Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Folksonomies"
  1. Peters, I.: Benutzerzentrierte Erschließungsverfahren (2013) 0.03
    0.034434386 = product of:
      0.10330315 = sum of:
        0.044397067 = weight(_text_:u in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044397067 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
        0.058906082 = weight(_text_:i in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058906082 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
  2. Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval (2008) 0.02
    0.020660631 = product of:
      0.061981894 = sum of:
        0.02663824 = weight(_text_:u in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02663824 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
        0.035343654 = weight(_text_:i in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035343654 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Die populären Web 2.0-Dienste werden von Prosumern - Produzenten und gleichsam Konsumenten - nicht nur dazu genutzt, Inhalte zu produzieren, sondern auch, um sie inhaltlich zu erschließen. Folksonomies erlauben es dem Nutzer, Dokumente mit eigenen Schlagworten, sog. Tags, zu beschreiben, ohne dabei auf gewisse Regeln oder Vorgaben achten zu müssen. Neben einigen Vorteilen zeigen Folksonomies aber auch zahlreiche Schwächen (u. a. einen Mangel an Präzision). Um diesen Nachteilen größtenteils entgegenzuwirken, schlagen wir eine Interpretation der Tags als natürlichsprachige Wörter vor. Dadurch ist es uns möglich, Methoden des Natural Language Processing (NLP) auf die Tags anzuwenden und so linguistische Probleme der Tags zu beseitigen. Darüber hinaus diskutieren wir Ansätze und weitere Vorschläge (Tagverteilungen, Kollaboration und akteurspezifische Aspekte) hinsichtlich eines Relevance Rankings von getaggten Dokumenten. Neben Vorschlägen auf ähnliche Dokumente ("more like this!") erlauben Folksonomies auch Hinweise auf verwandte Nutzer und damit auf Communities ("more like me!").
  3. Peters, I.: Folksonomies, social tagging and information retrieval (2011) 0.02
    0.020660631 = product of:
      0.061981894 = sum of:
        0.02663824 = weight(_text_:u in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02663824 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
        0.035343654 = weight(_text_:i in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035343654 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Innovations in information retrieval: perspectives for theory and practice. Eds.: A. Foster, u. P. Rafferty
  4. Peters, I.: Folksonomies : indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0 (2009) 0.01
    0.013773753 = product of:
      0.04132126 = sum of:
        0.017758826 = weight(_text_:u in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017758826 = score(doc=4203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
        0.023562433 = weight(_text_:i in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023562433 = score(doc=4203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Zugl.: Düsseldorf, Univ., Diss., 2009 u.d.T.: Peters, Isabella: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval Rez. in: IWP - Information Wissenschaft & Praxis, 61(2010) Heft 8, S.469-470 (U. Spree): "... Nachdem sich die Rezensentin durch 418 Seiten Text hindurch gelesen hat, bleibt sie unentschieden, wie der auffällige Einsatz langer Zitate (im Durchschnitt drei Zitate, die länger als vier kleingedruckte Zeilen sind, pro Seite) zu bewerten ist, zumal die Zitate nicht selten rein illustrativen Charakter haben bzw. Isabella Peters noch einmal zitiert, was sie bereits in eigenen Worten ausgedrückt hat. Redundanz und Verlängerung der Lesezeit halten sich hier die Waage mit der Möglichkeit, dass sich die Leserin einen unmittelbaren Eindruck von Sprache und Duktus der zitierten Literatur verschaffen kann. Eindeutig unschön ist das Beenden eines Gedankens oder einer Argumentation durch ein Zitat (z. B. S. 170). Im deutschen Original entstehen auf diese Weise die für deutsche wissenschaftliche Qualifikationsarbeiten typischen denglischen Texte. Für alle, die sich für Wissensrepräsentation, Information Retrieval und kollaborative Informationsdienste interessieren, ist "Folksonomies : Indexing and Retrieval in Web 2.0" trotz der angeführten kleinen Mängel zur Lektüre und Anschaffung - wegen seines beinahe enzyklopädischen Charakters auch als Nachschlage- oder Referenzwerk geeignet - unbedingt zu empfehlen. Abschließend möchte ich mich in einem Punkt der Produktinfo von de Gruyter uneingeschränkt anschließen: ein "Grundlagenwerk für Folksonomies".
  5. Shirky, C.: Ontology is overrated : categories, links, and tags (2005) 0.01
    0.012987573 = product of:
      0.077925436 = sum of:
        0.077925436 = weight(_text_:i in 1265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077925436 = score(doc=1265,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.55127037 = fieldWeight in 1265, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1265)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Today I want to talk about categorization, and I want to convince you that a lot of what we think we know about categorization is wrong. In particular, I want to convince you that many of the ways we're attempting to apply categorization to the electronic world are actually a bad fit, because we've adopted habits of mind that are left over from earlier strategies. I also want to convince you that what we're seeing when we see the Web is actually a radical break with previous categorization strategies, rather than an extension of them. The second part of the talk is more speculative, because it is often the case that old systems get broken before people know what's going to take their place. (Anyone watching the music industry can see this at work today.) That's what I think is happening with categorization. What I think is coming instead are much more organic ways of organizing information than our current categorization schemes allow, based on two units -- the link, which can point to anything, and the tag, which is a way of attaching labels to links. The strategy of tagging -- free-form labeling, without regard to categorical constraints -- seems like a recipe for disaster, but as the Web has shown us, you can extract a surprising amount of value from big messy data sets.
    Footnote
    This piece is based on two talks I gave in the spring of 2005 -- one at the O'Reilly ETech conference in March, entitled "Ontology Is Overrated", and one at the IMCExpo in April entitled "Folksonomies & Tags: The rise of user-developed classification." The written version is a heavily edited concatenation of those two talks.
  6. Tennis, J.T.: Social tagging and the next steps for indexing (2006) 0.01
    0.012852012 = product of:
      0.07711207 = sum of:
        0.07711207 = weight(_text_:t in 570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07711207 = score(doc=570,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 570, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=570)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Proceedings 17th SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, November 4, 2006, Austin, Texas. Eds.: Jonathan Furner and Joseph T. Tennis
  7. Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011) 0.01
    0.007854145 = product of:
      0.047124866 = sum of:
        0.047124866 = weight(_text_:i in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047124866 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  8. Huvila, I.: Aesthetic judgments in folksonomies as criteria for organising knowledge 0.01
    0.0068723774 = product of:
      0.041234262 = sum of:
        0.041234262 = weight(_text_:i in 3540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041234262 = score(doc=3540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 3540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3540)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  9. Peters, I.: Folksonomies : nutzergenerierte Schlagwörter als Indexierungswerkzeug für die Massen (2011) 0.01
    0.0068723774 = product of:
      0.041234262 = sum of:
        0.041234262 = weight(_text_:i in 4909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041234262 = score(doc=4909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 4909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4909)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  10. Peters, I.; Schumann, L.; Terliesner, J.: Folksonomy-basiertes Information Retrieval unter der Lupe (2012) 0.01
    0.0068723774 = product of:
      0.041234262 = sum of:
        0.041234262 = weight(_text_:i in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041234262 = score(doc=406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  11. Peters, I.: Folksonomies & Social Tagging (2023) 0.01
    0.0068723774 = product of:
      0.041234262 = sum of:
        0.041234262 = weight(_text_:i in 796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041234262 = score(doc=796,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 796, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=796)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  12. Goodrum, A.; Hibbard, C.E.; Fels, C.D.; Woodcock, C.K.: ¬The creation of keysigns : American sign language metadata (2008) 0.01
    0.006426006 = product of:
      0.038556036 = sum of:
        0.038556036 = weight(_text_:t in 2272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038556036 = score(doc=2272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 2272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2272)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
  13. Xie, H.; Li, X.; Wang, T.; Lau, R.Y.K.; Wong, T.-L.; Chen, L.; Wang, F.L.; Li, Q.: Incorporating sentiment into tag-based user profiles and resource profiles for personalized search in folksonomy (2016) 0.01
    0.0060584964 = product of:
      0.036350977 = sum of:
        0.036350977 = weight(_text_:t in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036350977 = score(doc=2671,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.24621303 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  14. Spiteri, L.: ¬The structure and form of folksonomy tags : the road to the public library catalogue (2007) 0.01
    0.0059196088 = product of:
      0.03551765 = sum of:
        0.03551765 = weight(_text_:u in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03551765 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
  15. Watters, C.; Nizam, N.: Knowledge organization on the Web : the emergent role of social classification (2012) 0.01
    0.0051796576 = product of:
      0.031077946 = sum of:
        0.031077946 = weight(_text_:u in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031077946 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
  16. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.01
    0.0050777243 = product of:
      0.030466344 = sum of:
        0.030466344 = product of:
          0.06093269 = sum of:
            0.06093269 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06093269 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037477795 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  17. Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Power tags in information retrieval (2010) 0.00
    0.00490884 = product of:
      0.029453041 = sum of:
        0.029453041 = weight(_text_:i in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029453041 = score(doc=865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  18. Kim, H.H.: Toward video semantic search based on a structured folksonomy (2011) 0.00
    0.0036997558 = product of:
      0.022198534 = sum of:
        0.022198534 = weight(_text_:u in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022198534 = score(doc=4350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  19. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.00
    0.0029920777 = product of:
      0.017952466 = sum of:
        0.017952466 = product of:
          0.035904933 = sum of:
            0.035904933 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035904933 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037477795 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  20. Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006) 0.00
    0.0029620058 = product of:
      0.017772034 = sum of:
        0.017772034 = product of:
          0.035544068 = sum of:
            0.035544068 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035544068 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037477795 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48