Search (147 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. Wurangian, N.: Using the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer to produce a bibliography list (1993) 0.06
    0.06308115 = product of:
      0.14718935 = sum of:
        0.018981 = weight(_text_:of in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018981 = score(doc=5055,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
        0.10441199 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10441199 = score(doc=5055,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.6033583 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
        0.023796353 = product of:
          0.047592707 = sum of:
            0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047592707 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the work of the E. Del Webb Memorial Library, Loma Linda Univ., in using the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer and Pro-Cite software to produce a bibliography listing the latest books added to the library collection. Describes the use of the macro facility of WordPerfect for Windows to process records downloaded using the recent PRISM version of the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.1, S.22-24
  2. Poynder, R.: Beyond Boolean (1994) 0.04
    0.037879355 = product of:
      0.13257773 = sum of:
        0.016438028 = weight(_text_:of in 610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016438028 = score(doc=610,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 610, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=610)
        0.11613971 = weight(_text_:distribution in 610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11613971 = score(doc=610,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24019864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.48351526 = fieldWeight in 610, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=610)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Used on its own, Boolean searching will only find between 20-25% of the relevant information. However, Personal Librarian has search tools which offer smart searching techniques, in particular a relevance ranking function. Although the software does not offer full natural language searching, it provides a natural language perspective. Although designed originally for the creation of inhouse databases, Personal Librarian is now used for a range of other applications including electronic publishing on CD-ROM distribution. Personal Librarian may be built on UNIX, DOS or Windows and may be searched on any other platform
  3. Levasseur, D.: Inmagic DB/TextWorks, un classique pour Windows (1997) 0.02
    0.02328677 = product of:
      0.08150369 = sum of:
        0.021221403 = weight(_text_:of in 881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021221403 = score(doc=881,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 881, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=881)
        0.06028229 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06028229 = score(doc=881,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 881, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=881)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the characteristics and functions of the textual database management program DB/TextWorks 2.0 of Inmagic Inc. Operating on a PC microcomputer in a Windows environment (stand alone or network), it combines the advantages of full text retrieval systems and the flexibility of databases. Presents an evaluation of the program and examines its use in libraries with the DB/TextWorks Library guide kit which proposes database models conceived for various functions; acquisitions, cataloging, loans, OPAC, serials management, and interlibrary loan
  4. dwi: Zitatenschatz (2003) 0.02
    0.020958724 = product of:
      0.073355526 = sum of:
        0.007117875 = weight(_text_:of in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007117875 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.103663445 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
        0.06623765 = weight(_text_:congress in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06623765 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    "Während der Anwender ein Manuskript bearbeitet, fügt er Zitate direkt in den Text ein. Bibliographix arbeitet dabei eng mit Word zusammen. Wer eine andere Textverarbeitung verwendet, muss zum Einfügen den Umweg über die Zwischenablage wählen. Im Text erscheinen zunächst temporäre Zitate. In der fertigen Fassung wandelt Bibliographix die Platzhalter in die endgültige Form um und erstellt einen Anhang aller zitierten Werke. Bibliographix bietet jetzt einen direkten Zugang zur Deutschen Bibliothek, zum Hessischen Verbundkatalog, dem Gemeinsamen Verbundkatalog norddeutscher Bibliotheken sowie dem schweizerischen Helveticat. Auch Anfragen in den USA (Medline sowie Library of Congress) sind möglich. Quellenangaben aus dem Bibliothekskatalog wandern per Mausklick in die eigene Datenbank. Dank sinnvoller Ergänzungen ist das Programm komfortabler geworden, aber nach wie vor intuitiv zu bedienen. Die Basisversion ist zwar auf zehn Bibliothekszugriffe beschränkt, für kleinere Arbeiten reicht diese kostenlose Variante aber aus."
  5. Kelly, J.A.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1997) 0.02
    0.01902106 = product of:
      0.06657371 = sum of:
        0.018981 = weight(_text_:of in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018981 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
        0.047592707 = product of:
          0.095185414 = sum of:
            0.095185414 = weight(_text_:22 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095185414 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  6. Kushwoh, S.S.; Gautam, J.N.; Singh, R.: Migration from CDS / ISIS to KOHA : a case study of data conversion from CCF to MARC 21 (2009) 0.02
    0.017899109 = product of:
      0.06264688 = sum of:
        0.01743516 = weight(_text_:of in 2279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01743516 = score(doc=2279,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 2279, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2279)
        0.045211717 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045211717 = score(doc=2279,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 2279, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2279)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Standards are important for quality and interoperability in any system. Bibliographic record creation standards such as MARC 21 (Machine Readable Catalogue), CCF (Common Communication Format), UNIMARC (Universal MARC) and their local variations, are in practice all across the library community. ILMS (Integrated Library Management Systems) are using these standards for the design of databases and the creation of bibliographic records. Their use is important for uniformity of the system and bibliographic data, but there are problems when a library wants to switch over from one system to another using different standards. This paper discusses migration from one record standard to another, mapping of data and related issues. Data exported from CDS/ISIS CCF based records to KOHA MARC 21 based records are discussed as a case study. This methodology, with few modifications, can be applied for migration of data in other bibliographicformats too. Freeware tools can be utilized for migration.
    Source
    International cataloging & bliographic control. 38(2009) no.1, S.6-12
  7. Breeding, M.: Library systems report 2019 : cycles of innovation (2019) 0.01
    0.01487543 = product of:
      0.052064 = sum of:
        0.016438028 = weight(_text_:of in 5988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016438028 = score(doc=5988,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 5988, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5988)
        0.03562597 = product of:
          0.07125194 = sum of:
            0.07125194 = weight(_text_:service in 5988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07125194 = score(doc=5988,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.37871996 = fieldWeight in 5988, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5988)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The library technology industry, broadly speaking, shows more affinity toward utility than innovation. Library automation systems are not necessarily exciting technologies, but they are workhorse applications that must support the complex tasks of acquiring, describing, and providing access to materials and services. They represent substantial investments, and their effectiveness is tested daily in the library. But more than efficiency is at stake: These products must be aligned with the priorities of the library relative to collection management, service provision, and other functions.
  8. Bellarby, L.: ¬A comparison of two personal bibliographic software packages : EndNote and Pro-Cite (1993) 0.01
    0.013440925 = product of:
      0.047043234 = sum of:
        0.02324688 = weight(_text_:of in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02324688 = score(doc=561,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
        0.023796353 = product of:
          0.047592707 = sum of:
            0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047592707 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a summary of a more detailed study made of evaluation versions of these 2 US software packages, due to appear in 'C and L applications'. The packages are aimed at individual researchers, students and lecturers rather than libraries. Concludes that the cheaper package, EndNote, appears better suited to the students with occasional need for bibliographies, whereas the more complex (and expensive) Pro-Cite would suit a researcher or writer with a high output of professional papers. Pro-Cite could probably also be used by a small library as a means of creating a database
    Source
    Law librarian. 24(1993) no.1, S.22-23
  9. Brandt, D.S.: Ovid searching software (1996) 0.01
    0.013440925 = product of:
      0.047043234 = sum of:
        0.02324688 = weight(_text_:of in 6754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02324688 = score(doc=6754,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 6754, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6754)
        0.023796353 = product of:
          0.047592707 = sum of:
            0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 6754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047592707 = score(doc=6754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews Ovid searching software, a system for searching and manipulating output from bibliographic databases. It allows fields of indexes to be searched, or for terms of a controlled vocabulary to be mapped, provides a variety of display options and permits customisation of system features. Output may be directed to e-mail. Ovid interface with over 80 commercial databases to exploit the features of each. Covers vendor and user profiles; operating environment; user interface, search strategies; display and manipulation of documents; and documentation
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  10. Pro-Cite 2.0 for the IBM and Biblio-Link to USMARC comunications format records (1993) 0.01
    0.012917634 = product of:
      0.090423435 = sum of:
        0.090423435 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.090423435 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 16(1993) no.2, S.125-127
  11. Boeder, R.: Database applications for libraries : an introduction (1996) 0.01
    0.012862217 = product of:
      0.045017757 = sum of:
        0.021221403 = weight(_text_:of in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021221403 = score(doc=340,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
        0.023796353 = product of:
          0.047592707 = sum of:
            0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047592707 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Overviews database applications in libraries. Explains the 2 basic types of databases, flat-file and relational, outlines the uses and advantages of relationship systems. Librarians can utilise a number of software packages for database management and design a database in cooperation with a programmer. The librarian needs to be involved in the conceptual and external level of database design. Offers advice on finding a database designer. Outlines ideas for library related applications of database software
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.25-28
  12. Edelblute, T.: ¬A Pro-Cite authority file on a network (1995) 0.01
    0.012615612 = product of:
      0.04415464 = sum of:
        0.01743516 = weight(_text_:of in 3350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01743516 = score(doc=3350,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 3350, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3350)
        0.02671948 = product of:
          0.05343896 = sum of:
            0.05343896 = weight(_text_:service in 3350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05343896 = score(doc=3350,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.28403997 = fieldWeight in 3350, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3350)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the creation of a subject authority file, using Pro-Cite bibliographic management software for the US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service and the Agricultural Engineering Faculty at the University of Missouri at Columbia. Pro-Cite was selected for its flexible customization abilities. A workform was created in Pro-Cite with fields for authorized term, variant spellings, definitions, primary source consulted, other sources consulted, notes, cross references, and date of last edit. Using the authorized term and cross reference fields, an INDEX.LST file and a printed thesaurus were created. By putting Pro-Cite on a Novell network, it was hoped that all users would be able to view the authority file, and directly upload terms into their search strategies, but this proved not to be possible until the release of Pro-Cite 2.0. Further upgrades were needed to keep the authority file working properly. Further improvments in a network version of Pro-Cite that include password protection are needed
  13. SilverPlatter unveils new Internet database gateway (1996) 0.01
    0.012261892 = product of:
      0.04291662 = sum of:
        0.011743895 = weight(_text_:of in 6644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011743895 = score(doc=6644,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 6644, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6644)
        0.031172724 = product of:
          0.06234545 = sum of:
            0.06234545 = weight(_text_:service in 6644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06234545 = score(doc=6644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.33137995 = fieldWeight in 6644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6644)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Announces WebSPIRS v3.0, an enhanced version of the Web gateway form SilverPlatter Information, Inc. The update is an http gateway that provides access to the WWW via SilverPlatter's Internet Subscription Service on the librar's ERL network, using any forms-capable browser. This eliminates the need to install individual search software at workstations. Features in the updated version include: a new, simplified interface; search history capabilities; record selection and marking capabilities; enhancements to the thesaurus; point and click record display options; 'message of the day' option; and enhanced online help. WebSPIRS is a good introduction to database searching for novices and is IP filtered and password protected
  14. UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994) 0.01
    0.012226465 = product of:
      0.042792626 = sum of:
        0.021970814 = weight(_text_:of in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021970814 = score(doc=8779,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
        0.02082181 = product of:
          0.04164362 = sum of:
            0.04164362 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04164362 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: CAMPOS, F.: UNIMARC: state of the art on the universal format for international exchange; HOLT, B.: The maintenance of UNIMARC; WILLER, M.: UNIMARC / Authorities format; HOPKINSON, A.: CDS/ISIS as a tool for implementing UNIMARC; BERKE, S. u. M. SIPOS: The comprehensive information system of the National Széchényi Library and the Hungarian MARC format; SHRAIBERG, Y.: Application of the CDS/ISIS software package and UNIMARC format in the automated systems of the Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology and other libraries of the Russian Federation; STOKLASOVA, B.: Exchange formats in the Czech Republic: past, present and future
  15. Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998) 0.01
    0.012222101 = product of:
      0.042777352 = sum of:
        0.018981 = weight(_text_:of in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018981 = score(doc=2878,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
        0.023796353 = product of:
          0.047592707 = sum of:
            0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047592707 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Ovid has supported a sophisticated interface for searching bibliographic and full text databases for some time. It is now offering a Web based version of this interface that is capable of accessing Z39.50-compliant OPACs and databases anywhere in the world. The Ovid Web Gateway builds on the Ovid Server, thus allowing for a variety of functions and configurations at user, group and database-specific level. The Web Gateway has a selection of download formats and delivery options
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  16. Kiem, C.M.; Middleton, M.: ¬An evaluation of textual storage and retrieval software : CDS/ISIS and InMagic (1998) 0.01
    0.011495537 = product of:
      0.04023438 = sum of:
        0.016438028 = weight(_text_:of in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016438028 = score(doc=1974,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
        0.023796353 = product of:
          0.047592707 = sum of:
            0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047592707 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    A comparison was made between CDS/ISIS, ist Windows version WINISIS, and InMagic's INMAGIC and DB/TextWorks software. Packages were evaluated for their database creation, information retrieval and report production capabilities. Windows versions were found to provide significant enhancements over DOS versions of software. The evaluation aimed to determine the advantages to a developing country of creating bibliographic databases using commercial software
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:54:49
  17. Griffin, J.: AskSam for Windows, version 3.0 (1996) 0.01
    0.011279118 = product of:
      0.039476912 = sum of:
        0.008304187 = weight(_text_:of in 6709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008304187 = score(doc=6709,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.120940685 = fieldWeight in 6709, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6709)
        0.031172724 = product of:
          0.06234545 = sum of:
            0.06234545 = weight(_text_:service in 6709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06234545 = score(doc=6709,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.33137995 = fieldWeight in 6709, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6709)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews askSam 3.0, a free form text database management system for large volumes of textual data includding e-mail, literature searches, CD-ROM ancyclopaedias, USENET newsgroup files, downloads from online service providers and HTML documents. AskSam works with files, documents, data entry forms, graphics and embedded objects. It has its own word processor, will import files from other databases, implements hypertext and includes a phone dialling option. AskSam is suitable for librarians, information or marketing professionals and business planners. Discusses installation and setup; documentation; data structures and file creation characterisitcs; data entry; modification; editing and copying; the search engine; reports; importing/exporting; and special features
  18. Perez, E.: Industrial strength database publishing : Inmagic DB/Textworks WebPublisher (1997) 0.01
    0.01125444 = product of:
      0.039390538 = sum of:
        0.018568728 = weight(_text_:of in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018568728 = score(doc=679,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
        0.02082181 = product of:
          0.04164362 = sum of:
            0.04164362 = weight(_text_:22 in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04164362 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The availability of powerful indexing and database products with easy Web connections means that libraries able to gather and edit their own data are emancipated from the large vendors. The Oregon State Library staff used the Data Magician translation utility as part of a complex, but speedy, database converison project. The Oregon Index database of approximately 300.000 records was converted from a BRS database host over to the Inmagic WebPublisher system. Describes the planning and action stepts used in producing the Web accessible index database of considerable size. Participants have high ratings to effectiveness of both the translation utility and the database engine
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  19. Rothera, H.: Framing the subject : a subject indexing model for electronic bibliographic databases in the humanities (1998) 0.01
    0.010633699 = product of:
      0.037217945 = sum of:
        0.013421593 = weight(_text_:of in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013421593 = score(doc=3904,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
        0.023796353 = product of:
          0.047592707 = sum of:
            0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047592707 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews in detail an MA dissertation to assess the scope and value of electronic bibliographic databases in the humanities. Develops and demonstrates a model to determine essential and desirable indexing terms and to highlight some inherent complexities. Assesses features of commercially available databases against this model. Presents personal observations on the dissertation experience and on prospects for further research in this area
    Source
    Library and information research news. 22(1998) no.71, S.24-33
  20. Copeland, A.J.; Barreau, D.: Helping people to manage and share their digital information : a role for public libraries (2011) 0.01
    0.010479827 = product of:
      0.036679395 = sum of:
        0.018832127 = weight(_text_:of in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018832127 = score(doc=5583,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
        0.017847266 = product of:
          0.035694532 = sum of:
            0.035694532 = weight(_text_:22 in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035694532 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    As a cultural institution, the public library is charged with providing resources and services that fit the needs of a particular community and, if space and budgets allow, of serving as a resource and repository of the community's past. To fulfill its mission to the public, the library must attract that public by offering materials and providing opportunities for them to pursue their unique and varied interests and discover new things. By engaging individuals in the identification and preservation of their own personal, digital objects, it may be possible to increase awareness in, and commitment to, community repositories that reflect a community's diversity and that will serve all. A user education program that focuses on the importance of identifying and preserving the information and artifacts that are important, that addresses the technical aspects of preservation, and that creates awareness of the benefits and challenges associated with sharing personal information can result in a community repository that ultimately has more value for both the individual and the community.
    Date
    11.12.2019 17:47:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 128
  • i 5
  • d 4
  • f 3
  • nl 3
  • ru 2
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 128
  • m 10
  • el 4
  • s 4
  • b 1
  • h 1
  • i 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications