-
Vander Wal, T.: Welcome to the Matrix! (2008)
0.04
0.044273335 = product of:
0.08854667 = sum of:
0.025704022 = weight(_text_:t in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025704022 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.17409891 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
0.052687205 = weight(_text_:i in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052687205 = score(doc=2881,freq=10.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.37272677 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
0.010155449 = product of:
0.020310897 = sum of:
0.020310897 = weight(_text_:22 in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020310897 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- My keynote at the workshop "Social Tagging in Knowledge Organization" was a great opportunity to make and share new experiences. For the first time ever, I sat in my office at home and gave a live web video presentation to a conference audience elsewhere on the globe. At the same time, it was also an opportunity to premier my conceptual model "Matrix of Perception" to an interdisciplinary audience of researchers and practitioners with a variety of backgrounds - reaching from philosophy, psychology, pedagogy and computation to library science and economics. The interdisciplinary approach of the conference is also mirrored in the structure of this volume, with articles on the theoretical background, the empirical analysis and the potential applications of tagging, for instance in university libraries, e-learning, or e-commerce. As an introduction to the topic of "social tagging" I would like to draw your attention to some foundation concepts of the phenomenon I have racked my brain with for the last few month. One thing I have seen missing in recent research and system development is a focus on the variety of user perspectives in social tagging. Different people perceive tagging in complex variegated ways and use this form of knowledge organization for a variety of purposes. My analytical interest lies in understanding the personas and patterns in tagging systems and in being able to label their different perceptions. To come up with a concise picture of user expectations, needs and activities, I have broken down the perspectives on tagging into two different categories, namely "faces" and "depth". When put together, they form the "Matrix of Perception" - a nuanced view of stakeholders and their respective levels of participation.
- Date
- 22. 6.2009 9:15:45
-
Peters, I.: Benutzerzentrierte Erschließungsverfahren (2013)
0.03
0.034434386 = product of:
0.10330315 = sum of:
0.044397067 = weight(_text_:u in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044397067 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
0.058906082 = weight(_text_:i in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058906082 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
-
Hotho, A.; Jäschke, R.; Benz, D.; Grahl, M.; Krause, B.; Schmitz, C.; Stumme, G.: Social Bookmarking am Beispiel BibSonomy (2009)
0.03
0.028975233 = product of:
0.0869257 = sum of:
0.051408045 = weight(_text_:t in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051408045 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
0.03551765 = weight(_text_:u in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03551765 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
-
Marchitelli, A.; Piazzini, T.: OPAC, SOPAC e social networking : cataloghi di biblioteca 2.0? (2008)
0.03
0.028738767 = product of:
0.0862163 = sum of:
0.04498204 = weight(_text_:t in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04498204 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
0.041234262 = weight(_text_:i in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041234262 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- i
-
Abreu, A.: "Every bit informs another" : framework analysis for descriptive practice and linked information (2008)
0.03
0.028738767 = product of:
0.0862163 = sum of:
0.04498204 = weight(_text_:t in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04498204 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
0.041234262 = weight(_text_:i in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041234262 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- The independent traditions of description in bibliographic and archival environments are rich and continually evolving. Recognizing this, how can Libraries, Archives and Museums seek convergence in describing materials on the web? In order to seek better description for materials and cross-institutional alignment, we can first reconceptualize where description may fit into work practices. I examine subject cataloging and archival practice alongside social tagging as a means of drawing conclusions for possible new paths in integration.
- Source
- Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
-
Simon, J.: Interdisciplinary knowledge creation : using wikis in science (2006)
0.03
0.027034871 = product of:
0.081104614 = sum of:
0.022198534 = weight(_text_:u in 2516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022198534 = score(doc=2516,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2516, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2516)
0.058906082 = weight(_text_:i in 2516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058906082 = score(doc=2516,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 2516, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2516)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This article focuses on two aspects of knowledge generation. First, I want to explore how new knowledge is created in interdisciplinary discourses and, second, how this process might be mediated and promoted by the use of wikis. I suggest that it is the noise coming to life in (ex)changes of perspectives that enables the creation of new knowledge. In section 1-4, I am going to examine how the concepts of noise from the mathematical theory of communication (Shannon 1948) on the one hand and theories of organizational knowledge creation (cf. Nonaka 1994) on the other might help to understand the process of interdisciplinary knowledge creation. In section 5 I am going to explore the role wiki technologies can play in supporting interdisciplinary collaborations. This section is influenced by own experiences in a wiki-based interdisciplinary collaboration. It seems that even though certain features of wiki technology make it an excellent tool to externalize and combine individual knowledge leaving room for noise and at the same time documenting this process, the full benefit of wikis can only be obtained if they are embedded into a broader communication context.
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Blumauer, A.; Hochmeister, M.: Tag-Recommender gestützte Annotation von Web-Dokumenten (2009)
0.03
0.025353327 = product of:
0.07605998 = sum of:
0.04498204 = weight(_text_:t in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04498204 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
0.031077946 = weight(_text_:u in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031077946 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
-
Fox, M.J.: Communities of practice, gender and social tagging (2012)
0.02
0.020660631 = product of:
0.061981894 = sum of:
0.02663824 = weight(_text_:u in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02663824 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
0.035343654 = weight(_text_:i in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035343654 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Social or collaborative tagging enables users to organize and label resources on the web. Libraries and other information environments hope that tagging can complement professional subject access with user-created terms. But who are the taggers, and does their language represent that of the user population? Some language theorists believe that inherent variables, such as gender or race, can be responsible for language use, whereas other researchers endorse more multiply-influenced practice-based approaches, where interactions with others affect language use more than a single variable. To explore whether linguistic variation in tagging is influenced more by gender or context, in this exploratory study, I will analyze the content and quantity of tags used on LibraryThing. This study seeks to dismantle stereotypical views of women's language use and to suggest a community of practice-based approach to analyzing social tags.
- Source
- Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
-
Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Scott, J.: Social bookmarking tools (I) : a general review (2005)
0.02
0.020321377 = product of:
0.06096413 = sum of:
0.031807106 = weight(_text_:t in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031807106 = score(doc=1188,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.2154364 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.029157026 = weight(_text_:i in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029157026 = score(doc=1188,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.20626646 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Because, to paraphrase a pop music lyric from a certain rock and roll band of yesterday, "the Web is old, the Web is new, the Web is all, the Web is you", it seems like we might have to face up to some of these stark realities. With the introduction of new social software applications such as blogs, wikis, newsfeeds, social networks, and bookmarking tools (the subject of this paper), the claim that Shelley Powers makes in a Burningbird blog entry seems apposite: "This is the user's web now, which means it's my web and I can make the rules." Reinvention is revolution - it brings us always back to beginnings. We are here going to remind you of hyperlinks in all their glory, sell you on the idea of bookmarking hyperlinks, point you at other folks who are doing the same, and tell you why this is a good thing. Just as long as those hyperlinks (or let's call them plain old links) are managed, tagged, commented upon, and published onto the Web, they represent a user's own personal library placed on public record, which - when aggregated with other personal libraries - allows for rich, social networking opportunities. Why spill any ink (digital or not) in rewriting what someone else has already written about instead of just pointing at the original story and adding the merest of titles, descriptions and tags for future reference? More importantly, why not make these personal 'link playlists' available to oneself and to others from whatever browser or computer one happens to be using at the time? This paper reviews some current initiatives, as of early 2005, in providing public link management applications on the Web - utilities that are often referred to under the general moniker of 'social bookmarking tools'. There are a couple of things going on here: 1) server-side software aimed specifically at managing links with, crucially, a strong, social networking flavour, and 2) an unabashedly open and unstructured approach to tagging, or user classification, of those links.
-
Niemann, C.: Intelligenz im Chaos : erste Schritte zur Analyse des Kreativen Potenzials eines Tagging-Systems (2010)
0.02
0.01810952 = product of:
0.05432856 = sum of:
0.03213003 = weight(_text_:t in 4375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03213003 = score(doc=4375,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 4375, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4375)
0.022198534 = weight(_text_:u in 4375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022198534 = score(doc=4375,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4375, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4375)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- ¬The Ne(x)t generation: das Angebot der Bibliotheken; 30. Österreichischer Bibliothekartag, Graz, 15.-18.9.2009. Hrsg.: Ute Bergner u. Erhard Göbel
-
Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007)
0.01
0.014049118 = product of:
0.042147353 = sum of:
0.029453041 = weight(_text_:i in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029453041 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.01269431 = product of:
0.02538862 = sum of:
0.02538862 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02538862 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- More and more users index everything on their own in the web 2.0. There are services for links, videos, pictures, books, encyclopaedic articles and scientific articles. All these services are library independent. But must that really be? Can't libraries help with their experience and tools to make user indexing better? On the experience of a project from German language Wikipedia together with the German person authority files (Personen Namen Datei - PND) located at German National Library (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) I would like to show what is possible. How users can and will use the authority files, if we let them. We will take a look how the project worked and what we can learn for future projects. Conclusions - Authority files can have a role in the web 2.0 - there must be an open interface/ service for retrieval - everything that is indexed on the net with authority files can be easy integrated in a federated search - O'Reilly: You have to found ways that your data get more important that more it will be used
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies : indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0 (2009)
0.01
0.013773753 = product of:
0.04132126 = sum of:
0.017758826 = weight(_text_:u in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017758826 = score(doc=4203,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
0.023562433 = weight(_text_:i in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023562433 = score(doc=4203,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Footnote
- Zugl.: Düsseldorf, Univ., Diss., 2009 u.d.T.: Peters, Isabella: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval Rez. in: IWP - Information Wissenschaft & Praxis, 61(2010) Heft 8, S.469-470 (U. Spree): "... Nachdem sich die Rezensentin durch 418 Seiten Text hindurch gelesen hat, bleibt sie unentschieden, wie der auffällige Einsatz langer Zitate (im Durchschnitt drei Zitate, die länger als vier kleingedruckte Zeilen sind, pro Seite) zu bewerten ist, zumal die Zitate nicht selten rein illustrativen Charakter haben bzw. Isabella Peters noch einmal zitiert, was sie bereits in eigenen Worten ausgedrückt hat. Redundanz und Verlängerung der Lesezeit halten sich hier die Waage mit der Möglichkeit, dass sich die Leserin einen unmittelbaren Eindruck von Sprache und Duktus der zitierten Literatur verschaffen kann. Eindeutig unschön ist das Beenden eines Gedankens oder einer Argumentation durch ein Zitat (z. B. S. 170). Im deutschen Original entstehen auf diese Weise die für deutsche wissenschaftliche Qualifikationsarbeiten typischen denglischen Texte. Für alle, die sich für Wissensrepräsentation, Information Retrieval und kollaborative Informationsdienste interessieren, ist "Folksonomies : Indexing and Retrieval in Web 2.0" trotz der angeführten kleinen Mängel zur Lektüre und Anschaffung - wegen seines beinahe enzyklopädischen Charakters auch als Nachschlage- oder Referenzwerk geeignet - unbedingt zu empfehlen. Abschließend möchte ich mich in einem Punkt der Produktinfo von de Gruyter uneingeschränkt anschließen: ein "Grundlagenwerk für Folksonomies".
-
Feinberg, M.: Expressive bibliography : personal collections in public space (2011)
0.01
0.013744755 = product of:
0.082468525 = sum of:
0.082468525 = weight(_text_:i in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082468525 = score(doc=4561,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This paper examines collections of citations that individual users contribute to social tagging systems such as Delicious and LibraryThing. I characterize these personal collections, furnished with various forms of metadata and arranged for Web display, as a means of communication, where a particular sensibility molds guiding principles for resource selection, description, and categorization. Using several analytic frameworks from museum studies, I present three brief case studies that interrogate both the substance and the means of expression achieved in such collections, which I term "expressive bibliographies." In considering these case studies, I explore how an explicit rhetorical perspective might inform purposeful design of expressive bibliography.
-
Shirky, C.: Ontology is overrated : categories, links, and tags (2005)
0.01
0.012987573 = product of:
0.077925436 = sum of:
0.077925436 = weight(_text_:i in 1265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077925436 = score(doc=1265,freq=14.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.55127037 = fieldWeight in 1265, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1265)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Today I want to talk about categorization, and I want to convince you that a lot of what we think we know about categorization is wrong. In particular, I want to convince you that many of the ways we're attempting to apply categorization to the electronic world are actually a bad fit, because we've adopted habits of mind that are left over from earlier strategies. I also want to convince you that what we're seeing when we see the Web is actually a radical break with previous categorization strategies, rather than an extension of them. The second part of the talk is more speculative, because it is often the case that old systems get broken before people know what's going to take their place. (Anyone watching the music industry can see this at work today.) That's what I think is happening with categorization. What I think is coming instead are much more organic ways of organizing information than our current categorization schemes allow, based on two units -- the link, which can point to anything, and the tag, which is a way of attaching labels to links. The strategy of tagging -- free-form labeling, without regard to categorical constraints -- seems like a recipe for disaster, but as the Web has shown us, you can extract a surprising amount of value from big messy data sets.
- Footnote
- This piece is based on two talks I gave in the spring of 2005 -- one at the O'Reilly ETech conference in March, entitled "Ontology Is Overrated", and one at the IMCExpo in April entitled "Folksonomies & Tags: The rise of user-developed classification." The written version is a heavily edited concatenation of those two talks.
-
Blank, M.; Bopp, T.; Hampel, T.; Schulte, J.: Social Tagging = Soziale Suche? (2008)
0.01
0.010602369 = product of:
0.06361421 = sum of:
0.06361421 = weight(_text_:t in 2888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06361421 = score(doc=2888,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.4308728 = fieldWeight in 2888, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2888)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Derntl, M.; Hampel, T.; Motschnig, R.; Pitner, T.: Social Tagging und Inclusive Universal Access (2008)
0.01
0.009087745 = product of:
0.054526467 = sum of:
0.054526467 = weight(_text_:t in 2864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054526467 = score(doc=2864,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.36931956 = fieldWeight in 2864, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2864)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Seehaus, S.: Können Suchmaschinen von Sozialer Software profitieren? (2008)
0.01
0.0085680075 = product of:
0.051408045 = sum of:
0.051408045 = weight(_text_:t in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051408045 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Im Rahmen eines Projekts gingen Studierende an der HAW Hamburg für ihre Auftraggeber Lycos Europe und T-Online der Frage nach, wie sich Inhalte aus sozialen Suchdiensten in die algorithmische Suche einbinden lassen. Dazu analysierten und verglichen sie die Vor- und Nachteile der Systeme, die Relevanz der Suchergebnisse, die Benutzerfreundlichkeit sowie die Qualität der Inhalte. Für soziale Software ergaben sich daraus bedeutende Verbesserungspotentiale. Der Text beschreibt die Ergebnisse und die Empfehlungen für Lycos IQ.
-
Raban, D.R.; Ronen, I.; Guy, I.: Acting or reacting? : Preferential attachment in a people-tagging system (2011)
0.01
0.00833058 = product of:
0.049983475 = sum of:
0.049983475 = weight(_text_:i in 4371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049983475 = score(doc=4371,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 4371, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4371)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011)
0.01
0.007854145 = product of:
0.047124866 = sum of:
0.047124866 = weight(_text_:i in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047124866 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Flack, M.: Social bookmarking tools (II) : a case study - Connotea (2005)
0.01
0.0075731203 = product of:
0.04543872 = sum of:
0.04543872 = weight(_text_:t in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04543872 = score(doc=1189,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.037477795 = queryNorm
0.3077663 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
