Search (278 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Stephens, A.: ¬The British National Bibliographic Service (1988) 0.17
    0.17159024 = product of:
      0.3002829 = sum of:
        0.016776992 = weight(_text_:of in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016776992 = score(doc=417,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
        0.07535286 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07535286 = score(doc=417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.43543637 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
        0.14517464 = weight(_text_:distribution in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14517464 = score(doc=417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24019864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.6043941 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
        0.06297842 = product of:
          0.12595683 = sum of:
            0.12595683 = weight(_text_:service in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12595683 = score(doc=417,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.6694886 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    The British Library's national bibliographic service and UKMARC database are described in detail. The use of shared cataloguing data in the UK, and overseas distribution of UKMARC records are discussed.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 8(1988) nos.3/4, S.155-163
  2. Williams, R.D.: MARC: thirty years and still going ... (1995) 0.15
    0.15047398 = product of:
      0.26332945 = sum of:
        0.02324688 = weight(_text_:of in 4020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02324688 = score(doc=4020,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 4020, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4020)
        0.08831687 = weight(_text_:congress in 4020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08831687 = score(doc=4020,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.42163986 = fieldWeight in 4020, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4020)
        0.11613971 = weight(_text_:distribution in 4020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11613971 = score(doc=4020,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24019864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.48351526 = fieldWeight in 4020, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4020)
        0.03562597 = product of:
          0.07125194 = sum of:
            0.07125194 = weight(_text_:service in 4020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07125194 = score(doc=4020,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.37871996 = fieldWeight in 4020, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4020)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    Traces the history of the MARC formats, for computerized bibliographic records and computerized cataloguing, from the initial work of the Library of Congress in the early 60s through to the various stages of development of the MARC Pilot Project (1966 to 1968); MARC2 (1968 to 1974); Distribution Service (1968); Retrospective Conversion (1968 to 1970); the Committee on Representation in Machine-Readable Form of Bibliographic Information (MARBI) and the USMARC Advisory Group; and the expansion, linkage and integration stages (1980 to the present)
  3. Avram, H.D.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1961-1974 (2009) 0.10
    0.09875251 = product of:
      0.17281689 = sum of:
        0.021970814 = weight(_text_:of in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021970814 = score(doc=3844,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
        0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07727726 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
        0.052747004 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052747004 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
        0.02082181 = product of:
          0.04164362 = sum of:
            0.04164362 = weight(_text_:22 in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04164362 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    The MARC Program of the Library of Congress, led during its formative years by the author of this entry, was a landmark in the history of automation. Technical procedures, standards, and formatting for the catalog record were experimented with and developed in modern form in this project. The project began when computers were mainframe, slow, and limited in storage. So little was known then about many aspects of automation of library information resources that the MARC project can be seen as a pioneering effort with immeasurable impact.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:53
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  4. MacCallum, S.H.: Harmonization of USMARC, CANMARC, and UKMARC (2000) 0.09
    0.094794184 = product of:
      0.16588981 = sum of:
        0.019672766 = weight(_text_:of in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019672766 = score(doc=185,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
        0.07806182 = weight(_text_:congress in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07806182 = score(doc=185,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.3726805 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
        0.053282518 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053282518 = score(doc=185,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.3079 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
        0.014872721 = product of:
          0.029745443 = sum of:
            0.029745443 = weight(_text_:22 in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029745443 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress, the National Library of Canada, and the British Library began discussing the harmonization of their respective MARC formats in 1994. The differences between USMARC and CAN/MARC were primarily in details rather than general specifications. Changes were made to CAN/MARC that eliminated many of the differences between CAN/MARC and the other two formats (USMARC and UKMARC). In addition, changes in USMARC that aligned USMARC and CAN/MARC were approved in 1997. The nature of the differences between UKMARC and CAN/MARC has necessitated a different process of harmonization. The differences between these two formats are many in extent, details, and approach to some requirements. Although total harmonization of USMARC-CAN/MARC with UKMARC is not feasible at this time, the British Library's program to add USMARC-CAN/MARC fields to UKMARC has increased the congruency of these formats. The National Library of Canada and the Library of Congress have begun to work on joint maintenance procedures and plan to have joint documentation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
  5. Guenther, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme : implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1996) 0.09
    0.0888728 = product of:
      0.20736986 = sum of:
        0.02348779 = weight(_text_:of in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02348779 = score(doc=5578,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
        0.109286554 = weight(_text_:congress in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109286554 = score(doc=5578,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.5217527 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
        0.074595526 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074595526 = score(doc=5578,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Potential uses for classification data in machine readable form and reasons for the development of a standard, the USMARC Format for Classification Data, which allows for classification data to interact with other USMARC bibliographic and authority data are discussed. The development, structure, content, and use of the standard is reviewed with implementation decisions for the Library of Congress Classification scheme noted. The author examines the implementation of USMARC classification at LC, the conversion of the schedules, and the functionality of the software being used. Problems in the effort are explored, and enhancements desired for the online classification system are considered.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.177-203
  6. Samples, J.; Bigelow, I.: MARC to BIBFRAME : converting the PCC to Linked Data (2020) 0.08
    0.08168939 = product of:
      0.19060856 = sum of:
        0.021970814 = weight(_text_:of in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021970814 = score(doc=119,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
        0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07727726 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
        0.09136049 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09136049 = score(doc=119,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) has formal relationships with the Library of Congress (LC), Share-VDE, and Linked Data for Production Phase 2 (LD4P2) for work on Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), and PCC institutions have been very active in the exploration of MARC to BIBFRAME conversion processes. This article will review the involvement of PCC in the development of BIBFRAME and examine the work of LC, Share-VDE, and LD4P2 on MARC to BIBFRAME conversion. It will conclude with a discussion of areas for further exploration by the PCC leading up to the creation of PCC conversion specifications and PCC BIBFRAME data.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.3/4, S.403-417
  7. Chapman, L.: How to catalogue : a practical manual using AACR2 and Library of Congress (1990) 0.08
    0.078454025 = product of:
      0.1830594 = sum of:
        0.0094905 = weight(_text_:of in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0094905 = score(doc=6081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
        0.08831687 = weight(_text_:congress in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08831687 = score(doc=6081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.42163986 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
        0.08525203 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08525203 = score(doc=6081,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.49264002 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    LCSH
    Cataloging
    Subject
    Cataloging
  8. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.08
    0.07501271 = product of:
      0.17502967 = sum of:
        0.016438028 = weight(_text_:of in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016438028 = score(doc=249,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.1347953 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1347953 = score(doc=249,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.023796353 = product of:
          0.047592707 = sum of:
            0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047592707 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Cataloging and classification standards and rules (1996) 0.07
    0.07461268 = product of:
      0.17409624 = sum of:
        0.01743516 = weight(_text_:of in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01743516 = score(doc=57,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
        0.06623765 = weight(_text_:congress in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06623765 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
        0.090423435 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.090423435 = score(doc=57,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: McCALLUM, S.: What makes a standard?; HOLLEY, R.P.: IFLA and international standards in the area of bibliographical control; STERN, B.: Internationalizing the rules in AACR2: adopting and translating AACR2 for use in non-Anglo-American and non-English-speaking cataloging environments; GUILES, K., R. EWALD u. B. TILLETT: The evolution of LCRIs: from de facto standards to ?; SPICHER, K.M.: The development of the MARC format; THOMAS, S.E.: The core bibliographic record and the program for cooperative cataloging; PALOWITCH, C. u. L. HOROWITZ: Meta-information structures for networked information resources; KUHAGEN, J.A.: Standards for name and series authority records; WILLIAMSON, N.: Standards and rules for subject access; GUENTHER, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme: implementation of the USMARC Format for Classification Data; LEAZER, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographical relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog: an examination of serials
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.21, nos.3/4
  10. Furrie, B.; Data Base Development Department of The Follett Software Company: Understanding MARC Bibliographic : Machine-readable cataloging (2000) 0.07
    0.06943747 = product of:
      0.16202076 = sum of:
        0.013421593 = weight(_text_:of in 6772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013421593 = score(doc=6772,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 6772, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6772)
        0.08831687 = weight(_text_:congress in 6772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08831687 = score(doc=6772,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.42163986 = fieldWeight in 6772, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6772)
        0.06028229 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06028229 = score(doc=6772,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 6772, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6772)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Imprint
    Washington, DC : Library of Congress
  11. Taylor, M.; Dickmeiss, A.: Delivering MARC/XML records from the Library of Congress catalogue using the open protocols SRW/U and Z39.50 (2005) 0.07
    0.06672095 = product of:
      0.1556822 = sum of:
        0.01423575 = weight(_text_:of in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01423575 = score(doc=4350,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
        0.11472698 = weight(_text_:congress in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11472698 = score(doc=4350,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.5477263 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
        0.02671948 = product of:
          0.05343896 = sum of:
            0.05343896 = weight(_text_:service in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05343896 = score(doc=4350,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.28403997 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The MARC standard for representing catalogue records and the Z39.50 standard for locating and retrieving them have facilitated interoperability in the library domain for more than a decade. With the increasing ubiquity of XML, these standards are being superseded by MARCXML and MarcXchange for record representation and SRW/U for searching and retrieval. Service providers moving from the older standards to the newer generally need to support both old and new forms during the transition period. YAZ Proxy uses a novel approach to provide SRW/MARCXML access to the Library of Congress catalogue, by translating requests into Z39.50 and querying the older system directly. As a fringe benefit, it also greatly accelerates Z39.50 access.
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
  12. Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004) 0.06
    0.060698543 = product of:
      0.14162993 = sum of:
        0.013421593 = weight(_text_:of in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013421593 = score(doc=132,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
        0.10441199 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10441199 = score(doc=132,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.6033583 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
        0.023796353 = product of:
          0.047592707 = sum of:
            0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047592707 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys the cataloging literature to collect problems that have been identified with the MARC 21 format. The problems are sorted into (1) problems that are not the fault of MARC 21; (2) problems that perhaps are not problems at all; (3) problems that are connected with the current shared cataloging environment; and 4) other problems with MARC 21 and vendor implementation of it. The author makes recommendations to deal with the true MARC 21 problems that remain after this analysis.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Radwanski, A.: Rozwoj formatu MARC (1996) 0.06
    0.058011476 = product of:
      0.1353601 = sum of:
        0.02324688 = weight(_text_:of in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02324688 = score(doc=3052,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
        0.08831687 = weight(_text_:congress in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08831687 = score(doc=3052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.42163986 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
        0.023796353 = product of:
          0.047592707 = sum of:
            0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047592707 = score(doc=3052,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the origins of the MARC format and its development connected with the proceedings of the Library of Congress and the British Library. Presents 2 standards: ISO 2709 and ISBD. Focuses on national and international formats elaborated in the 1970s and 1980s, including UNIMARC (1975) and CCF (1984). Outlines the prospects and directions of MARC format development, that is, integration of the format and implementing MARC in the network environment
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:34:37
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Development of the MARC format
  14. Xu, A.; Hess, K.; Akerman, L.: From MARC to BIBFRAME 2.0 : Crosswalks (2018) 0.06
    0.057228405 = product of:
      0.13353294 = sum of:
        0.017794685 = weight(_text_:of in 5172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017794685 = score(doc=5172,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 5172, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5172)
        0.07806182 = weight(_text_:congress in 5172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07806182 = score(doc=5172,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.3726805 = fieldWeight in 5172, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5172)
        0.03767643 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03767643 = score(doc=5172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 5172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5172)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    One of the big challenges facing academic libraries today is to increase the relevance of the libraries to their user communities. If the libraries can increase the visibility of their resources on the open web, it will increase the chances of the libraries to reach to their user communities via the user's first search experience. BIBFRAME and library Linked Data will enable libraries to publish their resources in a way that the Web understands, consume Linked Data to enrich their resources relevant to the libraries' user communities, and visualize networks across collections. However, one of the important steps for transitioning to BIBFRAME and library Linked Data involves crosswalks, mapping MARC fields and subfields across data models and performing necessary data reformatting to be in compliance with the specifications of the new model, which is currently BIBFRAME 2.0. This article looks into how the Library of Congress has mapped library bibliographic data from the MARC format to the BIBFRAME 2.0 model and vocabulary published and updated since April 2016, available from http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/index.html based on the recently released conversion specifications and converter, developed by the Library of Congress with input from many community members. The BIBFRAME 2.0 standard and conversion tools will enable libraries to transform bibliographic data from MARC into BIBFRAME 2.0, which introduces a Linked Data model as the improved method of bibliographic control for the future, and make bibliographic information more useful within and beyond library communities.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.2/3, S.224-250
  15. BIBFRAME Model Overview (2013) 0.06
    0.056743436 = product of:
      0.13240135 = sum of:
        0.014529302 = weight(_text_:of in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014529302 = score(doc=763,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.21160212 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
        0.09560581 = weight(_text_:congress in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09560581 = score(doc=763,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.45643854 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
        0.022266233 = product of:
          0.044532467 = sum of:
            0.044532467 = weight(_text_:service in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044532467 = score(doc=763,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.23669997 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative is an undertaking by the Library of Congress and the community to better accommodate future needs of the library community. A major focus of the initiative will be to determine a transition path for the MARC 21 exchange format to more Web based, Linked Data standards. Zepheira and The Library of Congress are working together to develop a Linked Data model, vocabulary and enabling tools / services for supporting this Initiative. BIBFRAME.ORG is a central hub for this effort.
    Content
    Vgl. Kommentar Eversberg: Wer dranbleiben will am Puls der Zeit und speziell an der sich dynamisierenden Evolution eines neuen Datenformatkonzepts, der sollte sich langsam beeilen, sich mit BIBFRAME vertraut zu machen: http://bibframe.org Diese Startseite organisiert nun den Zugang zu allem, was schon vorliegt und präsentabel ist, und das ist allerhand. Wer erst mal nur schnuppern will und schauen, wie denn BIBFRAME-Daten wohl aussehen, gehe zur "demonstration area", wo man u.a. auch aufbereitete Daten der DNB findet. Es gibt ferner Online Tools, und darunter einen "Transformation service", dem man eigenes MARC-XML übergeben kann, damit er was draus mache. [Exporte mit unserem MARCXML.APR klappen nicht unmittelbar, man muß zumindest die in der Datei schon vorhandenen zwei Kopfzeilen aktivieren und ans Ende noch </collection> setzen. Und hierarchische Daten machen noch Probleme, die wir uns vornehmen müssen.] Wer jetzt denkt, "Was geht uns das alles an?", der lese die letzte Zeile, die da lautet: "BIBFRAME.ORG is a collaborative effort of US Library of Congress, Zepheira and you!"
  16. Miller, E.; Ogbuji, U.: Linked data design for the visible library (2015) 0.06
    0.055834927 = product of:
      0.1302815 = sum of:
        0.018832127 = weight(_text_:of in 2773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018832127 = score(doc=2773,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 2773, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2773)
        0.06623765 = weight(_text_:congress in 2773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06623765 = score(doc=2773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 2773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2773)
        0.045211717 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045211717 = score(doc=2773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 2773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2773)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    In response to libraries' frustration over their rich resources being invisible on the web, Zepheira, at the request of the Library of Congress, created BIBFRAME, a bibliographic metadata framework for cataloging. The model replaces MARC records with linked data, promoting resource visibility through a rich network of links. In place of formal taxonomies, a small but extensible vocabulary streamlines metadata efforts. Rather than using a unique bibliographic record to describe one item, BIBFRAME draws on the Dublin Core and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) to generate formalized descriptions of Work, Instance, Authority and Annotation as well as associations between items. Zepheira trains librarians to transform MARC records to BIBFRAME resources and adapt the vocabulary for specialized needs, while subject matter experts and technical experts manage content, site design and usability. With a different approach toward data modeling and metadata, previously invisible resources gain visibility through linking.
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special section "Linked data and the charm of weak semantics".
    Source
    Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.23-29
  17. Beall, J.; Mitchell, J.S.: History of the representation of the DDC in the MARC Classification Format (2010) 0.06
    0.05565733 = product of:
      0.1298671 = sum of:
        0.021386553 = weight(_text_:of in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021386553 = score(doc=3568,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.31146988 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
        0.055198044 = weight(_text_:congress in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055198044 = score(doc=3568,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.26352492 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
        0.053282518 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053282518 = score(doc=3568,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.3079 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the history of the representation of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) in the Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC) formats, with a special emphasis on the development of the MARC classification format. Until 2009, the format used to represent the DDC has been a proprietary one that predated the development of the MARC classification format. The need to replace the current editorial support system, the desire to deliver DDC data in a variety of formats to support different uses, and the increasingly global context of editorial work with translation partners around the world prompted the Dewey editorial team, along with OCLC research and development colleagues, to rethink the underlying representation of the DDC and choose the MARC 21 formats for classification and authority data. The discussion is framed with quotes from the writings of Nancy J. Williamson, whose analysis of the content of the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) schedules played a key role in shaping the original MARC classification format.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 48(2010) no.1, S.48-63
  18. Smith, J.K.; Cunningham, R.L.; Sarapata, S.P.: MARC to ENC MARC : bringing the collection forward (2004) 0.05
    0.051637065 = product of:
      0.12048648 = sum of:
        0.008304187 = weight(_text_:of in 2844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008304187 = score(doc=2844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.120940685 = fieldWeight in 2844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2844)
        0.09136049 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09136049 = score(doc=2844,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 2844, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2844)
        0.02082181 = product of:
          0.04164362 = sum of:
            0.04164362 = weight(_text_:22 in 2844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04164362 = score(doc=2844,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2844, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2844)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This paper will describe the way in which the USMARC cataloging schema is used at the Eisenhower National Clearing-house (ENC). Discussion will include how ENC MARC extensions were developed for cataloging mathematics and science curriculum resources, and how the ENC workflow is integrated into the cataloging interface. The discussion will conclude with a historical look at the in-house data transfer from ENC MARC to the current production of IEEE LOM XML encoding for record sharing and OAI compliance, required under the NSDL project guidelines.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.28-39
  19. Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004) 0.05
    0.05076004 = product of:
      0.11844009 = sum of:
        0.02034102 = weight(_text_:of in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02034102 = score(doc=2837,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
        0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07727726 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
        0.02082181 = product of:
          0.04164362 = sum of:
            0.04164362 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04164362 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), its accompanying documentation and some of its applications. It reviews the MODS user guidelines provided by the Library of Congress and how they enable a user of the schema to consistently apply MODS as a metadata scheme. Because the schema itself could not fully document appropriate usage, the guidelines provide element definitions, history, relationships with other elements, usage conventions, and examples. Short descriptions of some MODS applications are given and a more detailed discussion of its use in the Library of Congress's Minerva project for Web archiving is given.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
  20. Guenther, R.S.: Bringing the Library of Congress into the computer age : converting LCC to machine-readable form (1996) 0.05
    0.050477482 = product of:
      0.17667118 = sum of:
        0.020547535 = weight(_text_:of in 4578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020547535 = score(doc=4578,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 4578, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4578)
        0.15612364 = weight(_text_:congress in 4578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15612364 = score(doc=4578,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.745361 = fieldWeight in 4578, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4578)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 231
  • m 21
  • s 17
  • el 11
  • l 3
  • n 3
  • ? 2
  • b 2
  • r 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…