Search (120 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen"
  1. Higgins, C.: Library of Congress Classification : Teddy Roosevelt's world in numbers? (2012) 0.09
    0.090124585 = product of:
      0.2102907 = sum of:
        0.025109503 = weight(_text_:of in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025109503 = score(doc=1905,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
        0.12489891 = weight(_text_:congress in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12489891 = score(doc=1905,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.5962888 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
        0.06028229 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06028229 = score(doc=1905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This article identifies late nineteenth-century American preoccupations and prejudices within the Library of Congress classification scheme, suggesting that these ought to be of concern to the worldwide community of classifiers who now apply the scheme beyond its original context. The approach of the article is both historical and critical. It uses a number of examples to demonstrate how the ideological content of the classification scheme fails to adequately represent contemporary global realities, while recognizing, and applauding, its essential pragmatism.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.4, S.249-262
  2. Heiner-Freiling, M.: DDC German - the project, the aims, the methods : new ideas for a well-established traditional classification system (2006) 0.07
    0.06564743 = product of:
      0.15317734 = sum of:
        0.018832127 = weight(_text_:of in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018832127 = score(doc=5779,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
        0.045211717 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045211717 = score(doc=5779,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
        0.08913349 = sum of:
          0.05343896 = weight(_text_:service in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05343896 = score(doc=5779,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043909185 = queryNorm
              0.28403997 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
          0.035694532 = weight(_text_:22 in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035694532 = score(doc=5779,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043909185 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The paper will give a short outline of the project DDC German. The project is not limited to a mere translation of DDC 22, but aims at the implementation of Dewey in the library networks of the German-language countries. Use of DDC mainly for retrieval purposes, not for shelving, leads to certain new aspects in classifying with Dewey which are described in detail and presented together with the German web service Melvil. Based an the German experience of cooperation and data exchange in the field of verbal indexing the paper develops some ideas an future Dewey cooperation between European and American libraries.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 42(2006) nos.3/4, S.147-162
  3. Lund, B.; Agbaji, D.: Use of Dewey Decimal Classification by academic libraries in the United States (2018) 0.07
    0.06514075 = product of:
      0.15199508 = sum of:
        0.021970814 = weight(_text_:of in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021970814 = score(doc=5181,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
        0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07727726 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
        0.052747004 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052747004 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Nearly 25 years have elapsed since the last comprehensive measure of the percentage of academic libraries that employ the Dewey and Library of Congress systems of classification. To provide updated statistics, the researchers surveyed all 3793 academic libraries via their online catalogs. The findings indicate that the use of Dewey has declined over the past four decades. Teachers' Colleges and Community Colleges in particular have higher rates of Dewey use than large research or professional universities. This information may help support academic library reclassification decisions.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.7, S.653-661
  4. McIlwaine, I.C.: Classification schemes : consultation with users and cooperation between editors (1997) 0.06
    0.06441817 = product of:
      0.15030906 = sum of:
        0.020132389 = weight(_text_:of in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020132389 = score(doc=5610,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
        0.06623765 = weight(_text_:congress in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06623765 = score(doc=5610,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
        0.06393902 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06393902 = score(doc=5610,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.36948 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Recent developments in the improvement of communication between those responsible for editing the general schemes of classification and their users are outlined. Increased participation in conferences, the publication of guides and manuals for aiding the implementation of general classifications, and the use of the Internet as a means of communicating are all ways in which users hear more about these schemes and can make their views known to those responsible for maintaining them. Increased communication at editorial level, including coordination of current developments and future revisions, is discussed. The Dewey Decimal Classification, the Library of Congress Classification, the Universal Decimal Classification, and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2) are reviewed and the ways in which each communicates with its users and participates in joint enterprises are noted.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and classification: trends, transformations, teaching, and training."
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 24(1997) nos.1/2, S.81-95
  5. Immroth, J. P.: Library of Congress Classification (19??) 0.06
    0.05813627 = product of:
      0.20347694 = sum of:
        0.026843186 = weight(_text_:of in 5645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026843186 = score(doc=5645,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 5645, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5645)
        0.17663375 = weight(_text_:congress in 5645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17663375 = score(doc=5645,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.8432797 = fieldWeight in 5645, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5645)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.15
  6. Immroth, J.P.: Library of Congress Classification (1976) 0.06
    0.055889927 = product of:
      0.19561474 = sum of:
        0.018981 = weight(_text_:of in 1274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018981 = score(doc=1274,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1274, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1274)
        0.17663375 = weight(_text_:congress in 1274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17663375 = score(doc=1274,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.8432797 = fieldWeight in 1274, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1274)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  7. Engbarth, M.: ¬Die Library of Congress Classification : Geschichte, Struktur, Verbreitung und Auswirkungen auf deutsche Bibliotheksklassifikationen (1980) 0.06
    0.055889927 = product of:
      0.19561474 = sum of:
        0.018981 = weight(_text_:of in 6784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018981 = score(doc=6784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 6784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6784)
        0.17663375 = weight(_text_:congress in 6784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17663375 = score(doc=6784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.8432797 = fieldWeight in 6784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6784)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  8. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.L.: Library of Congress Classification (LCC) (2009) 0.06
    0.05526712 = product of:
      0.12895662 = sum of:
        0.01743516 = weight(_text_:of in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01743516 = score(doc=3842,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
        0.09367418 = weight(_text_:congress in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09367418 = score(doc=3842,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.4472166 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
        0.017847266 = product of:
          0.035694532 = sum of:
            0.035694532 = weight(_text_:22 in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035694532 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Classification (LCC), originally designed for classifying the Library's own collection, is now used in a wide range of libraries, both in the United States and abroad. This entry recounts its history and development from its genesis to the present time, leading up to an explanation of LCC structure, tables, and notation. It then considers the system's potential for wider application in the online age, through speculation on using LCC as a tool for (a) partitioning large files; (b) generating domain-specific taxonomies; and (c) integrating classification and controlled subject terms for improved retrieval in the online public access catalog (OPAC) and the Internet. Finally, analyzing both its strong and relatively weak features, it addresses the question of whether in its current state LCC is in all respects ready for playing such roles
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:42
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  9. Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22: Dewey in the world, the world in Dewey (2004) 0.05
    0.05379279 = product of:
      0.1255165 = sum of:
        0.019672766 = weight(_text_:of in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019672766 = score(doc=2644,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
        0.07258732 = weight(_text_:distribution in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07258732 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24019864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.30219704 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
        0.03325642 = product of:
          0.06651284 = sum of:
            0.06651284 = weight(_text_:22 in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06651284 = score(doc=2644,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.43256867 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    In 2003, OCLC published Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22), in print and Web versions. The changes and updates in the new edition reflect a modern view of knowledge structures and address the general needs of Dewey users. The content of DDC 22 has been shaped by a number of social, geopolitical, and technical trends. The World Wide Web has provided a vehicle for more frequent distribution of updates to the DDC, and a medium for direct communication with Dewey users around the world. In addition to updating the system itself, other strategies are needed to accommodate the needs of the global Dewey user community. Translation of the system is one approach; another is mapping. Mapping terminology to the DDC is a strategy for supporting effective local implementation of the system while maintaining the internal cohesiveness of the DDC. This paper explores the usefulness of mapping terminology from English-language general subject headings lists produced outside the U.S.
    Object
    DDC-22
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  10. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.L.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification (2000) 0.05
    0.050869234 = product of:
      0.17804231 = sum of:
        0.02348779 = weight(_text_:of in 3165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02348779 = score(doc=3165,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 3165, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3165)
        0.15455452 = weight(_text_:congress in 3165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15455452 = score(doc=3165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.73786974 = fieldWeight in 3165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3165)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    The future of classification. Ed. R. Marcella u. A. Maltby
  11. Tauber, M.F.; Feinberg, H.: ¬The Dewey Decimal and Library of Congress Classifications : an overview (1974) 0.05
    0.048903685 = product of:
      0.17116289 = sum of:
        0.016608374 = weight(_text_:of in 1264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016608374 = score(doc=1264,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1264, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1264)
        0.15455452 = weight(_text_:congress in 1264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15455452 = score(doc=1264,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.73786974 = fieldWeight in 1264, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1264)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  12. Chan, L.M.: Immroth's guide to the Library of Congress Classification (1980) 0.05
    0.048903685 = product of:
      0.17116289 = sum of:
        0.016608374 = weight(_text_:of in 4307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016608374 = score(doc=4307,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 4307, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4307)
        0.15455452 = weight(_text_:congress in 4307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15455452 = score(doc=4307,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.73786974 = fieldWeight in 4307, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4307)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  13. Dittmann, H.; Hardy, J.: Learn Library of Congress Classification (2000) 0.04
    0.04405405 = product of:
      0.15418917 = sum of:
        0.02034102 = weight(_text_:of in 6826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02034102 = score(doc=6826,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 6826, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6826)
        0.13384815 = weight(_text_:congress in 6826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13384815 = score(doc=6826,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.63901395 = fieldWeight in 6826, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6826)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This book covers the skills necessary for a classifier using the LCC scheme, whether at a professional or paraprfessional level. It is equally suitable for use by library students in universities or colleges, and others who are studying classification by themselves, either with a specific goal or as part of their continuing professional development.
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: Introduction to classification - Introduction to LCC - Structure of LCC - Building a call number - Tables - Shelving - Classification Plus - More practice - Excercises - Answers
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of documentation 57(2001) no.3, S.453-454 (E. Patterson)
    LCSH
    Classification, Library of Congress
    Subject
    Classification, Library of Congress
  14. Chan, L.M.: ¬A guide to the Library of Congress Classification (1999) 0.04
    0.041917447 = product of:
      0.14671105 = sum of:
        0.01423575 = weight(_text_:of in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01423575 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
        0.1324753 = weight(_text_:congress in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1324753 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.63245976 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  15. Sitas, A.: ¬The classification of byzantine literature in the Library of Congress classification (2001) 0.04
    0.040111672 = product of:
      0.14039084 = sum of:
        0.025663862 = weight(_text_:of in 6957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025663862 = score(doc=6957,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 6957, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6957)
        0.11472698 = weight(_text_:congress in 6957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11472698 = score(doc=6957,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.5477263 = fieldWeight in 6957, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6957)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Topics concerning the Classification of Byzantine literature and, generally, of Byzantine texts are discussed, analyzed and made clear. The time boundaries of this period are described as well as the kinds of published material. Schedule PA (Supplement) of the Library of Congress Classification is discussed and evaluated as far as the handling of Byzantine literature is concerned. Schedule PA is also mentioned, as well as other relevant categories. Based on the results regarding the manner of handling Classical literature texts, it is concluded that a) Early Christian literature and the Fathers of the Church must be excluded from Class PA and b) in order to achieve a uniform, continuous, consistent and reliable classification of Byzantine texts, they must be treated according to the method proposed for Classical literature by the Library of Congress in Schedule PA.
  16. Martel, C.: Classification: a brief conspectus of present day library practice (1985) 0.04
    0.040022604 = product of:
      0.14007911 = sum of:
        0.02324688 = weight(_text_:of in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02324688 = score(doc=3623,freq=48.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
              6.928203 = tf(freq=48.0), with freq of:
                48.0 = termFreq=48.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
        0.116832234 = weight(_text_:congress in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.116832234 = score(doc=3623,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.5577771 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    It has been generally recognized that the Library of Congress Classification, developed at the turn of the century, has been based an practical rather than theoreti cal or philosophical considerations. Unlike most of the other library classification systems, which originated from individual minds, the Library of Congress Classification system was the result of corporate efforts. Nonetheless, there were a number of individuals who, in the early stages of its development, provided guidance regarding the general framework and direction of the scheme. The most important among these was Charles Martel (1860-1945) who was Chief Classifier at the Library of Congress when the system was first developed. In a paper read before the New Zealand Library Association in April 1911, from which the following excerpt has been taken, Martel gave his views concerning library classification in general and provided a glimpse of the rationale behind the Library of Congress Classification system in particular. In the following excerpt, Martel discusses the basis of the Library of Congress Classification system to be not "the scientific order of subjects ... [but] rather [a] convenient sequence of the various groups ... of books." This is the "literary warrant" an which the Library of Congress system has been based. With regard to the notation, Martel argues for brevity in preference to symmetry or mnemonics. Brevity of notation has since been recognized as one of the greatest advantages of the Library of Congress system as a device for shelf arrangement of books. Martel outlines seven groupings used in the system for subarranging books an the subject, first by form and then by subject subdivisions. This pattern, known as Martel's "seven points," has served as the general framework in individual classes and provided the most significant unifying factor for individual classes in the system, which contain many unique or disparate characteristics.
    Source
    Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
  17. Comaroni, J.P.: Use of the Dewey Decimal Classification in the United States and Canada (1978) 0.04
    0.03721406 = product of:
      0.1302492 = sum of:
        0.026260145 = weight(_text_:of in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026260145 = score(doc=1151,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
        0.103989065 = sum of:
          0.06234545 = weight(_text_:service in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06234545 = score(doc=1151,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043909185 = queryNorm
              0.33137995 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
          0.04164362 = weight(_text_:22 in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04164362 = score(doc=1151,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043909185 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of a survey of the use of the DDC in libraries of the United States and Canada is presented. (5% of alle libraries in the United States and Canada use DDC; of these are at least 75% use the most recent full or abridges edition. Librarians wish to have DDC revised continuously, but they do not want the meanings of numbers changed. Any assistance that can be provided in the application of DDC is welcome. Most of the larger libraries do not believe zhat the current index provides sufficient assistance. Divisions needing revision are listed with an index number reflecting priority. DDC is seen to be warmly regarded by librarians in general and by public service librarians in particular
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 22(1978), S.402-408
  18. Comaroni, J.P.; Satija, M.P.: Revising the Dewey Decimal Classification (1988) 0.03
    0.03187536 = product of:
      0.11156376 = sum of:
        0.02324688 = weight(_text_:of in 5221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02324688 = score(doc=5221,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 5221, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5221)
        0.08831687 = weight(_text_:congress in 5221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08831687 = score(doc=5221,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.42163986 = fieldWeight in 5221, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5221)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Revision of the DDC is based on the growth or recasting of knowledge that is revealed in a decade of publishing. Revision takes place at the Library of Congress and is guided by several professional committees and the advice of experts. 'Decimal Classification Additions, Notes and Decisions (DC&)' conveys revisions of a minor nature between editions. Separate publications, such as for 004-006 Data Processing and Computer Science, make extensive revisions available between editions
  19. Mowery, R.L.: ¬The "¬trend to LC" in college and university libraries (1975) 0.03
    0.03129665 = product of:
      0.10953827 = sum of:
        0.021221403 = weight(_text_:of in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021221403 = score(doc=1152,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
        0.08831687 = weight(_text_:congress in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08831687 = score(doc=1152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.42163986 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Seeking to document the extent to which libraries of four-year colleges and universities have adopted the LCC system, this study surveys the classification systems used by the libraries of 1.160 accredited four-year-colleges and universities. The LC system is presently being used by more than half of these libraries; however, throughout 1968-71 the "trend to LC" clearly lost momentum. Data are provided on the extent to which the Library of Congress and The DDC systems were used in 1967 and 1971 by libraries of various sizes and categories
  20. Alex, H.; Betz, A.; Heiner-Freiling, M.; Jackenkroll, M.; Mengel, T.; Preuss, M.: Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation : DDC 22 Deutsch. Übersichten (2005) 0.03
    0.03115716 = product of:
      0.07270004 = sum of:
        0.00474525 = weight(_text_:of in 4554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00474525 = score(doc=4554,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.06910896 = fieldWeight in 4554, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4554)
        0.044158436 = weight(_text_:congress in 4554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044158436 = score(doc=4554,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.21081993 = fieldWeight in 4554, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4554)
        0.023796353 = product of:
          0.047592707 = sum of:
            0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 4554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047592707 = score(doc=4554,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4554, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4554)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Die Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) ist Ende 2003 in der 22. Ausgabe der Standard Edition auf Englisch erschienen und wird genau zwei Jahre später nun auch auf Deutsch veröffentlicht. Nach Übersetzungen ins Französische, Italienische, Russische und Spanische ist unter Beteiligung der drei deutschsprachigen Länder und mit Unterstützung durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft die Voraussetzung dafür geschaffen worden, dass diese international weit verbreitete Klassifikation auch in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz heimisch werden kann. Die hier vorgelegten Übersichten, die die drei obersten Ebenen oder 1 000 Klassen der DDC umfassen, ermöglichen einen Einblick in die Gliederung der gesamten Klassifikation und sind in dieser Form für Bibliotheken und wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen frei verfügbar, während die tieferen Ebenen der DDC durch das Urheberrecht geschützt sind. Die vollständige Ausgabe der DDC 22 Deutsch erscheint 2005 im Verlag K. G. Saur. Mit dem Webservice Melvil bietet Die Deutsche Bibliothek ab Januar 2006 eine deutsche Version von WebDewey an, ergänzt um ein Recherchetool für das Retrieval DDC-erschlossener Daten. Die DDC 22 ist von einer an der Fachhochschule Köln angesiedelten Arbeitsgruppe ins Deutsche übersetzt worden, unterstützt von einemTeam von Fachreferentinnen und Fachreferenten an zahlreichen Bibliotheken des deutschen Sprachraums und fachlich beraten von der Expertengruppe DDC Deutsch. Die organisatorische Leitung des Projekts DDC Deutsch lag bei Der Deutschen Bibliothek als federführendem Mitglied des Konsortiums DDC Deutsch. Ab 2006 wird die Deutsche Nationalbibliografie vollständige DDC-Notationen mitliefern, bereits seit Bibliografiejahrgang 2004 folgen die Sachgruppen der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie einer auf den beiden obersten Ebenen der DDC basierenden Gliederung. Die hier vorgelegte Übersetzung der DDC wurde mit der Herausgeberin der DDC, Joan Mitchell (OCLC, Dublin/Ohio) und ihren Mitherausgebern an der Library of Congress abgestimmt, denen wir für ihre Unterstützung und Beratung herzlich danken. Die kurze Einführung in die Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation, die hier folgt, stellt das gesamte System der DDC vor, das mit seinen Haupt- und Hilfstafeln mehr als 60 000 Klassen umfasst. Die Möglichkeiten zur Erschließung differenzierterThemen gehen daher weit über die hier vorgelegten obersten Klassen der DDC hinaus und berücksichtigen viele moderne Teildisziplinen, die man in den Übersichten vielleicht vermisst. Bei der Verwendung der Übersichten ist zu beachten, dass aus drucktechnischen Gründen in einigen Fällen Klassen nur verkürzt wiedergegeben werden können und nur durch ihre Position innerhalb einer Folge von Klassen genau zu verstehen sind. Daher sollten für die Erschließung auch die vollständigen Klassenbenennungen herangezogen werden, die unter www.ddc-deutsch.de im Netz zur Verfügung stehen.

Authors

Languages

  • e 102
  • d 12
  • f 4
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 75
  • m 29
  • el 7
  • s 7
  • p 3
  • x 3
  • u 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications