-
Ohly, H.P.: ¬Der 'Stand der Technik' : eine bibliometrische Betrachtungsweise (2000)
0.35
0.3483444 = product of:
0.48768213 = sum of:
0.16002479 = weight(_text_:h.p in 6644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16002479 = score(doc=6644,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21695226 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9008293 = idf(docFreq=328, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.73760366 = fieldWeight in 6644, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.9008293 = idf(docFreq=328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6644)
0.1663719 = weight(_text_:ohly in 6644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1663719 = score(doc=6644,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22121295 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0167146 = idf(docFreq=292, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.7520893 = fieldWeight in 6644, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.0167146 = idf(docFreq=292, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6644)
0.034843467 = weight(_text_:u in 6644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034843467 = score(doc=6644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 6644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6644)
0.04584428 = weight(_text_:g in 6644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04584428 = score(doc=6644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 6644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6644)
0.08059767 = product of:
0.16119534 = sum of:
0.16119534 = weight(_text_:rahmstorf in 6644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16119534 = score(doc=6644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25894308 = queryWeight, product of:
7.042927 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.62251264 = fieldWeight in 6644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.042927 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.71428573 = coord(5/7)
- Source
- Globalisierung und Wissensorganisation: Neue Aspekte für Wissen, Wissenschaft und Informationssysteme: Proceedings der 6. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Hamburg, 23.-25.9.1999. Hrsg.: H.P. Ohly, G. Rahmstorf u. A. Sigel
-
Bonitz, M.; Scharnhorst, A.: National science systems and the Matthew effect for countries (2000)
0.21
0.21004431 = product of:
0.29406202 = sum of:
0.08486596 = weight(_text_:h.p in 6643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08486596 = score(doc=6643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21695226 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9008293 = idf(docFreq=328, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.39117342 = fieldWeight in 6643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9008293 = idf(docFreq=328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6643)
0.08823202 = weight(_text_:ohly in 6643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08823202 = score(doc=6643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22121295 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0167146 = idf(docFreq=292, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.39885557 = fieldWeight in 6643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0167146 = idf(docFreq=292, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6643)
0.026132599 = weight(_text_:u in 6643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026132599 = score(doc=6643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 6643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6643)
0.034383208 = weight(_text_:g in 6643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034383208 = score(doc=6643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 6643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6643)
0.060448255 = product of:
0.12089651 = sum of:
0.12089651 = weight(_text_:rahmstorf in 6643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12089651 = score(doc=6643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25894308 = queryWeight, product of:
7.042927 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.4668845 = fieldWeight in 6643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.042927 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6643)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.71428573 = coord(5/7)
- Source
- Globalisierung und Wissensorganisation: Neue Aspekte für Wissen, Wissenschaft und Informationssysteme: Proceedings der 6. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Hamburg, 23.-25.9.1999. Hrsg.: H.P. Ohly, G. Rahmstorf u. A. Sigel
-
Wagner-Döbler, R.: Kognitive Mobilität und Zipfs "Principle of Least Effort" (2004)
0.11
0.111244656 = product of:
0.19467814 = sum of:
0.07072163 = weight(_text_:h.p in 3159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07072163 = score(doc=3159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21695226 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9008293 = idf(docFreq=328, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.32597783 = fieldWeight in 3159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9008293 = idf(docFreq=328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3159)
0.07352668 = weight(_text_:ohly in 3159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07352668 = score(doc=3159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22121295 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0167146 = idf(docFreq=292, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.33237964 = fieldWeight in 3159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0167146 = idf(docFreq=292, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3159)
0.021777168 = weight(_text_:u in 3159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021777168 = score(doc=3159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 3159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3159)
0.028652674 = weight(_text_:g in 3159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028652674 = score(doc=3159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 3159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3159)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Source
- Wissensorganisation in kooperativen Lern- und Arbeitsumgebungen: Proceedings der 8. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Regensburg, 9.-11. Oktober 2002. Hrsg.: G. Budin u. H.P. Ohly
-
Ohly, H.P.: State-of-the-art reports : a bibliometric point of view (2000)
0.09
0.09379895 = product of:
0.21886422 = sum of:
0.01691658 = product of:
0.03383316 = sum of:
0.03383316 = weight(_text_:c in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03383316 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.09901028 = weight(_text_:h.p in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09901028 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21695226 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9008293 = idf(docFreq=328, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.45636898 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9008293 = idf(docFreq=328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
0.102937356 = weight(_text_:ohly in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102937356 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22121295 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0167146 = idf(docFreq=292, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.4653315 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0167146 = idf(docFreq=292, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Source
- Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
-
Ohly, K.P.: Bibliometrie in der Postmoderne (2006)
0.06
0.05989854 = product of:
0.20964488 = sum of:
0.08486596 = weight(_text_:h.p in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08486596 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21695226 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9008293 = idf(docFreq=328, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.39117342 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9008293 = idf(docFreq=328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
0.12477893 = weight(_text_:ohly in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12477893 = score(doc=5865,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22121295 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0167146 = idf(docFreq=292, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.564067 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.0167146 = idf(docFreq=292, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Wissensorganisation und Verantwortung: Gesellschaftliche, ökonomische und technische Aspekte. Proceedings der 9. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Duisburg, 5.-7. November 2004. Hrsg. von H.P. Ohly u.a
-
Tscherteu, G.; Langreiter, C.: Explorative Netzwerkanalyse im Living Web (2009)
0.04
0.042866137 = product of:
0.10002098 = sum of:
0.019333236 = product of:
0.03866647 = sum of:
0.03866647 = weight(_text_:c in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03866647 = score(doc=4870,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.034843467 = weight(_text_:u in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034843467 = score(doc=4870,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
0.04584428 = weight(_text_:g in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04584428 = score(doc=4870,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Source
- Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
-
Ohly, H.P.: ¬Die Bibliometrie ist tot - es lebe die Bibliometrie (2003)
0.04
0.041213803 = product of:
0.1442483 = sum of:
0.07072163 = weight(_text_:h.p in 2030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07072163 = score(doc=2030,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21695226 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9008293 = idf(docFreq=328, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.32597783 = fieldWeight in 2030, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9008293 = idf(docFreq=328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2030)
0.07352668 = weight(_text_:ohly in 2030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07352668 = score(doc=2030,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22121295 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0167146 = idf(docFreq=292, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.33237964 = fieldWeight in 2030, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0167146 = idf(docFreq=292, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2030)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Schlögl, C.: Informationskompetenz am Beispiel einer szientometrischen Untersuchung zum Informationsmanagement (2000)
0.04
0.03750787 = product of:
0.08751836 = sum of:
0.01691658 = product of:
0.03383316 = sum of:
0.03383316 = weight(_text_:c in 5485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03383316 = score(doc=5485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 5485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.030488033 = weight(_text_:u in 5485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030488033 = score(doc=5485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 5485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5485)
0.040113743 = weight(_text_:g in 5485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040113743 = score(doc=5485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 5485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5485)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Source
- Informationskompetenz - Basiskompetenz in der Informationsgesellschaft: Proceedings des 7. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2000), Hrsg.: G. Knorz u. R. Kuhlen
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.03
0.028186988 = product of:
0.09865446 = sum of:
0.068766415 = weight(_text_:g in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068766415 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.02988804 = product of:
0.05977608 = sum of:
0.05977608 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05977608 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
-
Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005)
0.02
0.018622149 = product of:
0.065177515 = sum of:
0.019333236 = product of:
0.03866647 = sum of:
0.03866647 = weight(_text_:c in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03866647 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04584428 = weight(_text_:g in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04584428 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Tonta, Y.; Ünal, Y.: Scatter of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in document delivery requests (2005)
0.02
0.018236332 = product of:
0.04255144 = sum of:
0.009666618 = product of:
0.019333236 = sum of:
0.019333236 = weight(_text_:c in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019333236 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02292214 = weight(_text_:g in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02292214 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.165991 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
0.009962681 = product of:
0.019925361 = sum of:
0.019925361 = weight(_text_:22 in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019925361 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- In this paper we investigate the scattering of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in more than 137,000 document delivery requests submitted to a national document delivery service. We first summarize the major findings of the study with regards to the performance of the service. We then identify the "core" journals from which article requests were satisfied and address the following research questions: (a) Does the distribution of (core) journals conform to the Bradford's Law of Scattering? (b) Is there a relationship between usage of journals and impact factors, journals with high impact factors being used more often than the rest? (c) Is there a relationship between usage of journals and total citation counts, journals with high total citation counts being used more often than the rest? (d) What is the median age of use (half-life) of requested articles in general? (e) Do requested articles that appear in core journals get obsolete more slowly? (f) Is there a relationship between obsolescence and journal impact factors, journals with high impact factors being obsolete more slowly? (g) Is there a relationship between obsolescence and total citation counts, journals with high total citation counts being obsolete more slowly? Based an the analysis of findings, we found that the distribution of highly and moderately used journal titles conform to Bradford's Law. The median age of use was 8 years for all requested articles. Ninety percent of the articles requested were 21 years of age or younger. Articles that appeared in 168 core journal titles seem to get obsolete slightly more slowly than those of all titles. We observed no statistically significant correlations between the frequency of journal use and ISI journal impact factors, and between the frequency of journal use and ISI- (Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, PA) cited half-lives for the most heavily used 168 core journal titles. There was a weak correlation between usage of journals and ISI-reported total citation counts. No statistically significant relationship was found between median age of use and journal impact factors and between median age of use and total citation counts. There was a weak negative correlation between ISI journal impact factors and cited half-lives of 168 core journals, and a weak correlation between ISI citation halflives and use half-lives of core journals. No correlation was found between cited half-lives of 168 core journals and their corresponding total citation counts as reported by ISI. Findings of the current study are discussed along with those of other studies.
- Date
- 20. 3.2005 10:54:22
-
Schreiber, M.: Revisiting the g-index : the average number of citations in the g-core (2009)
0.02
0.016042156 = product of:
0.11229509 = sum of:
0.11229509 = weight(_text_:g in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11229509 = score(doc=3313,freq=12.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.81318647 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- The g-index is discussed in terms of the average number of citations of the publications in the g-core, showing that it combines features of the h-index and the A-index in one number. For a visualization, data of 8 famous physicists are presented and analyzed. In comparison with the h-index, the g-index increases between 67% and 144%, on average by a factor of 2.
- Object
- g-index
-
Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007)
0.02
0.015648238 = product of:
0.05476883 = sum of:
0.034843467 = weight(_text_:u in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034843467 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.019925361 = product of:
0.039850723 = sum of:
0.039850723 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039850723 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 30.12.2007 11:22:39
- Source
- ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
-
González-Alcaide, G.; Castelló-Cogollos, L.; Navarro-Molina, C.; Aleixandre-Benavent, R.; Valderrama-Zurián, J.C.: Library and information science research areas : analysis of journal articles in LISA (2008)
0.01
0.01396661 = product of:
0.048883133 = sum of:
0.014499927 = product of:
0.028999854 = sum of:
0.028999854 = weight(_text_:c in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028999854 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.034383208 = weight(_text_:g in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034383208 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Schreiber, M.: Fractionalized counting of publications for the g-Index (2009)
0.01
0.013892915 = product of:
0.0972504 = sum of:
0.0972504 = weight(_text_:g in 3125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0972504 = score(doc=3125,freq=16.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.70424014 = fieldWeight in 3125, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3125)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- L. Egghe ([2008]) studied the h-index (Hirsch index) and the g-index, counting the authorship of cited articles in a fractional way. But his definition of the gF-index for the case that the article count is fractionalized yielded values that were close to or even larger than the original g-index. Here I propose an alternative definition by which the g-index is modified in such a way that the resulting gm-index is always smaller than the original g-index. Based on the interpretation of the g-index as the highest number of articles of a scientist that received on average g or more citations, in the specification of the new gm-index the articles are counted fractionally not only for the rank but also for the average.
- Object
- g-index
-
Egghe, L.: Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship (2008)
0.01
0.012031618 = product of:
0.08422132 = sum of:
0.08422132 = weight(_text_:g in 2004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08422132 = score(doc=2004,freq=12.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.60988986 = fieldWeight in 2004, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2004)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- This article studies the h-index (Hirsch index) and the g-index of authors, in case one counts authorship of the cited articles in a fractional way. There are two ways to do this: One counts the citations to these papers in a fractional way or one counts the ranks of the papers in a fractional way as credit for an author. In both cases, we define the fractional h- and g-indexes, and we present inequalities (both upper and lower bounds) between these fractional h- and g-indexes and their corresponding unweighted values (also involving, of course, the coauthorship distribution). Wherever applicable, examples and counterexamples are provided. In a concrete example (the publication citation list of the present author), we make explicit calculations of these fractional h- and g-indexes and show that they are not very different from the unweighted ones.
- Object
- g-index
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008)
0.01
0.011736178 = product of:
0.04107662 = sum of:
0.026132599 = weight(_text_:u in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026132599 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.01494402 = product of:
0.02988804 = sum of:
0.02988804 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02988804 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:03:12
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Costas, R., M. Bordons u. T.N. van Leeuwen u.a.: Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.740-753.
-
Egghe, L.: ¬The influence of transformations on the h-index and the g-index (2008)
0.01
0.01146107 = product of:
0.08022749 = sum of:
0.08022749 = weight(_text_:g in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08022749 = score(doc=1881,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- In a previous article, we introduced a general transformation on sources and one on items in an arbitrary information production process (IPP). In this article, we investigate the influence of these transformations on the h-index and on the g-index. General formulae that describe this influence are presented. These are applied to the case that the size-frequency function is Lotkaian (i.e., is a decreasing power function). We further show that the h-index of the transformed IPP belongs to the interval bounded by the two transformations of the h-index of the original IPP, and we also show that this property is not true for the g-index.
- Object
- g-index
-
Woeginger, G.J.: Generalizations of Egghe's g-index (2009)
0.01
0.011343518 = product of:
0.07940462 = sum of:
0.07940462 = weight(_text_:g in 2857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07940462 = score(doc=2857,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.5750097 = fieldWeight in 2857, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2857)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- This paper introduces the generalized Egghe-indices as a new family of scientific impact measures for ranking the output of scientific researchers. The definition of this family is strongly inspired by Egghe's well-known g-index. The main contribution of the paper is a family of axiomatic characterizations that characterize every generalized Egghe-index in terms of four axioms.
- Object
- g-Index
-
Schreiber, M.: ¬An empirical investigation of the g-index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h-index, the A-index, and the R-index (2008)
0.01
0.010829693 = product of:
0.07580785 = sum of:
0.07580785 = weight(_text_:g in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07580785 = score(doc=1968,freq=14.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.5489636 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- J.E. Hirsch (2005) introduced the h-index to quantify an individual's scientific research output by the largest number h of a scientist's papers that received at least h citations. To take into account the highly skewed frequency distribution of citations, L. Egghe (2006a) proposed the g-index as an improvement of the h-index. I have worked out 26 practical cases of physicists from the Institute of Physics at Chemnitz University of Technology, and compare the h and g values in this study. It is demonstrated that the g-index discriminates better between different citation patterns. This also can be achieved by evaluating B.H. Jin's (2006) A-index, which reflects the average number of citations in the h-core, and interpreting it in conjunction with the h-index. h and A can be combined into the R-index to measure the h-core's citation intensity. I also have determined the A and R values for the 26 datasets. For a better comparison, I utilize interpolated indices. The correlations between the various indices as well as with the total number of papers and the highest citation counts are discussed. The largest Pearson correlation coefficient is found between g and R. Although the correlation between g and h is relatively strong, the arrangement of the datasets is significantly different depending on whether they are put into order according to the values of either h or g.
