weight(_text_:22 in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020310897 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037477795 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper highlights some of the significant findings from author's PhD: "Factors affecting the end-use of electronic databases in public libraries." Public libraries have a wide range of different types of users who, unlike academic or special library users, are not necessarily information-trained (see Coles, 1998). Whereas the academic, special library user may have specific information needs that can be met by electronic sources, public library users do not necessarily have such specific information needs that can easily be identified and met. Most user surveys have tended to concentrate on the searching and retrieval aspect of information seeking behaviour, whereas this study's user survey focused more on how people perceived and related to Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). It was not how people searched a particular electronic source, in this case CD-ROM, that was of prime interest but rather whether or not people actually used them at all and the reasons why people did or did not use electronic media. There were several reasons the study looked at CD-ROM specifically. Firstly, CD-ROM is a well established technology, most people should be familiar with CD-ROM/multimedia. Secondly, CD-ROM was, at the start of the study, the only open access electronic media widely available in public libraries. As well as examining why public library users chose to use electronic sources, the paper looks at the types of CD-ROM databases used both in the library and in general Also examined are what sort of searches users carried out. Where appropriate some of the problems inherent in studying end-users in public libraries and the difficulty in getting reliable data, are discussed. Several methods were used to collect the data. I wished to avoid limiting research to a small sample of library sites, the aim was to be as broad in scope as possible. There were two main groups of people 1 wished to look at: non-users as well as CD-ROM users
    Date
    22. 3.2002 8:51:28
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 13-15 August 1998, Sheffield, UK. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  11. Vuong, T.; Saastamoinen, M.; Jacucci, G.; Ruotsalo, T.: Understanding user behavior in naturalistic information search tasks (2019) 0.02
    0.024963921 = product of:
      0.07489176 = sum of:
        0.04543872 = weight(_text_:t in 5419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04543872 = score(doc=5419,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.3077663 = fieldWeight in 5419, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5419)
        0.029453041 = weight(_text_:i in 5419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029453041 = score(doc=5419,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 5419, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5419)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Understanding users' search behavior has largely relied on the information available from search engine logs, which provide limited information about the contextual factors affecting users' behavior. Consequently, questions such as how users' intentions, task goals, and substances of the users' tasks affect search behavior, as well as what triggers information needs, remain largely unanswered. We report an experiment in which naturalistic information search behavior was captured by analyzing 24/7 continuous recordings of information on participants' computer screens. Written task diaries describing the participants' tasks were collected and used as real-life task contexts for further categorization. All search tasks were extracted and classified under various task categories according to users' intentions, task goals, and substances of the tasks. We investigated the effect of different task categories on three behavioral factors: search efforts, content-triggers, and application context. Our results suggest four findings: (i) Search activity is integrally associated with the users' creative processes. The content users have seen prior to searching more often triggers search, and is used as a query, within creative tasks. (ii) Searching within intellectual and creative tasks is more time-intensive, while search activity occurring as a part of daily routine tasks is associated with more frequent searching within a search task. (iii) Searching is more often induced from utility applications in tasks demanding a degree of intellectual effort. (iv) Users' leisure information-seeking activity is occurring inherently within social media services or comes from social communication platforms. The implications of our findings for information access and management systems are discussed.
  12. Harms, I.; Schweibenz, W.: Usability engineering methods for the Web (2000) 0.02
    0.020660631 = product of:
      0.061981894 = sum of:
        0.02663824 = weight(_text_:u in 5482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02663824 = score(doc=5482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 5482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5482)
        0.035343654 = weight(_text_:i in 5482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035343654 = score(doc=5482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 5482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5482)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Informationskompetenz - Basiskompetenz in der Informationsgesellschaft: Proceedings des 7. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2000), Hrsg.: G. Knorz u. R. Kuhlen
  13. Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.: ¬A study of information seeking and retrieving : pt.2: users, questions, and effectiveness (1988) 0.02
    0.01817549 = product of:
      0.109052934 = sum of:
        0.109052934 = weight(_text_:t in 3258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109052934 = score(doc=3258,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.7386391 = fieldWeight in 3258, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3258)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    s. Abstract von T.1
  14. Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.: ¬A study of information seeking and retrieving : pt.3: searchers, searches, and overlap (1988) 0.02
    0.01817549 = product of:
      0.109052934 = sum of:
        0.109052934 = weight(_text_:t in 3259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109052934 = score(doc=3259,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.7386391 = fieldWeight in 3259, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3259)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    s. Abstract von T.1
  15. Su, L.T.: ¬A comprehensive and systematic model of user evaluation of Web search engines : Il. An evaluation by undergraduates (2003) 0.02
    0.018115735 = product of:
      0.054347202 = sum of:
        0.04165289 = weight(_text_:i in 2117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04165289 = score(doc=2117,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 2117, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2117)
        0.01269431 = product of:
          0.02538862 = sum of:
            0.02538862 = weight(_text_:22 in 2117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02538862 = score(doc=2117,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037477795 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2117, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2117)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an application of the model described in Part I to the evaluation of Web search engines by undergraduates. The study observed how 36 undergraduate used four major search engines to find information for their own individual problems and how they evaluated these engines based an actual interaction with the search engines. User evaluation was based an 16 performance measures representing five evaluation criteria: relevance, efficiency, utility, user satisfaction, and connectivity. Non-performance (user-related) measures were also applied. Each participant searched his/ her own topic an all four engines and provided satisfaction ratings for system features and interaction and reasons for satisfaction. Each also made relevance judgements of retrieved items in relation to his/her own information need and participated in post-search Interviews to provide reactions to the search results and overall performance. The study found significant differences in precision PR1 relative recall, user satisfaction with output display, time saving, value of search results, and overall performance among the four engines and also significant engine by discipline interactions an all these measures. In addition, the study found significant differences in user satisfaction with response time among four engines, and significant engine by discipline interaction in user satisfaction with search interface. None of the four search engines dominated in every aspect of the multidimensional evaluation. Content analysis of verbal data identified a number of user criteria and users evaluative comments based an these criteria. Results from both quantitative analysis and content analysis provide insight for system design and development, and useful feedback an strengths and weaknesses of search engines for system improvement
    Date
    24. 1.2004 18:27:22
    Footnote
    Teil I im selben Heft
  16. Large, A.; Beheshti, J.; Rahman, T.: Design criteria for children's Web portals : the users speak out (2002) 0.02
    0.017929737 = product of:
      0.053789206 = sum of:
        0.038556036 = weight(_text_:t in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038556036 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
        0.015233172 = product of:
          0.030466344 = sum of:
            0.030466344 = weight(_text_:22 in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030466344 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037477795 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2005 10:34:22
  17. Holler, U.: Benutzerfreundlichkeit von Sachkatalogen (1975) 0.02
    0.017758828 = product of:
      0.10655296 = sum of:
        0.10655296 = weight(_text_:u in 1947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10655296 = score(doc=1947,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.86826813 = fieldWeight in 1947, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=1947)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  18. Spink, A.; Bray, K.E.; Jaeckel, M.; Sidberry, G.: Everyday life information-seeking by low-income African American households : Wynnewood Healthy Neighbourhood Project (1999) 0.02
    0.017217193 = product of:
      0.051651575 = sum of:
        0.022198534 = weight(_text_:u in 282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022198534 = score(doc=282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=282)
        0.029453041 = weight(_text_:i in 282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029453041 = score(doc=282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=282)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports findings from Phase I of the Wynnewood Study - a major project investigating the information-seeking and information needs of lowincome African-American households in the Wynnewood Project in Dallas, Texas. The Parks at Wynnewood is a residential housing development at which the University of North Texas (UNT) is currently conducting the Healthy Neighbourhoods urban revitalization project. This study is also part of the second phase of a major UNT project that is investigating the community service needs of the Wynnewood residents. During this needs assessment all Wynnewood households were interviewed using an extensive twelve-page questionnaire, including a number of questions on their information needs and information-seeking behaviour. The results of the survey provide data bearing on the development of an information resource center and an information literacy programme for Wynnewood community residents. A model of resident's information environment is presented. The study of information-seeking and information needs, also known as nonwork information-seeking or citizen information-seeking, is an important and emerging area of interdisciplinary information science research. More specifically, this study is providing important data on the everyday life information needs and seeking behaviours of low-income African Americans households.
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 13-15 August 1998, Sheffield, UK. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  19. Pejtersen, A.M.: Investigation of search strategies in fiction based on an analysis of 134 user-librarian conversations (1979) 0.01
    0.014994013 = product of:
      0.08996408 = sum of:
        0.08996408 = weight(_text_:t in 3024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08996408 = score(doc=3024,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.60934615 = fieldWeight in 3024, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3024)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    IRFIS 3. Ed: T. Henriksen
  20. Ewert, G.: Zur Benutzung von Katalogen und Lesesälen in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken. T.1-2 (1990) 0.01
    0.014994013 = product of:
      0.08996408 = sum of:
        0.08996408 = weight(_text_:t in 1587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08996408 = score(doc=1587,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.60934615 = fieldWeight in 1587, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1587)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    

Years

Languages

  • e 110
  • d 16
  • i 2
  • ja 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 126
  • m 3
  • b 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…