-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004)
0.12
0.12412755 = product of:
0.21722321 = sum of:
0.022193875 = weight(_text_:of in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022193875 = score(doc=138,freq=28.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.32322758 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.055198044 = weight(_text_:congress in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055198044 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.26352492 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.12495858 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12495858 = score(doc=138,freq=22.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.7220895 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.014872721 = product of:
0.029745443 = sum of:
0.029745443 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029745443 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- This paper presents findings of a survey an the state of cataloging and metadata education. in ALA-accredited library and information science progranis in North America. The survey was conducted in response to Action Item 5.1 of the "Bibliographic Control of Web Resources: A Library of Congress Action Plan," which focuses an providing metadata education to new LIS professionals. The study found LIS programs increased their reliance an introductory courses to cover cataloging and metadata, but fewer programs than before had a cataloging course requirement. The knowledge of cataloging delivered in introductory courses was basic, and the coverage of metadata was limited to an overview. Cataloging courses showed similarity in coverage and practice and focused an print mater!als. Few cataloging educators provided exercises in metadata record creation using non-AACR standards. Advanced cataloging courses provided in-depth coverage of subject cataloging and the cataloging of nonbook resources, but offered very limited coverage of metadata. Few programs offered full courses an metadata, and even fewer offered advanced metadata courses. Metadata topics were well integrated into LIS curricula, but coverage of metadata courses varied from program to program, depending an the interests of instructors. Educators were forward-looking and agreed an the inclusion of specific knowledge and skills in metadata instruction. A series of actions were proposed to assist educators in providing students with competencies in cataloging and metadata.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
McCallum, S.H.: Library of Congress metadata landscape (2003)
0.11
0.10797101 = product of:
0.18894926 = sum of:
0.017794685 = weight(_text_:of in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017794685 = score(doc=1760,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
0.09560581 = weight(_text_:congress in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09560581 = score(doc=1760,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.45643854 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
0.053282518 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053282518 = score(doc=1760,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.3079 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
0.022266233 = product of:
0.044532467 = sum of:
0.044532467 = weight(_text_:service in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044532467 = score(doc=1760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.23669997 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- The Library of Congress (LC) has many of the same challenges as other libraries, especially large ones. LC has many different types of resources - books, journals, maps, music, manuscripts, audio, moving image, still image, artifacts, electronic - with large collections of each. Different levels of access are needed for this material: for some, collection level bibliographic description is adequate; for many, item level access is adequate; but for others, such as sound recordings, analytic, or sub unit access is highly desirable.The sizes of the LC collections are a major challenge - over 125 million non-electronic and over 3 million electronic items (and growing rapidly). And finally, electronic resources are presenting us with new issues - from metadata to preservation to storage to linking techniques. LC has tried to approach these challenges from a service perspective. Access must be successful for the end user, which mandates as much coherence and consistency in the metadata as possible and access systems that are easy to use. This paper focuses an the Library of Congress' perspective an metadata in the following three areas: (1) descriptive metadata in our current operations, (2) pathways that are developing that will support possible evolution in the future, and (3) broader metadata needs with digital material. The discussion is from a metadata element set and format point of view, not a cataloging data and cataloging rules view. Most acronyms used in this paper are expanded in an Appendix.
-
Sturmane, A.; Eglite, E.; Jankevica-Balode, M.: Subject metadata development for digital resources in Latvia (2014)
0.08
0.08233951 = product of:
0.19212553 = sum of:
0.02348779 = weight(_text_:of in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02348779 = score(doc=1963,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07727726 = score(doc=1963,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
0.09136049 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09136049 = score(doc=1963,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The National Library of Latvia (NLL) made a decision to use the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) in 2000. At present the NLL Subject Headings Database in Latvian holds approximately 34,000 subject headings and is used for subject cataloging of textual resources, including articles from serials. For digital objects NLL uses a system like Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST). We succesfully use it in the project "In Search of Lost Latvia," one of the milestones in the development of the subject cataloging of digital resources in Latvia.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.1, S.20-31
-
Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999)
0.07
0.07183192 = product of:
0.16760781 = sum of:
0.02324688 = weight(_text_:of in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02324688 = score(doc=6095,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.12056458 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12056458 = score(doc=6095,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.023796353 = product of:
0.047592707 = sum of:
0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047592707 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
-
Wartburg, K. von; Sibille, C.; Aliverti, C.: Metadata collaboration between the Swiss National Library and research institutions in the field of Swiss historiography (2019)
0.07
0.06504873 = product of:
0.15178037 = sum of:
0.01743516 = weight(_text_:of in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01743516 = score(doc=5272,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.045211717 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045211717 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.08913349 = sum of:
0.05343896 = weight(_text_:service in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05343896 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.28403997 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.035694532 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035694532 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This article presents examples of metadata collaborations between the Swiss National Library (NL) and research institutions in the field of Swiss historiography. The NL publishes the Bibliography on Swiss History (BSH). In order to meet the demands of its research community, the NL has improved the accessibility and interoperability of the BSH database. Moreover, the BSH takes part in metadata projects such as Metagrid, a web service linking different historical databases. Other metadata collaborations with partners in the historical field such as the Law Sources Foundation (LSF) will position the BSH as an indispensable literature hub for publications on Swiss history.
- Date
- 30. 5.2019 19:22:49
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'The Role and Function of National Bibliographies for Research'.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 57(2019) no.1, S.24-36
-
Zavalin, V.: Exploration of subject and genre representation in bibliographic metadata representing works of fiction for children and young adults (2024)
0.06
0.064941555 = product of:
0.1515303 = sum of:
0.021353623 = weight(_text_:of in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021353623 = score(doc=1152,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
0.06623765 = weight(_text_:congress in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06623765 = score(doc=1152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
0.06393902 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06393902 = score(doc=1152,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.36948 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This study examines subject and genre representation in metadata that describes information resources created for children and young adult audiences. Both quantitative and limited qualitative analyses were applied to the analysis of WorldCat records collected in 2021 and contributed by the Children's and Young Adults' Cataloging Program at the US Library of Congress. This dataset contains records created several years prior to the data collection point and edited by various OCLC member institutions. Findings provide information on the level and patterns of application of these kinds of metadata important for information access, with a focus on the fields, subfields, and controlled vocabularies used. The discussion of results includes a detailed evaluation of genre and subject metadata quality (accuracy, completeness, and consistency).
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 61(2023) no.1, p.47-66
-
Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996)
0.06
0.06490938 = product of:
0.15145522 = sum of:
0.02324688 = weight(_text_:of in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02324688 = score(doc=3689,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.10441199 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10441199 = score(doc=3689,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.6033583 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.023796353 = product of:
0.047592707 = sum of:
0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047592707 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Using grant funding, some prominent creators of digital libraries have promised users of networked resources certain kinds of access. Some of this access finds a ready-made vehicle in USMARC, some of it in the TEI header, some of it has yet to find the most appropriate vehicle. In its quest to provide access to what users need, the cataloging community can show leadership by exploring the strength inherent in a metadata-providing system like the TEI header.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.59-73
-
Patton, M.; Reynolds, D.; Choudhury, G.S.; DiLauro, T.: Toward a metadata generation framework : a case study at Johns Hopkins University (2004)
0.06
0.064455226 = product of:
0.112796634 = sum of:
0.020684065 = weight(_text_:of in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020684065 = score(doc=1192,freq=38.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.30123898 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
38.0 = termFreq=38.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.044158436 = weight(_text_:congress in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044158436 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.21081993 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.030141145 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030141145 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.17417455 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.017812986 = product of:
0.03562597 = sum of:
0.03562597 = weight(_text_:service in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03562597 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.18935998 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- In the June 2003 issue of D-Lib Magazine, Kenney et al. (2003) discuss a comparative study between Cornell's email reference staff and Google's Answers service. This interesting study provided insights on the potential impact of "computing and simple algorithms combined with human intelligence" for library reference services. As mentioned in the Kenney et al. article, Bill Arms (2000) had discussed the possibilities of automated digital libraries in an even earlier D-Lib article. Arms discusses not only automating reference services, but also another library function that seems to inspire lively debates about automation-metadata creation. While intended to illuminate, these debates sometimes generate more heat than light. In an effort to explore the potential for automating metadata generation, the Digital Knowledge Center (DKC) of the Sheridan Libraries at The Johns Hopkins University developed and tested an automated name authority control (ANAC) tool. ANAC represents a component of a digital workflow management system developed in connection with the digital Lester S. Levy Collection of Sheet Music. The evaluation of ANAC followed the spirit of the Kenney et al. study that was, as they stated, "more exploratory than scientific." These ANAC evaluation results are shared with the hope of fostering constructive dialogue and discussions about the potential for semi-automated techniques or frameworks for library functions and services such as metadata creation. The DKC's research agenda emphasizes the development of tools that combine automated processes and human intervention, with the overall goal of involving humans at higher levels of analysis and decision-making. Others have looked at issues regarding the automated generation of metadata. A session at the 2003 Joint Conference on Digital Libraries was devoted to automatic metadata creation, and a session at the 2004 conference addressed automated name disambiguation. Commercial vendors such as OCLC, Marcive, and LTI have long used automated techniques for matching names to Library of Congress authority records. We began developing ANAC as a component of a larger suite of open source tools to support workflow management for digital projects. This article describes the goals for the ANAC tool, provides an overview of the metadata records used for testing, describes the architecture for ANAC, and concludes with discussions of the methodology and evaluation of the experiment comparing human cataloging and ANAC-generated results.
-
Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; O'Neill, E.T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: ¬A faceted approach to subject data in the Dublin Core metadata record (2001)
0.06
0.06284256 = product of:
0.14663264 = sum of:
0.016608374 = weight(_text_:of in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016608374 = score(doc=6109,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07727726 = score(doc=6109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
0.052747004 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052747004 = score(doc=6109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This article describes FAST, the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology, a project at OCLC to make Library of Congress Subject Headings easier to use in Dublin Core metadata by breaking out facets of space, time, and form. Work on FAST can be watched at its web site, http://www.miskatonic.org/library/, which has recent presentations and reports. It is interesting to see facets and Dublin Core combined, though both LCSH and FAST subject headings are beyond what most people making a small faceted classification would want or need.
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 4(2001) nos.1/2, S.35-47
-
Tillett, B.B.: AACR2 and metadata : library opportunities in the global semantic Web (2003)
0.06
0.06189104 = product of:
0.14441243 = sum of:
0.01423575 = weight(_text_:of in 5510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01423575 = score(doc=5510,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 5510, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5510)
0.06623765 = weight(_text_:congress in 5510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06623765 = score(doc=5510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 5510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5510)
0.06393902 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06393902 = score(doc=5510,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.36948 = fieldWeight in 5510, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5510)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Explores the opportunities for libraries to contribute to the proposed global "Semantic Web." Library name and subject authority files, including work that IFLA has done related to a new view of "Universal Bibliographic Control" in the Internet environment and the work underway in the U.S. and Europe, are making a reality of the virtual international authority file on the Web. The bibliographic and authority records created according to AACR2 reflect standards for metadata that libraries have provided for years. New opportunities for using these records in the digital world are described (interoperability), including mapping with Dublin Core metadata. AACR2 recently updated Chapter 9 on Electronic Resources. That process and highlights of the changes are described, including Library of Congress' rule interpretations.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Electronic cataloging: AACR2 and metadata for serials and monographs"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 36(2003) nos.3/4, S.101-119
-
Arms, C.R.: Available and useful : OAI at the Library of Congress (2003)
0.06
0.05769832 = product of:
0.13462941 = sum of:
0.01423575 = weight(_text_:of in 4773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01423575 = score(doc=4773,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 4773, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4773)
0.09367418 = weight(_text_:congress in 4773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09367418 = score(doc=4773,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.4472166 = fieldWeight in 4773, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4773)
0.02671948 = product of:
0.05343896 = sum of:
0.05343896 = weight(_text_:service in 4773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05343896 = score(doc=4773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.28403997 = fieldWeight in 4773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The Library of Congress (LC) was an early adopter of the OAI Protocol for Metadata Harvesting. The protocol allows LC to make digitized historical collections available for integration into other services. The protocol was straightforward to implement and the harvesting traffic has no perceptible effect on the primary users of the American Memory project. Now that services can integrate records for cultural heritage resources from many sources, it is time to build on that experience to develop better services. How should the scarce resources available to produce metadata be deployed to most advantage to support discovery in different contexts? How might metadata harvesting be exploited to support new interfaces and enhanced navigation among related resources in digital libraries? This article starts a conversation between metadata providers and service builders by describing LC's experience and questions that have surfaced.
-
Baca, M.; O'Keefe, E.: Sharing standards and expertise in the early 21st century : Moving toward a collaborative, "cross-community" model for metadata creation (2008)
0.06
0.0574106 = product of:
0.13395807 = sum of:
0.022508696 = weight(_text_:of in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022508696 = score(doc=2321,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
0.06623765 = weight(_text_:congress in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06623765 = score(doc=2321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
0.045211717 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045211717 = score(doc=2321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This paper provides a brief overview of the evolving descriptive metadata landscape, one phenomenon of which can be characterized as "cross-community" metadata as manifested in records that are the result of a combination of carefully considered data value and data content standards. he online catalog of the Morgan Library & Museum provides a real-life illustration of how diverse data content standards and vocabulary tools can be integrated within the classic data structure/technical interchange format of MARC21 to better describe unique, museum-type objects, and to provide better end-user access and understanding. The Morgan experience also shows the value of developing a collaborative model for metadata creation that combines the subject expertise of curators and scholars with the cataloging expertise and knowledge of standards possessed by librarians.
- Content
- Beitrag während: World library and information congress: 74th IFLA general conference and council, 10-14 August 2008, Québec, Canada.
-
Seaman, D.: Selection, access, and control in library of electronic texts (1996)
0.06
0.055196006 = product of:
0.12879068 = sum of:
0.016608374 = weight(_text_:of in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016608374 = score(doc=599,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
0.09136049 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09136049 = score(doc=599,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
0.02082181 = product of:
0.04164362 = sum of:
0.04164362 = weight(_text_:22 in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04164362 = score(doc=599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The Electronic Text Center at the University of Virginia has been mounting SGML full-text databases on-line since 1992, and actively building a user community around this Internet resource. Conceiving of what we do as firmly a library operation, we have sought to integrate the electronic text databases into the training, cataloging, preservation, and collection development areas of our library. Central to our selection criteria is the desire for softwareand platform-independent textsif it's not SGML, it's ephermeraland central to our cataloging endeavors is on SGML bibliographic record such as the Text Encoding Initiative header.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.75-84
-
Understanding metadata (2004)
0.05
0.05486974 = product of:
0.12802939 = sum of:
0.018981 = weight(_text_:of in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018981 = score(doc=2686,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.08525203 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08525203 = score(doc=2686,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.49264002 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.023796353 = product of:
0.047592707 = sum of:
0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047592707 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
- Date
- 10. 9.2004 10:22:40
-
Cantara, L.: METS: the metadata encoding and transmission standard (2005)
0.05
0.053865053 = product of:
0.12568513 = sum of:
0.01423575 = weight(_text_:of in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01423575 = score(doc=5727,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
0.06623765 = weight(_text_:congress in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06623765 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
0.045211717 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045211717 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a data communication standard for encoding descriptive, administrative, and structural metadata regarding objects within a digital library, expressed using the XML Schema Language of the World Wide Web Consortium. An initiative of the Digital Library Federation, METS is under development by an international editorial board and is maintained in the Network Development and MARC Standards Office of the Library of Congress. Designed in conformance with the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model, a METS document encapsulates digital objects and metadata as Information Packages for transmitting and/or exchanging digital objects to and from digital repositories, disseminating digital objects via the Web, and archiving digital objects for long-term preservation and access. This paper presents an introduction to the METS standard and through illustrated examples, demonstrates how to build a METS document.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 40(2005) nos.3/4, S.237-253
-
Intner, S.S.; Lazinger, S.S.; Weihs, J.: Metadata and its impact on libraries (2005)
0.05
0.052617203 = product of:
0.0920801 = sum of:
0.021221403 = weight(_text_:of in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021221403 = score(doc=339,freq=160.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
12.649111 = tf(freq=160.0), with freq of:
160.0 = termFreq=160.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
0.022079218 = weight(_text_:congress in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022079218 = score(doc=339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.105409965 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
0.03987299 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03987299 = score(doc=339,freq=14.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.23041128 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
0.008906493 = product of:
0.017812986 = sum of:
0.017812986 = weight(_text_:service in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017812986 = score(doc=339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.09467999 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- Three experts of the cataloguing world tackle the topic of metadata, explaining fundamental concepts and their accompanying rationales, as well as exploring current developments and future innovations.
- Content
- What is metadata? - Metadata schemas & their relationships to particular communities - Library and information-related metadata schemas - Creating library metadata for monographic materials - Creating library metadata for continuing materials - Integrating library metadata into local cataloging and bibliographic - databases - Digital collections/digital libraries - Archiving & preserving digital materials - Impact of digital resources on library services - Future possibilities
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST. 58(2007) no.6., S.909-910 (A.D. Petrou): "A division in metadata definitions for physical objects vs. those for digital resources offered in Chapter 1 is punctuated by the use of broader, more inclusive metadata definitions, such as data about data as well as with the inclusion of more specific metadata definitions intended for networked resources. Intertwined with the book's subject matter, which is to "distinguish traditional cataloguing from metadata activity" (5), the authors' chosen metadata definition is also detailed on page 5 as follows: Thus while granting the validity of the inclusive definition, we concentrate primarily on metadata as it is most commonly thought of both inside and outside of the library community, as "structured information used to find, access, use and manage information resources primarily in a digital environment." (International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science, 2003) Metadata principles discussed by the authors include modularity, extensibility, refinement and multilingualism. The latter set is followed by seven misconceptions about metadata. Two types of metadata discussed are automatically generated indexes and manually created records. In terms of categories of metadata, the authors present three sets of them as follows: descriptive, structural, and administrative metadata. Chapter 2 focuses on metadata for communities of practice, and is a prelude to content in Chapter 3 where metadata applications, use, and development are presented from the perspective of libraries. Chapter 2 discusses the emergence and impact of metadata on organization and access of online resources from the perspective of communities for which such standards exist and for the need for mapping one standard to another. Discussion focuses on metalanguages, such as Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) and eXtensible Markup Language (XML), "capable of embedding descriptive elements within the document markup itself' (25). This discussion falls under syntactic interoperability. For semantic interoperability, HTML and other mark-up languages, such as Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) and Computer Interchange of Museum Information (CIMI), are covered. For structural interoperability, Dublin Core's 15 metadata elements are grouped into three areas: content (title, subject, description, type, source, relation, and coverage), intellectual property (creator, publisher, contributor and rights), and instantiation (date, format, identifier, and language) for discussion.
Other selected specialized metadata element sets or schemas, such as Government Information Locator Service (GILS), are presented. Attention is brought to the different sets of elements and the need for linking up these elements across metadata schemes from a semantic point of view. It is no surprise, then, that after the presentation of additional specialized sets of metadata from the educational community and the arts sector, attention is turned to the discussion of Crosswalks between metadata element sets or the mapping of one metadata standard to another. Finally, the five appendices detailing elements found in Dublin Core, GILS, ARIADNE versions 3 and 3. 1, and Categories for the Description of Works of Art are an excellent addition to this chapter's focus on metadata and communities of practice. Chapters 3-6 provide an up-to-date account of the use of metadata standards in Libraries from the point of view of a community of practice. Some of the content standards included in these four chapters are AACR2, Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), and Library of Congress Subject Classification. In addition, uses of MARC along with planned implementations of the archival community's encoding scheme, EAD, are covered in detail. In a way, content in these chapters can be considered as a refresher course on the history, current state, importance, and usefulness of the above-mentioned standards in Libraries. Application of the standards is offered for various types of materials, such as monographic materials, continuing resources, and integrating library metadata into local catalogs and databases. A review of current digital library projects takes place in Chapter 7. While details about these projects tend to become out of date fast, the sections on issues and problems encountered in digital projects and successes and failures deserve any reader's close inspection. A suggested model is important enough to merit a specific mention below, in a short list format, as it encapsulates lessons learned from issues, problems, successes, and failures in digital projects. Before detailing the model, however, the various projects included in Chapter 7 should be mentioned. The projects are: Colorado Digitization Project, Cooperative Online Resource Catalog (an Office of Research project by OCLC, Inc.), California Digital Library, JSTOR, LC's National Digital Library Program and VARIATIONS.
Chapter 8 discusses issues of archiving and preserving digital materials. The chapter reiterates, "What is the point of all of this if the resources identified and catalogued are not preserved?" (Gorman, 2003, p. 16). Discussion about preservation and related issues is organized in five sections that successively ask why, what, who, how, and how much of the plethora of digital materials should be archived and preserved. These are not easy questions because of media instability and technological obsolescence. Stakeholders in communities with diverse interests compete in terms of which community or representative of a community has an authoritative say in what and how much get archived and preserved. In discussing the above-mentioned questions, the authors once again provide valuable information and lessons from a number of initiatives in Europe, Australia, and from other global initiatives. The Draft Charter on the Preservation of the Digital Heritage and the Guidelines for the Preservation of Digital Heritage, both published by UNESCO, are discussed and some of the preservation principles from the Guidelines are listed. The existing diversity in administrative arrangements for these new projects and resources notwithstanding, the impact on content produced for online reserves through work done in digital projects and from the use of metadata and the impact on levels of reference services and the ensuing need for different models to train users and staff is undeniable. In terms of education and training, formal coursework, continuing education, and informal and on-the-job training are just some of the available options. The intensity in resources required for cataloguing digital materials, the questions over the quality of digital resources, and the threat of the new digital environment to the survival of the traditional library are all issues quoted by critics and others, however, who are concerned about a balance for planning and resources allocated for traditional or print-based resources and newer digital resources. A number of questions are asked as part of the book's conclusions in Chapter 10. Of these questions, one that touches on all of the rest and upon much of the book's content is the question: What does the future hold for metadata in libraries? Metadata standards are alive and well in many communities of practice, as Chapters 2-6 have demonstrated. The usefulness of metadata continues to be high and innovation in various elements should keep information professionals engaged for decades to come. There is no doubt that metadata have had a tremendous impact in how we organize information for access and in terms of who, how, when, and where contact is made with library services and collections online. Planning and commitment to a diversity of metadata to serve the plethora of needs in communities of practice are paramount for the continued success of many digital projects and for online preservation of our digital heritage."
- LCSH
- Cataloging / Standards
Cataloging of electronic information resources
Cataloging of integrating resources
- Subject
- Cataloging / Standards
Cataloging of electronic information resources
Cataloging of integrating resources
-
Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004)
0.05
0.05076004 = product of:
0.11844009 = sum of:
0.02034102 = weight(_text_:of in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02034102 = score(doc=2837,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07727726 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.02082181 = product of:
0.04164362 = sum of:
0.04164362 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04164362 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), its accompanying documentation and some of its applications. It reviews the MODS user guidelines provided by the Library of Congress and how they enable a user of the schema to consistently apply MODS as a metadata scheme. Because the schema itself could not fully document appropriate usage, the guidelines provide element definitions, history, relationships with other elements, usage conventions, and examples. Short descriptions of some MODS applications are given and a more detailed discussion of its use in the Library of Congress's Minerva project for Web archiving is given.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
-
Brownlee, R.: Research data and repository metadata : policy and technical issues at the University of Sydney Library (2009)
0.05
0.047281433 = product of:
0.11032334 = sum of:
0.018832127 = weight(_text_:of in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018832127 = score(doc=2988,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
0.045211717 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045211717 = score(doc=2988,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
0.046279497 = product of:
0.092558995 = sum of:
0.092558995 = weight(_text_:service in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092558995 = score(doc=2988,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.49197167 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The University of Sydney Library's repository contains research outputs primarily comprising traditional publication types. Many academics manage data collections within databases and spreadsheets using metadata dissimilar to the repository's Dublin Core schema. During 2007 and 2008 the author explored issues surrounding submission of a small range of research data collections and associated metadata. Native metadata structures were analysed and mapped to DC and scripts translated, packaged and transferred collections. This paper discusses metadata management and repository service levels and sustainability. It describes the Library's approach to defining service requirements and includes discussion of various metadata management options. It also describes related activities within the University of Sydney to develop eResearch services and to harmonise the roles and relationships of eResearch support service providers.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 47(2009) nos.3/4, S.xx-xx
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.05
0.04622279 = product of:
0.16177976 = sum of:
0.013421593 = weight(_text_:of in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013421593 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.14835817 = sum of:
0.10076547 = weight(_text_:service in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10076547 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.5355909 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047592707 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Jizba, L.; Hillmann, D.I.: Insights from Ithaca : an interview with Diane Hillmann on metadata, Dublin Core, the National Science Digital Library, and more (2004/05)
0.05
0.045926243 = product of:
0.10716123 = sum of:
0.011743895 = weight(_text_:of in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011743895 = score(doc=637,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
0.074595526 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074595526 = score(doc=637,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
0.02082181 = product of:
0.04164362 = sum of:
0.04164362 = weight(_text_:22 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04164362 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- In an interview, Diane I. Hillmann, an expert in metadata for digital libraries and currently co-principal investigator for the National Science Digital Library Registry based at Cornell University, discusses her education and career, and provides overviews and insights on metadata initiatives, including standards and models such as the widely adopted Dublin Core schema. She shares her professional interests from the early part of her career with communications, cataloging, and database production services; highlights key issues; and provides ideas and resources for managing changes in metadata standards and digital projects.
- Date
- 2.12.2007 19:35:22
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 7(2004/05) nos.3/4, S.1-15
