Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. From information to knowledge : conceptual and content analysis by computer (1995) 0.03 
    0.027942708 = product of:
  0.08382812 = sum of:
    0.054375082 = weight(_text_:u in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054375082 = score(doc=5392,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.44308627 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
    0.029453041 = weight(_text_:i in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029453041 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    SCHMIDT, K.M.: Concepts - content - meaning: an introduction; DUCHASTEL, J. et al.: The SACAO project: using computation toward textual data analysis; PAQUIN, L.-C. u. L. DUPUY: An approach to expertise transfer: computer-assisted text analysis; HOGENRAAD, R., Y. BESTGEN u. J.-L. NYSTEN: Terrorist rhetoric: texture and architecture; MOHLER, P.P.: On the interaction between reading and computing: an interpretative approach to content analysis; LANCASHIRE, I.: Computer tools for cognitive stylistics; MERGENTHALER, E.: An outline of knowledge based text analysis; NAMENWIRTH, J.Z.: Ideography in computer-aided content analysis; WEBER, R.P. u. J.Z. Namenwirth: Content-analytic indicators: a self-critique; McKINNON, A.: Optimizing the aberrant frequency word technique; ROSATI, R.: Factor analysis in classical archaeology: export patterns of Attic pottery trade; PETRILLO, P.S.: Old and new worlds: ancient coinage and modern technology; DARANYI, S., S. MARJAI u.a.: Caryatids and the measurement of semiosis in architecture; ZARRI, G.P.: Intelligent information retrieval: an application in the field of historical biographical data; BOUCHARD, G., R. ROY u.a.: Computers and genealogy: from family reconstitution to population reconstruction; DEMÉLAS-BOHY, M.-D. u. M. RENAUD: Instability, networks and political parties: a political history expert system prototype; DARANYI, S., A. ABRANYI u. G. KOVACS: Knowledge extraction from ethnopoetic texts by multivariate statistical methods; FRAUTSCHI, R.L.: Measures of narrative voice in French prose fiction applied to textual samples from the enlightenment to the twentieth century; DANNENBERG, R. u.a.: A project in computer music: the musician's workbench
    Editor
    Nissan, E. u. K. Schmidt
  2. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.02 
    0.023261895 = product of:
  0.069785684 = sum of:
    0.044397067 = weight(_text_:u in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044397067 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
    0.02538862 = product of:
      0.05077724 = sum of:
        0.05077724 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05077724 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
    Source
    Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u, L. Kajberg
  3. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.02 
    0.018609516 = product of:
  0.05582855 = sum of:
    0.03551765 = weight(_text_:u in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03551765 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
    0.020310897 = product of:
      0.040621795 = sum of:
        0.040621795 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040621795 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
  4. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.1: Inhoudsanalyse (1989) 0.01 
    0.014994013 = product of:
  0.08996408 = sum of:
    0.08996408 = weight(_text_:t in 1841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08996408 = score(doc=1841,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.60934615 = fieldWeight in 1841, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1841)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  5. Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬A new approach to the classification of fiction (1982) 0.01 
    0.013884298 = product of:
  0.08330578 = sum of:
    0.08330578 = weight(_text_:i in 7240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08330578 = score(doc=7240,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.58933276 = fieldWeight in 7240, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7240)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed. I. Dahlberg
  6. Hoover, L.: ¬A beginners' guide for subject analysis of theses and dissertations in the hard sciences (2005) 0.01 
    0.01071001 = product of:
  0.06426006 = sum of:
    0.06426006 = weight(_text_:t in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06426006 = score(doc=5740,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This guide, for beginning catalogers with humanities or social sciences backgrounds, provides assistance in subject analysis (based on Library of Congress Subject Headings) of theses and dissertations (T/Ds) that are produced by graduate students in university departments in the hard sciences (physical sciences and engineering). It is aimed at those who have had little or no experience in cataloging, especially of this type of material, and for those who desire to supplement local mentoring resources for subject analysis in the hard sciences. Theses and dissertations from these departments present a special challenge because they are the results of current research representing specific new concepts with which the cataloger may not be familiar. In fact, subject headings often have not yet been created for the specific concept(s) being researched. Additionally, T/D authors often use jargon/terminology specific to their department. Catalogers often have many other duties in addition to subject analysis of T/Ds in the hard sciences, yet they desire to provide optimal access through accurate, thorough subject analysis. Tips are provided for determining the content of the T/D, strategic searches on WorldCat for possible subject headings, evaluating the relevancy of these subject headings for final selection, and selecting appropriate subdivisions where needed. Lists of basic reference resources are also provided.
  7. Sigel, A.: How can user-oriented depth analysis be constructively guided? (2000) 0.01 
    0.009091301 = product of:
  0.054547805 = sum of:
    0.054547805 = weight(_text_:i in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054547805 = score(doc=133,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.38588926 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    It is vital for library and information science to understand the subject indexing process thoroughly. However, document analysis, the first and most important step in indexing, has not received sufficient attention. As this is an exceptionally hard problem, we still do not dispose of a sound indexing theory. Therefore we have difficulties in teaching indexing and in explaining why a given subject representation is "better" than another. Technological advancements have not helped to close this fundamental gap. To proceed, we should ask the right questions instead. Several types of indexer inconsistencies can be explained as acceptable, yet different conceptualizations which resulting of the variety of groups dealing with a problem from their respective viewpoints. Multiple indexed documents are regarded as the normal case. Intersubjectively replicable indexing results are often questionable or do not constitute interesting cases of indexing at all. In the context of my ongoing dissertation in which I intend to develop an enhanced indexing theory by investigating improvements within a social sciences domain, this paper explains user-oriented selective depth analysis and why I chose that configuration. Strongly influenced by Mai's dissertation, I also communicate my first insights concerning current indexing theories. I agree that I cannot ignore epistemological stances and philosophical issues in language and meaning related to indexing and accept the openness of the interpretive nature of the indexing process. Although I present arguments against the employment of an indexing language as well, it is still indispensable in situations which demand easier access and control by devices. Despite the enormous difficulties the user-oriented and selective depth analysis poses, I argue that it is both feasible and useful if one achieves careful guidance of the possible interpretations. There is some hope because the number of useful interpretations is limited: Every summary is tailored to a purpose, audience and situation. Domain, discourse and social practice entail additional constraints. A pluralistic method mix that focusses on ecologically valid, holistic contexts and employs qualitative methods is recommended. Domain analysis urgently has to be made more practical and applicable. Only then we will be able to investigate empirically domains in order to identify their structures shaped by the corresponding discourse communities. We plan to represent the recognized problem structures and indexing questions of relevance to a small domain in formal, ontological computer models -- if we can find such stable knowledge structures. This would allow us to tailor dynamically summaries for user communities. For practical purposes we suggest to assume a less demanding position than Hjorland's "totality of the epistemological potential". It is sufficent that we identify and represent iteratively the information needs of today's user groups in interactive knowledge-based systems. The best way to formalize such knowledge gained about discourse communities is however unknown. Indexers should stay in direct contact with the community they serve or be part of it to ensure agreement with their viewpoints. Checklist/request-oriented indexing could be very helpful but it remains to be demonstrated how well it will be applicable in the social sciences. A frame-based representation or at least a sophisticated grouping of terms could help to express relational knowledge structures. There remains much work to do since in practice no one has shown yet how such an improved indexing system would work and if the indexing results were really "better".
  8. Belkin, N.J.: ¬The problem of 'matching' in information retrieval (1980) 0.01 
    0.008879414 = product of:
  0.05327648 = sum of:
    0.05327648 = weight(_text_:u in 1329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05327648 = score(doc=1329,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 1329, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1329)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
  9. Kessel, K.: Who's afraid of the big, bad uktena mster? : subject cataloging for images (2016) 0.01 
    0.007854145 = product of:
  0.047124866 = sum of:
    0.047124866 = weight(_text_:i in 3003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047124866 = score(doc=3003,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 3003, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3003)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This article describes the difference between cataloging images and cataloging books, the obstacles to including subject data in image cataloging records and how these obstacles can be overcome to make image collections more accessible. I call for participants to help create a subject authority reference resource for non-Western art. This article is an expanded and revised version of a presentation for the 2016 Joint ARLIS/VRA conference in Seattle.
  10. Shaw, R.: Information organization and the philosophy of history (2013) 0.01 
    0.0068723774 = product of:
  0.041234262 = sum of:
    0.041234262 = weight(_text_:i in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041234262 = score(doc=946,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The philosophy of history can help articulate problems relevant to information organization. One such problem is "aboutness": How do texts relate to the world? In response to this problem, philosophers of history have developed theories of colligation describing how authors bind together phenomena under organizing concepts. Drawing on these ideas, I present a theory of subject analysis that avoids the problematic illusion of an independent "landscape" of subjects. This theory points to a broad vision of the future of information organization and some specific challenges to be met.
  11. Chen, H.; Ng, T.: ¬An algorithmic approach to concept exploration in a large knowledge network (automatic thesaurus consultation) : symbolic branch-and-bound search versus connectionist Hopfield Net Activation (1995) 0.01 
    0.006426006 = product of:
  0.038556036 = sum of:
    0.038556036 = weight(_text_:t in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038556036 = score(doc=2203,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  12. Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.B.: Convergent theories : using a multidisciplinary approach to expalin indexing results (1995) 0.01 
    0.006426006 = product of:
  0.038556036 = sum of:
    0.038556036 = weight(_text_:t in 3832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038556036 = score(doc=3832,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 3832, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3832)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Forging new partnerships in information: converging technologies. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'95, Chicago, IL, 9-12 October 1995. Ed.: T. Kinney
  13. Amac, T.: Linguistic context analysis : a new approach to communication evaluation (1997) 0.01 
    0.006426006 = product of:
  0.038556036 = sum of:
    0.038556036 = weight(_text_:t in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038556036 = score(doc=2576,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  14. Miene, A.; Hermes, T.; Ioannidis, G.: Wie kommt das Bild in die Datenbank? : Inhaltsbasierte Analyse von Bildern und Videos (2002) 0.01 
    0.006426006 = product of:
  0.038556036 = sum of:
    0.038556036 = weight(_text_:t in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038556036 = score(doc=213,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  15. Buckland, M.; Shaw, R.: 4W vocabulary mapping across diiverse reference genres (2008) 0.01 
    0.006426006 = product of:
  0.038556036 = sum of:
    0.038556036 = weight(_text_:t in 2258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038556036 = score(doc=2258,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 2258, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2258)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
  16. Xie, H.; Li, X.; Wang, T.; Lau, R.Y.K.; Wong, T.-L.; Chen, L.; Wang, F.L.; Li, Q.: Incorporating sentiment into tag-based user profiles and resource profiles for personalized search in folksonomy (2016) 0.01 
    0.0060584964 = product of:
  0.036350977 = sum of:
    0.036350977 = weight(_text_:t in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036350977 = score(doc=2671,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.24621303 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  17. Moraes, J.B.E. de: Aboutness in fiction : methodological perspectives for knowledge organization (2012) 0.01 
    0.0059196088 = product of:
  0.03551765 = sum of:
    0.03551765 = weight(_text_:u in 856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03551765 = score(doc=856,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 856, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=856)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
  18. Pozzi de Sousa, B.; Ortega, C.D.: Aspects regarding the notion of subject in the context of different theoretical trends : teaching approaches in Brazil (2018) 0.01 
    0.0059196088 = product of:
  0.03551765 = sum of:
    0.03551765 = weight(_text_:u in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03551765 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  19. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.01 
    0.005619647 = product of:
  0.016858941 = sum of:
    0.011781217 = weight(_text_:i in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011781217 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.083344236 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
    0.0050777243 = product of:
      0.010155449 = sum of:
        0.010155449 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010155449 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Footnote
    Bade begins his discussion of errors in subject analysis by summarizing the contents of seven records containing what he considers to be egregious errors. The examples were drawn only from items that he has encountered in the course of his work. Five of the seven records were full-level ("I" level) records for Eastern European materials created between 1996 and 2000 in the OCLC WorldCat database. The final two examples were taken from records created by Bade himself over an unspecified period of time. Although he is to be commended for examining the actual items cataloged and for examining mostly items that he claims to have adequate linguistic and subject expertise to evaluate reliably, Bade's methodology has major flaws. First and foremost, the number of examples provided is completely inadequate to draw any conclusions about the extent of the problem. Although an in-depth qualitative analysis of a small number of records might have yielded some valuable insight into factors that contribute to errors in subject analysis, Bade provides no Information about the circumstances under which the live OCLC records he critiques were created. Instead, he offers simplistic explanations for the errors based solely an his own assumptions. He supplements his analysis of examples with an extremely brief survey of other studies regarding errors in subject analysis, which consists primarily of criticism of work done by Sheila Intner. In the end, it is impossible to draw any reliable conclusions about the nature or extent of errors in subject analysis found in records in shared bibliographic databases based an Bade's analysis. In the final third of the essay, Bade finally reveals his true concern: the deintellectualization of cataloging. It would strengthen the essay tremendously to present this as the primary premise from the very beginning, as this section offers glimpses of a compelling argument. Bade laments, "Many librarians simply do not sec cataloging as an intellectual activity requiring an educated mind" (p. 20). Commenting an recent trends in copy cataloging practice, he declares, "The disaster of our time is that this work is being done more and more by people who can neither evaluate nor correct imported errors and offen are forbidden from even thinking about it" (p. 26). Bade argues that the most valuable content found in catalog records is the intellectual content contributed by knowledgeable catalogers, and he asserts that to perform intellectually demanding tasks such as subject analysis reliably and effectively, catalogers must have the linguistic and subject knowledge required to gain at least a rudimentary understanding of the materials that they describe. He contends that requiring catalogers to quickly dispense with materials in unfamiliar languages and subjects clearly undermines their ability to perform the intellectual work of cataloging and leads to an increasing number of errors in the bibliographic records contributed to shared databases.
  20. Jens-Erik Mai, J.-E.: ¬The role of documents, domains and decisions in indexing (2004) 0.01 
    0.0055537196 = product of:
  0.033322316 = sum of:
    0.033322316 = weight(_text_:i in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033322316 = score(doc=2653,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.2357331 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    1. Introduction The document at hand is often regarded as the most important entity for analysis in the indexing situation. The indexer's focus is directed to the "entity and its faithful description" (Soergel, 1985, 227) and the indexer is advised to "stick to the text and the author's claims" (Lancaster, 2003, 37). The indexer's aim is to establish the subject matter based an an analysis of the document with the goal of representing the document as truthfully as possible and to ensure the subject representation's validity by remaining neutral and objective. To help indexers with their task they are guided towards particular and important attributes of the document that could help them determine the document's subject matter. The exact attributes the indexer is recommended to examine varies, but typical examples are: the title, the abstract, the table of contents, chapter headings, chapter subheadings, preface, introduction, foreword, the text itself, bibliographical references, index entries, illustrations, diagrams, and tables and their captions. The exact recommendations vary according to the type of document that is being indexed (monographs vs. periodical articles, for instance). It is clear that indexers should provide faithful descriptions, that indexers should represent the author's claims, and that the document's attributes are helpful points of analysis. However, indexers need much more guidance when determining the subject than simply the documents themselves. One approach that could be taken to handle the Situation is a useroriented approach in which it is argued that the indexer should ask, "how should I make this document ... visible to potential users? What terms should I use to convey its knowledge to those interested?" (Albrechtsen, 1993, 222). The basic idea is that indexers need to have the users' information needs and terminology in mind when determining the subject matter of documents as well as when selecting index terms.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 27
  • d 4
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 27
  • m 4
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications