Search (79 results, page 4 of 4)

0.0049776384 = product of:
  0.034843467 = sum of:
    0.034843467 = weight(_text_:u in 1186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034843467 = score(doc=1186,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036766402 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1186, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1186)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng

0.0049776384 = product of:
  0.034843467 = sum of:
    0.034843467 = weight(_text_:u in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034843467 = score(doc=1193,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036766402 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng

0.0049776384 = product of:
  0.034843467 = sum of:
    0.034843467 = weight(_text_:u in 1378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034843467 = score(doc=1378,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036766402 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1378, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1378)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Editor

Mugnier, M.L. u. M. Chein

0.004833309 = product of:
  0.03383316 = sum of:
    0.03383316 = product of:
      0.06766632 = sum of:
        0.06766632 = weight(_text_:c in 2005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06766632 = score(doc=2005,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 2005, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2005)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.0043554334 = product of:
  0.030488033 = sum of:
    0.030488033 = weight(_text_:u in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030488033 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036766402 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Klassifikation und Erkenntnis II. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 2 u. 3 "Wissensdarstellung und Wissensvermittlung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979

0.00426972 = product of:
  0.02988804 = sum of:
    0.02988804 = product of:
      0.05977608 = sum of:
        0.05977608 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05977608 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)

0.0041428367 = product of:
  0.028999854 = sum of:
    0.028999854 = product of:
      0.057999708 = sum of:
        0.057999708 = weight(_text_:c in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057999708 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.0037332284 = product of:
  0.026132599 = sum of:
    0.026132599 = weight(_text_:u in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026132599 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036766402 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng

0.0037332284 = product of:
  0.026132599 = sum of:
    0.026132599 = weight(_text_:u in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026132599 = score(doc=1207,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036766402 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng

0.0037332284 = product of:
  0.026132599 = sum of:
    0.026132599 = weight(_text_:u in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026132599 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036766402 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.0031110242 = product of:
  0.021777168 = sum of:
    0.021777168 = weight(_text_:u in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021777168 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036766402 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.0031110242 = product of:
  0.021777168 = sum of:
    0.021777168 = weight(_text_:u in 3217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021777168 = score(doc=3217,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036766402 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 3217, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3217)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Frames, fields and contrasts: new essays in semantic and lexical organization. Eds.: A. Lehrer u. E.F. Kittay

0.00213486 = product of:
  0.01494402 = sum of:
    0.01494402 = product of:
      0.02988804 = sum of:
        0.02988804 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02988804 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx

0.0017790502 = product of:
  0.012453351 = sum of:
    0.012453351 = product of:
      0.024906702 = sum of:
        0.024906702 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024906702 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

22. 1.2012 13:11:25

0.0017790502 = product of:
  0.012453351 = sum of:
    0.012453351 = product of:
      0.024906702 = sum of:
        0.024906702 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024906702 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

11.12.2019 19:00:22

0.0017261818 = product of:
  0.012083272 = sum of:
    0.012083272 = product of:
      0.024166545 = sum of:
        0.024166545 = weight(_text_:c in 7868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024166545 = score(doc=7868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 7868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7868)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.0017261818 = product of:
  0.012083272 = sum of:
    0.012083272 = product of:
      0.024166545 = sum of:
        0.024166545 = weight(_text_:c in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024166545 = score(doc=2527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.0012083272 = product of:
  0.00845829 = sum of:
    0.00845829 = product of:
      0.01691658 = sum of:
        0.01691658 = weight(_text_:c in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01691658 = score(doc=1077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.

0.0010357092 = product of:
  0.0072499635 = sum of:
    0.0072499635 = product of:
      0.014499927 = sum of:
        0.014499927 = weight(_text_:c in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014499927 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.114332706 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Content

Concepts and Language: The Role of Conceptual Structure in Human Evolution (Keith Devlin) - Concepts in Linguistics - Concepts in Natural Language (Gisela Harras) - Patterns, Schemata, and Types: Author Support through Formalized Experience (Felix H. Gatzemeier) - Conventions and Notations for Knowledge Representation and Retrieval (Philippe Martin) - Conceptual Ontology: Ontology, Metadata, and Semiotics (John F. Sowa) - Pragmatically Yours (Mary Keeler) - Conceptual Modeling for Distributed Ontology Environments (Deborah L. McGuinness) - Discovery of Class Relations in Exception Structured Knowledge Bases (Hendra Suryanto, Paul Compton) - Conceptual Graphs: Perspectives: CGs Applications: Where Are We 7 Years after the First ICCS ? (Michel Chein, David Genest) - The Engineering of a CC-Based System: Fundamental Issues (Guy W. Mineau) - Conceptual Graphs, Metamodeling, and Notation of Concepts (Olivier Gerbé, Guy W. Mineau, Rudolf K. Keller) - Knowledge Representation and Reasonings: Based on Graph Homomorphism (Marie-Laure Mugnier) - User Modeling Using Conceptual Graphs for Intelligent Agents (James F. Baldwin, Trevor P. Martin, Aimilia Tzanavari) - Towards a Unified Querying System of Both Structured and Semi-structured Imprecise Data Using Fuzzy View (Patrice Buche, Ollivier Haemmerlé) - Formal Semantics of Conceptual Structures: The Extensional Semantics of the Conceptual Graph Formalism (Guy W. Mineau) - Semantics of Attribute Relations in Conceptual Graphs (Pavel Kocura) - Nested Concept Graphs and Triadic Power Context Families (Susanne Prediger) - Negations in Simple Concept Graphs (Frithjof Dau) - Extending the CG Model by Simulations (Jean-François Baget) - Contextual Logic and Formal Concept Analysis: Building and Structuring Description Logic Knowledge Bases: Using Least Common Subsumers and Concept Analysis (Franz Baader, Ralf Molitor) - On the Contextual Logic of Ordinal Data (Silke Pollandt, Rudolf Wille) - Boolean Concept Logic (Rudolf Wille) - Lattices of Triadic Concept Graphs (Bernd Groh, Rudolf Wille) - Formalizing Hypotheses with Concepts (Bernhard Ganter, Sergei 0. Kuznetsov) - Generalized Formal Concept Analysis (Laurent Chaudron, Nicolas Maille) - A Logical Generalization of Formal Concept Analysis (Sébastien Ferré, Olivier Ridoux) - On the Treatment of Incomplete Knowledge in Formal Concept Analysis (Peter Burmeister, Richard Holzer) - Conceptual Structures in Practice: Logic-Based Networks: Concept Graphs and Conceptual Structures (Peter W. Eklund) - Conceptual Knowledge Discovery and Data Analysis (Joachim Hereth, Gerd Stumme, Rudolf Wille, Uta Wille) - CEM - A Conceptual Email Manager (Richard Cole, Gerd Stumme) - A Contextual-Logic Extension of TOSCANA (Peter Eklund, Bernd Groh, Gerd Stumme, Rudolf Wille) - A Conceptual Graph Model for W3C Resource Description Framework (Olivier Corby, Rose Dieng, Cédric Hébert) - Computational Aspects of Conceptual Structures: Computing with Conceptual Structures (Bernhard Ganter) - Symmetry and the Computation of Conceptual Structures (Robert Levinson) An Introduction to SNePS 3 (Stuart C. Shapiro) - Composition Norm Dynamics Calculation with Conceptual Graphs (Aldo de Moor) - From PROLOG++ to PROLOG+CG: A CG Object-Oriented Logic Programming Language (Adil Kabbaj, Martin Janta-Polczynski) - A Cost-Bounded Algorithm to Control Events Generalization (Gaël de Chalendar, Brigitte Grau, Olivier Ferret)