Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Folksonomies"
  1. Watters, C.; Nizam, N.: Knowledge organization on the Web : the emergent role of social classification (2012) 0.01
    0.013544176 = product of:
      0.047404613 = sum of:
        0.01691658 = product of:
          0.03383316 = sum of:
            0.03383316 = weight(_text_:c in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03383316 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.030488033 = weight(_text_:u in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030488033 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
  2. Peters, I.: Folksonomies : indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0 (2009) 0.01
    0.011526821 = product of:
      0.040343873 = sum of:
        0.017421734 = weight(_text_:u in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017421734 = score(doc=4203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
        0.02292214 = weight(_text_:g in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02292214 = score(doc=4203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.165991 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Footnote
    Zugl.: Düsseldorf, Univ., Diss., 2009 u.d.T.: Peters, Isabella: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval Rez. in: IWP - Information Wissenschaft & Praxis, 61(2010) Heft 8, S.469-470 (U. Spree): "... Nachdem sich die Rezensentin durch 418 Seiten Text hindurch gelesen hat, bleibt sie unentschieden, wie der auffällige Einsatz langer Zitate (im Durchschnitt drei Zitate, die länger als vier kleingedruckte Zeilen sind, pro Seite) zu bewerten ist, zumal die Zitate nicht selten rein illustrativen Charakter haben bzw. Isabella Peters noch einmal zitiert, was sie bereits in eigenen Worten ausgedrückt hat. Redundanz und Verlängerung der Lesezeit halten sich hier die Waage mit der Möglichkeit, dass sich die Leserin einen unmittelbaren Eindruck von Sprache und Duktus der zitierten Literatur verschaffen kann. Eindeutig unschön ist das Beenden eines Gedankens oder einer Argumentation durch ein Zitat (z. B. S. 170). Im deutschen Original entstehen auf diese Weise die für deutsche wissenschaftliche Qualifikationsarbeiten typischen denglischen Texte. Für alle, die sich für Wissensrepräsentation, Information Retrieval und kollaborative Informationsdienste interessieren, ist "Folksonomies : Indexing and Retrieval in Web 2.0" trotz der angeführten kleinen Mängel zur Lektüre und Anschaffung - wegen seines beinahe enzyklopädischen Charakters auch als Nachschlage- oder Referenzwerk geeignet - unbedingt zu empfehlen. Abschließend möchte ich mich in einem Punkt der Produktinfo von de Gruyter uneingeschränkt anschließen: ein "Grundlagenwerk für Folksonomies".
    Weitere Rez. in: Library review 59(2010) no.7, S.566-568 (G. Macgregor)
  3. Spiteri, L.: ¬The structure and form of folksonomy tags : the road to the public library catalogue (2007) 0.00
    0.0049776384 = product of:
      0.034843467 = sum of:
        0.034843467 = weight(_text_:u in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034843467 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
  4. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.00
    0.00426972 = product of:
      0.02988804 = sum of:
        0.02988804 = product of:
          0.05977608 = sum of:
            0.05977608 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05977608 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  5. Macgregor, G.; McCulloch, E.: Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool (2006) 0.00
    0.004093239 = product of:
      0.028652674 = sum of:
        0.028652674 = weight(_text_:g in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028652674 = score(doc=764,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  6. Solskinnsbakk, G.; Gulla, J.A.; Haderlein, V.; Myrseth, P.; Cerrato, O.: Quality of hierarchies in ontologies and folksonomies (2012) 0.00
    0.004093239 = product of:
      0.028652674 = sum of:
        0.028652674 = weight(_text_:g in 1034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028652674 = score(doc=1034,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 1034, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1034)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  7. Peters, I.: Folksonomies, social tagging and information retrieval (2011) 0.00
    0.0037332284 = product of:
      0.026132599 = sum of:
        0.026132599 = weight(_text_:u in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026132599 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Innovations in information retrieval: perspectives for theory and practice. Eds.: A. Foster, u. P. Rafferty
  8. Kim, H.H.: Toward video semantic search based on a structured folksonomy (2011) 0.00
    0.0031110242 = product of:
      0.021777168 = sum of:
        0.021777168 = weight(_text_:u in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021777168 = score(doc=4350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  9. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.00
    0.0025159568 = product of:
      0.017611697 = sum of:
        0.017611697 = product of:
          0.035223395 = sum of:
            0.035223395 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035223395 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  10. Schwartz, C.: Thesauri and facets and tags, Oh my! : a look at three decades in subject analysis (2008) 0.00
    0.0024166545 = product of:
      0.01691658 = sum of:
        0.01691658 = product of:
          0.03383316 = sum of:
            0.03383316 = weight(_text_:c in 5566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03383316 = score(doc=5566,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 5566, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5566)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  11. Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008) 0.00
    0.00213486 = product of:
      0.01494402 = sum of:
        0.01494402 = product of:
          0.02988804 = sum of:
            0.02988804 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02988804 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2008 12:39:22
  12. Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008) 0.00
    0.0017790502 = product of:
      0.012453351 = sum of:
        0.012453351 = product of:
          0.024906702 = sum of:
            0.024906702 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024906702 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  13. Shirky, C.: Ontology is overrated : categories, links, and tags (2005) 0.00
    0.0017261818 = product of:
      0.012083272 = sum of:
        0.012083272 = product of:
          0.024166545 = sum of:
            0.024166545 = weight(_text_:c in 1265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024166545 = score(doc=1265,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1265, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1265)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  14. Park, H.: ¬A conceptual framework to study folksonomic interaction (2011) 0.00
    0.0017261818 = product of:
      0.012083272 = sum of:
        0.012083272 = product of:
          0.024166545 = sum of:
            0.024166545 = weight(_text_:c in 4852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024166545 = score(doc=4852,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4852, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4852)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes a conceptual framework to recast a folksonomy as a Web classification and to use this to explore the ways in which people work with it in assessing, sharing, and navigating Web resources. The author uses information scent and foraging theory as a context to discuss how folksonomy is constructed through interactions among users, a folksonomic system, and a given domain that consists of a group of users who share the same interest or goals. The discussion centers on two dimensions of folksonomies: (1) folksonomy as a Web classification which puts like information together in a Web context; and (2) folksonomy as information scent which helps users to find related resources and users, and obtain desired information. This paper aims to integrate these two dimensions with a conceptual framework that addresses the structure of a folksonomy shaped by users' interactions. A proposed framework consists of three components of users' interactions with a folksonomy: (a) tagging - cognitive categorization of Web accessible resources by an individual user; (b) navigation - exploration and discovery of Web accessible resources in the folksonomic system; and (c) knowledge sharing - representation and communication of knowledge within a domain. This understanding will help us motivate possible future directions of research in folksonomy. This initial framework will frame a number of research questions and help lay the groundwork for future empirical research which focuses on qualitative analysis of a folksonomy and users' tagging behaviors.
  15. Moreiro-González, J.-A.; Bolaños-Mejías, C.: Folksonomy indexing from the assignment of free tags to setup subject : a search analysis into the domain of legal history (2018) 0.00
    0.0017261818 = product of:
      0.012083272 = sum of:
        0.012083272 = product of:
          0.024166545 = sum of:
            0.024166545 = weight(_text_:c in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024166545 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)