-
Grimaldi, T.: ¬L'indicizzazione dal punto di vista cognitivo (II) (1996)
0.04
0.039942276 = product of:
0.11982682 = sum of:
0.07270195 = weight(_text_:t in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07270195 = score(doc=992,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.49242607 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.047124866 = weight(_text_:i in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047124866 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- T.1 in: Bibliotecario 1995, no.1, S.277-301
- Language
- i
-
Buchanan, B.: Theory of library classification (1979)
0.03
0.034054097 = product of:
0.10216229 = sum of:
0.03551765 = weight(_text_:u in 641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03551765 = score(doc=641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=641)
0.06664463 = weight(_text_:i in 641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06664463 = score(doc=641,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.4714662 = fieldWeight in 641, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=641)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Inhalt: Classification: definition and uses - The relationships between classes - Enumerative and faceted schemes - Decisions - The construction of a faceted scheme: I - The construction of a faceted scheme: II - Notation: I - Notation: II - Notation: III - The alphabetical subject index - General classification schemes - Objections to systematic order - Automatic classification
- Theme
- Grundlagen u. Einführungen: Allgemeine Literatur
-
Lang, F.: Klassifikation : T.1-2. (1979-80)
0.03
0.02968045 = product of:
0.17808269 = sum of:
0.17808269 = weight(_text_:t in 1775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17808269 = score(doc=1775,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
1.2061926 = fieldWeight in 1775, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1775)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- DK-Mitteilungen. 23(1979), S.11-13 (T.1); 24(1980), S.1-5 (T.2)
-
Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995)
0.03
0.028279748 = product of:
0.08483924 = sum of:
0.07214493 = weight(_text_:i in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07214493 = score(doc=5562,freq=12.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.51037717 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.01269431 = product of:
0.02538862 = sum of:
0.02538862 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02538862 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- For my segment of this program I'd like to focus on some basic qualities of classification schemes. These qualities are critical to our ability to truly organize knowledge for access. As I see it, there are at least five qualities of note. The first one of these properties that I want to talk about is "authoritative." By this I mean standardized, but I mean more than standardized with a built in consensus-building process. A classification scheme constructed by a collaborative, consensus-building process carries the approval, and the authority, of the discipline groups that contribute to it and that it affects... The next property of classification systems is "expandable," living, responsive, with a clear locus of responsibility for its continuous upkeep. The worst thing you can do with a thesaurus, or a classification scheme, is to finish it. You can't ever finish it because it reflects ongoing intellectual activity... The third property is "intuitive." That is, the system has to be approachable, it has to be transparent, or at least capable of being transparent. It has to have an underlying logic that supports the classification scheme but doesn't dominate it... The fourth property is "organized and logical." I advocate very strongly, and agree with Lois Chan, that classification must be based on a rule-based structure, on somebody's world-view of the syndetic structure... The fifth property is "universal" by which I mean the classification scheme needs be useable by any specific system or application, and be available as a language for multiple purposes.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.02
0.023513481 = product of:
0.07054044 = sum of:
0.050229546 = weight(_text_:u in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050229546 = score(doc=4339,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.40930554 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.020310897 = product of:
0.040621795 = sum of:
0.040621795 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040621795 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Pages
- S.1-22
- Source
- Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken: Theorie - Anwendung - Nutzen. Hrsg.: H. Alex, G. Bee u. U. Junger
-
Tennis, J.T.: Never facets alone : the evolving thought and persistent problems in Ranganathan's theories of classification (2017)
0.02
0.02128381 = product of:
0.06385142 = sum of:
0.022198534 = weight(_text_:u in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022198534 = score(doc=5800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
0.04165289 = weight(_text_:i in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04165289 = score(doc=5800,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan's theory of classification spans a number of works over a number of decades. And while he was devoted to solving many problems in the practice of librarianship, and is known as the father of library science in India (Garfield, 1984), his work in classification revolves around one central concern. His classification research addressed the problems that arose from introducing new ideas into a scheme for classification, while maintaining a meaningful hierarchical and systematically arranged order of classes. This is because hierarchical and systematically arranged classes are the defining characteristic of useful classification. To lose this order is to through the addition of new classes is to introduce confusion, if not chaos, and to move toward a useless classification - or at least one that requires complete revision. In the following chapter, I outline the stages, and the elements of those stages, in Ranganathan's thought on classification from 1926-1972, as well as posthumous work that continues his agenda. And while facets figure prominently in all of these stages; but for Ranganathan to achieve his goal, he must continually add to this central feature of his theory of classification. I will close this chapter with an outline of persistent problems that represent research fronts for the field. Chief among these are what to do about scheme change and the open question about the rigor of information modeling in light of semantic web developments.
- Source
- Dimensions of knowledge: facets for knowledge organization. Eds.: R.P. Smiraglia, u. H.-L. Lee
-
Perreault, J.: Categories and relators : a new schema (1994)
0.02
0.020660631 = product of:
0.061981894 = sum of:
0.02663824 = weight(_text_:u in 8863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02663824 = score(doc=8863,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 8863, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8863)
0.035343654 = weight(_text_:i in 8863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035343654 = score(doc=8863,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 8863, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8863)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Based on the works of Aristotle, Ramon Lull, I. Kant and the experiences with relationships published in the works of S.R. Ranganathan, E.de Grolier, J. Mills, J.C. Costello, E. Wall, R. Pagès, A. Leroy, P. Braffort, M. Kervégant, J.C. Gardin and J. Farradane, categories and relationships were collected, analyzed, grouped and classified in a triadic way so that a scheme resulted by which 120 relationships could be defined and identified by their positions and their codes. The exercise was meant to create and supply a tool for the replacement of the non-significant relation symbol, the colon, in the UDC by a letter code which could express the actual relationship contained in a classificatory statement. Examples for their application illustrate different cases occuring
- Footnote
- Reprint von: Rev. Int. Doc. 32(1965) no.4, S.136-144; dto. als FID/CR report no.4 u. im Buch des Verf.: Towards a theory for UDC. London: Bingley 1969, S.119-148
-
Beghtol, C.: Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning (2001)
0.02
0.020660631 = product of:
0.061981894 = sum of:
0.02663824 = weight(_text_:u in 1138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02663824 = score(doc=1138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1138)
0.035343654 = weight(_text_:i in 1138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035343654 = score(doc=1138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1138)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- In a changing information environment, we need to reassess each element of bibliographic control, including classification theories and systems. Every classification system is a theoretical construct imposed an "reality." The classificatory relationships that are assumed to be valuable have generally received less attention than the topics included in the systems. Relationships are functions of both the syntactic and semantic axes of classification systems, and both explicit and implicit relationships are discussed. Examples are drawn from a number of different systems, both bibliographic and non-bibliographic, and the cultural warrant (i. e., the sociocultural context) of classification systems is examined. The part-whole relationship is discussed as an example of a universally valid concept that is treated as a component of the cultural warrant of a classification system.
- Source
- Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
-
Dahlberg, I.: Einteilungsprinzipien von Klassifikationssystemen (1974)
0.02
0.01963536 = product of:
0.117812164 = sum of:
0.117812164 = weight(_text_:i in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.117812164 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.83344233 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Dimensions of knowledge : facets for knowledge organization (2017)
0.02
0.01810952 = product of:
0.05432856 = sum of:
0.03213003 = weight(_text_:t in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03213003 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
0.022198534 = weight(_text_:u in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022198534 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Inhalt: Richard P. Smiraglia: A Brief Introduction to Facets in Knowledge Organization / Kathryn La Barre: Interrogating Facet Theory: Decolonizing Knowledge Organization / Joseph T. Tennis: Never Facets Alone: The Evolving Thought and Persistent Problems in Ranganathan's Theories of Classification / M. P. Satija and Dong-Guen Oh: The DDC and the Knowledge Categories: Dewey did Faceting without Knowing It / Claudio Gnoli: Classifying Phenomena Part 3: Facets / Rick Szostak: Facet Analysis Without Facet Indicators / Elizabeth Milonas: An Examination of Facets within Search Engine Result Pages / Richard P. Smiraglia: Facets for Clustering and Disambiguation: The Domain Discourse of Facets in Knowledge Organization
- Editor
- Smiraglia, R.P. u. H.-L. Lee
-
Austin, D.: Basic concept classes and primitive relations (1982)
0.02
0.01666116 = product of:
0.09996695 = sum of:
0.09996695 = weight(_text_:i in 6580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09996695 = score(doc=6580,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.70719934 = fieldWeight in 6580, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6580)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Foskett, D.J.; Bury, S.: Concept organisation and universal classification schemes (1982)
0.02
0.01666116 = product of:
0.09996695 = sum of:
0.09996695 = weight(_text_:i in 17) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09996695 = score(doc=17,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.70719934 = fieldWeight in 17, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=17)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Kumar, K.: Theoretical bases for universal classification systems (1982)
0.02
0.01666116 = product of:
0.09996695 = sum of:
0.09996695 = weight(_text_:i in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09996695 = score(doc=34,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.70719934 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.02
0.016283326 = product of:
0.048849978 = sum of:
0.031077946 = weight(_text_:u in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031077946 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.017772034 = product of:
0.035544068 = sum of:
0.035544068 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035544068 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
Classification research for knowledge representation and organization : Proc. of the 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991 (1992)
0.02
0.015818095 = product of:
0.047454283 = sum of:
0.029782457 = weight(_text_:u in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029782457 = score(doc=2072,freq=10.0), product of:
0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.24268833 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.017671827 = weight(_text_:i in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017671827 = score(doc=2072,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.12501636 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: SVENONIUS, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities; BEALL, J.: Editing the Dewey Decimal Classification online: the evolution of the DDC database; BEGHTOL, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: Concept relation structures and their graphic display; FUGMANN, R.: Illusory goals in information science research; GILCHRIST, A.: UDC: the 1990's and beyond; GREEN, R.: The expression of syntagmatic relationships in indexing: are frame-based index languages the answer?; HUMPHREY, S.M.: Use and management of classification systems for knowledge-based indexing; MIKSA, F.L.: The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification; SCOTT, M. u. A.F. FONSECA: Methodology for functional appraisal of records and creation of a functional thesaurus; ALBRECHTSEN, H.: PRESS: a thesaurus-based information system for software reuse; AMAESHI, B.: A preliminary AAT compatible African art thesaurus; CHATTERJEE, A.: Structures of Indian classification systems of the pre-Ranganathan era and their impact on the Colon Classification; COCHRANE, P.A.: Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: A general versus a special algorithm in the graphic display of thesauri; DAHLBERG, I.: The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view: DRABENSTOTT, K.M., RIESTER, L.C. u. B.A.DEDE: Shelflisting using expert systems; FIDEL, R.: Thesaurus requirements for an intermediary expert system; GREEN, R.: Insights into classification from the cognitive sciences: ramifications for index languages; GROLIER, E. de: Towards a syndetic information retrieval system; GUENTHER, R.: The USMARC format for classification data: development and implementation; HOWARTH, L.C.: Factors influencing policies for the adoption and integration of revisions to classification schedules; HUDON, M.: Term definitions in subject thesauri: the Canadian literacy thesaurus experience; HUSAIN, S.: Notational techniques for the accomodation of subjects in Colon Classification 7th edition: theoretical possibility vis-à-vis practical need; KWASNIK, B.H. u. C. JORGERSEN: The exploration by means of repertory grids of semantic differences among names of official documents; MICCO, M.: Suggestions for automating the Library of Congress Classification schedules; PERREAULT, J.M.: An essay on the prehistory of general categories (II): G.W. Leibniz, Conrad Gesner; REES-POTTER, L.K.: How well do thesauri serve the social sciences?; REVIE, C.W. u. G. SMART: The construction and the use of faceted classification schema in technical domains; ROCKMORE, M.: Structuring a flexible faceted thsaurus record for corporate information retrieval; ROULIN, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus; SMITH, L.C.: UNISIST revisited: compatibility in the context of collaboratories; STILES, W.G.: Notes concerning the use chain indexing as a possible means of simulating the inductive leap within artificial intelligence; SVENONIUS, E., LIU, S. u. B. SUBRAHMANYAM: Automation in chain indexing; TURNER, J.: Structure in data in the Stockshot database at the National Film Board of Canada; VIZINE-GOETZ, D.: The Dewey Decimal Classification as an online classification tool; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Restructuring UDC: problems and possibilies; WILSON, A.: The hierarchy of belief: ideological tendentiousness in universal classification; WILSON, B.F.: An evaluation of the systematic botany schedule of the Universal Decimal Classification (English full edition, 1979); ZENG, L.: Research and development of classification and thesauri in China; CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
-
Gnoli, C.: Classificazione a facette (2004)
0.01
0.013744755 = product of:
0.082468525 = sum of:
0.082468525 = weight(_text_:i in 3746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082468525 = score(doc=3746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 3746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3746)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Language
- i
-
Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008)
0.01
0.011953158 = product of:
0.035859473 = sum of:
0.025704022 = weight(_text_:t in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025704022 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.17409891 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.010155449 = product of:
0.020310897 = sum of:
0.020310897 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020310897 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Potential and benefits of classification schemes and thesauri in building organizational taxonomies cannot be fully utilized by organizations. Empirical data of building an organizational taxonomy by the top-down approach of using classification schemes and thesauri appear to be lacking. The paper seeks to make a contribution in this regard. Design/methodology/approach - A case study of building an organizational taxonomy was conducted in the information studies domain for the Division of Information Studies at Nanyang Technology University, Singapore. The taxonomy was built by using the Dewey Decimal Classification, the Information Science Taxonomy, two information systems taxonomies, and three thesauri (ASIS&T, LISA, and ERIC). Findings - Classification schemes and thesauri were found to be helpful in creating the structure and categories related to the subject facet of the taxonomy, but organizational community sources had to be consulted and several methods had to be employed. The organizational activities and stakeholders' needs had to be identified to determine the objectives, facets, and the subject coverage of the taxonomy. Main categories were determined by identifying the stakeholders' interests and consulting organizational community sources and domain taxonomies. Category terms were selected from terminologies of classification schemes, domain taxonomies, and thesauri against the stakeholders' interests. Hierarchical structures of the main categories were constructed in line with the stakeholders' perspectives and the navigational role taking advantage of structures/term relationships from classification schemes and thesauri. Categories were determined in line with the concepts and the hierarchical levels. Format of categories were uniformed according to a commonly used standard. The consistency principle was employed to make the taxonomy structure and categories neater. Validation of the draft taxonomy through consultations with the stakeholders further refined the taxonomy. Originality/value - No similar study could be traced in the literature. The steps and methods used in the taxonomy development, and the information studies taxonomy itself, will be helpful for library and information schools and other similar organizations in their effort to develop taxonomies for organizing content and aiding navigation on organizational sites.
- Date
- 7.11.2008 15:22:04
-
Henrichs, N.: Gegenstandstheoretische Grundlagen der Bibliotheksklassifikation? (1979)
0.01
0.011781218 = product of:
0.07068731 = sum of:
0.07068731 = weight(_text_:i in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07068731 = score(doc=1423,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Klassifikation und Erkenntnis I. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 1 "Klassifikation und Wissensgewinnung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
-
DIN 32705: Klassifikationssysteme: Erstellung und Weiterentwicklung von Klassifikationssystemen (1987)
0.01
0.011781218 = product of:
0.07068731 = sum of:
0.07068731 = weight(_text_:i in 1653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07068731 = score(doc=1653,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 1653, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1653)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Vgl. zur Einführung in die Norm auch die Beiträge von W. Gödert: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme ... in: Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 11(1987) und I. Dahlberg: DIN 32705: ... in: International classification 19(1992)
-
Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015)
0.01
0.011630948 = product of:
0.034892842 = sum of:
0.022198534 = weight(_text_:u in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022198534 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.01269431 = product of:
0.02538862 = sum of:
0.02538862 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02538862 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 8.11.2015 21:27:22
- Source
- Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
